Advertisement

Councillors and their parties

Chapter
Part of the Urban and Regional Research International book series (URI, volume 14)

Abstract

Local government councillors are often perceived as the weakest link in the local government power triangle of mayor, elected councillors and senior bureaucrats. The power position of councillors in particular countries depends on their legal status and the amount of resources and administrative-professional support available to them. Nevertheless, it can also be substantially influenced by the role of party politics in their careers. Councillors can be members of national parties, running for these parties in local elections. Alternatively, they can run for local parties or lists, or run as independent candidates, the latter option viable particularly in majoritarian electoral systems, where councillors represent electoral wards.

Keywords

Local Politics Party Member Local Election National Party Party Organization 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Copus, C., Wingfield, M., Steyvers, K. And Reynaert, H. (2012) ‘A place to party? Parties and non-partisanship in local government’ in Mossberger, K., Clarke, S. E. And John, P. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Urban Politics. Oxford University Press: New York, 210-230.Google Scholar
  2. Crouch, C. (2004) Post Democracy. Polity Press: Cambridge.Google Scholar
  3. Dudzinska, A. (2008) ‘Non-party lists in local election in Poland’ in Reiser, M. and Holtmann, E. (eds.) Farewell to the Party Model? Independent Local Lists in East and West European Countries. Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften: Wiesbaden, 105-126.Google Scholar
  4. Erie, S. P., Kogan, V. And MacKenzie, S. A. (2011) Paradise Plundered, Fiscal Crisis and Governance Failures in San Diego. Stanford University Press: Stanford.Google Scholar
  5. Fallend, F., Ignits, G. And Swianiewicz, P. (2006) ‘Divided loyalities? Mayors between party representation and local community interests’ in Bäck, H., Heinelt, H. And Magnier, A. (eds.) 245-270.Google Scholar
  6. Heinelt, H. And Hlepas, N.-K. (2006) ‘Typologies of local government systems’ in Bäck, H., Heinelt, H. And Magnier, A. (eds.) The European Mayor, Political Leaders in the Changing Context of Local Democracy. Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften: Wiesbaden, 21-42.Google Scholar
  7. Maisel, L. S. and Buckley, K. Z. (2005) Parties and Elections in america, 4th ed. Rowman & Littlefield: Lanham.Google Scholar
  8. Phillips, S. D. (2010) ‘You say you want an evolution? From citizen to community engagement in Canadian Cities’ in Brunet-Jailly, E. And Martin, J. F. (eds.) Local Government in a Global World, Australia and Canada in Comparative Perspective. University of Toronto Press: Toronto, 55-80.Google Scholar
  9. Razin, E. And Hazan, A. (forthcoming) ‘Attitudes of European local councilors towards local governance reforms: a north-south divide?’, Local Government Studies.Google Scholar
  10. Reiser, M. and Holtmann, E. (eds.) (2008) Farewell to the Party Model? Independent Local Lists in East and West European Countries. Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften: Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
  11. Welch, S. And Bledsoe, T. (1988) Urban Reform and its Consequences, A Study in Representation. University of Chicago Press: Chicago.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeographyHebrew University of JerusalemJerusalemIsrael

Personalised recommendations