Skip to main content

First experimental study: A second look at expectations as reference points – the domain of losses

  • Chapter
Reference-Dependent Preferences
  • 656 Accesses

Abstract

Reference dependency has a long tradition in psychology (Lewin et al., 1944, Siegel, 1957) and it has been applied in behavioral economics with Kahneman and Tversky’s prospect theory. Following Kahneman and Tversky (1979), whether a decision outcome is perceived as a gain or as a loss compared with a subjective reference point has a strong influence on risk attitudes (Hack & Lam-mers, 2008). In principle, individuals show risk aversion in the gain domain and risk-seeking behavior in the loss domain, as well as a significantly greater aver-sion to losses than an appreciation of gains. The literature that examines the individual reference point is relatively poorly conceived, although it is vital to define what constitutes a reference point.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stommel, E. (2013). First experimental study: A second look at expectations as reference points – the domain of losses. In: Reference-Dependent Preferences. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-00635-8_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics