Advertisement

Appreciation and Effects of Sponsorship Disclosure

  • Sophie C. Boerman
  • Eva A. van Reijmersdal
  • Peter C. Neijens
Chapter
Part of the EAA Series book series

Abstract

With the continuing growth of the paid inclusion of brands in television programs, the lines between editorial and commercial content are more and more blurred. This has attracted criticism from consumer advocacy groups, public policy officials, the media and consumers, claiming that sponsored content in TV programs is unethical and deceptive (Cain, 2011; Kuhn, Hume, & Love, 2010). They argue that because this form of advertising is embedded into program content, the commercial intent is kept hidden (Bhatnagar, Aksoy, & Malkoc, 2004). Consequently, viewers are not always aware of the commercial and persuasive purpose of sponsored program content, and – as a result – they do not activate their cognitive defences and can be influenced without being aware (Kuhn et al., 2010; Lee, 2008).

Keywords

Product Placement Television Viewer Disclosure Timing Persuasion Knowledge Brand Placement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Audiovisual Media Services Directive. (2010), “Directive 2010/13/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council,” retrieved June 12, 2012, from http://ec.europa.eu/avpolicy/reg/tvwf/index_en.htm
  2. Bhatnagar , N.; Aksoy, L. and S. A. Malkoc (2004), “Embedding Brands within Media Content: The Impact of Message, Media, and Consumer Characteristics on Placement Efficacy,” in: L. J. Shrum (2004) (ed.): The Psychology of Media Entertainment. Blurring the Lines between En-tertainment and Persuasion, Lawrence Elrbaum Associates, Mahwah: New Jersey, 99–116.Google Scholar
  3. Boerman , S. C.; Van Reijmersdal, E. A. and P. C. Neijens (2012), “Sponsorship Disclosure: Effects of Duration on Persuasion Knowledge and Brand Responses,” in: Journal of Communication,Vol. 62, No. 6, 1047–1064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brehm, J. W. (1966), “A Theory of Psychological Reactance,” Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Bruner, G. C., James, K. E. and P. J. Hensel (2001), “Marketing Scales Handbook. A Compilation of Multi-item Measures”, Volume III, American Marketing Association, Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar
  6. Cacioppo, J. T. and R. E. Petty (1981), “Social Psychological Procedures for Cognitive Response Assessment: The Thought-listing Technique,” in: Merluzzi, T. V.; Glass, C. R. and M. Genest (1981) (eds.): Cognitive Assessment, Guilford Press, New York, 309–342.Google Scholar
  7. Cain, R. M. (2011), “Embedded Advertising on Television: Disclosure, Deception and Free Speech Rights,” in: Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, Vol. 30, No. 2, 226–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Campbell , M. C.; Mohr, G. S. and P. W. J. Verlegh (2007), “Effects of Product Placement and Sponsorship Disclosure: A Flexible Correction Approach,” paper presented at: International Conference on Research in Advertising, Lisbon, Portugal.Google Scholar
  9. Friestad, M. and P. Wright (1994), “The Persuasion Knowledge Model: How People Cope with Persuasion Attempts,” in: Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 21, No. 1, 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gupta , P. B.; Balasubramanian, S. K. and M. L. Klassen (2000), “Viewers’ Evaluations of Product Placements in Movies: Public Policy Issues and Managerial Implications,” in: Journal of Cur-rent Issues & Research in Advertising, Vol. 22, No. 2, 41–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gupta, P. B. and S. J. Gould (1997), “Consumers’ Perceptions of the Ethics and Acceptability of Product Placements in Movies: Product Category and Individual Differences, in: Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, Vol. 19, No. 1, 37–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Karrh , J. A.; Frith, K. T. and C. Callison (2001), “Audience Attitudes towards Brand (Product) Placement: Singapore and the United States, in: International Journal of Advertising, Vol. 20, No. 1, 3–24.Google Scholar
  13. Krippendorff, K. (2003), “Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology,” 2nd ed., Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
  14. Kuhn , K. L.; Hume, M. and A. Love (2010), “Examining the Covert Nature of Product Placement: Implications for Public Policy,” in: Journal of Promotion Management, Vol. 16, No. 1, 59–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lee, S. (2008), “Product Placement in the United States: A Revolution in Need of Regulation, in: Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, Vol. 26, No. 1, 203–232.Google Scholar
  16. McGuire, W. J. and D. Papageorgis (1962), “Effectiveness of Forewarning in Developing Re-sistance to Persuasion,” in: The Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 26, No. 1, 24–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Muehling, D. D. (1987), “An investigation of factors underlying attitude-toward-advertising-in-general,” in: Journal of Advertising, Vol. 16, No. 1, 32–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nebenzahl, I. D. and E. D. Jaffe (1998), “Ethical Dimensions of Advertising Executions,” in: Jour-nal of Business Ethics, Vol. 17, No. 7, 805–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Neijens, P. C. and E. G. Smit (2003), “Audience Reactions towards Non-spot Advertising: Influ-ence of Viewer and Program Characteristics, in: Hansen, F. and L. Bech Christensen (2003) (eds.): Branding and Advertising, CBS Press, Copenhagen, 266–283.Google Scholar
  20. Newell , J.; Blevins, J. L. and M. Bugeja (2009), “Tragedies of the Broadcast Commons: Consumer Perspectives on the Ethics of Product Placement and Video News Releases, in: Journal of Mass Media Ethics, Vol. 24, No. 4, 201–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ong, B. S. (2004), “A Comparison of Product Placements in Movies and Television Programs: An Online Research Study, in: Journal of Promotion Management, Vol. 10, No. 1, 147–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Petty, R. E. and J. T. Cacioppo (1977), “Forewarning, Cognitive Responding, and Resistance to Persuasion, in: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 35, No. 9, 645–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schejter, A. M. (2006), “Art Thou for Us, or for our Adversaries? Communicative Action and the Regulation of Product Placement: A Comparative Study and a Tool for Analysis, in: Tulane Journal of International Law and Comparative Law, Vol. 15, No. 1, 89–119.Google Scholar
  24. Sung , Y.; De Gregorio, F. and J. Jung (2009), “Non-student Consumer Attitudes towards Product Placement, in: International Journal of Advertising, Vol. 28, No. 2, 257–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tewksbury , D.; Jensen, J. and K. Coe (2011), “Video News Releases and the Public: The Impact of Source Labeling on the Perceived Credibility of Television News, in: Journal of Communica-tion, Vol. 61, No. 2, 328–348.Google Scholar
  26. Van Reijmersdal, E. A. and K. Tutaj (2010), “Effects of Brand Placement Disclosures on Audience Reactions and Persuasion Knowledge,” paper presented at: International Conference on Re-search in Advertising,Madrid, Spain.Google Scholar
  27. Van Reijmersdal, E. A., Neijens, P. C. and E. G. Smit (2007), “Effects of Television Brand Place-ment on Brand Image,” in: Psychology and Marketing, Vol. 24, No. 5, 403–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wentzel , D.; Tomczak, T. and A. Herrmann (2010), “The Moderating Effect of Manipulative Intent and Cognitive Resources on the Evaluation of Narrative Ads, in: Psychology & Marketing, Vol. 27, No. 5, 510–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Woods, L. (2008), “The Consumer and Advertising Regulation in the Television without Frontiers and Audiovisual Media Services Directives,” in: Journal of Consumer Policy, Vol. 31, 63–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1994), “The Personal Involvement Inventory: Reduction, Revision and Applica-tion to Advertising,” in: Journal of Advertising, Vol 23, No. 4, 59–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sophie C. Boerman
    • 1
  • Eva A. van Reijmersdal
    • 1
  • Peter C. Neijens
    • 1
  1. 1.ASCoRUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamNetherlands

Personalised recommendations