Advertisement

Regionalisierung im politikwissenschaftlichen Vergleich

Chapter
Part of the Springer Reference Sozialwissenschaften book series (SRS)

Zusammenfassung

Wir befinden uns in einem Zeitalter der Regionalisierung der internationalen Beziehungen, wie aber werden Regionalismus und Regionalisierung in vergleichender Perspektive untersucht? In Anbetracht der Vielfalt an Konzepten und Zugängen zu diesem wiederbelebten Forschungsfeld definiert dieser Beitrag zunächst zentrale Konzepte (Regionalisierung, Regionalismus und regionale Integration) und grenzt sie voneinander ab. Er stellt dann zwei unterschiedliche Zugänge zu komparativem Regionalismus dar. Der stärker disziplinär politikwissenschaftliche Zugang ist durch die Internationalen Beziehungen geprägt und untersucht das Phänomen Regionalismus als den eines Aufbaus unabhängiger Entscheidungsstrukturen auf regionaler Ebene. Ihm wird ein stärker an den Area Studies ausgerichteter, qualitativer Zugang gegenüber gestellt und dessen Vergleichsmethodik erläutert.

Schlüsselwörter

Vergleichende Regionalismusforschung Regionalismus Regionalisierung Regionale Integration Area Studies 

Literatur

  1. Acharya, Amitav. 2012. Comparative regionalism: A field whose time has come? The International Spectator 47(1): 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acharya, Amitav. 2014. Global international relations (IR) and regional worlds. International Studies Quarterly 58: 647–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Acharya, Amitav, und Alastair Iain Johnston, Hrsg. 2007. Crafting cooperation: The design und effect of regional institutions in comparative perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Ahram, Ariel I. 2011. The theory und method of comparative area studies. Qualitative Research 11(1): 69–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aris, Stephen, und Andreas Wengger, Hrsg. 2013. Regional organisations und security: Conceptions und practices. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Atkinson, Glen. 1999. Developing global institutions: Lessons to be learned from regional integration experiences. Journal of Economic Issues 33(2): 335–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Balsiger, Jörg, und Miriam Prys. 2014. Regional agreements in international environmental politics. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Online First (May) 1–22.Google Scholar
  8. Battaglino, Jorge. 2012. Defence in a post-hegemonic regional agenda: The case of the South American Defense Council. In The rise of post-hegemonic regionalism: The case of Latin America, Hrsg. Pía Riggirozzi und Diana Tussie, 81–100. Dordrecht/Heidelberg/London/New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Beeson, Mark. 2005. Rethinking regionalism: Europe und East Asia in comparative historical perspective. Journal of European Public Policy 12(6): 969–985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Beeson, Mark, und Richard Stubbs, Hrsg. 2012. Routledge handbook of Asian regionalism. Abingdon/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Börzel, Tanja, und Thomas Risse, Hrsg. Im Erscheinen. Handbook of comparative regionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Börzel, Tanja A. 2005. Mind the gap! European integration between level und scope. Journal of European Public Policy 12(2): 217–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Börzel, Tanja A. 2012. Comparative regionalism. In Handbook of international relations, Hrsg. Carlsnaes Walter, Thomas Risse und Beth A. Simmons, 503–530. Los Angeles/London: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Börzel, Tanja A., und Thomas Risse. 2012. From Europeanisation to diffusion: Introduction. West European Politics 35(1): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Breslin, Shaun, und Richard Higgott. 2000. Studying regions: Learning from the old, constructing the new. New Political Economy 5(3): 333–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Burley, Anne-Marie, und Walter Mattli. 1993. Europe before the court: A political theory of legal integration. International Organization 47(1): 41–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Buzan, Barry, und Ole Waever. 2003. Regions und powers. The structure of international security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Carranza, Mario E. 2006. Clinging together: Mercosur’s ambitious external agenda, its internal crisis, und the future of regional economic integration in South America. Review of International Political Economy 13(5): 802–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dabene, Olivier. 2009. The politics of regional integration in Latin America. Theoretical and comparative explorations. Houndsmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dabene, Olivier. 2012. Consistency und resilience through cycles of repoliticization. In The rise of post-hegemonic regionalism: The case of Latin America, Hrsg. Pía Riggirozzi und Diana Tussie, 41–64. Dordrecht/Heidelberg/London/New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Engel, Ulf, und Joao Gomes Porto, Hrsg. 2010. Africa’s new peace und security architecture: Promoting norms, institutionalizing solutions. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  22. Flores-Quiroga, Aldo. 2009. Competitive regionalism und Mexico’s FTA strategy. In Competitive regionalism: FTA diffusion in the Pacific Rim, Hrsg. Mireya Solis, Barbara Stallings und Saori N. Katada, 139–160. Hampshire: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  23. Goertz, Gary, und Kathy Powers. 2012. Regional governance: The evolution of a new institutional form. Berlin: Social Science Center Berlin.Google Scholar
  24. Gray, Julia. 2011. External actors und outside funding in south-south regional trade arrangements. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  25. Gray, Julia, und Shane Killian. 2011. Patronage appointments to international economic organizations. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
  26. Haas, Ernst B. 1961. International integration: The European und the universal process. International Organization 15(3): 366–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Haas, Ernst B. 1970. The study of regional integration: Reflections on the joy und anguish of pretheorizing. International Organization 24(4): 607–646.Google Scholar
  28. Haas, Ernst B. 2004 [1958]. The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social, und Economic Forces, 1950–1957. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  29. Haftel, Yoram. 2007. Designing for peace: Regional integration arrangements, institutional variation, und militarized interstate dispute. International Organization 61(1): 217–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Haftel, Yoram Z. 2013. Commerce und institutions: Trade, scope, und the design of regional economic organizations. Review of International Organizations 8: 389–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hancock, Kathleen J. 2009. Regional integration. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hettne, Björn, und Fredrik Söderbaum. 2000. Theorizing the rise of regionness. New Political Economy 5(3): 457–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hooghe, Liesbet, und Gary Marks. 2012. The authority of international organizations. Amsterdam: Free University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  34. Iapadre, Lelio. 2006. Regional integration agreements und the geography of world trade. In Assessment und measurement of regional integration, Hrsg. Philippe de Lombaerde, 65–85. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Jessop, Bob. 2003. The political economy of scale and the construction of cross-border-micro-regions. In Theories of new regionalism: A Palgrave reader, Hrsg. Frederik Söderbaum und Timothy M. Shaw. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  36. Jahn, Detlef. 2005. Fälle, Fallstricke und die komparative Methode in der vergleichenden Politikwissenschaft. In Vergleichen in der Politikwissenschaft, Hrsg. Sabine Kropp und Michael Minkenberg, 55–75. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jahn, Detlef. 2009. Globalisierung als Galton-Problem: Regionale und temporale Diffusionsschübe. In Methoden der vergleichenden Politik- und Sozialwissenschaft, Hrsg. Susanne Pickel, Gert Pickel, Hans-Joachim Lauth und Detlef Jahn, 87–112. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jetschke, Anja. 2011. Comparative Regional Organizations Project (CROP). A survey of regional organizations. Hamburg: German Institute of Global und Area Studies.Google Scholar
  39. Jetschke, Anja, Amitav Acharya, Philippe De Lombaerde, Hiro Katsumata, und T. J. Pempel. 2015. Roundtable: Studying Asian and comparative regionalism through Amitav Acharya’s work. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific. Online First. http://irap.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2015/04/25/irap.lcv005.abstract. Zugegriffen am 15.09.2015.
  40. Jetschke, Anja, und Tobias Lenz. 2011. Vergleichende Regionalismusforschung und Diffusion: Eine neue Forschungsagenda. Politische Vierteljahresschrift 52(3): 448–474.Google Scholar
  41. Jetschke, Anja, und Tobias Lenz. 2013. Does regionalism diffuse? A new research agenda for the study of regional organizations. Journal of European Public Policy 20(4): 626–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Jørgensen, Knud Erik, und Morten Valbjørn. 2012. Four dialogues und the funeral of a beautiful relationship: European studies und new regionalism. Cooperation und Conflict 47(1): 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Katzenstein, Peter. 2000. Introduction: Asian regionalism in comparative perspective. In Network power. Japan und Asia, Hrsg. Peter Katzenstein und Takashi Shiraishi, 1–46. Ithaca/London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Katzenstein, Peter. 2005. A world of regions. Asia und Europe in the American Imperium. Ithaca/London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Lake, David A. 2007. Delegating divisible sovereignty. Sweeping a conceptual minefield. Review of International Organizations 2(3): 219–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. van Langenhove, Luk. 2012. Why we need to ‚unpack‘ regions to compare them more effectively. International Spectator 47(1): 16–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lawson, Fred H. 2009. Comparative regionalism. The library of essays in international relations. Farnham/Burlington: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  48. Lindberg, Leon N. 1970. Political integration as a multidimensional phenomenon requiring multivariate measurement. International Organization 24(4): 649–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lombaerde, Philippe de, Hrsg. 2006. Assessment und measurement of regional integration. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  50. Lombaerde, Philippe de, und Luk Langenhove. 2006. Indicators of regional integration: Conceptual und methodological aspects. In Assessment und measurement of regional integration, Hrsg. Philippe Lombaerde, 9–41. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  51. Malamud, Andrés. 2012. Moving regions: Brazil’s global emergence und the redefinition of Latin American borders. In The rise of post-hegemonic regionalism: The case of Latin America, Hrsg. Pía Riggirozzi und Diana Tussie, 176–182. Dordrecht/Heidelberg/London/New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  52. Marks, Gary, Tobias Lenz, Besir Ceka, und Brian Burgoon. 2014. Discovering cooperation: A contractual approach to institutional change in regional organizations. Amsterdam: Free University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  53. Milner, Helen V., und Keiko Kubota. 2005. Why the move to free trade? Democracy und trade policy in the developing countries. International Organization 59(1): 107–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Moravcsik, Andrew. 1998. The choice for Europe. Social purpose und state power from Messina to Maastricht. Ithaca/New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Nolte, Detlef. 2010. How to compare regional powers: Analytical concepts und research topics. Review of International Studies 36(4): 881–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Nye, Joseph S. 1965. Patterns und catalysts in regional-integration. International Organization 19(4): 870–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Nye, Joseph S. 1967. Regional integration und political development. International Development Review 9(3): 17–19.Google Scholar
  58. Nye, Joseph S. 1968. Comparative regional integration – Concept und measurement. International Organization 22(4): 855–880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Paul, T. V., Hrsg. 2012. International relations theory und regional transformation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Phillips, N. 2002. Regional integration in Latin America und the Caribbean: The political economy of open regionalism. International Affairs 78(3): 679–680.Google Scholar
  61. Powers, Kathy, und Gary Goertz. 2011. The economic-institutional construction of regions: Conceptualisation und operationalisation. Review of International Studies 37(5): 2387–2415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Riggirozzi, Pía. 2012. Reconstructing regionalism: What does development have to do with it? In The rise of post-hegemonic regionalism: The case of Latin America, Hrsg. Pía Riggirozzi und Diana Tussie, 17–40. Dordrecht/Heidelberg/London/New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Riggirozzi, Pía, und Diana Tussie. 2012. The rise of post-hegemonic regionalism in Latin America. In The rise of post-hegemonic regionalism: The case of Latin America, Hrsg. Pía Riggirozzi und Diana Tussie, 1–16. Dordrecht/Heidelberg/London/New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Rittberger, Berthold, und Frank Schimmelfennig. 2005. Integrationstheorien: Entstehung und Entwicklung der EU. In Die Europäische Union. Theorien und Analysekonzepte, Hrsg. Katharina Holzinger, Christoph Knill, Dirk Peters, Berthold Rittberger, Frank Schimmelfennig und Wolfgang Wagner, 19–80. Paderborn: Schöningh.Google Scholar
  65. Sandholtz, Wayne, und Alec Stone Sweet, Hrsg. 2004. European integration und supranational governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Sbragia, Alberta. 2008. Review article: Comparative regionalism: What might it be? Journal of Common Market Studies 46(1): 29–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Schlipphak, Bernd, und Timo Menniken. 2011. Assessing attitudes towards regional integration processes. In The regional integration manual, Hrsg. Philippe Lombaerde, 24–50. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  68. Schmitter, Phillipe C. 1969. Further notes on operationalizing some variables related to regional integration. International Organization 23(2): 327–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Schmitter, Philippe C. 2005. Neo-neofunctionalism. In European integration theory, Hrsg. Antje Wiener und Thomas Diez, 45–73. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  70. Söderbaum, Frederik. 2012. Theories of regionalism. In Routledge handbook of Asian regionalism, Hrsg. Mark Beeson und Richard Stubbs, 11–21. Abingdon/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  71. Solingen, Etel. 1998: Regional orders at century’s dawn. Global und domestic influences on grand strategy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Solis, Mireya, Barbara Stallings, und Saori N. Katada, Hrsg. 2009. Competitive regionalism. FTA diffusion in the Pacific Rim. Hampshire: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  73. Warleigh-Lack, Alex, und Luk Van Langenhove. 2010. Rethinking EU studies: The contribution of comparative regionalism. Journal of European Integration 32(6): 541–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Weiffen, Britta, Wehner, Leslie, und Nolte, Detelf. 2013. Overlapping regional security institutions in South America: The case of OAS and UNASUR. Journal of Comparative Area Studies, 16(4): 370–389.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Professorin für Internationale BeziehungenInstitut für Politikwissenschaft, Universität GöttingenGöttingenDeutschland

Personalised recommendations