Future Trends in Finance Shared Services Organisations

  • Frank Helbing
  • Thilo Rau
  • Alexander Riedel


Shared Services Organisations are viewed as an important driver to improve efficiency and achieve cost-savings for finance and accounting functions. In theory, Shared Services provide a clear set of benefits: Cost reductions, better services and increasing efficiency of resources. Today, more than 90 % of all large multinational Western companies already operate Shared Service Centres (SSCs).


Future Trend Parent Company Business Unit International Financial Reporting Standard Optical Character Recognition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. AKSIN, Z./MASINI, A.(2008): Effective Strategies for Internal Outsourcing and Offshoring of Business Services: An empirical investigation, in: Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 26 (2008), pp. 239–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. BALDWIN, C./CLARK, K. B.(2000): Design Rules: The Power of Modularity, Cambridge (MA) 2000.Google Scholar
  3. BERGERON, B.(2003): Essentials of Shared Services, Hoboken (NJ) 2003.Google Scholar
  4. CORBETT, M.(2004): The Outsourcing Revolution – Why it makes sense and how to do it right. Chicago (IL) 2004.Google Scholar
  5. DAVENPORT, T.(2005): The Coming Commoditization of Processes, in: Harvard Business Review, June 2005, pp. 100–108.Google Scholar
  6. DPR (2012): Tätigkeitsbericht 2011, online:, date visited: 22/06/2012.
  7. DRESSLER, S. (2007): Shared Services, Business Process Outsourcing und Offshoring, Wiesbaden 2007.Google Scholar
  8. DÜRR, A.(2001): Soziale Verantwortlichkeit in globalen Produktionsnetzwerken: Erkenntnisse aus der Bekleidungsindustrie, Berlin 2001.Google Scholar
  9. EIU (2012): The Economist Intelligence Unit: Data tool, online: aspx, date visited: 27/06/2012.
  10. EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2011): Textiles and Footwear, online:, date visited: 17/07/2012.
  11. FARRELL, D.(2004): Beyond Offshoring: Assess Your Company’s Global Potential, in: Harvard Business Review, Vol. 82 (2004), No. 12, pp. 82–90.Google Scholar
  12. FÜLBIER, R./KUSCHEL, P.(2012): Komplexitätszunahme in der IFRS-Rechnungslegung? – Versuche der Systematisierung und indikatorbasierten Messung, in: Der Betrieb, No. 17 (2012), pp. 929–937.Google Scholar
  13. GHEMAWAT, P.(1985): Building Strategy on the Experience Curve, in: Harvard Business Review, Vol. 63 (1985), No. 2, pp. 143–149.Google Scholar
  14. GOLDMAN SACHS (2010): Die BRICS nehmen Fahrt auf, online: http://www.goldmansachs. com/gsam/docs/funds_international/brochures_and_sales_aids/fund_literature/rb_brics_de.pdf, date visited: 25/06/2012.
  15. HAMEL, G./PRAHALAD, C. K.(1994): Competing for the Future, Boston (MA) 1994). HIRSCHMANN, W. B.(1964): Profit from the learning curve. In: Harvard Business Review, Jan/Feb 1964, pp. 125–139.Google Scholar
  16. IDW (2007): Importe – Der Konkurrenzdruck steigt. Pressemitteilung 14/2007, Köln.Google Scholar
  17. IDW (2011): Presseinformation, online:, date visited: 25/06/2012.
  18. INTEL (2005): Moore’s Law, online: Materials/Moores_Law_2pg.pdf, date visited: 25/06/2012.
  19. KAKABADSE, A./KAKABADSE, N.(2002): Trends in Outsourcing – Contrasting USA and Europe, in: European Management Journal, Vol 20 (2002), No. 2, p. 189–198.Google Scholar
  20. KÜTING, K.(2012a): HGB oder IFRS?, in: Der Betrieb, No. 13 (2012), p. 1.Google Scholar
  21. KÜTING, K.(2012b): Zur Komplexität der Rechnungslegungssysteme nach HGB und IFRS, in: Der Betrieb, No. 6 (2012), pp. 297–304.Google Scholar
  22. LOITZ, R./GLASNER, K.(2011): Embedded Accounting, in: Der Betrieb, 2011, p. 2789–2797.Google Scholar
  23. MARKT-DATEN (2012): Daten Chart/Download, online: djia.txt, date visited: 25/06/2012.
  24. MEYER, H./BRAUN, R. (2010): Fair Value als Treiber der Komplexität von IFRS, in: Betriebs Berater, No. 30, 2010, pp. 1779–1782.Google Scholar
  25. NIXON, SD (2009): U.S. National Security in New Times, in: Frontiers of Engineering: Reports on Leading-Edge Engineering from the 2008 Symposium, 2009, National Academy of Engineering, Washington, p. 127-132.Google Scholar
  26. PIERCY, N. F./LANE, N.(2005): Strategic Imperatives for Transformation in the Conventional Sales Organization, in: Journal of Change Management, Vol. 5 (2005), No. 3, p. 249–266.Google Scholar
  27. PORTER, M. E.(1979): How Competitive Forces Shape Strategy, in: Harvard Business Review, March/April 1979, p. 137–145.Google Scholar
  28. ROGERS, P./SAENZ, H.(2007): Make Your Back Office an Accelerator, in: Harvard Business Review, March 2007, Vol. 85 (2007), No. 3, p. 30.Google Scholar
  29. SAKO, M.(2010): Outsourcing versus Shared Services, in: Communications of the ACM, Vol. 53 (2010), No. 7, p. 27–29.Google Scholar
  30. SIEMENS (2012): FAQ – Siemens Global Website, online: index/faq.htm, date visited: 01/06/2012.
  31. STATISTISCHES BUNDESAMT (2012a): Bevölkerungsstatistiken, online: DE/ZahlenFakten/GesellschaftStaat/StaatGesellschaft.html, date visited: 23/03/2012.
  32. STATISTISCHES BUNDESAMT (2012b): Absolventenstatistik, online:, date visited: 25/06/2012.
  33. THOMPSON, J. D.(1967): Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory, New York (NY) 1967.Google Scholar
  34. UN (2012): The United Nations at a Glance, online: shtml, date visited: 01/06/2012.
  35. WALTER, C.(2005): Kryder’s Law, in: Scientific American Magazine, No. 8 (2005), pp. 32–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. WOMACK, J. P./JONES, D. T./ROOS, D.(2007): The Machine That Changed the World, New York (NY) 2007.Google Scholar
  37. WORLDBANK RESEARCH CENTER (2012): Data by indicators, online:, date visited: 23/03/2012.
  38. WPK (2011): Stellungnahme zur IASB Agenda Consultation, online: WPK-Stellungnahme_21-11-2011.pdf.

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft AGKPMGMünchenGermany

Personalised recommendations