Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Militärregime im Autokratievergleich und in der Demokratisierungsforschung – Befunde und Perspektiven der Forschung

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Staatstätigkeiten, Parteien und Demokratie

Zusammenfassung

Der Autokratievergleich hat in den letzten Jahrzehnten mehrere Konjunkturen durchlaufen. Nach dem zweiten Weltkrieg dominierte die Totalitarismusforschung. Die Analyse totalitärer Führer- und Parteiendiktaturen wurde in den 1960er und 1970er Jahren abgelöst vom Konzept des Autoritarismus (Brooker 2009). Mit der „dritten Demokratisierungswelle„ (1974 ff.) geriet die Autoritarismusforschung in den Schatten der Demokratisierungsstudien. Die Analyse nicht-demokratischer Regime blieb relevant, wurde aber vorrangig mit Blick auf die Chancen, Pfade und Herausforderungen der Demokratisierung und Konsolidierung post-autoritärer Regime betrieben (Ulfelder 2005).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Agüero, Felipe. 1998. Legacies of transitions: Institutionalization, the military, and democracy. Mershon International Studies Review 42(2):383–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alagappa, Muthiah (Hrsg.). 2004. Military Professionalism in Asia: Conceptual and Empirical Perspectives. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arceneaux, Craig L. 2001. Bounded Missions: Military Regimes and Democratization in the Southern Cone and Brazil. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Art, David. 2012. What Do We Know About Authoritarianism After Ten Years? Comparative Politics 44(3):351–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bank, André. 2009. Die Renaissance des Autoritarismus. Erkenntnisse und Grenzen neuerer Beiträge der Comparative Politics und Nahostforschung. hrss 4(1):10–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barany, Zoltan D. 1997. „Democratic Consolidation and the Military: The East European Experience”. Comparative Politics 30(1):21–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barracca, Steven. 2007. Military coups in the post-cold war era: Pakistan, Ecuador and Venezuela. Third World Quarterly 28(1):137–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belkin, Aaron und Evan Schofer. 2003. Toward a Structural Understanding of Coup Risk. Journal of Conflict Resolution 47(5):594–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boix, Carles und Milan Svolik. 2011. The Foundations of Limited Authoritarian Government: Institutions and Power-Sharing in Dictatorships. Manuskript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooker, Paul. 2009. Non-Democratic Regimes, 2. Auflage. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brownlee, Jason. 2007. Authoritarianism in an Age of Democratization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cheibub, José A., Jennifer Gandhi und John Vreeland. 2009. Democracy and dictatorship revisited. Public Choice 143(1–2):67–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheibub, José Antonio. 2007. Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croissant, Aurel.2013 (im Erscheinen). Coups and Post-Coup Politics in Southeast Asia and the Pacific Islands: Theoretical and Comparative Perspectives. Australian Journal of International Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croissant, Aurel und David Kuehn. 2011. Militär und zivile Politik. München: Oldenbourg Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Croissant , Aurel , David Kuehn, Paul W. Chambers, Philip Voelkel und Siegfried O. Wolf. 2011. Theorizing Civilian Control in New Democracies: Agency, Structure and Institutional Change. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft 5(1):75–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croissant , Aurel , David Kuehn, Paul W. Chambers und Siegfried. 2010. Beyond the fallacy of coup-ism: conceptualizing civilian control of the military in emerging democracies. Democratization 17(5):950–975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croissant , Aurel , David Kuehn, Philip Lorenz und Paul W. Chambers 2013. Democratization and Civliian Control in Asia. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Croissant, Aurel und Stefan Wurster. 2013. Persistence and Performance of Autocracies in Comparison: Introducing Issues and Perspectives. Contemporary Politics, special issue, vol. 19, no. 1: 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ezrow, Natasha M. und Erica Frantz. 2011. Dictators and Dictatorships. Understanding Authoritarian Regimes and Their Leaders. New York: The Continuum International Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feaver, Peter D. 1996. The Civil-Military Problematique: Huntington, Janowitz, and the Question of Civilian Control. Armed Forces & Society 23(2):127–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finer, Samuel E. 1962. The man on horseback: The role of the military in politics. London: Pall Mall Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finer, Samuel E. 1985. The retreat to the barracks: Notes on the practice and the theory of military withdrawal from the seats of power. Third World Quarterly 7(1):16–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geddes, Barbara. 1999. What do we know about democratization after twenty years? Annual Review of Political Science 2: 115–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geddes, Barbara. 2006. Paradigms and sand castles: Theory building and research design in comparative politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geddes, Barbara. 2009. How Autocrats Defend Themselves Against Armed Rivals. Manuskript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geddes, Barbara, Joseph Wright und Erica Frantz. 2012. Authoritarian Regimes: A New Data Set. Manuskript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadenius, Axel und Jan Teorell. 2007. Pathways from Authoritarianism. Journal of Democracy 18(1):143–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadenius, Axel und Jan Teorell. 2010. Authoritarian Regimes Data Set, version 2.1, Codebook. Department of Political Science, Lund University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, Samuel P. 1957. The soldier and the state: The theory and politics of civil-military relations. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, Samuel P. 1968. Political order in changing societies. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kailitz, Steffen. 2012. Why and How We Should Classify Political Regimes by their Legitimation? Manuskript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamrava, Mehran 2000: Military Professionalization and Civil-Military Relations in the Middle East. Political Science Quarterly 122(3):433–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karl, Terry L. und Philippe C. Schmitter. 1991. Modes of Transition in Latin America, Southern and Eastern Europe. International Social Science Journal 128: 269–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kräme, Raimund und Armin Kuhn. 2006. Militär und Politik in Süd- und Mittelamerika: Herausforderungen für demokratische Politik. Berlin: Dietz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai, Brian und Dan Slater. 2005. Institutions on the Offensive. Domestic Sources of Dispute Initiation in Authoritarian Regimes, 1950–1992. American Journal of Political Science 50: 113–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, Harold D. 1941. The Garrison State. The American Journal of Sociology 46(4):455–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linz, Juan J. 2000. Totalitäre und autoritäre Regime, Berlin: Berliner Debatte Wissenschaftsverlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linz, Juan J. und Alfred C. Stepan. 1996. Problems of democratic transition and consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and post-communist Europe. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luttwak, Edward. 1968. Coup d’état: A practical handbook. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magaloni, Beatriz und Ruth Kricheli. 2010. Political Order and One-Party Rule. Annual Review of Political Science 13: 123–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mainwaring, Scott und Frances Hagopian. 2005. Introduction: The Third Wave of Democratization in Latin America. In The Third Wave of Democratization in Latin America. Advances and Setbacks, Hrsg. Scott Mainwaring und Frances Hagopian, 1–14. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mares, David R. 1998. Civil-Military Relations, Democracy, and the Regional Neighborhood. In Civil-Military Relations: Building Democracy and Regional Security in Latin America, Southern Asia, and Central Europe, Hrsg. David R. Mares, 1–25. Boulder/Oxford: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merkel, Wolfgang, Hans-Jürgen Puhle und Aurel Croissant. 2003. Defekte Demokratien, Bd. 1: Theorie. Opladen: Leske und Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merkel, Wolfgang. 2010. Systemtransformation: Eine Einführung in die Theorie und Empirie der Transformationsforschung, 2. Auflage. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merkel , Wolfgang , Johannes Gerschewski, Alexander Schmotz, Christoph H. Stefes und Dag 2012. Warum überleben Diktaturen? Unveröffentlichtes Manuskript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordlinger, Eric A. 1977. Soldiers in politics: Military coups and governments. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez-Liñán, Anàbal. 2007. Presidential Impeachment and the New Political Instability in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pickel, Gert und Susanne Pickel. 2006. Politische Kultur- und Demokratieforschung. Grundbegriffe, Theorien, Methoden. Eine Einführung. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilster, Ulrich und Tobias Böhmelt. 2011. Coup-Proofing and Military Effectiveness in Interstate Wars, 1967–99. Conflict Management and Peace Science 28(4):331–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pin, Richard Jong-A und Shu Yu. 2010. Do Coup Leaders Matter? Leadership Change and Economic Growth in Politically Unstable Countries. KOF Working Papers 252, Zürich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pion-Berlin, David und Harold A. Trinkunas. 2010. Civilian Praetorianism and military shirking during constitutional crises in Latin America. Comparative Politics 42(4):395–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, Jonathan M. und Clayton L. Thyne. 2011. Global instances of coups from 1950–2010: A new dataset. Journal of Peace Research 48(2):249–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Przeworski, Adam. 2003. Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. In The Democracy Source Book, Hrsg. Robert Dahl, Ian Shapiro und José Antonio Cheibub, 76–93. Boston: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puddington, Arch. 2012. Freedom in the World 2012. The Arab Uprising and their Global Repercussions. In Freedom House. Freedom in the World 2012, http://www.freedomhouse.org.

  • Saam, Nicole J. 1999. Simulating the Micro-Macro Link: New Approaches to an Old Problem and an Application to Military Coups. Sociological Methodology 29(1):43–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schedler, Andreas. 2009. The New Institutionalism in the Study of Authoritarian Regimes. Totalitarismus und Demokratie 6(2):323–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schedler, Andreas (Hrsg.). 2006. Electoral authoritarianism. The dynamics of unfree competition. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, Manfred G. 2010. Demokratietheorien: Eine Einführung, 5. Auflage. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, Manfred G. 2012. Legitimation durch Performanz? Zur Output-Legitimität in Autokratien. Manuskript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serra, Narcàs. 2010. The military transition: Democratic reform of the armed forces. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siaroff, Alan. 2009. Comparing political regimes: A thematic introduction to comparative politics. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Peter H. 2005. Democracy in Latin America: Political change in comparative perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stepan, Alfred C. 1971. The military in politics: Changing patterns in Brazil. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svolik, Milan. 2008. Authoritarian Reversals and Democratic Consolidation. American Political Science Review 102(2):153–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svolik, Milan W. 2010. Contracting on Violence: Authoritarian Repression and Military Intervention in Politics. Manuskript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teorell, Jan. 2012. Does Authoritarian Regime Type Affect the Prospects for Democratization? Contingent Regime Change in the World, 1972–2005. Manuskript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trinkunas, Harold A. 2005. Crafting civilian control of the military in Venezuela: A comparative perspective. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulfelder, Jay. 2005. Contentious Collective Action and the Breakdown of Authoritarian Regime. International Political Science Review 26(3):311–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Max. 1922. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch, Claude E. Jr. 1992. Military Disengagement from Politics: Paradigms, Processes, or Random Effects. Armed Forces & Society 18(3):323–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wintrobe, Ronald. 2000. The Political Economy of Dictatorship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, Ekkart. 1983. Political violence, crises, and revolutions. Cambridge: Schenkman.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Heidelberg, Deutschland

    Aurel Croissant

Authors
  1. Aurel Croissant
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Universität Bern, Lerchenweg 36, Bern, 3000, Switzerland

    Klaus Armingeon

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Croissant, A. (2013). Militärregime im Autokratievergleich und in der Demokratisierungsforschung – Befunde und Perspektiven der Forschung. In: Armingeon, K. (eds) Staatstätigkeiten, Parteien und Demokratie. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-01853-5_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-01853-5_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-01852-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-01853-5

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation