Advertisement

Councillors and democracy: What do they think, and how can differences in their views be explained?

Chapter
Part of the Urban and Regional Research International book series (URI, volume 14)

Abstract

Municipal councils are representative bodies and are thus a core institution of a particular understanding of democracy – namely representative or ‘liberal’ democracy. This model of democracy stresses (i) the individual’s right to participate in general elections and through this process, the aggregation of individual preferences to form guidelines for those in representative bodies or in government and (ii) the capacity to make those representative bodies accountable to the individual citizen through those elections. However, it is an open question as to whether or not councillors have an understanding of democracy according to this model – or one which deviates from and goes beyond this model by considering and valuing interrelations based on broader forms of participation, beyond participating in elections.

Keywords

Liberal Democracy Basic Belief Representative Democracy Participatory Democracy Representative Body 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barber, B. (1984) Strong Democracy. Participatory Politics for a New Age. University of California Press: Berkley, Los Angeles, London.Google Scholar
  2. Barnes, S. H., Kaase, M., Allerbeck, K. R., Farah, B. G., Heunks, F., Inglehart, R., Jennings, M. K., Klingemann, H.-D., Marsh, A. and Rosenmayr, L. (eds.) (1979) Political Action. Mass Participation in five Western Democracies. Sage: Beverly Hills/London.Google Scholar
  3. Cohen, J. (2007) ‘Deliberative democracy’ in Rosenberg, S. R (ed.) Deliberation, Participation and Democracy. Can the people govern? Palgrave Macmillan: Houndmills, New York, 219-236.Google Scholar
  4. Habermas, J. (1992) Faktizität und Geltung. Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats. Suhrkamp: Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
  5. Habermas, J. (1996a) Between Facts and Norms. Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Blackwell Publishers: Cambridge.Google Scholar
  6. Habermas, J. (1996b) Die Einbeziehung des Anderen: Studien zur politischen Theorie. Suhrkamp: Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
  7. Heinelt, H. (2010) Governing Modern Societies. Towards participatory governance. Routledge: London and New York.Google Scholar
  8. Heinelt, H. (2012a) ‘Introduction: The Role Perception and Behaviour of Municipal Councillors in the Changing Context of Local Democracy’, Local Government Studies, DOI:10.1080/03003930.2012.670745.Google Scholar
  9. Heinelt, H. (2012b) ‘Councillors’ Notions of Democracy, and their Role Perception and Behaviour in the Changing Context of Local Democracy’, Local Government Studies, DOI:10.1080/03003930.2012.670746.Google Scholar
  10. Heinelt, H., Hlepas, N.-K. (2006) ‘Typologies of local government systems’ in Bäck, H., Heinelt, H. and Magnier, A. (eds.) The European Mayor: Political leaders in the changing context of local democracy. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften: Wiesbaden, 21-33.Google Scholar
  11. Inglehart, R. (1990) Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton University Press: Princeton.Google Scholar
  12. Kaase, M., and Marsh, A. (1979) ‘Distribution of Political Action’ in Barnes, S. H., Kaase, M., Allerbeck, K. R., Farah, B. G., Heunks, F., Inglehart, R., Jennings, M. K., Klingemann, H.-D., Marsh, A. and Rosenmayr, L. (eds.) Political Action. Mass Participation in five Western Democracies. Sage: Beverly Hills/London, 167-201.Google Scholar
  13. Klingemann, H.-D., Volkens, A., Bara, J. L., Budge, I. and McDonald, M. D. (2006) Mapping Policy Preferences II. Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments in Eastern Europe, European Union, and OECD 1990-2003. Oxford University Press: Oxford.Google Scholar
  14. Mannheim, K. (1965) ‘Das Problem der Generationen’, in Mannheim, K.: Wissenssoziologie. Luchterhand: Neuwied, 509-565.Google Scholar
  15. Mouritzen, P. E. and Svara, J. H. (2002) Leadership at the Apex. Politicians and administrators in western local governments. Pittsburgh University Press: Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
  16. Pateman, C. (1970) Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge University Press: London, New York.Google Scholar
  17. Pitkin, H. F. (1967) The Concept of Representation. University of California Press: Berkeley, Los Angeles, London.Google Scholar
  18. Pierre, J. and Peters, B. G. (2000) Governance, Politics and the State. Macmillan: London.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Political ScienceTechnische Universität DarmstadtDarmstadtGermany

Personalised recommendations