Skip to main content

Pelvis

  • Chapter
Clinical MR Imaging
  • 154 Accesses

Abstract

Magnetic Resonance (MR) imaging is established as the investigation of choice for most neurological and musculoskeletal imaging. Its role in body imaging is less well established, but up-to-date machinery allows good quality, and reproducible images can be obtained from most parts of the body. In general, MR imaging of the pelvis is well-researched, presents few technical problems and is rapidly gaining acceptance as the technique of choice in many clinical situations, particularly in urological and gynecological oncology. The pelvis is sufficiently distant from the diaphragm that respiration artifact is minimal. Bowel peristalsis may be modified pharmacologically, and position-ing maneuvers and bladder filling can help remove the small bowel from the field of view. The major vessels in the pelvis rarely cause clinically distracting artifacts. Demonstration of disease within the pelvis depends on good quality images using sequences that are reliable and reproducible. Therefore, up-to-date instruments operating at high field strength (1.0-1.5 T) are ideally suited to pelvic imaging. Nevertheless, clinically adequate images can often be obtained with low field systems, usually by extending imaging times. With a cooperative patient, clinically useful images may be obtained with machines operating at a field strength as low as 0.2 T.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Further Reading

  • Allen KS, Kressel HY, Arger PH, Pollack HM (1989) Age-related changes of the prostate. Am J Roentgenol 152:77–81

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ascher SM, Arnold LL, Patt RH et al (1994) Adenomyosis: prospective comparison of MR imaging and transvaginal sonography. Radiology 190:803–806

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barentsz JO, Ruijs SHJ, Strijk SP (1993) The role of MR imaging in carcinoma of the urinary bladder. Am J Roentgenol 160:937–947

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barker PG, Lunniss PJ, Armstrong P et al (1994) Magnetic resonance imaging of fistula-in-ano: technique, interpretation and accuracy. Clin Radiol 49:7–13

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brown G, Mac Vicar D, Ayton V, Husband J (1995) The role of intravenous contrast enhancement in magnetic resonance imaging of prostatic carcinoma. Clin Radiol 50:601–606

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chang YCF, Hricak H, Thurnher S, Lacey C (1988) Vagina: evaluation with MR imaging. Part II. Neoplasms. Radiology 169:175–179

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • deSouza NM, Scoones D, Krausz T, Gilderdale DJ, Soutter WP (1996) High-resolution MR imaging of stage I cervical neoplasia with a dedicated transvaginal coü: MR features and correlation of imaging and pathologic findings. Am J Roentgenol 166:553–559

    Google Scholar 

  • Halligan S (1998) Imaging fistula-in-ano. Clin Radiol 53: 85–95

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Halligan S, Healy JC, Bartram CI (1998) Magnetic resonance imaging of fistula-in-ano: STIR or SPIR? Brit J Radiol 71:141–145

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hricak H, Chang YCF, Thurnher S (1988) Vagina: evaluation with MR imaging. Part I. Normal anatomy and congenital anomalies. Radiology 169:169–174

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hricak H, Lacey CG, Sandles LG, Chang YC, Winkler ML, Stern JL (1988) Invasive cervical carcinoma: comparison of MR imaging and surgical findings. Radiology 166:623–631

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hricak H, Carrington BM (eds) (1991) MRI of the pelvis. Appleton & Lange, Norwalk

    Google Scholar 

  • Hricak H, White S, Vigneron D et al (1994) Carcinoma of the prostate gland: MR imaging with pelvic phased-ar-ray coils versus integrated endorectal-pelvic phased array coils versus integrated endorectal-pelvic phased-ar-ray coils. Radiology 193:703–709

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huch Boni R, Boner J, Debatin J, Trinkler F, Knonagel H, Von Hochstetter A, Helfenstein U, Krestin G (1995) Optimization of prostate carcinoma stagingxomparison of imaging and clinical methods. Clin Radiol 50: 593–600

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Husband JE, Oliff JF, Williams MP, Heron CW, Cherryman GR (1989) Bladder cancer: staging with CT and MR imaging. Radiology 173:435–440

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Husband JE (1992) Review: staging bladder cancer. Clin Radiol 3:153–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ito K, Fujita T, Uchisako H et al (1994) MR imaging of the uterus: findings from high-resolution multi-section dynamic imaging with a surface coil. Am J Roentgenol 163:873–879

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaji Y, Sugimura K, Kitao M, Ishida T (1994) Histopathology of uterine cervical carcinoma: diagnostic compari- son of endorectal surface coil and standard body coil MRI. J Comput Assist Tomog 18:785–792

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim B, Semelka RC, Ascher SM, Chalpin D, Carroll P, Hricak H (1994) Bladder tumour staging: comparison of contrast enhanced CT, T1- and T2-weighted MR imaging, dynamic gadolinium-enhanced imaging, and late gadolinium-enhanced imaging. Radiology 193:239–245

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lien HH, Blomlie V, Tropé C, Krn J, Abeler VM (1991) Cancer of the endometrium: value of MR imaging in determining depth of invasion into the myometrium. Am J Roentgenol 157:1221–1223

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mac Vicar D, Husband J (1993) Imaging in the management of prostatic cancer. Imaging 5:29–37

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott VG, Meakem III TJ, Stolpen AH, Schnall MD (1995) Prostatic and periprostatic cysts: findings on MR imaging. Am J Roentgenol 164:123–127

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn S, Franzini D, Demlow T, Rosencrantz D, Kim J, Hanna RA, Szumowski J (1994) MR imaging of prostate cancer with an endorectal surface coil technique: correlation with whole mount-specimens. Radiology 190:323–327

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reinhold C, McCarthy S, Bret PM et al (1996) Diffuse adeno-myosis: comparison of endovaginal US and MR imaging with histopathologic correlation. Radiology 199:151–158

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scoutt LM, McCauley TR, Flynn SD, Luthringer DJ, McCarthy SM (1993) Zonal anatomy of the cervix: correlation of MR imaging and histologic examination of hysterectomy specimens. Radiology 186:159–162

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scoutt LM, McCarthy SM, Flynn SD et al (1995) Clinical stage I endometrial carcinoma: pitfalls in preoperative assessment with MR imaging. Radiology 194:567–572

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Semelka RC, Ascher SM, Reinhold C (eds) (1997) MRI of the abdomen and pelvis. A text atlas. Wiley-Liss, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer JA, Ward J, Ambrose NS (1998) Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of perianal fistulae. Clin Radiol 53:96–104

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Subak LL, Hricak H, Powell CB, Azizi L, Stern JL (1995) Cervical carcinoma: computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative staging. Obstet Gynecol 86:43–50

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tempany CMC (ed) (1996) The male pelvis. MRI clinics of North America vol 3 no 2

    Google Scholar 

  • Tempany CMC, Fielding JR (1996) Female pelvis. In: Edel-man RR, Hesselink JR, Zlatkin MB (eds). Clinical magnetic resonance imaging. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 1432–1465

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Schering

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

MacVicar, D., Revell, P. (1999). Pelvis. In: Reimer, P., Parizel, P.M., Stichnoth, FA. (eds) Clinical MR Imaging. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-97990-3_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-97990-3_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-64098-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-97990-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics