Advertisement

Profound Coziness: Affective Citizenship and the Failure to Enact Community in a Dutch Urban Neighborhood

Chapter

Abstract

Research has shown that the last two decades has seen the rise of voluntarism and more particular a reframing and re-enactment of the ideal-type citizen as a moral subject of responsible communities. In this chapter I ask how citizens are enacted by policy practitioners through different policy practices. Drawing on two years of ethnographic fieldwork in a deprived urban neighborhood, I analyse the policy practices of neighborhood gatherings in an Amsterdam neighborhood that are part of a community participation programme called Neighborhood Circle. Through these gatherings policy practitioners try to stimulate and encourage residents to perform voluntary tasks in the neighborhood. I will argue that in these meetings policy practitioners arouse ‘profound coziness’: a sphere animated by fellow feeling and imagine residents to be activated by the capacity to feel and act upon these feelings, rather than the capacity to think and deliberate rationally. Through these practices different ‘citizens’ emerge. On the one hand the ‘respected citizen’ embodied by (post)migrant women who feel proud to finally be able to participate and recognized by policy practitioners. On the other hand the ‘resentful citizen’ embodied by autochthonous volunteers who feel unrecognized by practitioners and feel publicly displaced by (post)migrant women. I show that the ideal-type citizen that is enacted by policy practitioners singles out other expressions of citizenship, leaving some volunteers in the neighborhood to feel displaced unable to act and a sense of fellow feeling and community far away.

References

  1. Anderson, Benedict. 1991. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  2. Buckingham, Susan, Elodie Marandet, Fiona Smith, Emma Wainwright, and Marilyn Diosi. 2006. “The Liminality of Training Spaces: Places of Private/Public Transitions.” Geoforum 37(6):895–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bull, Anna Cento and Brian Jones. 2006. “Governance and Social Capital in Urban Regeneration: A Comparison Between Bristol and Naples.” Urban Studies 43(4):767–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clarke, John. 2010. “Enrolling Ordinary People: Governmental Strategies and the Avoidance of Politics?” Citizenship Studies 14(6):637–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clarke, John and Janet Newman. 1997. The Managerial State: Power, Politics and Ideology in the Remaking of Social Welfare. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Clarke, John; Janet Newman, and Louise Westmarland. 2007. “Creating Citizens-Consumers? Public Service Reform and (Un)Willing Selves.” pp. 125–145 in On Willing Selves: Neoliberal Politics and the Challenge of Neuroscience, edited by Sabine Maasen and Barbara Stutter. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillian.Google Scholar
  7. De Wilde, Mandy. 2013. “Een gevoelige kwestie of een gevoelskwestie? Affectief burgerschap in de wijk in historisch perspectief.” pp. 24–43 in Als meedoen pijn doet. Affectief burgerschap in de wijk, edited by Evelien Tonkens and Mandy de Wilde. Amsterdam: Van Gennep.Google Scholar
  8. De Wilde, Mandy; Menno Hurenkamp, and Evelien Tonkens. 2014. “Flexible Relations, Frail Contacts and Failing Demands: How Community Groups and Local Institutions Interact in Local Governance in the Netherlands.” Urban Studies 51(16):3365–3383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Duyvendak, Jan Willem. 2011. The Politics of Home: Belonging and Nostalgia in Western Europe and the United States. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Elias, Norbert. [1976] 2005. Gevestigden en Buitenstaanders: Spanningen en Machtsverhoudingen Tussen Twee Arbeidersbuurten. Amsterdam: Boom.Google Scholar
  11. Etzioni, Amitai. 1998. The New Golden Rule: Community and Morality In a Democratic Society. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  12. Forrest, Ray and Ade Kearns. 2001. “Social cohesion, social capital and the neighbourhood.” Urban studies, 38(12): 2125–2143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fortier, Anne-Marie. 2010. “Proximity by Design? Affective Citizenship and the Management of Unease.” Citizenship Studies 14(1):17–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. —. 2007. “Too Close for Comfort: Loving thy Neighbor and the Management of Multicultural Intimacies.” Environment and Planning D 25(1):104–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Haus, Michael and Jan Erling-Klausen. 2011. “Urban Leadership and Community Involvement: Ingredients for Good Governance?” Urban Affairs Review 47(2):256–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hochschild, Arlie. 2003. The Commercialization of Intimate Life: Notes from Home and Work. Berkeley, London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  17. Isin, Engin. 2004. “The Neurotic Citizen.” Citizenship Studies 8(3):217–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Johnson, Carol. 2010. “The Politics of Affective Citizenship: From Blair to Obama.” Citizenship Studies 14(5):495–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Larner, Wendy. 2005. “Neoliberalism in (Regional) Theory and Practice: The stronger Communities Action Fund in New Zealand.” Geographical Research 43(1):9–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lawless, Paul, Mike Foden, Ian Wilson and Christina Beatty. 2010. “Understanding Area-Based Regeneration: The New Deal for Communities Programme in England.” Urban Studies 47(2):257–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lister, Ruth. 2003. Citizenship: Feminist Perspectives. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Lowndes, Vivien and David Wilson. 2001. “Social Capital and Local Governance: Exploring the Institutional Design Variable.” Political Studies 49(4):629–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. MacLeavy, Julie. 2009. “(Re)Analysing Community Empowerment: Rationalities and Technologies of Government in Bristols’ New Deal for Communities.” Urban Studies 46(4):849–875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Maloney, William, Graham Smith, and Gerry Stoker. 2000. “Social Capital and Urban Governance: Adding a More Contextualized Top Down Perspective.” Political Studies, 48(4):802–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Marcus, George. 2002. The Sentimental Citizen: Emotion in Democratic Politics. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Marinetto, Michael. 2003. “Who Wants to Be an Active Citizen? The Politics and Practice of Community Involvement.” Sociology 37(1):103–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Martin, Deborah. 2002. “Constructing the ‘Neighborhood Sphere’: Gender and Community Organizing.” Gender, Place and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography 9(4):333–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mookherjee, Monica. 2005. “Affective Citizenship: Feminism, Postcolonialism and the Politics of Recognition.” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 8(1):31–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Muehlebach, Anadrea. 2012. The Moral Neoliberal: Welfare and Citizenship in Italy. Chicago: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Newman, Janet, ed. 2005. Remaking Governance: Peoples, Politics and the Public Sphere. Polity: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
  31. Newman, Janer and Evelien Tonkens. 2011. Participation, Responsibility and Choice: Summoning the Active Citizen in Western European Welfare States. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Newman, Janet and John Clarke. 2009. Publics, Politics and Power: Remaking the Public in Public Services. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  33. Pares, Marc, Jordi Bonet-Marti and Marc Marti-Costa. 2012. Does Participation Really Matter in Urban Regeneration Policies? Exploring Governance Networks in Catalonia (Spain). Urban Affairs Review 48(2): 238–271.Google Scholar
  34. POSEIDON Partnership on Socio-Economic and Integrated Development of Neighbourhoods (2006) Neighbourhood Management Guide.Google Scholar
  35. Putnam, R. 2004. Better Together. Restoring the American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  36. —. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  37. Rose, Nicolas. 1999. Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Uitermark, Justus. 2014. “Integration and Control: The Governing of Urban Marginality in Western Europe.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 38(4):1418–1436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Uitermark, Justus and Jan Willem Duyvendak. 2008. “Citizen Participation in a Mediated Age: Neighborhood Governance in the Netherlands.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 32(1):114–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Van Gunsteren, Herman. 1998. A Theory of Citizenship: Organizing Plurality in Contemporary Democracies. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  41. Van Kempen, Ronald and Gideon Bolt 2009. “Social cohesion, social mix, and urban policies in the Netherlands.” Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 24(4): 457–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.AmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations