Searching for Minimalist Humanitarian Intervention Strategies in Global Security Policy

  • Wilfried von Bredow
Part of the Schriftenreihe des Zentrums für Militärgeschichte und Sozialwissenschaften der Bundeswehr book series (SZMSB, volume 14)


In July 2006, after the usual complex process of international and national decision-making, 780 German soldiers were deployed to the capital of the Democratic Republic of Congo Kinshasa and to Libreville in Gabon. They were part of EUFOR RD Congo which consisted of 2,400 soldiers from the armed forces of several EU countries.


Security Council Humanitarian Intervention Violent Conflict Military Intervention United Nations Security Council 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bellamy, Alex J. (2011): Libya and the Responsibility to Protect: The Exception and the Norm. Ethics and International Affairs, 25: 3, 263–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blin, Arnaud (2011): Armed Groups and Intra-State Conflicts: The Dawn of a New Era? International Review of the Red Cross, 93: 882, 287–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brummer, Klaus/Fröhlich, Stefan (2011): Zehn Jahre Deutschland in Afghanistan. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  4. Bundesministerium der Verteidigung (Ed.) (2006): White Paper on German Security Policy and the Future of the Bundeswehr. Berlin: BMVg.Google Scholar
  5. Caforio, Giuseppe (Ed.) (2007): Social Sciences and the Military. An Interdisciplinary Overview. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Chiari, Bernhard/Pahl, Magnus (Eds.) (2010): Auslandseinsätze der Bundeswehr. Paderborn: F. Schöningh Verlag.Google Scholar
  7. Christie, Ryerson (2012): The Pacification of Soldiering, and the Militarization of Development: Contradictions Inherent in Provincial Reconstruction in Afghanistan. Globalizations, 9: 1, 53–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Edmunds, Timothy (2003): Security Sector Reform: Concepts and Implementation. Germann/Edmunds 2003: 15–30.Google Scholar
  9. Foley, Conor (2008): The Thin Blue Line. How Humanitarianism Went to War. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  10. Frech, Siegfried/Trummer, Peter I. (Eds.) (2005): Neue Kriege. Akteure, Gewaltmärkte, Ökonomie. Schwalbach/Ts.: Wochenschau Verlag.Google Scholar
  11. Fürst, Henrik/Kümmel, Gerhard (Eds.) (2011): Core Values and the Expeditionary Mindset: Armed Forces in Metamorphosis. Baden-Baden: Nomos.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Galtung, Johan (1969): Violence, Peace and Peace Research. Journal of Peace Research, 6: 3, 167–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Germann, Wilhelm N./Edmunds, Timothy (Eds.) (2003): Towards Security Sector Reform in Post Cold War Europe. A Framework for Assessment. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlag.Google Scholar
  14. Hinnebusch, Raymond (2012): Syria: From ‘Authoritarian Upgrading’ to Revolution? International Affairs, 88: 1, 95–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hinsch, Wilfried/Janssen, Dieter (2006): Menschenrechte militärisch schützen. Ein Plädoyer für humanitäre Intervention. Munich: C. H. BeckGoogle Scholar
  16. Holzgrefe, J. L. (2003): The Humanitarian Intervention Debate. In: Holzgrefe/ Keohane 2003: 15–52.Google Scholar
  17. Holzgrefe, J. L./Keohane, Robert O. (Eds.) (2003): Humanitarian Intervention. Ethical, Legal, and Political Dimensions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Horsman, Mathew/Marshall, Andrew (1995): After the Nation-State. Citizens, Tribalism and the New World Disorder. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  19. International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty (ICISS) (2001): The Responsibility to Protect. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre.Google Scholar
  20. Jäger, Thomas/Kümmel, Gerhard (Eds.) (2007): Private Military and Security Companies. Chances, Problems, Pitfalls and Prospects. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kaldor, Mary (2003): Global Civil Society. An Answer to War. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  22. Kathman, Jacob D. (2011): Civil War Diffusion and Regional Motivations for Intervention. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 55: 6, 847–876.Google Scholar
  23. Krause, Keith (2012): Hybrid Violence: Locating the Use of Force in Postconflict Settings. Global Governance, 18: 1, 39–56.Google Scholar
  24. Kümmel, Gerhard (2011): Identity, Identity Shifts and Identity Politics: The German Soldier Facing a Pre-/Post-Westphalian World Risk Society, Ambitious National Politics, an Ambivalent Home Society and a Military under Stress. In: Fürst/ Kümmel 2011: 51–67.Google Scholar
  25. Kümmel, Gerhard (2012): Die Hybridisierung der Streitkräfte: Militärische Aufgaben im Wandel. In: Leonhard/Werkner 2012: 117–138.Google Scholar
  26. Leonhard, Nina/Werkner, Ines-Jacqueline (Eds.) (2012): Militärsoziologie – Eine Einführung. Revised Edition. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Moore, Jonathan (2007): Deciding Humanitarian Intervention. Social Research. An International Quarterly of Social Sciences, 74: 1, 169–200.Google Scholar
  28. Moskos, Charles C. (2000): Toward a Postmodern Military: The United States as a Paradigm. In: Moskos/Williams/Segal 2000: 14–31.Google Scholar
  29. Moskos ,Charles C./Williams, John Allen/Segal, David R. (Eds.) (2000): The Postmodern Military. Armed Forces after the Cold War. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Münkler, Herfried (2005): Die neuen Kriege. In: Frech/Trummer 2005: 13–32.Google Scholar
  31. Münkler, Herfried/Malowitz, Karsten (2008a): Humanitäre Intervention: Bedeutung, Entwicklung und Perspektiven eines umstrittenen Konzepts – Ein Überblick. In: Münkler/Malowitz 2008: 7–27.Google Scholar
  32. Münkler, Herfried (2008b): Humanitäre militärische Intervention. Eine politikwissenschaftliche Evaluation. In: Münkler/Malowitz 2008: 89–112.Google Scholar
  33. Münkler, Herfried/Malowitz, Karsten (Eds.) (2008): Humanitäre Intervention. Ein Instrument außenpolitischer Konfliktbearbeitung – Grundlagen und Diskussion. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  34. Rashid, Ahmed (2009): Descent into Chaos. The U.S. and the Disaster in Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Central Asia. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  35. Schmidseder, Karl (2003): Internationale Interventionen und Crisis Response Operations. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  36. Sedra, Mark/Burt, Geoff/Lawrence, Mike (2011): The Afghan Exit Strategy is Fraught with Peril. The Globe and Mail, 7 December 2011.Google Scholar
  37. Smith, Rupert (2007): The Utility of Force. The Art of War in the Modern World. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  38. United Nations, General Assembly (2005): World Summit Outcome, Doc A/60/L.1. Washington, D.C.: United Nations. summit outcome doc 2005(1).pdf (accessed 15 April 2012).
  39. van Creveld, Martin (1999): The Rise and Fall of the State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  40. van Creveld, Martin (2009): Gesichter des Krieges. Der Wandel bewaffneter Konflikte von 1900 bis heute. Munich: Siedler.Google Scholar
  41. von Bredow, Wilfried (1997): Global Street Workers? War and the Armed Forces in a Globalizing World. Defence Analysis, 13: 2, 169–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. von Bredow, Wilfried (2007): Conceptual Insecurity: New Wars, MOOTW, CRO, Terrorism, and the Military. In: Caforio 2007: 163–180.Google Scholar
  43. von Bredow, Wilfried (2011): Germany in Afghanistan. The Pitfalls of Peace- Building in National and International Perspective. Res Militaris, 2: 1. (accessed 25 April 2012).
  44. Weiss, Thomas G. (2011): RtoP Alive and Well after Libya. Ethics and International Affairs, 25: 3, 287–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Werthes, Sascha (2003): Probleme und Perspektiven von Sanktionen als politisches Instrument der Vereinten Nationen. Münster: LIT-Verlag.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wilfried von Bredow
    • 1
  1. 1.Philipps-UniversityMarburgGermany

Personalised recommendations