The Abdominal Aorta and Its Branches

  • I. P. Arlart
  • L. Guhl
Part of the Medical Radiology book series (MEDRAD)


The abdominal aorta and its branches are responsible for transporting blood into the arteries of the pelvis and lover extremities and maintaining the parenchymal function of the liver, spleen, pancreas, adrenals, and kidneys. Angiography visualizes in a highly specific way not only primary vascular lesions of different anatomical areas of the abdomen but also parenchymal lesions of different etiology. Thus, conventional x-ray angiography was considered the method of choice for many years before newer noninvasive technologies became available such as ultrasonography (US) and computed tomography (CT). These methods were introduced successfully into the diagnotic armamentarium for evaluating parenchymal and perivascular disorders as well as vascular abnormalities, particularly in vessels with larger diameters. Contrast-enhanced CT and color Doppler US have in fact revolutionized the diagnostic approach in abdominal vessel disease. Due to the high accuracy of US and CT in these areas, indications for angiography have been reduced and changed significantly. Today, abdominal angiography still plays a prominent role as a highly accurate diagnostic procedure in vasoocclusive disease, renovascular disease, and gastrointestinal bleeding that cannot be localized by endoscopy, particularly in cases in which therapeutic interventions can be performed during the same procedure by the radiologist (i. e., recanalization by administration of fibrinolytic agents or transluminal angioplasty or implantation of vascular stents, embolization therapy using different agents and materials, and localized administration of chemotherapeutics). Furthermore, angiography has proved useful for preoperative vascular mapping in order to demonstrate abnormal vascular supply or intraparenchymal vasculature prior to local tumor resection.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Amanuma M, Mohiaddin RH, Hasegawa M, Heshiki A, Longmore DB (1992) Abdominal aorta: characterization of blood flow and measurement of its regional distribution by cine magnetic resonance phase-shift velocity mapping. Eur Radiol 2:559–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amparo EG, Hoddick WK, Hricak H, Sollitto R, Justich E, Filly RA, Higgins CB (1985) Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography in the evaluation of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Radiology 154:451–456PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson CM, Edelman RR, Turski PA (1993) Clinical magnetic resonance angiography. Raven Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Arlart IP, Guhl L, Edelman RR (1992a) Magnetic resonance angiography of the abdominal aorta. Cardiovasc Intervent Rodiol 15:43–50Google Scholar
  5. Arlart IP, Guhl L, Hausmann R (1992b) Evaluation of 2D- and 3D-time-of-iiight MRA in renal artery stenosis. ROFO 157:59–64PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cullenward MJ, Scanlan KA, Pozniak MA, Acher CA (1986) Inflammatory aortic aneurysm (periaortic fibrosis): radiologic imaging. Radiology 159:75–82PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Darling RC, Messina CR, Brewster DC, Ottinger LW (1977) Autopsy study of unoperated abdominal aortic aneurysms: the case for early resection. Circulation 56 (suppl II): 161-164Google Scholar
  8. Debatin JF, Spritzer CE, Grist TM, Beam C, Svetkey LP, Newman GE, Sostman HD (1991) Imaging of the renal arteries: value of MR angiography. AJR 157:981–990PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Debatin JF, Ting RH, Wegmiiller H et al. (1994) Renal artery blood flow: quantification with phase contrast MR imaging with and without breath holding. Radiology 190:371–378PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Dumoulin CL, Yucel EK, Vock P, Souza SP, Terrier F, Steinberg FL, Wegmuller H (1990) Two- and three-dimensional phase contrast MR angiography of the abdomen. Comput Assist Tomogr 14:779–784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ecklund K, Hartnell GG, Hughes LA, Stokes KR, Finn JP (1994) MR angiography as the sole method in evaluating abdominal aortic aneurysms: correlation with conventional techniques and surgery. Radiology 192:345–350PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Edelman RR, Wentz KU, Mattle H, Zhao B, Liu C, Kim D, Laub G (1989) Projection arteriography and venography: initial clinical results with MR. Radiology 172:351–357PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Evancho M, Osbakken M, Weidner W (1985) Comparison of NMR imaging and aortography for preoperative evaluation of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Magn Reson Med 2:41–45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Galanski M, Prokop M, Chavan A, Schaefer CM, Nischelsky JE (1992) Renal artery stenoses: spiral CT angiography. Radiology 189:185–192Google Scholar
  15. Gross-Fengels W, Friedmann G, Lemaitre F, Schmidt R, Lanfermann H, Erasmi H (1991) Conventional and cine-MRI in patients with aneurysms of the abdominal aorta. ROFO 155:337–343PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Harrison EG Jr, McCormack LJ (1971) Pathologic classification of renal arterial disease in renovascular hypertension. Mayo Clin Proc 46:161–167PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Havey RJ, Krumloysky JE, DelGreco F, Gartner HM (1985) Screening for renovascular hypertension. Is renal digital subtraction angiography the preferred non-invasive test? JAMA 254:388–393PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kadir S (1986) Diagnostic angiography. Saunders, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  19. Kandarpa K, Piwnica-Worms D, Chopra PS et al. (1992) Prospective double-blinded comparison of MR imaging and aortography in the preoperative evaluation of abdominal aortic aneurysms. JVIR 3:83–89PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kent KG, Edelman RR, Kim D, Steinman TI, Porter DH, Skillman JJ (1991) Magnetic resonance imaging: a reliable test for the evaluation of proximal atherosclerotic renal arterial stenosis. J Vase Surg 13:311–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kim D, Edelman RR, Kent KG, Porter DH, Skillman JJ (1990) Abdominal aorta and renal artery stenosis: evaluation with MR angiography. Radiology 174:727–731PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Koslin DB, Kenney PJ, Keller FS, Koehler RE, Gross GM (1988) Preoperative evaluation of abdominal aortic aneurysm by MR imaging with aortography correlation. JCVIR 11:329–335Google Scholar
  23. Li D, Haacke EM, Mugler JP, Berr S, Brookeman JR, Hutton MC (1994) Three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography using selective inversion recovery RAGE with fat saturation and ECG-triggering: apphcation to renal arteries. Magn Reson Med 31:414–422PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Loubeyre P, Revel D, Garcia P et al. (1994) Screening patients for renal artery stenosis: value of three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography. AJR 162:847–852PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Owen RS, Baum RA, Carpenter JP, Holland GA, Cope C (1993) Symptomatic peripheral vascular disease: selection of imaging parameters and clinical evaluation with MR angiography. Radiology 187:627–635PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Parker DL, Yuan C, Blatter DD (1991) MR angiography by multiple thin slab 3D acquisition. Magn Reson Med 17:434–451PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Prince MR (1994) Gadohnium-enhanced MR aortography. Radiology 191:155–164PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Prokop M, Schaefer C, Kalender WA, Polacin A, Galanski M (1993) Vascular imaging with spiral CT. Radiologe 33:694–704PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Purdy D, Cadena G, Laub G (1992) The design of variable flip angle slab selection (TONE) pulses for improved 3D MR angiography. In: Book of abstracts, vol 1. Eleventh annual meeting, Soc Magn Res Med, Berkeley, Calif., USA, p 882Google Scholar
  30. Richter CS, Krestin GP, Eichenberger AC, Schöpke W, Fuchs WA (1993) Assessment of renal artery stenosis by phase contrast magnetic resonance angiography. Eur Radiol 3:493–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rubin GD, Dake MD, Napel S et al. (1994) Spiral CT of renal artery stenosis: comparison of three-dimensional rendering techniques. Radiology 190:181–190PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Ruff SJ, Watson MR (1988) Magnetic resonance imaging versus angiography in the preoperative assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Am J Surg 155:651–654PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schwerk WB, Restrepo IK, Stellwaag M, Klose KJ, Schade Brittinger C (1994) Renal artery stenosis: grading with image-directed Doppler US evaluation of renal resistive index. Radiology 190:785–790PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Siegel CL, Cohan RH (1994) CT of abdominal aortic aneurysms. AJR 163:17–29PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Strotzer M, Pruell CM, Geissler A, Kohler SM, Kraemer BK, Gmeinwieser J (1993) Noninvasive assessment of renal artery stenosis: a comparison of MRA, angiography, color Doppler sonography, and intraarterial angiography. Radiology 189 (suppl): 189Google Scholar
  36. Vollmar J (1985) Das Bauchartenaneurysma: Wandel in der Diagnostik und chirurgischen Therapie. Chirurg 56:238–242PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Yucel EK, Kaufman JA, Prince M, Bazari H, Fang LST, Waltman AC (1993a) Time of flight renal MR angiography: utility in patients with renal insufficiency. Magn Reson Imaging 11:925–930PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yucel EK, Kaufman JA, Geller SC, Waltman AC (1993b) Atherosclerotic occlusive disease of the lower extremity: prospective evalation with two-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography. Radiology 187:637–641PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • I. P. Arlart
    • 1
  • L. Guhl
    • 1
  1. 1.Radiologisches InstitutKatharinenhospitalStuttgartGermany

Personalised recommendations