Social Entrepreneurship Business Models: Managing Innovation for Social and Economic Value Creation



Today humankind faces persistent ecological and social challenges that no single organization or individual can solve. Social entrepreneurship provides an innovative management perspective for addressing these problems by seeing them as an entrepreneurial opportunity. In order to emphasize the underlying mechanisms of how social entrepreneurs „do business“ we use the concept of business models as a generic framework. This concept helps to explain how social entrepreneurs creatively combine preexistent resources (e.g. financial, physical, human) in innovative ways and how value —financial and social —is created. We identify three social entrepreneurship business models - the „freemium“, the „catalyst“, and the „expertise broker“ model. We use three real-life examples to illustrate how social entrepreneurs have a distinct access to resources and integrate them innovatively in the configuration of their value proposition, value architecture, and revenue model.


Business Model Social Entrepreneurship Social Entrepreneur Business Model Innovation Social Mission 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barney J (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. (Anonymous, Ed.) J Manage 17(1):99–120. doi:10.1177/014920639101700108Google Scholar
  2. Baron-Cohen S, Ashwin E, Ashwin C, Tavassoli T, Chakrabarti B (2009) Talent in autism: hyper-systemizing, hyper-attention to detail and sensory hypersensitivity. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. Biol Sci 364(1522):1377–1383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beckmann M (2011) The social case as a business case: making sense of social entrepreneurship from an ordonomic perspective. In: Pies I, Koslowski P (eds) Corporate citizenship and new governance. The political role of corporations, Vol 40. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 91–115. doi:10.1007/978–94-007-1661-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beckmann M, Zeyen A, Krzeminska A (2014) Mission, Finance, and Innovation: The Similarities and Differences between Social Entrepreneurship and Social Business. In: Grove A & Berg G. A. (Eds.): Cases and Perspectives on the Social Business Movement. Springer Verlag (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  5. Boons F, Lüdeke-Freund F (2013) Business models for sustainable innovation: state-of-the-art and steps towards a research agenda. J Cleaner Prod 45(April):9–19. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bornstein D (2007) How to change the world: social entrepreneurs and the power of ideas. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Chancenwerk (2013) Über Chancenwerk. Accessed 14 July 2013
  8. Dacin PA, Dacin MT, Matear M (2010) Social entrepreneurship: why we don ’ t need a new theory and how we move forward from here. Acad Manage Perspect 24(3):37–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dees JG (1998) The meaning of “ Social Entrepreneurship ”, pp 1–5. Retrieved from
  10. Dees JG, Anderson BB (2006) Framing a theory of social entrepreneurship: building on two schools of practice and thought. In: Williamson D (ed) Research on social entrepreneurship: understanding and contributing to an emerging field. ARNOVA, Indianapolis, pp 39–66Google Scholar
  11. Defourney J, Nyssens M (2010) Conceptions of social enterprise and social entrepreneurship in Europe and the United States: convergence and divergence. J Social Entrepreneurship 1(1):32–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Discovering Hands (2013) Discovering hands—Der Tastsinn Blinder verbessert die Brustkrebsfrüherkennung. Accessed 14 July 2013
  13. Dodd Jr, E. M. (1931). For whom are corporate managers trustees. Harv. L. Rev., 45, 1145.Google Scholar
  14. Engel J, Baumert J, Hölzel D (2000) Brustkrebsfrüherkennung in Deutschland. Der Radiologe 40(2):177–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Foster D, Wass V (2012) Disability in the labour market: an exploration of concepts of the ideal worker and organisational fit that disadvantage employees with impairments. Sociology, Online Fir. doi:10.1177/0038038512454245Google Scholar
  16. Freeman E (1984) Stakeholder management. A strategic approach. Pitman Publishing, MarchfieldGoogle Scholar
  17. Goldrich M, Kanics LM (2003) Tactile acuity is enhanced in blindness. J Neurosci 23(8):3439–3445Google Scholar
  18. Hamel G (2000) Leading the revolution. Harvard Business School Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  19. Humberg KM (2011) Poverty reduction through social business? Lessons learnt from Grameen joint ventures in Bangladesh. oekom verlag, München, p. 334Google Scholar
  20. IKEA (2013) Our business idea. Accessed 30 July 2013
  21. Jensen, M. C. (2009). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(2), 235–256.Google Scholar
  22. Karma-Movement (2013) Facebook-Page of the Karma-Movement “Build more, by less.” Accessed 30 July 2013
  23. Kunz N (2011) Interview with Norbert Kunz—CEO of social impact start. BelrinGoogle Scholar
  24. Lehner OM (2013) Crowdfunding social ventures: a model and research agenda. 15(3):1–28Google Scholar
  25. Levine R (2007) Case studies in global health: millions saved. Jones and Bartlett Publishers, SudburyGoogle Scholar
  26. Mair J, Marti I (2009) Entrepreneurship in and around institutional voids: a case study from Bangladesh. J Bus Ventur 24(5):419–435. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.04.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mair J, Schoen O (2007) Successful social entrepreneurial business models in the context of developing economies: an explorative study. Int J Emerg Markets 2(1):54–68. doi:10.1108/17468800710718895CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McGivering J (2013, February) The Indian women pushed into hysterectomies. BBC News Magazine. Retrieved from
  29. Mehta, P., & Shenoy, S. (2011). Infinite vision: How Aravind became the world’s greatest business case for compassion. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.Google Scholar
  30. Mises L von (2008) Profit and Loss. Ludwig von Mises Institute, AuburnGoogle Scholar
  31. Murphy PJ, Coombes SM (2008) A model of social entrepreneurial discovery. J Bus Ethics 87(3):325–336. doi:10.1007/s10551-008-9921-yGoogle Scholar
  32. Nicholls A (2005) Measuring impact in social entrepreneurship: new accountabilities to stakeholders and investors?Google Scholar
  33. Nicholls A (2006) Social entrepreneurship: new models of sustainable social change. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  34. Osterwalder A, Pigneur Y (2010) Business model generation: a handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. Wiley.comGoogle Scholar
  35. Osterwalder A, Pigneur Y (2011) Aligning profit and purpose through business model innovation. In: Palazzo G, Wentland M (eds) Responsible management practices for the 21st century. Pearson International, pp 61–75Google Scholar
  36. Osterwalder A, Pigneur Y, Tucci CL (2005) Clarifying business models: origins, present, and future of the concept clarifying business models: origins, present, and future of the concept. Communication of the Association of Information Systems, 15 (May)Google Scholar
  37. Porter ME, Kramer MR (2006) Strategy and society. The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harv Bus Rev 84(12):78–92Google Scholar
  38. Porter ME, Kramer M (2011) Creating shared value. Harv Bus Rev, January-FeGoogle Scholar
  39. Prahalad CK (2010) The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid: eradicating poverty through profits. Wharton School, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  40. Priddat BP (2011) Organisationstheoretische Einschätzungen—Warum Social Entrepreneurship so attraktiv für High Potentials ist. In Hackenberg H, Empter S (eds) Social entrepreneurship—social business: Für die Gesellschaft unternehmen. VS Verlag, Wiesbaden, pp 105–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rangan KV, Thulasiraj RD (2007) Making sight affordable. Innovations: technology, governance, globalizationh. 1(3):35–49Google Scholar
  42. Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, A., Chapin, F. S., Lambin, E. F., Foley, J. (2009). A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461(September):472–475Google Scholar
  43. Russell J, Cohn R (2012) Freemium. Book on DemandGoogle Scholar
  44. Schramm C (2010) All entrepreneurship is social. Stanford Soc Innovat Rev (Spring) 21–22Google Scholar
  45. Schumpeter J (1934) The theory of economic development. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  46. Seelos C, Mair J (2005) Social entrepreneurship: creating new business models to serve the poor. Bus Horiz 48(3):241–246. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2004.11.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Social Impact Start (2013) Home. Accessed 05 Aug 2013
  48. Specialisterne (2013) Welcome to Specialisterne. Accessed 30 July 2013
  49. Staehler P (2002) Geschäftsmodelle in der digitalen Ökonomie; Merkmale, Strategien und Auswirkungen, 2nd edn. Josef Eul VerlagGoogle Scholar
  50. Thompson JD, MacMillan IC (2010) Business models: creating new markets and societal wealth. Long Range Plann 43(2–3):291–307. doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2009.11.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Vaeter (2013) Väter. Werte, die tragen. Accessed 14 July 2013
  52. Weerawardena J, Mort GS (2006) Investigating social entrepreneurship: a multidimensional model. J World Bus 41(1):21–35. doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2005.09.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wellcome (2013) Wellcome—Hilfe nach der Geburt. Accessed 14 July 2013
  54. Wilson F, Post JE (2011) Business models for people, planet (& profits): exploring the phenomena of social business, a market-based approach to social value creation. Small Bus Econ 40(3):715–737. doi:10.1007/s11187-011-9401-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Yunus M (2008a) Economic security for a world in crisis. World Pol J 5–12Google Scholar
  56. Yunus M (2008b) Creating a world without poverty: social business and the future of capitalism, (November), 16–41Google Scholar
  57. Yunus M, Weber K (2010) Building social business. The new kind of capitalism that serves humanity’s most pressing needs. Public Affairs, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  58. Zeyen A, Beckmann M (2011) Social entrepreneurship and institutional logics. Centre for Sustainability Management, Lueneburg, pp 1–34Google Scholar
  59. Zott C, Amit R, Massa L (2011) The business model: recent developments and future research. J Manage 37(4):1019–1042. doi:10.1177/0149206311406265Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lehrstuhl für Corporate Sustainability ManagementFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-NürnbergNürnbergDeutschland

Personalised recommendations