Skip to main content

Cumulative impacts of offshore windfarms

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1142 Accesses

Abstract

Offshore windfarms intrude upon an environment already heavily affected by human activities such as shipping and fishing. As they are large and complex installations and given the large numbers planned, offshore windfarms can be expected to have significant impacts on marine ecosystems with long-lasting effects from both construction and operation. Environmental impacts of offshore windfarms include destruction of the sea bottom and benthic communities, disruption of migrating species such as birds via barrier effects, and disturbance of sound-sensitive marine species through increased underwater noise. The various impacts affect species both concurrently and sequentially at different life stages and should therefore be assessed from a cumulative perspective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Literature

  • Aumüller R, Boos K, Freienstein S, Hil, K, Hill R (2011). Beschreibung eines Vogelschlagereignisses und seiner Ursachen an einer Forschungsplattform in der Deutschen Bucht – Vogelwarte 49: 9–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aumüller R, Boos K, Freienstein S, Hill K, Hill R (2013). Weichen Zugvögel Windenergieanlagen auf See aus? Eine Methode zur Untersuchung und Analyse von Reaktionen tagsüber ziehender Vogelarten auf Offshore-Windparks. – Vogelwarte 51: 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrew RK, Howe BM, Mercer JA (2011). Long-time trends in ship traffic noise for four sites off the North American West Coast. – J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 129, 642–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coates R (2002). The Advanced SONAR Course. – Seiche ISBN 1-904055-01-X.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busch M, Kannen A, Garthe S, Jessop M (2013). Consequences of a cumulative perspective on marine environmental impacts: Offshore windfarming and seabirds at North Sea scale in context of the EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive. Ocean & Coastal Management 71 (2013) 213–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dierschke V & Garthe S (2006). Literature review of offshore windfarms with regard to seabirds. – In: Zucco C, Wende W, Merck T, Köchling I, Köppel J (eds.): Ecological Research on Offshore Windfarms: International Exchange of Experiences. Part B: Literature Review of Ecological Impacts. BfN-Skripten 186, Bundesamt für Naturschutz, Bonn, pp. 131–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drewitt AL & Langston RHW (2006). Assessing the impacts of windfarms on birds. – Ibis 148: 29–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Everaert J & Stienen EWM (2007). Impact of wind turbines on birds in Zeebrugge (Belgium) – significant effect on breeding tern colony due to collisions. – Biodivers. Conserv. 16: 3345–3359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hüppop O & Hilgerloh G (2012). Flight call rates of migrating thrushes: effects of wind conditions, humidity and time of day at an illuminated offshore platform. – J. Avian Biol.: 85–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hüppop O, Dierschke J, Exo KM, Fredrich E, Hill R (2006). Bird migration studies and potential collision risk with offshore wind turbines – Ibis 148: 90–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucke K, Siebert U, Lepper PA, Blanchet MA (2009). Temporary shift in masked hearing thresholds in a harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) after exposure to seismic airgun stimuli. – J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 125: 4060–4070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krijgsveld KL, Fijn RC, Heunks C, van Horssen PW, de Fouw J, Collier MP, Poot MJM, Beuker D, Dirksen S (2010). Effect Studies Offshore Windfarm Egmond aan Zee. Progress report on fluxes and behaviour of flying birds 33 covering 2007 & 2008. Bureau Waardenburg report 09-023. Bureau Waardenburg, Culemborg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koschinski S & Luedemann K (2013). Development of Noise Mitigation Measures in Offshore Windfarm Construction. – Report to the German Federal Agency for Nature Conservation, BfN, Bonn. (http://www.bfn.de/0314_meeresnaturschutz-berichte.html)

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald MA, Hildebrand JA, Wiggins SM (2006). Increases in deep ocean ambient noise in the Northeast Pacific west of San Nicolas Island, California. – J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 120(2):711–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OSPAR (2006). Review of the Current State of Knowledge on the Environmental Impacts of the Location, Operation and Removal/Disposal of Offshore Wind-Farms. – OSPAR Commission, 2009. Publication number 278/2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • OSPAR (2009). Overview of the impacts of anthropogenic underwater sound in the marine environment. – OSPAR Commission, 2009. Publication number 441/2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen IK, MacKenzie M, Rexstad E, Wisz MS, Fox AD (2011). Comparing pre- and post-construction distributions of long-tailed ducks Clangula hyemalis in and around the Nysted offshore windfarm, Denmark: a quasi-designed experiment accounting for imperfect detection, local surface features and autocorrelation. – CREEM Tech Report 2011-1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrow MR, Gilroy JJ, Skeate ER, Tomlinson ML (2011). Effects of the construction of Scroby Sands offshore windfarm on the prey base of Little tern Sternula albifrons at its most important UK colony. – Mar. Poll. Bull. 62: 1661–1670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson WJ, Malme CI, Green Jr CR, Thomson DH (1995). Marine mammals and noise. – Vol 1. Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwemmer P, Mendel B, Sonntag N, Dierschke V, Garthe S (2011). Effects of ship traffic on seabirds in offshore waters: implications for marine conservation and spatial planning. – Ecol. Appl. 21: 1851–1860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Southall BL, Bowles AE, Ellison WT, Finneran JJ, Gentry RL, Greene jr. CR, Kastak D, Ketten DR, Miller JH, Nachtigall PE, Richardson WJ, Thomas JA, Tyack PL (2007). Marine mammal noise exposure criteria: Initial scientific recommendations. – Aquat. Mamm. 33, 411–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tougaard J, Carstensen J, Wisz MS, Jespersen M, Teilmann J, Bech NI, Skov H (2006). Harbour Porpoises on Horns Reef Effects of the Horns Reef Windfarm. – Final Report to Vattenfall A/S, NERI, Roskilde, Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Damian, HP., Merck, T. (2014). Cumulative impacts of offshore windfarms. In: Federal Maritime and Hydrographic Agency, ., Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety, . (eds) Ecological Research at the Offshore Windfarm alpha ventus. Springer Spektrum, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-02462-8_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics