Physical and Histological Differences between Human Fibular and Femoral Compact Bone

  • F. G. Evans
  • S. Bang


Although there is a voluminous literature on the histology of bone, its physical properties have been studied far less extensively and there are even fewer attempts to relate the physical properties of bone to its histological structure.


Collagen Fiber Ultimate Tensile Strength Tensile Strain Compact Bone Histological Structure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aoji, O.: Metrical studies on the lamellar structure of human long bones. J. Kyoto Prefect. Med. Univ. 65, 941–965 (1959) [Japanese with English summary].Google Scholar
  2. Ascenzi, A., and E. Bonvccl: The ultimate tensile strength of single osteones. Acta anat. (Basel) 58, 160–183 (1964).Google Scholar
  3. Cohen, J., and W. H. Harris: The three-dimensional anatomy of Haversian systems. J. Bone Jt Surg. A 40, 419–434 (1958).Google Scholar
  4. Currey, J. D.: Differences in the tensile strength of bone of different histological types. J. Anat. (Lond.) 93, 87–95 (1959).Google Scholar
  5. Dempster, W. T., and R. F. Coleman: Tensile strength of bone along and across the grain. J. appl. Physiol. 16, 355–360 (1961).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Eastoe, J. E.: The organic matrix of bone. In: The biochemistry and physiology of bone, p. 81–105 [G. H. Bourne(ed.)]. New York: Academic Press 1956.Google Scholar
  7. Evans, F. G.: Relations between the microscopic structure and tensile strength of human bone. Acta anat. (Basel) 35, 285–301 (1958).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Evans, F. G.,and C. C. Coolbaugh, and M. Lebow: An apparatus for determining bone density by means of radioactive strontium (Sr90). Science 114, 182–185 (1951).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Evans, F. G.,and C. C. Coolbaugh, and M. Lebow, and M. Lebow: Regional differences in some physical properties of the human femur. J. appl. Physiol. 3, 563–572 (1951).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Filogamo, G.: La forme et la taille des ostéones chez quelques mammifères. Arch. Biol. (Liège) 57, 137–143 (1946).Google Scholar
  11. Maj, G.: Osservazioni nulle differenze topografiche della resistenza meccanica del tessuto osseo di uno stesso segmento schelectrico. Monit. zool. ital. 49, 139–149 (1938).Google Scholar
  12. Maj, G., E. Toajari: Osservazioni sperimentali sul meccanismo di resistenze del tessuto osseo lamellare compatto alle azioni meccaniche. Chir. Organi Mov. 22, 541–557 (1937).Google Scholar
  13. Olivo, O. M.: Rispondenza della funzione meccanica varia degli osteoni con la loro diversa minuta architettura. Boll. Soc. ital. Biol. Sper. 12, 400–401 (1937).Google Scholar
  14. Toajari, E.: Resistenza meccanica ed elasticità del tessuto osseo studiata in rapporto alla minuta struttura. Monit. zool. ital. 48 (1938).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg 1966

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. G. Evans
  • S. Bang

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations