Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Parallele Handlungsstrategien zur Förderung der Team-Innovativität

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Balance Management

Zusammenfassung

Das folgende Kapitel stellt das Zusammenspiel zwischen Aufgaben- sowie Beziehungskonflikt, den beiden Moderatorvariablen Verstehen und Abwägen sowie Synergie und Implementation und der Teamleistung in den Mittelpunkt. Basierend auf einer empirischen Untersuchung von 111 Teams aus 91 mehrheitlich deutschen Organisationen wird aufgezeigt, dass die neu eingeführte Variable Verstehen und Abwägen als öffnende Handlungsstrategie den Vermittlungsprozess von Aufgabenkonflikt in Team-Effizienz positiv moderiert und negative Auswirkungen des Beziehungskonfliktes sowohl auf Team-Innovation als auch – Effizienz wirkungsvoll abpuffert.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literaturverzeichnis

  • Abrams, D. & Hogg, M. A. (1990). An introduction to the social identity approach, in: D. Abrams & M. A. Hogg (Eds.): Social Identity Theory: Constructive and Critical Advances, 1–9, London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aiken, L. S. & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amason, A. C. & Sapienza, H. (1997). The effects of top management team size and interaction norms on cognitive and affective conflict. Journal of Management, 23, 495–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amason, A. C. (1996). Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 39(1),123–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, N. & West, M. A. (1998). Measuring climate fur work group innovation: Development and validation of the Team Climate Inventory. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 235–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atuahene-Gima, K. (2003). The effects of centrifugal and centripetal forces on product development speed and quality: How does problem solving matter. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 359–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behfar, K., Peterson, R., Mannix, E. & Trochim, W. (2008). The critical role of conflict resolution in teams: A close look at the links between conflict type, conflict management strategies, and team outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(1),170–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bendersky, C., Behfar, K., Weingart, L. R., Todorova, G., Bear, J. & Jehn, K. (2010). Revisiting the Dimensions of Intra-Group Conflict: Theoretical and Psychometric Construct Refinement, IACM 23rd Annual Conference Paper, Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1611845, letzter Abruf im September 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, J. W., Scott, K. D. & Burroughs, S. M. (2000). Support, commitment, and employee outcomes in a team environment. Journal of Management, 26, 1113–1132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-interdependence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis, in: K. J. Klein & S. W. Kozlowski (Eds.): Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions, (S. 349–382). San Francisco: Jossy-Bass/Pfeiffer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brislin, R. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written materials, in: H. C. Triandis & J. W. Berry (Eds.): Handbook of cross-cultural psychology, 2, Methodology (S. 137–164). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodbeck, F., Anderson, N. & West, M. A. (2000). TKI Teamklima-Inventar. Gottingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnevale, P. J. & Probst, T. M. (1998). Social values and social conflict in creative problem solving and categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1300–1309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G. & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for behavioral sciences (3rd ed.), Mahwah, New York: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, R. A. & Szumal, J. L. (1994). The impact of group interaction styles on problemsolving effectiveness. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 30, 415–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Dreu, C. K. W. & Van Vianen, A. E. (2001). Managing relationship conflict and the effectiveness of organizational teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 309–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Dreu, C. K. W. & Weingart, L. R. (2003). Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 741–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Dreu, C. K. W. & West, M. A. (2001). Minority dissent and team innovation: The importance of participation in decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(6),1191–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Dreu, C. K. W. (2006). When too much and too little hurts: Evidence for a curvilinear relationship between task conflict and innovation in teams. Journal of Management, 32, 83–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dezso, C. L., Grohsjean, T. & Kretschmer, T. (2010). The Impact of General and Firm Specific Coordination Experience on Team Performance: Evidence from the Electronic Games Industry, Unpublished Paper, Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1632612, letzter Abruf im September 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earley, P. C. & Mosakowski, E. (2000). Creating hybrid team cultures: An empirical test of transfunctional team functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 26–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gebert, D. (2004a). Durch diversity zu mehr Teaminnovativitat?, in: Die Betriebswirtschaft, 64(4),412–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebert, D. (2004b). Innovation durch Teamarbeit: Eine kritische Bestandsaufnahme. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebert, D., Boerner, S. & Kearney, E. (2006). Cross-functionality and innovation in new product development teams: A dilemmatic structure and its consequences for themanagement of diversity, in: European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 15(4),431–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gebert, D., Boerner, S. & Kearney, E. (2010). Fostering team innovation: Why is it important to combine opposing action strategies? Organization Science, 21(3),593–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, C. B. (1999). Do they do what they believe they can? Group efficacy and group effectiveness across tasks and cultures. Academy of Managment Journal, 42, 138–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greer, L., Jehn, K. A., Thatcher, S. M. B. & Mannix, E. A. (2007). The Effect of Trust on Conflict and Performance in Groups Split by Demographic Faultlines. IACM 2007 Meetings Paper, Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1100580, letzter Abruf im September 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruenfeld, D. H., Mannix, E. A., Williams, K. Y. & Neale, M. A. (1996). Group Composition and Decision Making: How Member Familiarity and Information Distribution Affect Process and Performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67(1),1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guay, F., Vallerand, R. J. & Blanchard, C. (2000). On the assessment of state intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The situational motivation scale (SIMS), Motivation and Emotion, 24, 175–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haleblian, J. & Finkelstein, S. (1993). Top Management Team Size, CEO Dominance, and Firm Performance: The Moderating Roles of Environmental Turbulence and Discretion. Academy of Management Journal, 36(4),844–863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinkle, S. & Brown, R. (1990). Intergroup comparisons and social identity: Some links and lacunae, in: D. Abrams & M. A. Hogg (Eds.): Social Identity Theory: Constructive and Critical Advances (S. 49–70). London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, M. A. & Terry, D. J. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review, 25, 121–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogl, M. & Gemunden, H. G. (2005). Management von Teams. Theoretische Konzepte und empirische Befunde (3. Aufl.). Wiesbaden: Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogl, M. & Gemunden, H. G. (2001). Teamwork Quality and the Success of Innovative Projects: A Theoretical Concept and Empirical Evidence. Organization Science, 12(4),435–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, S. E., May, K. E. & Whitney, K. (1995). Understanding the dynamics of diversity in decision-making teams, in: R. A. Guzzo and E. Salas (Eds.): Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations (S. 204–261). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, L. R., Demaree, R. G. & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group Interraterreliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 85–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jehn, K. A. & Bendersky, C. (2003). Intragroup conflict in organizations: A contingency perspective on the conflict-outcome relationship. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 187–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jehn, K. A. & Mannix, E. A. (2001). The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 238–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jehn, K. A. (1994). Enhancing Effectiveness: An Investigation of Advantages and Disadvantages of Value-Based Intragroup Conflict. The International Journal of Conflict Management, 5(3),223–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jehn, K. A. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 256–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jehn, K. A. (1997). A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 530–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. & Neale, M. (1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 741–763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, R. (1982). The Effects of group Longevity on Project Communication and Performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27, 81–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kearney, E., Gebert, D. & Voelpel, S. (2009). When and how diversity benefits team processes and outcomes: The importance of team members’ need for cognition. Academy of Management Journal, 52(3),581–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, R. T. (2001). Cross-functional project groups in research and new product development: Diversity, communications, job stress, and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 547–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korsgaard, M. A., Schweiger, D. M. & Sapienza, H. J. (1995). Building commitment, attachment, and trust in strategic decision-making teams: The role of procedural justice. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 60–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, B. S. (1997). The black box of organizational demography. Organization Science, 8, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, D. Z., Cross, R. & Abrams, L. C. (2002). Why should I trust you: Predictors of interpersonal trust in a knowledge transfer context, Paper presented at the Academy of Management Meeting, Denver, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovelace, K., Shapiro, D. L. & Weingart, L. R. (2001). Maximizing cross-functional new product teams’ innovativeness and constraint adherence: A conflict communications perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 779–793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathieu, J. E., Goodwin, G. F., Heffner, T. S., Salas, E. & Cannon-Bowers, A. (2000). The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 273–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meade, A. W., Watson, A. M. & Kroustalis, C. M. (2007). Assessing Common Methods Bias in Organizational Research, Paper presented at the 22nd Annual Meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaelsen, L. K., Watson, W. E. & Black, R. H. (1989). A realistic test of individual versus group consensus decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 834–839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammed, S. & Angell, L. C. (2004). Surface- and Deep-level Diversity in Workgroups: Examining the Moderating Effects of Team Orientation and Team Process on Relationship Conflict. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 1015–1039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammed, S. & Ringseis, E. (2001). Cognitive diversity and consensus in group decision making: The role of inputs, processes, and outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 85, 310–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammed, S., Ferzandi, L. & Hamilton, K. (2010). Metaphor no more: A 15-year review of the team mental model construct. Journal of Management, 36(4),876–910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moye, N., Gilson, L. L. & Langfred, C. W. (2005). The Influence of Conflict on Creativity-Relevant In-tragroup Processes Over Time, IACM 18th Annual Conference, Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=735144, letzter Abruf im September 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakes, P. J. (1987). The Salience of Social Categories, in: J. Turner (Ed): Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self Categorization Theory (S. 117–141). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelled, L. H. (1996). Demographic diversity, conflict, and work group outcomes: An intervening process theory. Organization Science, 7, 615–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M. & Xin, K. R. (1999). Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y. & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pruitt, D. G. & Kim, S. H. (2004). Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate, and settlement (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reagans, R. & Zuckerman, E. W. (2001). Networks, diversity, and productivity: The social capital of corporate R & D teams. Organization Science, 12, 502–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sackmann, S., Bissels, S. & Bissels, T. (2002). Kulturelle Vielfalt in Organisationen: Ansatze zum Umgang mit einem vernachlassigten Thema der Organisationswissenschaften. Die Betriebswirtschaft, 62(1),43–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffner, M. (2007). Diversity und Effektivitat in der Teamarbeit: Eine konflikttheoretische Analyse. Berlin: Promotion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H. & Muller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Test of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures, in: Methods of Psychological Research – Online, 8(2),23–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, B. (1987). The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40, 437–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz-Hardt, S., Frey, D., Luthgens, C. & Moscovici, S. (2000). Biased information search in group decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 655–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz-Hardt, S., Jochims, M. & Frey, D. (2002). Productive conflict in group decision making: Genuine and contrived dissent as strategies to counteract biased information seeking. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 88, 563–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweiger, D. M., Sandberg, W. R. & Ragan, J. W. (1986). Group Approaches for Improving Strategic Decision Making: A Comparative Analysis of Dialectical Inquiry, Devil’s Advocacy, and Consensus. Academy of Management Journal, 29(1),51–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheremata, W. A. (2000). Centrifugal and centripetal forces in radical new product development under time pressure. Academy of Management Review, 25, 389–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, T. L. & Peterson, R. S. (2000). Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: The pivotal role of intragroup trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 102–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simons, T. L., Pelled, L. H. & Smith, K. A. (1999). Making use of difference: Diversity, debate, and decision comprehensiveness in top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 662–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snell, R. S., Tjosvold, D. & Su Fang (2006). Resolving ethical conflicts at workthrough cooperative goals and constructive controversy in the People’s Republic of China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23, 319–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stallybrass, O. (1977): "Stereotype", in: A. Bullock & O. Stallybrass (Eds.). The Fontana Dictionary of modern thought, London: Fontana/Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stasser, G. & Titus, W. (1985). Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during group discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1467–1478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stasser, G. (1992). Pooling of Unshared Information During Group Discussion, in: S. Worchel, W. Wood, W. & J. A. (Eds.): Group Process and Productivity (S. 48–67). Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. (1982). Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tjosvold, D. (1986). Constructive controversy: A key strategy for groups. Personnel, 63, 39–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tjosvold, D. (1997). Conflict within interdependence: Its value for productivity and individuality, in: C. K. W. De Dreu & E. van de Vliert (Eds.): Using conflict in organizations (S. 39–52). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. C. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, A. H. & Ferry, D. L. (1980). Measuring and assessing organizations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Vegt, G. S. & Bunderson, J. S. (2005). Learning and performance in multi-functional teams: The importance of collective team identification. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 532–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Vegt, G. S. & Janssen, O. (2003). Joint impact of interdependence and group diversity on innovation. Journal of Management, 29(5),729–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Vegt, G. S., Bunderson, J. S. & Oosterhof, A. (2006). Expertness diversity and interpersonal helping in teams: Why those who need the most help end up getting the least. Academy of Management Journal, 49(5),877–893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Knippenberg, D. & Schippers, M. C. (2007). Work group diversity. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 515–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Knippenberg, D., De Dreu, C. K. W. & Homan, A. C. (2004). Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6),1008–1022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, W. E., Michaelsen, L. K. & Sharp W. (1991). Member Competence, Group Interaction, and Group Decision-Making: A Longitudinal Study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 801–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wegner, D. M. (1987). Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind, in: B. Mullen & G. R. Goethals (Eds.): Theories of group behaviour (S. 185–208). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • West, M. A. & Farr, J. L. (1990). Innovation at work, in: M. A. West & J. L. Farr (Eds.): Innovation and Creativity at Work: Psychological and Organizational Strategies (3–13). Wiley: Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, M. A. (1990). The social psychology of innovation in groups, in: M. A. West & J. L. Farr (Eds.): Innovation and Creativity at Work: Psychological and Organizational Strategies (S. 309–333). Wiley: Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, M. A. (1996). Preface: Introducing Work Group Psychology, in: West, M. A (Ed.): Handbook of Work Group Psychology, xxv-xxxiii, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, M. A. (2002). Sparkling Fountains or Stagnant Ponds: An Integrative Model of Creativity and Innovation Implementation in Work Groups. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 51(3),355–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zapf, D. & Leymann, H. (1996). Mobbing and victimization at work, [Special issue]. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(2).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Berlin, Deutschland

    Dr. Johannes Kirch

Authors
  1. Dr. Johannes Kirch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johannes Kirch .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. , Professor für Wirtschaftspsychologie, BiTS Iserlohn, Reiterweg 26 b, Iserlohn, 58636, Germany

    Ralf Lanwehr

  2. BiTS Iserlohn, Reiterweg 26 b, Iserlohn, 58636, Germany

    Matthias Müller-Lindenberg

  3. BiTS Iserlohn, Reiterweg 26 b, Iserlohn, 58636, Germany

    Daria Mai

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kirch, J. (2013). Parallele Handlungsstrategien zur Förderung der Team-Innovativität. In: Lanwehr, R., Müller-Lindenberg, M., Mai, D. (eds) Balance Management. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-02192-4_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-02192-4_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-02191-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-02192-4

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation