Workplace Skill Accumulation and its Impact on Earnings and Labor Mobility: The U.S. Experience

  • Lisa M. Lynch
Conference paper

Abstract

This paper shifts the discussion in this conference from issues related to human capital creation provided by formal education, to the determinants and outcomes of human capital accumulation that occurs in the workplace after formal schooling has been completed. In recent years this type of human capital creation has received an increasing amount of attention in the U.S. for three main reasons. First, growing international competition has forced firms around the world to identify ways in which they can increase the productivity of their labor inputs. Since labor productivity growth has been much slower in the U.S. than in other countries policies which might stimulate higher productivity growth in the U.S. are viewed as crucial for economic competitiveness. Second, rapid changes in technology, especially in the area of information technology, have resulted in the massive retraining of workers and substantial changes in the skill requirements of workers. This has been felt in all sectors but particularly in industries such as telecommunications. Finally, changing work organizations associated with the switch to “just-in-time” production from “just-in-case” production has resulted in workers rotating through a wider number of jobs. Consequently, they are being trained on-the-job in a wider set of skills. In addition, as firms decrease the number of layers within the organization and push more decisions down on to the line, workers need to have broader abilities to take on these new responsibilities.

Keywords

Europe Transportation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Becker, G. (1964), Human Capital. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Blanchflower, D. and L.M. Lynch (1991), “Training at Work: A Comparison of U.S. and British Youths”, in Lynch, L.M. (ed.), Private-Sector Training: International Comparisons. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  3. Cameron, S. and J. Heckman (1991), The Non-Equivalence of High School Equivalents. University of Chicago. Mimeo.Google Scholar
  4. Fowler, E. (1990), “Shortage of Skilled Workers Is Expected”, New York Times, 31 July.Google Scholar
  5. Heckman, J. (1979), “Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error”, Econometrica, Vol. 47, pp. 153 - 161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Heckman, J. and R. Robb (1986), “Alternative Identifying Assumptions in Econometric Models of Selection Bias”, in Slottje, D. (ed.), Advances in Econometrics, Vol. 5. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  7. Lynch, L.M. (1992a), “Private-Sector Training and the Earnings of Young Workers”, American Economic Review, Vol. 82, pp. 299 - 312.Google Scholar
  8. Lynch, L.M. (1992b), Differential Effects of Post-School Training on Early Career Mobility. NBER Working Paper No. 4034.Google Scholar
  9. Lynch, L.M. (ed.) (1992c), Private-Sector Training: International Comparisons. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  10. Lynch, L.M. (1992d), Young People’s Pathways into Work: Utilization of Postsecondary Education and Training. Report submitted to the National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  11. Mincer, J. (1974), Schooling, Experience and Earnings. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Weiss, A. and R. Wang (1990), A Sorting Model of Labor Contracts: Implications for Layoffs and Wage-Tenure Profiles. Boston University. Mimeo.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lisa M. Lynch
    • 1
  1. 1.Sloan School of ManagementMITCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations