Zusammenfassung
The four cases analyzed in part two have a surprising outcome: only in one case (Metric Labeling) did U.S. pressure cause a complete withdrawal of a planned European directive. The remaining three cases have illustrated how the EU unilaterally adopted new regulations while showing little consideration for U.S. economic interests or regulatory cooperation respectively. This is a most surprising result as critical voices in IPE would have predicted a much more influential role of U.S. economic interests in the European decision making process. In two of the cases (WEEE, ODS), the U.S. government had the majority of business actors as well as major EU Member States on its side, but still failed to change the European regulation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ziegler, O. (2013). The four cases and their outcomes. In: EU Regulatory Decision Making and the Role of the United States. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-00054-7_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-00054-7_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-00053-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-00054-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)