Advertisement

Coordinating community governance? Local councillors in different governance network arrangements

Chapter
Part of the Urban and Regional Research International book series (URI, volume 14)

Abstract

In modern European cities, councillors are but one actor amongst many. They increasingly act within a web of multiple local players who exert influence on the policy process in various forms. Political leadership and steering are not only undertaken by public actors such as the municipal government, the administration or the council. In our globalised world, private actors are becoming increasingly important in the municipal decision-making process – new forms of governance are emerging (see e.g. Bekkers et al. 2007; Denters and Rose 2005; Klok and Denters 2005; Pierre 2000; Vetter and Kersting 2003).

Keywords

Civil Society Public Actor Local Politics Local Councillor Executive Board 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bang, H. (ed.) (2003) Governance as Social and Political Communication. Manchester University Press: Manchester.Google Scholar
  2. Barnett, N. (2011) ‘Local Government at the Nexus?’, Local Government Studies 37 (3), 275-290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bekkers, V., Dijkstra, G., Edwards, A. and Fenger, M. (2007) ‘Governance and the Democratic Deficit: An Evaluation’ in Bekkers, V., Dijkstra, G., Edwards, A. and Fenger, M. (eds.) Governance and the Democratic Deficit. Ashgate: Aldershot, 295-312.Google Scholar
  4. Benz, A. and Papadopoulos, Y. (eds.) (2006) Governance and Democracy. Routledge: London.Google Scholar
  5. Davies, J. S. (2007) ‘The Limits of Partnership: An Exit-Action Strategy for Local Democratic Inclusion’, Political Studies 55 (4), 779-800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Denters, B. and Rose, L. E. (2005) ‘Towards Local Governance?’ in Denters, B. and Rose, L. E (eds.) Comparing Local Governance. Trends and Developments. Palgrave Macmillan: Houndmills, 246-262.Google Scholar
  7. Goldsmith, M. (1992) ‘Local Government’, Urban Studies 29 (3/4), 393-410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hesse, J. J. and Sharpe, L. J. (1991) ‘Local Government in International Perspective: Some Comparative Observations’, in Hesse, J. J (ed.) Local Government and Urban Affairs in International Perspective. Nomos: Baden-Baden, 603-621.Google Scholar
  9. Jessop, B. (1998): The Rise of Governance and the Risk of Failure: The Case of Economic Development. Basil Blackwell: Oxford.Google Scholar
  10. Klijn, E.-H. and Skelcher, C. (2007) ‘Democracy and Governance Networks: Compatible or not?’, Public Administration 85 (3), 587-608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Klok, P.-J. and Denters, B. (2005) ‘Urban leadership and community involvement: an institutional analysis’, in Haus, M., Heinelt, H. and Stewart, M. (eds.) Urban Governance und Democracy. Leadership and community involvement. Routledge: London, 40-64.Google Scholar
  12. Mossberger, K. and Stoker, G. (2001) ‘The evolution of urban regime theory. The challenge of conceptualization’, Urban Affairs Review 36 (6), 810-835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Page, E. and Goldsmith, M. (1987) Central and Local Government Relations: A Comparative Analysis of West European Unitary States. Sage: London.Google Scholar
  14. Pierre, J. (2000) ‘Introduction: Understanding Governance’ in Pierre, J. (ed.): Debating Governance. Authority, Steering and Democracy. Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1-10.Google Scholar
  15. Sellers, J. M. and Lidström, A. (2007) ‘Decentralisation, Local Government, and the Welfare State’, Governance 20 (4), 609-632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sellers, J. M. (2005) ‘Re-Placing the Nation – An Agenda for Comparative Urban Politics’, Urban Affairs Review 40 (4), 419-445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sellers, J. M. (2002) ‘The Nation-State and Urban Governance – Toward Multilevel Analysis’, Urban Affairs Review 37 (5), 611-641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Skelcher, C. (2005) ‘Jurisdictional Integrity, Polycentrism, and the Design of Democratic Governance’, Governance 18 (1), 89-110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sørensen, E. (2006): ‚Metagovernance. The Changing Role of Politicians in Processes of Democratic Governance’, American Review of Public Administration 36 (1), 98-114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sørensen, E. and Torfing, J. (2005) ‘The Democratic Anchorage of Governance Networks’, Scandinavian Political Studies 28 (3), 195-218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sørensen, E. and Torfing, J. (2007a) ‘Introduction: Governance Network Research: Towards a Second Generation’ in Sørensen, E. and Torfing, J. (eds.) Theories of Democratic Network Governance. Palgrave-Macmillan: Basingstoke, 1-21.Google Scholar
  22. Sørensen, E. and Torfing, J. (eds.) (2007b) Theories of Democratic Network Governance. Palgrave-Macmillan: Basingstoke.Google Scholar
  23. Sørensen, E. and Torfing, J. (2009) ‘Making Governance Networks Effective and Democratic through Metagovernance’, Public Administration 87 (2), 234-258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Stoker, G. (2004): Transforming Local Governance. Palgrave Macmillan: Basingstoke.Google Scholar
  25. Stoker, G. (2005) ‘New Localism, Participation and Community Governance’, Paper presented to the UN 6th Global Forum on Reinventing Government, 24-27 May, Seoul, Republic of Korea.Google Scholar
  26. Stoker, G. (2011): ‘Was Local Governance such a Good Idea? A Global Comparative Perspective’, Public Administration 89 (1), 15-31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Stone, C. (1989) Regime Politics: Governing Atlanta, 1946-1988. University Press of Kansas, Lawrence.Google Scholar
  28. Stone, C. (1993) ‘Urban regimes and the capacity to govern: A political economy approach’, Journal of Urban Affairs 15 (1), 1-28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Vetter, A. and Kersting, N. (2003) ‘Reforming local government. Heading for efficiency and democracy’, in Kersting, N. and Vetter, A. (eds.) Reforming Local Government in Europe. Closing the Gap between Democracy and Efficiency. Leske + Budrich: Opladen, 333-349.Google Scholar
  30. Wollmann, H. (2000) ‘Local Government Systems: From historic divergence towards convergence? Great Britain, France, and Germany as (comparative) cases in point’, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 18 (1), 33-55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wolman, H. and Goldsmith, M. (1992) Urban Politics and Policy: A Comparative Approach. Blackwell: London.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Political ScienceUniversity of ZurichZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations