Skip to main content

The four cases and their outcomes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
EU Regulatory Decision Making and the Role of the United States
  • 544 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

The four cases analyzed in part two have a surprising outcome: only in one case (Metric Labeling) did U.S. pressure cause a complete withdrawal of a planned European directive. The remaining three cases have illustrated how the EU unilaterally adopted new regulations while showing little consideration for U.S. economic interests or regulatory cooperation respectively. This is a most surprising result as critical voices in IPE would have predicted a much more influential role of U.S. economic interests in the European decision making process. In two of the cases (WEEE, ODS), the U.S. government had the majority of business actors as well as major EU Member States on its side, but still failed to change the European regulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ziegler, O. (2013). The four cases and their outcomes. In: EU Regulatory Decision Making and the Role of the United States. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-00054-7_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics