Abstract
This chapter examines the correlation between trade ties and reconciliation. Amounting evidences of the European experience have contributed to justify the causality between the two. Theoretical explanations have been, therefore, gradually consolidated. Built on the work of Mitrany (Mitrany, 1944), Ernst Haas (E. B. Haas, 1958), Hall/Taylor, Rosamond, and Nugent (Rosamond, 2000), Functionalism, Neo-functionalism and Neo-institutionalism (one Strand of the Integration theory) have been introduced in sequence to serve as strategies of peace-seeking, maintaining and prospering among post-conflict countries in Europe. It is claimed that under the condition of interdependence, “egoistic” countries could co-exist peacefully and cooperatively. Trade and other “functionalist” interdependence have minimized chances to solve problems through the use of armed force. The trend observed by existing scholarships is: the tighter trade ties, the easier countries find their way to reconciliation. This is the basic claim of interest-driven theory of reconciliation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ren, L. (2014). Trade Ties and Reconciliation. In: Rationality and Emotion. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-02216-7_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-02216-7_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-02215-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-02216-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)