Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Zukunft der Arbeitswelt 2030 als Herausforderung des Personalmanagements

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbuch Strategisches Personalmanagement

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Adams, J. (1976). The Structure and Dynamics of Behavior in Organizational Boundary Roles. In M. Dunnette (Hrsg.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, H., & Herker, D. (1977). Boundary Spanning: Managing External Dependence in Product Development Teams. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 1(2), 119–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, J., & Robertson, I. (1995). Work Psychology (3 Aufl.). London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, E. (2009). Top Executives? Work Relationship and Work-Family Balance. Wiesbaden.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barkow, T. (2004). The Future of Work. Public Relations Tactics, 11(7), 26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, B., & Kozlowski, S. (2002). A Typology of Virtual Teams – Implications For Effective Leadership. Group and Organization Management, 27(1), 14–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruhn, M., & Hadwich, K. (2011). Forum Dienstleistungsmanagement: Dienstleistungsproduktivität. Wiesbaden.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, S., Farmer, S., & Fedor, D. (2008). The Influence of Age on Volunteer Contributions in a Nonprofit Organization. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29(3), 311–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chubb, L. (2008). Constructing the Future of Work Beyond Age Barriers. People Management, 14(11), 12–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, A., & Blass, E. (2007). The Future Workplace: Views from the Floor. Futures, 39(1), 38–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, G., & Shoemaker, P. (2005). Scanning the Periphery. Harvard Business Review, 83(11), 135–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. (2001). Multidimensional Constructs in Organizational Behavior Research: An Integrative Analytical Framework. Organizational Research Methods, 4(2), 144–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fennel, M., & Alexander, J. (1987). Organizational Boundary Spanning in Institutionalized Environments. Academy of Management Journal, 30(3), 456–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, L. (1954). Kant’s Theory of Time. The Review of Metaphysics, 7(3), 379–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A. (2000). Work in 2020 – Prognostications about the World of Work 20 Years into the Millennium. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 15(3), 242–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabler Verlag (Hrsg.). (2010). Gabler Wirtschaftslexikon, Stichwort: Industrie, online im Internet. http://wirtschaftslexikon.gabler.de/Archiv/10387/industrie-v5.html. Zugegriffen: 08.10.2010.

  • Handy, C. (1980). The Changing Shape of Work. Organizational Dynamics, 9(2), 26–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harpaz, I., & Fu, X. (2002). The Structure of the Meaning of Work: A Relative Stability Amidst Change. Human Relations, 55(6), 639–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hungenberg, H., & Wulf, T. (2011). Grundlagen der Unternehmensführung: Einführung für Bachelorstudierende (4. Aufl.). Berlin.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jaworski, B., & Kohli, A. (1993). Market Orientation: Antecedents and Consequences. Journal of Marketing, 57(3), 53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1787). Critique of Pure Reason, Trans. J.M.D. Meiklejohn. http://worldlibrary.net/eBooks/WorldeBookLibrary.com/critiquepurereason.htm. Zugegriffen: 22.02.2010.

  • Kocka, J. (2001). Thesen zur Geschichte und Zukunft der Arbeit. Politik und Zeitgeschichte, B21, 8–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreibich, R. (2007). Zukunftstechnologien und Innovationen 2030 – Konsequenzen für die berufliche Bildung, Zukunft berufliche Bildung – BIBB-Fachkongress 2007, Institut für Zukunftsmedien und Technologiebewertung. Berlin/Düsseldorf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, M. (2005). Organizational Buffering: Managing Boundaries and Cores. Organization Studies, 26(1), 37–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinovits-Wiesendanger, A. (2002), Einstellungen zur Arbeit und Freizeit im Zeitverlauf: Ergebnisse aus UNIVOX Gesellschaftsmonitoring Studien, GfS-Forschungsinstitut, Wirtschaftsforschung und Sozialmarketing, Zürich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis (2. Aufl.). Thousand Oaks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortensen, M., & Hinds, P. (2001). Conflict and Shared Identity in Geographically Distributed Teams. International Journal of Conflict Management, 12(3), 212–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, J. (1977). Developments of a Measure of Perceived Work Environment (PWE). Academy of Management Journal, 20(4), 520–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pomeroy, A. (2007). The Future is Now. HR Magazin, (September), 46–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajeswari, K., & Anantharaman, R. (2005). Role of Human-Computer Interaction Factors as Moderators of Occupational Stress and Work Exhaustion. International Journal of Human Computer Interaction, 19(1), 137–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothlin, P., & Werder, P. (2008). Boreout! Overcoming Workplace Demotivation. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos, F., & Eisenhardt, K. (2005). Organizational Boundaries and Theories of Organization. Organization Science, 16(5), 491–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaffers, H., Brodt, T., Palot, M., & Prinz, W. (2006). The Future Workspace: Perspectives on Mobile and Collaborative Working. Netherlands: Telematica Institut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoemaker, P. (1995). Scenario Planning: A Tool for Strategic Thinking. Sloan Management Review, 36(2), 25–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. (1981). Organizations: Rational, Natural and Open Systems. Englewood Cliffs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shally, C., Gilson, L., & Blum, T. (2000). Matching Creativity Requirements and the Work Environment: Effects on Satisfaction and Intentions to Leave. Academy of Management Journal, 43(2), 215–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, Y. (2004). A Person-Environment Fit Model for Virtual Organizations. Journal of Management, 30(5), 725–743.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sine, W., Mitsuhashi, H., & Kirsch, D. (2006). Revisiting Burns and Stalker: Formal Structure and New Venture Performance in Emerging Economic Sectors. Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 121–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparrow, P. (2000). New Employee Behaviours, Work Designs and Forms of Work Organization: What is in Store for the Future of Work? Journal of Managerial Psychology, 15(3), 202–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stock-Homburg, R. (2010). Personalmanagement: Theorien – Konzepte – Instrumente (2. Aufl.). Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stock-Homburg, R. (2010). How does product program innovativeness affect customer satisfaction? A comparison of goods and services. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(6), 813–827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundaramurthy, D., & Kreiner, G. (2008). Governing by managing identity boundaries: the case of family businesses. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 32(3), 415–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutcliffe, K., & Zaheer, A. (1998). Uncertainty in the transaction environment: an empirical test. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tandler, T., & Streitz, N. (2002). Roomware – moving toward ubiquitious computers. IEEE Micro, (November/December), 36–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thatcher, S., & Zhu, X. (2006). Changing identities in a changing workplace: identification, identity enactment, self-verification, and telecommuting. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 1076–1088.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, A. M., DeMarie, S. M., & Hendrickson, A. R. (1998). Virtual teams: technology and the workplace of the future. Academy of Management Perspective, 12(3), 17–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veen, S., & Backes-Gellner, U. (2009). Betriebliche Altersstrukturen und Produktivitätseffekte. In U. Backes-Gellner, & S. Veen (Hrsg.), Altern, Arbeit und Betrieb (S. 29–64). Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verity, J. (2003). Scenario planning as a strategy technique. European Business Journal, 15(4), 185–195.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Technische Universität Darmstadt, Hochschulstr. 1, 64289, Darmstadt, Deutschland

    Ruth Stock-Homburg Prof. Dr.

Authors
  1. Ruth Stock-Homburg Prof. Dr.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ruth Stock-Homburg Prof. Dr. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Technische Universität Darmstadt, Hochschulstr. 1, Darmstadt, 64289, Germany

    Ruth Stock-Homburg

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stock-Homburg, R. (2013). Zukunft der Arbeitswelt 2030 als Herausforderung des Personalmanagements. In: Stock-Homburg, R. (eds) Handbuch Strategisches Personalmanagement. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-00431-6_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-00431-6_32

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-00430-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-00431-6

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation