Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Party Government, Institutions, and Social Protection in the Age of Austerity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Staatstätigkeiten, Parteien und Demokratie

Zusammenfassung

In a recent survey of the welfare state impacts of political parties, Manfred Schmidt concludes (2010: 223): “…partisan theory remains a valuable tool in the comparative study of the welfare state in economically advanced democratic states…” Schmidt cites, among other evidence, clear programmatic differences in the early 2000s between social democratic and secular center-right parties on the issue of raising taxes to support enhanced social protection, the mode of welfare state finance, and the overall balance between state and market in the production of welfare.

The author would like to thank James Allen and Lyle Scruggs for unpublished data on programmatic entitlements in contemporary social policy and Dennis Quinn for unpublished data on financial and capital market liberalization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Achen, Christopher. 2000. Why lagged dependent variables can suppress the power of other independent variables and what can be done about it. Paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the Midwest Political Science Association, 27.04.2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams , James , Andrea Haupt, and Heather Stoll. 2009. What moves parties? The role of public opinion and global economic conditions in Western Europe. Comparative Political Studies 42: 611–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, James, and Lyle Scruggs. 2004. Political partisanship and welfare state reform in advanced industrial societies. American Journal of Political Science 48: 496–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armingeon, Klaus. 2006. Reconciling competing claims of the welfare state clientele: The politics of old and new social risk coverage in comparative perspective. In The Politics of Post-Industrial Welfare States: Adapting Post-war Social Policies to New Social Risks, eds. Klaus Armingeon and Giuliano Bonoli, 100–122. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armingeon, Klaus. 2007. Active labour market policy, international organizations and domestic politics. Journal of European Public Policy 14: 905–932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beramendi, Pablo, and Christopher Anderson (eds.). 2008. Democracy, Inequality, and Redistribution: A Comparative Perspective. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becher, Michael. 2010. Constraining ministerial power: The impact of veto players on labor market reforms in industrial democracies, 1973–2000. Comparative political studies 43: 33–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Nathaniel, and Jonathan Katz. 1996. Nuisance versus substance: Specifying and estimating timeseries- cross-section models. Political Analysis 6: 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blais , André , Donald Blake, and Stéphane Dion. 1993. Do parties make a difference? Parties and the size of government in liberal democracies. American Journal of Political Science 37: 40–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonoli, Giuliano. 2001. Political institutions, veto points, and the process of welfare state adaption. In The New Politics of the Welfare State, ed. Paul Pierson, 238–264. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, David. 2009. Rich Democracies, Poor People: How Politics Explain Poverty. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, Clem, and Jeff Manza. 2007. Why Welfare States Persist? The Importance of Public Opinion in Democracies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, Sarah. 2005. Interdependent and domestic foundations of policy change: The diffusion of pension privatization around the world. International Studies Quarterly 49: 273–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgoon, Brian. 2012. Partisan embedding of liberalism: How trade, investment, and immigration affect party support for the welfare state. Comparative Political Studies 45: 606–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busemeyer, Marius. 2009a. Social democrats and the new partisan politics of public investment in education. Journal of European Public Policy 16: 107–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busemeyer, Marius. 2009b. From myth to reality: globalization and public spending in OECD countries revisited. European Journal of Political Research 48: 455–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, David. 1978. The expansion of the public economy: A comparative analysis. American Political Science Review 72: 1243–1261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castles, Francis G. 1978. The Social Democratic Image of Society. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castles, Francis G. 1982a. The Impact of Parties: Politics and Policies in Democratic Capitalist States. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castles, Francis G. 1982b. The impact of parties on public expenditures. In The Impact of Parties: Politics and Policies in Democratic Capitalist States, ed. Francis G. Castles, 21–90. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castles, Francis. 2004. The Future of the Welfare State: Crisis Myths and Crisis Realities. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Castles, Francis G., and Robert McKinlay. 1979. Does politics matter? An analysis of the public welfare commitment in advanced democratic states. European Journal of Political Research 7: 169–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crepaz, Markus, and Vickie Birchfield. 2000. Global economics, local politics: Globalization and Lijphart’s theory of consensus democracy and the politics of inclusion. In Democracy and Institutions: the Life Work of Arend Lijphart, eds. Markus Crepaz, Thomas Koelble and David Wilsford, 197–224. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cusack, Thomas. 1997. Partisan politics and public finance: change in public spending in industrialized democracies, 1955–89. Public Choice 91: 375–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cusack , Thomas , Torben Iversen, and Philipp Rehm. 2006. Risks at work: the demand and supply sides of government redistribution. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 22: 365–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 1990. Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. London: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franzese, Robert J. Jr. 2002. Macroeconomic Policies of Developed Democracies. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Franzese, Robert J. Jr., and Jude C. Hays. 2008. Interdependence in comparative politics: substance, theory, empirics, substance. Comparative Political Studies 41: 742–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, Geoffrey. 1998. Partisan Politics in a Global Economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Giger, Nathalie, and Moira Nelson. 2010. The electoral consequences of welfare state retrenchment: Blame avoidance or credit claiming in the era of permanent austerity? European Journal of Political Research 50: 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gingrich, Jane. 2011. Making Markets in the Welfare State: The Politics of Varying Market Reforms. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Green-Pedersen, Christopher. 2002a. The Politics of Justification: Party Competition and Welfare State Retrenchment in Denmark and the Netherlands from 1982–1998. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Green-Pedersen, Christoffer. 2002b. New public management reforms of the Danish and Swedish welfare states: the role of different social democratic responses. Governance 15: 271–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Peter, and David Soskice (eds.). 2001.Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Häusermann, Silja. 2010. The Politics of Welfare State Reform in Continental Europe: Modernization in Hard Times. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hibbs, Douglas. 1977. Political parties and macroeconomic policy. American Political Science Review 71: 1467–1487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hibbs, Douglas. 1992. Partisan theory after fifteen years. European Journal of Political Economy 8: 361–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, Alexander. 1999. Social Democracy and Welfare Capitalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, Alexander, and Kendralin Freeman. 2009. Pension income replacement: Permanent and transitory determinants. Journal of European Public Policy 16: 127–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, Alexander, and Lane Kenworthy. 1998. Cooperation and political economic performance in affluent democratic capitalism. American Journal of Sociology 103: 1631–1672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, Alexander, and Duane Swank. 1984. On the political economy of welfare expansion: A comparative analysis of 19 advanced capitalist democracies, 1960–1971. Comparative Political Studies 17: 81–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, Alexander, and Duane Swank. 1992. Politics, institutions, and welfare spending in industrialized democracies, 1960–1992. American Political Science Review 86: 659–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, Alexander, and Christopher Zorn. 2005. Economic globalization, the macro economy, and reversals of welfare expansion in affluent democracies 1978–1994. International Organization 59: 631–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber, Evelyne, and John D. Stephens. 1998. Internationalization and the social democratic welfare model: Crises and future prospects. Comparative Political Studies 33: 353–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber, Evelyne, and John D. Stephens. 2001. Partisan Choice in Global Markets: Development and Crisis of Advanced Welfare States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Huber, Evelyne, and John D. Stephens. 2006. Combating old and new social risks. In The Politics of Post- Industrial Welfare States: Adapting Post-war Social Policies to New Social Risks, eds. Klaus Armingeon and Giuliano Bonoli, 143–168. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber , Evelyne , Charles Ragin, and John D. Stephens. 1993. Social democracy, Christian democracy, constitutional structure and the welfare state. American Journal of Sociology 99: 711–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huo, Jingjing. 2009. Third Way Reforms: Social Democracy after the Golden Age. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Immergut, Ellen, and Tarik Abou-Chadi. 2012. Beyond veto points and veto players: the role of electoral vulnerability in pension politics. Typescript, Humboldt University, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iversen, Torben 2005 Capitalism, Democracy and Welfare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Iversen, Torben, and Thomas Cusack. 2000. The causes of welfare expansion: deindustrialization or globalization? World Politics 52: 313–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iversen, Torben, and David Soskice. 2001. An asset theory of social preferences. American Political Science Review 95: 875–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iversen, Torben, and David Soskice. 2006. Electoral institutions and the politics of coalitions: why some democracies redistribute more than others. American Political Science Review 100: 165–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iversen, Torben, and Divid Soskice. 2009. Dualism and political coalitions: inclusionary versus exclusionary reforms in an age of rising inequality. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, 3–6 Sept. 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iversen, Torben, and Anne Wren. 1998. Equality, employment, and budgetary restraint: The trilemma of the service economy. World Politics 50: 507–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jahn, Detlef. 2006. Globalization as ‘Galton’s Problem’: The missing link in the analysis of diffusion patterns in welfare state development. International Organization 60: 401–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, Carsten. 2011. Conditional contraction: globalization and capitalist systems. European Journal of Political Research 50: 168–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kam, Cindy D., and Robert Franzese. 2009. Modeling and Interpreting Interactive Hypotheses in Regression Analysis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenworthy, Lane. 2009. The effect o f public opinion social policy generosity. Socio-Economic Review 7: 727–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keman , Hans , Kees van Kersbergen, and Barbara Vis. 2006. Political parties and new social risks: the double backlash against Social Democracy and Christian Democracy. In The Politics of Post-Industrial Welfare States: Adapting Post-war Social Policies to New Social Risks, eds. Klaus Armingeon and Giuliano Bonoli, 27–51. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, HeeMin, and Richard C. Fording. 1998. Voter ideology in Western democracies, 1946–1989. European Journal of Political Research 33: 73–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, HeeMin, and Richard C. Fording. 2003. Voter ideology in Western democracies: An update. European Journal of Political Research 42: 95–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitschelt, Herbert, and Philipp Rehm. New social risks and political preferences. In The Politics of Post- Industrial Welfare States: Adapting Post-war Social Policies to New Social Risks, eds. Klaus Armingeon and Giuliano Bonoli, 53–82. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kittel, Bernhard, and Herbert Obinger. 2003. Political parties, institutions, and the dynamics of social expenditure in times of austerity. Journal of European Public Policy 10: 20–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kittel, Bernhard, and Hannes Winner. 2005. How reliable is pooled analysis in political economy? The globalization-welfare state nexus revisited. European Journal of Political Economy 44: 269–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korpi, Walter. 1980. Social policy and distributional conflict in the capitalist democracies. West European Politics 3: 296–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korpi, Walter. 2006. Power resources and employer-centered approaches in explanations of welfare states and varieties of capitalism. World Politics 58: 167–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korpi, Walter, and Joakim Palme. 2003. New politics and class politics in the context of austerity and globalization. American Political Science Review 97: 425–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kühner, Stephan. 2010. Do party governments matter after all? Executive ideology, constitutional structures and their combined effect on welfare state change. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 12: 395–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwon , Hyeok Yong, and Jonas Pontusson. 2012. Globalization, labour power, and partisan politics revisited. Socio-Economic Review 8: 251–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, Arend. 1999. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countires. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindvall, Johannes. 2010. Power sharing and reform capacity. Journal of Theoretical Politics 22: 359–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, Julia, and Mikko Myrskylä. 2009. Always the third rail? Pension income and policy preferences in European Democracies. Comparative Political Studies 42: 1068–1097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin , Cathie Jo, and Duane Swank. 2004. Does the organization of capital matter? American Political Science Review 98: 593–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin , Cathie Jo, and Duane Swank. 2012. The Political Construction of Business Interests: Coordination, Growth, and Inequality. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moene , Karl Ove, and Michael Wallerstein. 2003. Earnings inequality and welfare spending: A disaggregated analysis. World Politics 55: 485–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palier, Bruno. 2010. The long conservative corporatist road to welfare reforms. In A long goodbye to Bismark? The politics of welfare reform in continental Europe, ed. Bruno Palier, 333–388. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, Paul. 1994. Dismantling the Welfare State: Reagan, Thatcher and the Politics of Retrenchment in Britain and the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, Paul. 1996. The new politics of the welfare state. World Politics 48: 143–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, Paul. 2001. Coping with permanent austerity: Welfare state restructuring in affluent democracies. In The New Politics of the Welfare State, ed. Paul Pierson, 410–456. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plümper, Thomas, and Vera Troeger. 2007. Efficient estimation of time-invariant and rarely changing variables in finite sample panel analyses with unit fixed effects. Political Analysis 15: 124–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, Dennis. 1997. The Correlates of Change in International Financial Regulation. American Political Science Review 91: 531–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rehm, Philipp. 2011. Social policy by popular demand. World Politics 63: 271–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, Fiona. 2000. †Beyond left and right’: the new partisan politics of welfare. Governance 13: 155–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rueda, David. 2005. Insider-outsider politics in industrialized democracies. American Political Science Review 99: 61–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rueda, David. 2006. Social democracy, and active labour-market policies: insiders, outsiders and the politics of employment protection. British Journal of Political Science 36: 385–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rueda, David. 2007. Social Democracy Inside Out: Partisanship and Labor Market Policy in Industrialized Democracies. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, Manfred G. 1982a. Wohlfahrtsstaatliche Politik unter bürgerlichen und sozialdemokratischen Regierungen. Ein internationaler Vergleich. Frankfurt a.M.: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, Manfred G. 1982b. The role of parties in shaping macroeconomic policy. In The Impact of Parties: Politics and Policies in Democratic Capitalist States, ed. Francis G. Castles, 97–176. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, Manfred G. 1996. When parties matter: a review of the possibilities and limits of partisan influence on public policy. European Journal of Political Research 30: 155–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, Manfred G. 1997. Determinants of social expenditure in liberal democracies: the post World War II experience. Acta Politica 32: 153–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, Manfred G. 2002. The impact of political parties, constitutional structures and veto players in public policy. In Comparative Democratic Politics: A Guide to Contemporary Theory and Research, ed. Hans Keman, 166–84. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, Manfred G. 2010. Parties. In The Oxford Handbook of the Welfare State, eds. Francis G. Castles, Stephan Leibfried, Jane Lewis, Herbert Obinger, and Christopher Pierson, 111–26. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scruggs, Lyle. 2008. Social rights, welfare generosity, and inequality. In Democracy, Inequality, and Representation, eds. Pablo Beramendi, and Christopher Anserson, 62–90. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scruggs, Lyle. 2011. Unemployment benefits, policy retrenchment, and global economic crises, 1980–2011. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, 1–4 Sept 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons , Beth , Frank Dobbin, and Geoffrey Garrett. 2008. Introduction: The diffusion of liberalism. In The Global Diffusion of Markets and Democracy, eds. Beth Simmons, Frank Dobbin, and Geoffrey Garrett, 1–63. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starke , Peter , Herbert Obinger, and Francis G. Castles. 2008. Convergence towards where: In what ways, if any, are welfare states becoming more similar? Journal of European Public Policy 15: 975–1000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, John D. 1979. The Transition from Capitalism to Socialism. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svallfors, Stefan. 2010. Public attidtudes. In The Oxford Handbook of the Welfare State, eds. Francis G. Castles, Stephan Leibfried, Jane Lewis, Herbert Obinger, and Christopher Pierson, 241–251. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swank, Duane. 1988. The political economy of government domestic expenditure in the affluent democracies, 1960–1980. American Journal of Political Science 32: 1120–1150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swank, Duane. 2001. Political institutions and welfare state restructuring. In The New Politics of the Welfare State, ed. Paul Pierson, 197–237. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swank, Duane. 2002. Global Capital, Political Institutions, and Policy Change in Developed Welfare States. New York: Cambridge University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Swank, Duane. 2006. Tax policy in an era of internationalization: Explaining the spread of neoliberalism. International Organization 60: 883–910.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swank, Duane. 2010. Globalization. In The Oxford Handbook of the Welfare State, eds. Francis G. Castles, Stephan Leibfried, Jane Lewis, Herbert Obinger, and Christopher Pierson, 318–332. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swank, Duane. 2011. Activating change? The political economy of active social policy in developed capitalist democracies. In Comparing European Workers Part B: Policies and Institutions (Research in the Sociology of Work, Volume 22), ed. David Brady, 9–51. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swank, Duane, and Cathie Jo Martin. 2001. Employers and the welfare state. Comparative Political Studies 34: 889–923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsebelis, George. 1995. Decision making in political systems: veto players in presidentialism, parliamentarism, multicameralism and multipartyism. British Journal of Political Science 25: 289–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsebelis, George. 2002. Veto Players. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Kersbergen, Kees. 1995. Social Capitalism: A Study of Christian Democracy and the Welfare State. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wagschal, Uwe, and Georg Wenzelburger. 2008. Roads to success: budget consolidations in OECD countries. Journal of Public Policy 28: 309–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagschal, Uwe and Georg Wenzelburger. 2012. When do governments consolidate? A quantitative analysis of 23 OECD countries (1980–2005). Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 14: 45–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilensky, Harold. 1981. Leftism, Catholicism, and democratic corporatism: The role of political parties in recent welfare state development. In The Development of Welfare States in Europe and America, eds. Peter Flora, and Arnold Heidenheimer, 345–382. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilensky, Harold. 2002. Rich Democracies: Political Economy, Public Policy, and Performance. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilensky, Harold. 2012. American Political Economy in Global Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zehavi, Amos. 2012. Welfare state politics in privatization of delivery: Linking program constituencies to Left and Right. Comparative Political Studies 45: 194–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Milwaukee, USA

    Duane Swank

Authors
  1. Duane Swank
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Universität Bern, Lerchenweg 36, Bern, 3000, Switzerland

    Klaus Armingeon

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Swank, D. (2013). Party Government, Institutions, and Social Protection in the Age of Austerity. In: Armingeon, K. (eds) Staatstätigkeiten, Parteien und Demokratie. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-01853-5_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-01853-5_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-01852-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-01853-5

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation