Advertisement

Der Einsatz von Mobiltelefonen in der Umfrageforschung Methoden zur Verbesserung der Datenqualität

  • Marek Fuchs
Chapter
Part of the Schriftenreihe der ASI - Arbeitsgemeinschaft Sozialwissenschaftlicher Institute book series (SASI)

Zusammenfassung

Seit ihren Anfängen ist die Umfragemethodologie – nicht nur in Deutschland – einem stetigen Wandel unterworfen. Zwar gibt und gab es Längsschnittuntersuchungen, in denen eingeführte Methoden kontinuierlich angewendet werden, um bevölkerungsrepräsentative oder einzelne Teilgrup pen abbildende Schätzungen vornehmen zu können: zum Beispiel das European Social Survey, das Sozio-oekonomische Panel, der ALLBUS, um Studien aus dem Feld der akademischen Sozialforschung zu nennen, oder die Media-Analyse als Beispiel für eine in den privaten Instituten über Jahre mit relativ konstantem Design durchgeführte Untersuchung.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. AAPOR (2011): Standard definitions. Final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys: AAPOR.Google Scholar
  2. Blumberg, S. J.; Luke, J. V.; Ganesh, N.; Davern, M. E.; Boudreaux, M. H.; Soderberg, K. (2011): Wireless substitution: State-level estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, January 2007–June 2010. Washington, D.C.: National Center for Health Statistics.Google Scholar
  3. Beukenhorst, D.; Giesen, D. (2010): Internet use for data collection at Statistics Netherlands. Paper presented at the 2nd International Workshop on Internet Survey Methods.Google Scholar
  4. Brick, J. M.; Brick, P. D.; Dipko, S.; Presser, S.; Tucker, C.; Yuan, Y. (2007): Cell phone survey feasibility in the U.S.: Sampling and calling cell numbers versus landline numbers. Public Opinion Quarterly, 71(1), 23-39.Google Scholar
  5. Busse, B.; Fuchs, M. (2012): The components of landline telephone survey coverage bias. The relative importance of no-phone and mobile-only populations. Quality & Quantity, 46(4), 1209-1225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Conrad, F. G.; Schober, M. (2008): Envisioning the survey interview of the future. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  7. Couper, M. P. (2011): The future of modes of data collection. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75(5), 889-908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Daas, P.; Roos, M.; de Blois, C.; Hoekstra, R.; ten Bosch, O.; Ma, Y. (2011): New data sources for statistics: Experiences at Statistics Netherlands. Paper presented at the NTTS - Conferences on New Techniques and Technologies for Statistics.Google Scholar
  9. de Leeuw, E. D.; De Heer, W. (2002): Trends in household survey nonresponse: A longitudinal and international comparison. In R. M. Groves, D. A. Dillman, J. L. Eltinge & R. J. A. Little (Eds.), Survey nonresponse (pp. 41-54): New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  10. de Leeuw, E. D.; Hox, J. J. (2010): Internet surveys as part of a mixed-mode design. In M. Das, P. Ester & L. Kaczmirek (Eds.), Social and Behavioral research and the internet (pp. 45-76): New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Dillman, D. A.; Christian, L. M. (2005): Survey mode as a source of instability in responses across surveys. Field Methods, 17(1), 30-52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dillman, D. A.; Phelps, G.; Tortora, R. D.; Swift, K.; Kohrell, J.; Berck, J. et al. (2009): Response rate and measurement differences in mixed-mode surveys using mail, telephone, interactive voice response (IVR) and the Internet. Social Science Research, 38, 1-18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fuchs, M. (2007): Mobile Web Survey. Möglichkeiten der Verknüpfung von Online-Befragung und Handy-Befragung. ZUMA-Nachrichten Spezial (13), 105-126.Google Scholar
  14. Fuchs, M. (2008a): Mobile Web Survey: A preliminary discussion of methodological implications. In F. G. Conrad & M. F. Schober (Eds.), Envisioning the survey interview of the future (pp. 77-94): New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  15. Fuchs, M. (2008b): Total survey error. In P. J. Lavrakas (Ed.), Encyclopedia of survey research methods (Vol. 2, pp. 896-902): Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  16. Fuchs, M.; Busse, B. (2009): The coverage bias of mobile Web surveys across European countries. International Journal of Internet Science, 4(1), 21-33.Google Scholar
  17. Gabler, S.; Ayhan, Ö. (2007): Gewichtung bei der Erhebung im Festnetz und über Mobilfunk. Ein Dual Frame Ansatz. ZUMA-Nachrichten Spezial (13), 39-46.Google Scholar
  18. Groves, R. M. (2006): Nonresponse rates and nonresponse bias in household surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 70(5), 646-675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Groves, R. M.; Peytcheva, E. (2008): The impact of nonresponse rates on nonresponse bias. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72(2), 167-189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Häder, M.; Häder, S. (Eds.): (2009): Telefonbefragungen über das Mobilfunknetz. Konzept, Design und Umsetzung einer Strategie zur Datenerhebung. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.Google Scholar
  21. Harrison, C. H. (2005): Coverage error. In S. J. Best & B. Radcliff (Eds.), Polling America: An encyclopedia of public opinion (Vol. 1, pp. 134-140): Westpost: Greenwood.Google Scholar
  22. Hofmann, H. (2007): Kombinierte Stichproben für Telefonumfragen - Ansätze in Europa. ZUMA-Nachrichten Spezial (13), 47-58.Google Scholar
  23. Keeter, S.; Kennedy, C.; Clark, A.; Tompson, T.; Mokrzycki, M. (2007): What‘s missing from national landline RDD surveys? The impact of the growing cell-only population. Public Opinion Quarterly, 71(5), 772-792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kennedy, C. (2007): Evaluating the effects of screening for telephone service in dual frame RDD surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 71(5), 750-771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kersten, H. M. P.; Bethlehem, J. G. (1984): Exploring and Reducing the Nonresponse Bias By Asking the Basic Question. The Statistical Journal of the United Nations Commission for Europe, 2, 369-380.Google Scholar
  26. Kunz, T.; Fuchs, M. (2011): Pre-call validation of RDD cell phone numbers. A field experiment. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Association for Public Opinion Research.Google Scholar
  27. Lepkowski, J. M.; Tucker, C.; Brick, J. M.; De Leeuw, E. D.; Japec, L.; Lavrakas, P. J. et al. (Eds.): (2008): Advances in telephone survey methodology. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  28. Link, M. W.; Mokdad, A. (2005): Advance letters as a means of improving respondent cooperation in random digit dial studies. A multistate experiment. Public Opinion Quarterly, 69(4), 572-587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Link, M. W.; Battaglia, M. P.; Frankel, M. R.; Osborn, L.; Mokdad, A. (2007): Reaching the U.S. cell phone generation. Comparison of cell phone survey results with an ongoing landline telephone survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 71(5), 814-839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lynn, P.; Kaminska, O. (2010): The impact of mobile phones on survey measurement error. Paper presented at the Mobile Research Conference 2010.Google Scholar
  31. Miller, G. (2011): Social scientists wade into the tweet stream. Science, News & Analysis, 333, 1814-1815.Google Scholar
  32. Peytchev, A. (2011): Breakoff and unit nonresponse across web surveys. Journal of Official Statistics, 27(1), 33-47.Google Scholar
  33. Peytchev, A.; Carley-Baxter, L. R.; Black, M. C. (2010): Coverage bias in variances, associations, and total error from exclusion of the cell phone-only population in the United States. Social Science Computer Review, 28(3), 287-302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Peytchev, A.; Hill, C. A. (2010): Experiments in mobile web survey design. Similarities to other modes and unique considerations. Social Science Computer Review, 28(3), 319-335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Raento, M.; Oulasvirta, A.; Eagle, N. (2009): Smartphones: An emerging tool for social scientists. Sociological Methods Research, 37(3), 426-454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schlinzig, T.; Schneiderat, G. (2009): Möglichkeiten zur Erhöhung der Teilnahmebereitschaft bei Telefonumfragen über Festnetz und Mobilfunk. Zum Potenzial von Warmkontakt und randomisierter Geburtstagsauswahl. In M. Weichbold, J. Bacher & C. Wolf (Eds.), Umfrageforschung. Herausforderungen und Grenzen (pp. 21-44): Meppel: Krips b.v.Google Scholar
  37. Schneiderat, G.; Schlinzig, T. (2009): Teilnahmebereitschaft und Teilnahmeverhalten bei Telefonumfragen in der Allgemeinen Bevölkerung über das Mobilfunknetz. In M. Häder, S. Häder (Eds.), Telefonbefragungen über das Mobilfunknetz. Konzept, Design und Umsetzung einer Strategie zur Datenerhebung (pp. 83-98): Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.Google Scholar
  38. Steeh, C.; Buskirk, T. D.; Callegaro, M. (2007): Using text messages in U.S. mobile phone surveys. Field Methods, 19(1), 59-75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Stieger, S.; Reips, U. D. (2005): Dynamic Interviewing Program (DIP): Automatic online interviews via the instant messenger ICQ. Paper presented at the General Online Research Conference (GOR):Google Scholar
  40. Vannieuwenhuyze, J.; Loosveldt, G.; Molenberghs, G. (2010): A method for evaluating mode effects in mixed-mode surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 74(5), 1027-1045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Vehovar, V.; Berzelak, N.; Manfreda, K. L. (2010): Mobile phones in an environment of competing survey modes: Applying metric for evaluation of costs and errors. Social Science Computer Review, 28(3), 303-318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Virtanen, V.; Sirkiä, T.; Jokiranta, V. (2007): Reducing nonresponse by SMS reminders in mail surveys. Social Science Computer Review, 25(3), 384-395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Weeks, M. F.; Kulka, R. A.; Pierson, S. A. (1987): Optimal call scheduling for a telephone survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 51(4), 540-549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wilmot, A.; Dewar, A. (2006): Developing harmonised questions for use in a mixed-mode data collection environment. Survey Methodology Bulletin, Special Edition, 58, 75-89.Google Scholar
  45. Wolter, K. M.; Smith, P.; Blumberg, S. J. (2010): Statistical foundations of cell-phone surveys. Survey Methodology, 36(2), 203-215.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marek Fuchs
    • 1
  1. 1.Technische Universität DarmstadtDarmstadtDeutschland

Personalised recommendations