Skip to main content

Soldiers Drawn into Politics? Civil-Military Relations, Hybrid Military Spaces and the Future of Interventions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

In January 2012, a video depicting U.S. soldiers urinating on Afghan dead bodies was released. Mr George Little, a Pentagon spokesman, declared that the footage was “utterly deplorable”, and this was followed by similar statements by other high-ranking U.S. government officials (Bowley/Rosenberg 2012). The behavior of these soldiers had dramatic political consequences for the reputation of U.S. soldiers abroad and for their credibility and legitimacy in respect to military operations in Afghanistan.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ångström, Jan/Duyvesteyn, Isabelle (Eds.) (2010): Exploring the Utility of Force in Modern Conflict. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bland, Douglas (1999): A Unified Theory of Civil-Military Relations.Armed Forces & Society, 126: 1, 7–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowley, Graham/Rosenberg, Matthew (2012): Video Inflames a Delicate Moment for U.S. in Afghanistan.The New York Times, 12 January 2012.http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/13/world/asia/video-said-to-show-marines-urinating-on-taliban-corpses.html?_r=1 & pagewanted = al.

  • Burk, James (2002): Theories of Democratic Civil-Military Relations.Armed Forces & Society, 29: 1, 7–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caforio, Giuseppe/Dandeker, Christopher/Kümmel, Gerhard (Eds.) (2008): Armed Forces, Soldiers and Civil-Military Relations: Essays in Honor of Jürgen Kuhlmann. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clausewitz, Carl von (1976): On War. Edited and translated by Michael Howard and Peter Paret. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Eliot (2002): Supreme Command: Soldiers, Statesmen and Leadership in Wartime. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottey, Andrew/Edmunds, Timothy/Foster, Anthony (2002): The Second Generation Problematic: Rethinking Democracy and Civil-Military Relations.Armed Forces & Society, 29: 1, 31–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cottey, Andrew/Edmunds, Timothy/Forster, Anthony (Eds.) (2002): Democratic Control of the Military in Postcommunist Europe. Guarding the Guards. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dandeker, Christopher (2006): Surveillance and Military Transformation: Organizational Trends in Twenty First Century Armed Services. In: Haggerty/Ericson 2006: 225–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dandeker, Christopher (2010): From Victory to Success: The Changing Mission of Western Armed Forces. In: Ångström/Duyvesteyn 2010: 16–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dandeker, Christopher/Gow, James (1997): The Future of Peace Support Operations. Strategic Peacekeeping and Success.Armed Forces & Society, 23: 3, 327–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desch, Michael (1999): Civilian Control of the Military: The Changing Security Environment. Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feaver, Peter D. (1999): Civil-Military Relations.Annual Review of Political Science, 2, 211–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haas, Harald/Kernic, Franz/Plaschke, Andrea (Eds.) (2012): Leadership in Challenging Situations. Frankfurt a. M.: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggerty, Kevin D./Ericson, Richard V. (Eds.) (2006): The New Politics of Surveillance and Visibility. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haltiner, Karl/Kümmel, Gerhard (2008): The Hybrid Soldier: Identity Changes in the Military. In: Caforio/Dandeker/Kümmel 2008: 75–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, Samuel (1957): The Soldier and the State: The Theory and Politics of Civil-Military Relations. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janowitz, Morris (1960): The Professional Soldier: A Social and Political Portrait. London: The Free Press of Glencoe Collier Macmillan Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, Simon (2002): Strategic Corporal or Tactical Colonel? Anchoring the Right Variable.Defense and Security Analysis, 19: 2, 189–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krulak, Charles C. (1999): The Strategic Corporal: Leadership in the Three Block War.Marine Corps Gazette, 83: 5, 18–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyall, Jason/Wilson, Isaiah (2009): Rage Against the Machines: Explaining Outcomes in Counterinsurgency Wars.International Organization, 63: 1, 67–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, Patrick (2012): A Matter of Choice: Strategy and Discretion in the Shadow of World War Two.Journal of Strategic Studies, 35: 3, 317–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resteigne, Delphine/Soeters Joseph (2009): Managing Military.Armed Forces & Society, 35: 2, 307–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, Frederik (2010): Moving Beyond the Security-Development Nexus. Third Generation Civil-Military Relations.PRISM Paper, 2: 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruffa, Chiara (2012a): Afghan War Lessons.The Diplomat, 7 March 2012,http://www.thediplomat.com/flashpoints-blog/2012/03/07/afghan-war-lessons/.

  • Ruffa, Chiara (2012b): What Kind of Military Leadership for What Kind of Operation? Assessing ‘Mission Command’ in Peace Operations and Counterinsurgencies. In: Haas/Kernic/Plaschke 2012: 183–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Rupert (2005): The Utility of Force – The Art of War in the Modern World. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strachan, Hew (2006): Making Strategy: Civil-Military Relations after Iraq.Survival, 48: 3, 59–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tootal, Stuart (2010): Danger Close The True Story of Helmand from the Leader of 3 PARA. John Murray Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uppsala University, Department of Peace and Conflict Research (2012): Uppsala Conflict Data Program. UCDP Conflict Encyclopedia. Uppsala.http://www. ucdp.uu.se/database (accessed 10 September 2012).

  • Vennesson, Pascal (2003): Civil-Military Relations in France: Is there a Gap?Journal of Strategic Studies, 26: 2, 29–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vennesson, Pascal (2009): Military Strategy in the Global Village.New Global Studies, 3: 1.http://www.bepress.com/ngs/vol3/iss3/art1.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ruffa, C., Dandeker, C., Vennesson, P. (2013). Soldiers Drawn into Politics? Civil-Military Relations, Hybrid Military Spaces and the Future of Interventions. In: Kümmel, G., Giegerich, B. (eds) The Armed Forces: Towards a Post-Interventionist Era?. Schriftenreihe des Zentrums für Militärgeschichte und Sozialwissenschaften der Bundeswehr, vol 14. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-01286-1_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics