Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Hegemoniale Rivalität. Brasilien, China und die USA in Lateinamerika

  • Chapter
Die großen Schwellenländer

Part of the book series: Globale Politische Ökonomie ((GPÖ))

  • 6223 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Die zumeist ökonomische Bedeutungszunahme der südlichen Schwellenländer wird oft als Machtverlust der Vereinigten Staaten interpretiert. Der vorliegende Beitrag setzt sich kritisch mit dieser Annahme auseinander, indem er Aktivitäten und Machtpotenziale Chinas, Brasiliens sowie der USA in Lateinamerika vergleicht. Als „traditioneller Hinterhof “ US-amerikanischer Außenpolitik sowie Zielgebiet zunehmender Bemühungen sowohl Chinas als auch Brasiliens eignet sich die Region daher, um Form und Ausmaß einer gegebenenfalls aufkeimenden hegemonialen Rivalität zu untersuchen. Analytisch wird vorgeschlagen, die Aktivitäten der relevanten Akteure in den vier Bereichen militärischer, ökonomischer und institutioneller Macht sowie „soft power“ zu untersuchen. In der Summe ist dabei festzuhalten, dass aufzeigbare Machtveränderungen – jenseits einer selektiven Präsentation bzw. einer deterministischen, automatisch politische Folgen unterstellenden, Interpretation ökonomischer Trends – je nach untersuchtem Politikfeld deutlich variieren.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Berthona, João Fábio. 2010. Brazil: An Emerging Military Power? The Problem of the Use of Force in Brazilian International Relations in the 21st Century. Revista Brasileira de Politica Internacional 53 (2): 107–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bijian, Zheng. 2005. China’s ‘Peaceful Rise’ to Great Power Status. Foreign Affairs, 84 (5): 18–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bliss, Katherine. 2009. China’s Projection of Soft Power in the Americas In Chinese Soft Power and Its Implications for the US-Competition and Cooperation in the Developing World, hrsg Carola McGiffert, 45–62. Washington, D.C: Center for Strategic and International Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brand, Alexander, und Stefan Robel. 2011. Global Media, US Hegemony and the Transatlantic Divide In Transatlantic Encounters. Philosophy, Media, Politics, hrsg Elzbieta Oleksy, und Wieslaw Oleksy, 73–98. Frankfurt/M.: Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briceño Ruiz, José. 2010. From the South America Free Trade Area to the Union of South American Nations. Latin America Policy 1(2): 208–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burges, Sean W. 2008. Consensual Hegemony: Theorizing Brazilian Foreign Policy after the Cold War. International Relations 22 (1): 65–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardenas, Mauricio. 2011. Is China the New North? Assessing the Impact of Chinese Trade with Latin America. Transcript, Brookings Institute, 11 August.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEPAL. 2010. Panorama de Inserción Internacional de América Latina y el Caribe 2009-2010. Santiago de Chile: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerny, Philip. 2006. Dilemmas of Operationalizing Hegemony. In Hegemony and Power, hrsg Mark Haugaard, und Howard Lentner, 67–87. Lanham: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Ian. 2009: Bringing Hegemony Back In: Te US and International Order. International Affairs 85 (1): 23 -36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottrell, M. Patrick. 2011. Hope or Hype? Legitimacy and US Leadership in a Global Age. Foreign Policy Analysis 7 (3): 337–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crandall, Russell. 2008. Te United States and Latin America after the Cold War, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crandall, Russell. 2011. The Post-American Hemisphere. Power and Politics in an Autonomous Latin America. Foreign Affairs 90 (3): 83–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crick, Reid. 2007. The Latin American Dollar Standard in the Post-Crisis Era. Center for Latin American Issues Working Paper. Washington DC: George Washington University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dadush, Uri, und William Shaw. 2011. Juggernaut. How Emerging Markets are Reshaping Globalization. Washington DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Destradi, Sandra. 2008. Empire, Hegemony, and Leadership: Developing a Research Framework for the Study of Regional Powers. GIGA Working Papers 79. Hamburg: German Institute of Global and Area Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, Erica. 2011. Is China the New North? Assessing the Impact of Chinese Trade with Latin America. Transcript. Brookings Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECLAC. 2011. People’s Republic of China and Latin America and the Caribbean. Santiago de Chile: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichengreen, Barry. 2011. Exorbitant Privilege: Te Rise and Fall of the Dollar and the Future of the International Monetary System. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, Evan R. 2011a. China-Latin America Military Engagement: Good Will, Good Business, and Strategic Position. Strategic Studies Institute. http://www.strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pubs/download. cfm?q = 1077. Zugegriffen: 20. Juli 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, Evan R. 2011b. Chinese Soft Power in Latin America: A Case Study. Joint Forces Quarterly 60 (1): 85–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freier, Feline. 2011. Südafrikas wirtschaftliche Position und politische Positionierung im BRICS-Verbund. Für die Freiheit 21/2011. Potsdam: Friedrich-Naumann-Stiftung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, Kevin, Amos Irwin, und Katherine Koleski. 2012. Chinese Loans to Latin America: A Better Deal? Inter-American Dialogue. http://www.thedialogue.org/PublicationFiles/TeNewBanksinTown-Full-Textnewversion.pdf. Zugegriffen: 20. Juli 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallup Poll. 2008. One in Four Latin Americans Wishes to Emigrate. http://www.ga llup.com/poll/103837/one-four-latin-americans-wishes-emigrate.aspx. Zugegriffen: 07. Mai 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanban. 2012. Confucius Institutes/Classrooms Worldwide. http://www.hanban.org. Zugegriffen: 21. Februar 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hearn, Jonathan. 2012. Theorizing Power. Houndsmills: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heine, Jorge, und R. Viswanathan. 2011. The Other BRIC in Latin America: India. Americas Quarterly 5 (2). http://www.americasquarterly.org/node/2422. Zugegriffen: 19. September 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellinger, Daniel. 2011. Obama and the Bolivarian Agenda for the Americas. Latin American Perspectives 38 (4): 46–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, Karl-Dieter. 2008. Mexikos “War on Drugs” und die Mérida Initiative. GIGA Focus 4/2008. Hamburg: German Institute of Global and Area Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, Laura. 2011. Hegemoniale Rivalitäten aus Sicht des Neogramscianismus. In: Globale Rivalitäten, hrsg Tobias ten Brink, 105–122. Stuttgart: Steiner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, Shixue. 2011. Three Factors in Recent Development of Sino-Latin American Relations. In Enter the Dragon? China’s Presence in Latin America, hrsg Cynthia Arnson, Mark Mohr, und Riordan Roett, 43–52. Washington DC: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. http://www.wilsoncenter.org/sites/default/fles/EnterDragonFinal.pdf. Zugegriffen: 20. Juli 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kappel, Robert. 2011. The Decline of Europe and the US: Shifts in the World Economy and in Global Politics. GIGA Focus International Edition 1/2011. Hamburg: German Institute of Global and Area Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kupchan, Charles. 2012. No One’s World. The West, the Rising Rest, and the Coming Global Turn. Oxford/ New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurz, Maximilian, und Wolfgang Muno. 2005. Der Plan Colombia: Kolumbien im Visier des Krieges gegen den Terror der USA in Lateinamerika. Brennpunkt Lateinamerika 3/2005: 25–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layne, Christopher. 2012. Tis Time it’s Real. The End of Unipolarity and the Pax Americana. International Studies Quarterly 56 (1): 203–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leahy, Joe. 2011. Latin America Ponders Role of the Renminbi. Financial Times, 06. Juni 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemoine, Maurice. 2010. Vorgeschobene Einsatzpunkte. Die beunruhigende Militärpräsenz der USA in Kolumbien. Le Monde diplomatique. http://www.monde-diplomatique.de/pm/2010/02/12.mondeText. artikel, a0071.idx,20. Zugegriffen: 20. Juli 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, James M. 2011. The Future of US Global Leadership. International Affairs 87 (4): 765–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muno, Wolfgang. 2012. Lateinamerikapolitik. In Handlexikon der Europäischen Union, hrsg Jan Bergmann, 593–597. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, Joseph S. 2011. The Future of Power. New York: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opratko, Benjamin. 2012. Hegemonie. Politische Theorie nach Antonio Gramsci. Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Presno, Xelcis. 2011. Chinese President Congratulates Creation of CELAC. Radio Havana. http://www.radiohc/ ing/news/world/4178-chinese-president-congratulates-creation-of-CELAC. Zugegriffen: 29. März 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribeiro, Daniela, und Regina Kfuri. 2010. A nova integração regional e a expansão do capitalismo brasileiro na América do Sul. Observador On-Line (Observatório Político Sul-Americano) 5 (4): 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribeiro-Hoffmann, Andrea, und Monica Herz. 2010, Regional Governance in Latin America: Institutions and Normative Discourses in the Post-Cold War Period. In International Management and International Relations: A Critical Perspective from Latin America, hrsg. Ana, Guedes, und/Abingdon:, Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robel, Stefan. 2001. Hegemonie in den Internationalen Beziehungen: Lehren aus dem Scheitern der ‚Teorie He-gemonialer Stabilität‘. Dresdner Arbeitspapiere Internationale Beziehungen (DAP) Nr. 2. Dresden: Technische Universität.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robel, Stefan, und Miriam Prys. 2011. Hegemony, Not Empire. Journal of International Relations and Development 14 (2): 247–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roesler, Peter. 2012. Foreign Direct Investment from and to Latin America: A Bi-directional Analysis. GIGA Special Publication. http://www.giga-hamburg.de/dl/download.php?d=/content/publikationen/pdf/ R%F6slerFDI.pdf. Zugegriffen: 20. Juli 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblum, Marc, und Kate Brick. 2011. US Immigration Policy and Mexican/Central American Migration Flows: Ten and Now. Washington DC: Migration Policy Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez, Alex. 2007. Russia Returns to Latin America. Washington DC: Council on Hemispheric Affairs Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • SIPRI. 2012. Factsheet 2010. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, http://www.sipri.org/re-search/armaments/milex/factsheet2010. Zugegrifen: 20. Juli 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strange, Susan. 1988. The Persistent Myth of Lost Hegemony. International Organization 41 (4): 551–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ten Brink, Tobias. 2008. Globale Rivalitäten. Anspruch und Realität des amerikanischen Imperiums. Perspektiven 6. http://www.perspektiven-online.at/2008/10/30/globale-rivalitaeten-anspruch-und-realita-et-des-amerikanischen-imperiums/. Zugegriffen: 20. August 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • USDOD. 2012. Active Duty Personnel Strengths by Regional Area and by Country. http://siadapp.dmdc.osd. mil/personnel/MILITARY/history/hst1109.pdf. Zugegrifen: 20. Februar 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Pijl, Kees. 2006. Global Rivalries. Fractures and Faultlines in the Global Political Economy. London: Pluto.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Ham, Peter. 2010. Social Power in International Relations. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villa, Rafael, und Manuela Viana. 2010. Security Issues During Lula’s Administration: From the Reactive to the Assertive Approach. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional 53: 91–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, Cynthia. 2011. U.S. Reponses to China’s Growing Interests in Latin America. In Enter the Drag-on? China’s Presence in Latin America, hrsg Cynthia Arnson, Mark Mohr, und Riordan Roett, 65–70. Washington DC: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. http://www.wilsoncenter.org/ sites/default/ fles/EnterDragonFinal.pdf. Zugegriffen: 20. Juli 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. 2011. Global Commodity Markets Annex in Global Economic Reports, June. http://wwwsitere-sources.worldbank.org/INTPROSPECTS/Resources/334934-1322593305595/8287139-13. Zugegriff-en: 29. März 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, Denise. 2009. China’s Use of Soft Power in the Developing World. In Chinese Soft Power and Its Im-plications for the US-Competition and Cooperation in the Developing World, hrsg Carola McGiffert, 1–9. Washington DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zibechi, Raúl. 2010. Latin America’s Inexorable March Toward ‘Autonomy from the Imperial Center’. La Jornada, 26. Februar 2010. Übersetzung: WorldMeets.US.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Politikwissenschaft, Johannes-Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Colonel-Kleinmann-Weg 2, 55128, Mainz, Deutschland

    Dr. Alexander Brand & Dr. Susan McEwan-Fial

  2. Willy Brandt School of Public Policy, Universität Erfurt, Postfach 900 221, 99105, Erfurt, Deutschland

    Dr. Wolfgang Muno

  3. Otto-Suhr-Institut für Politikwissenschaft, Freie Universität Berlin, Ihnenstraße 22, 14195, Berlin, Deutschland

    Dr. Andrea Ribeiro-Hoffmann

Authors
  1. Dr. Alexander Brand
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dr. Susan McEwan-Fial
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dr. Wolfgang Muno
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Dr. Andrea Ribeiro-Hoffmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander Brand .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Goethe-Universität Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland

    Andreas Nölke , Christian May  & Simone Claar ,  & 

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brand, A., McEwan-Fial, S., Muno, W., Ribeiro-Hoffmann, A. (2014). Hegemoniale Rivalität. Brasilien, China und die USA in Lateinamerika. In: Nölke, A., May, C., Claar, S. (eds) Die großen Schwellenländer. Globale Politische Ökonomie. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-02537-3_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation