Advertisement

Stellenwert streßechokardiographischer Techniken im Spektrum möglicher Anwendungsgebiete

  • Günter Haug

Zusammenfassung

Die streßechokardiographischen Untersuchungsmethoden stellen eine wesentliche Bereicherung in der kardiologischen Funktionsdiagnostik des Akutkrankenhauses dar. Die Abklärung einer Angina-pectoris-Symptomatik bei Patienten, die akut in die Klinik aufgenommen werden und der herkömmlichen Diagnostik eines Belastungs-EKGs nicht zugänglich sind, stellt eine häufige Indikation zur Durchführung einer streßechokardiographischen Untersuchung dar. .Verhindern primäre EKG-Veränderangen wie Schenkelblock, Linkshypertrophie, Zustand nach Myokardinfarkt oder Repolarisationsstörungen aus verschiedenen Gründen (Digitalis, Antiarrhythmika etc.) eine verläßliche Auswertung des Belastungs-EKGs, so empfiehlt sich bei diesen Patienten die Durchführung einer fahrradergometrischen Streßechokardiographie, der physiologischsten Form der Belastung. Dabei kann gleichzeitig die körperliche Belastungsfähigkeit des Patienten mitbeurteilt werden.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

Literatur zu Kapitel 8.1.1

  1. 1.
    Applegate RJ, Dell’italia LJ, Crawford MH (1987) Usefulness of two-dimensional echocardiography during low-level exercise testing early after uncomplicated myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 60: 10–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boccanelli A, Pontillo D, Greco C, Zanchi E, Carboni GP, Cecchetti C, Risa AL (1992) Comparison of exercise test, dipyridamole and dobutamine stress echocardiography for the detection of multivessel disease after myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 19 (suppl): 359AGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bolli R, Zhu WX, Myers ML, Hartley CJ, Roberts R (1985) Beta-adrenergic stimulation reverses postishemic myocardial dysfunction without producing subsequent functional deterioration. Am J Cardiol 56: 946 - 948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bolognese L, Sarasso G, Aralda D, Bongo AS, Rossi L, Rossi P (1989) High dose dipyridamole echocardiography early after uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction: correlation with exercise testing and coronary angiography, J Am Coll Cardiol 14: 357 - 363PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Braunwald E, Kloner RA (1982) The stunned myocardium: prolonged, postischemic ventricular dysfunction. Circulation 69: 991 - 999Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Buda AJ, Zotz RJ, Gallagher KP (1987) The effect of inotropic stimulation on normal and ischemic myocardium after coronary occlusion. Circulation 76: 163 - 172PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Casanova R, Parrocini A, Guidalotti PL, Capacci Pf, Jacopi F, Fabbri M, Maresta A (1992) Dose and test for dipyridamole infusion and cardiac imaging early after uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 70: 1402 - 1406PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chiaranda G, Lazzaro A, Mangiameli S (1993). The low-dose echo-dobutamine test in post-AMI early phase. 1st international symposium of stress echocardiography in Pisa 1993Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chiarella F, Domenicucci S, Bellotti P, Bellone P, Scarsi G, Moroni L, Vecchio (1993) Ultra-early risk stratification by stress-echo: rationale and results. 1st international symposium of stress echocardiography in Pisa 1993Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ю.Согуа ВС, Rasmussen S, Knoebel SB, Feigenbaum H (1975) Echocardiography in acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 36: 1Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ellis SG, Wynne J, Braunwald E, Henschke CI, Sandor T, Kloner RA (1984) Response of reperfusion-sal- vaged, stunned myocardium to inotropic stimulation. Am Heart J 107: 13 - 19PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fishman EZ, Ben-Ari E, Pines A, Drory Y, Motro M, Kellermann J J (1992) Usefulness of heavy isometric exercise echocardiography for assessing left ventricular wall motion pattern late ( 6 months) after acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 70: 1123 - 1128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Galeti A, Coletta C, Greco G, Bordi L, Burattini M, Colaceci R, Cevi V: Risk stratification in coronary heart disease with echo-dobutamine test. A follow up study in 74 patients. 1st international symposium of stress echocardiography in Pisa 1993Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hecht HA, DeBord L, Shaw RE, Ryan C, Dunlap R, Stretzer SH, Myler KR (1993) Usefulness of supine bicycle stress echocardiography for detection of restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol 71: 293 - 296PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Marcovitz PA, Armstrong WF (1991) Dobutamine stress echocardiography: diagnostic utility. Herz 16: 372 - 378PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Marwick TH, Nemec JJ, Pashkow FJ, Stewart WJ, Salcedo EE (1992) Accuracy and limitations of exercise echocardiography in a routine clinical setting. JACC 19: 74 - 81PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    McNeill AJ, Fioretti PM, El-Said EM, Salustri A, de Feyter PJ, Roeland JR (1992) Dobutamine stress echocardiography before and after coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol 69: 740 - 745PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nieminen M, Parisi AF, O’Boyle JE, Folland ED, Khuri S, Kloner RA (1982) Serial evaluation of myocardial thickening and thinning in acute experimental infarction and quantification using two-dimensional echocardiography. Circulation 66: 174–180PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pellikka PA, Oh JK, Bailey KR, Nichols BA, Rooke TW, Tajik AJ (1992) Prognostic role of Dobutamine stress echocardiography before noncardiac surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 19 (suppl): 100ACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Picano E, Marzullo P, Gigli G, Reisenhofer B, Parodi O, Distante A, L’Abbate A: Identification of viable myocardium by dipyridamole-induced improvement in regional left ventricular function assessed by echocardiography in myocardial infarction and comparison with thallium scintigraphy at rest. Am J Cardiol 1992; 70: 703–710PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Picano E, Severi S, Michelassi C, Lattanzi F, Masini M, Orsini E, Distante A, L’Abbate A (1989) Prognostic importance of dipyridamole-echocardiography test in coronary artery disease. Circulation 80: 450–457PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Picano E, Pirelli S, Marzilli M, Faletra F, Lattanzi F, Campoplo L, Massa D, Alberti A, Gara E, Distante A, L’Abbate A (1989) Usefulness of high-dose dipyridamole echocardiography test in coronary angioplasty. Circulation 80: 807–815PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pierard LA, de Landsheere C, Berthe C, Rigo P, Kulbertus HE (1990) Identification of viable myocardium by echocardiography during dobutamine infusion in patients with myocardial infarction after thrombolytic therapy: comparison with positron emission tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 15: 1021–1031PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ryan T, Armstrong WF, O’Donnell JA, Feigenbaum H (1987) Risk stratification after acute myocardial infarction by means of exercise two-dimensional echocardiography. Am Heart J 114: 1305–1316PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Salustri A, Fioretti PM, McNeill AJ, Pozzoli MMA, Roeland JR (1992) Pharmacological stress echocardiography in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease and myocardial ischemia: a comparison between dobutamine and dipyridamol. Eur Heart 13: 1356–1362Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sawada SG, Segar DS, Ryan T, Brown SE, Dohan AM, Williams R, Fineberg NS, Armstrong WF, Feigenbaum H (1991) Echocardiographic detection of coronary artery disease during dobutamine infusion. Circulation 83: 1605–1614PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Schroder K, Voller H, Hansen B, Linderer T, Spielberg C, Miinzberg H, Schroder R (1991) Which stress- echocardiographic test is best suitable to identify jeopardized myocardium shortly after myocardial infarction? Circulation 84 (suppl II): 208Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Schroder K, Voller H, Hansen B, Schroder R (1992) Can stress induced changes in the wall motion score indicate the necessity for an intervention in patients with coronary artery disease? A stress echocardiographic study. J Am Coll Cardiol 19 (suppl): 101AGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Schroder K, Voller H, Hansen B, Levenson B, Wilkenshoff U, Schroder R (1992) StreB-Echokardiographie als Routine-Untersuchung bei koronarer Herzkrankheit. DMW 117: 1583–1588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Schroder R (1983) Systemic versus intracoronary streptokinase infusion in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 1: 1254–1261PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Seveso G, Chiarella F, Previtali M, Bolognese L, on behalf of the EPIC study group (1992) The prognostic value of dipyridamole-echocardiography early after uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction: Updated results of the EPIC study. J Am Coll Cardiol 19 (suppl): 100AGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    The TIMI Study Group (1985) The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Trial: phase I findings. N Engl J Med 312: 932–936Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wilkenshoff UM, Schroder K, Voller H, Dissmann R, Dingerkus H, Linderer T, Schroder R (1994) Comparison of dobutamine and dipyridamole stress echocardiography in patients with single and multivessel disease undergoing PTC A. J Am Coll Cardiol 2 (suppl)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wilkenshoff U, Schroder K, Voller H, Miinzberg H, Dissmann R, Spielberg C, Linderer T, Schroder R (1993) Detection of jeopardized myocardium after acute myocardial infarction with dipyridamole echocardiography stress test. Eur Heart J 14 (suppl.): 1528Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wilkenshoff U, Schroder K, Voller H, Dissmann R, Linderer T, Schroder R: Validity and tolerance of dobutamine and dipyridamole stress echocardiography before and after PTC A (1993) 1st international symposium of stress echocardiography in Pisa 1993Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wilkenshoff UM (1994) Ischamische Herzerkrankung; Infarktkomplikationen. In: Schmailzl KJG (Hrsg.) Kardiale Ultraschalldiagnostik. Blackwell Wissenschaft, Berlin, S. 679–696Google Scholar

Literatur zu Kapitel 8.1.2

  1. 1.
    Angermann CE, Spes CH, Hart RJ, Kemkes BM, Gokel MJ, Theisen A (1989) Echokardiographische Diagnose akuter AbstoBungsreaktionen bei herztransplantierten Patienten unter Cyclosporintherapie. Z. Kardiol 78: 243–252PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Armstrong WF, O’Donnell M, Dillon JC, McHenry PL, Morris SN, Feigenbaum H (1986) Complementary value of two-dimensional exercise echocardiography to routine treadmill exercise testing. Ann Int Med 105: 829–835PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Billingham ME (1981) Diagnosis of cardiac rejection by endomyocarial biopsy. J Heart Transplant 1: 25–30Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Borer JS, Brensike JF, Redwood DR (1975) Limitation of the elektrokardiographic response to exercise in predicting coronary artery disease. New Engl J Med 293: 367–371PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dawkins KD, Oldershaw PJ, Billingham ME, Hunt S, Oyer PE, Jamieson SW, Popp RL, Stinson EB, Shumway NE (1984) Changes in diastolic function as a noninvasive marker of cardiac allograft rejection. J Heart Transplant 3: 286–294Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Friedman BJ, Drinkovic N, Miles H, Shih WJ, Mazzoleni A, De Marioa AN (1986) Assessment of left ventricular diastolic function: comparison of Doppler and gatet blood pool scintigraphy. J Am Coll Cardiol 8: 1348–1354PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gaasch WH, Cole JS, Quinones MA, Alexander JK (1975) Dynamic determinants of left ventricular diastolic pressure-volume relations in man. Circulation 51: 531–535Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Heyndrick CR, Baic H, Nelkins P, Leusen K, Fishbein MC, Vatner SF (1978) Depression of regional blood flow and wall thickening after brief coronary occlusion. Am J Physiol 234: H653–H660Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kenitz J, Cohnert T, Schafers JH et al. (1987) A classification of cardiac allograft rejection. Am J Surg Path (1987) 11: 503–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Myerowitz PD, Gilbert E (1987) Myocardial biopsy following heart transplantation. In: Myerowitz PD (ed) Heart Transplantation. Futura Mount Kisco, New York 219Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Myreng Y, Smiseth OA (1990) Assessment of Left Ventricular Relaxation by Doppler Echocardiography. Circulation 81: 586–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nesto RW, Kowalchuk GJ (1987) The ischemic cascade: Temporal sequence of hemodynamic, elektrocar- diographic and symptomatic expressions of ischemia. Am J Cardiol 57: 23C–30CCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Oyer PE, Stinson EB, Jamieson SW, Hunt SA, Perlroth M, Billingham M, Shumway NE (1993) Cyclospo- rine in cardiac transplantation: A V2 year follow-up. Transplant Proc 15: 2546–2552Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Picano E (1992) Stress Echocardiography. Berlin/Heidelberg/New York: Springer Verlag pp 48–56Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schiitz A, Kemkes BM, Kugler CH, Angermann CH, Schad N, Rienmiiller R, Fritsch S, Anthuber M, Neumeier P, Gokel JM (1990) The influence of rejection episodes on the development of coronary artery disease after heart transplantation. Eur J Cardio-Thorac Surg 4: 300–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Stoddard MF, Chaitmann BR, Byers SL, Mrosek D, Labovitz AJ (1989) Am Heart J 117: 395–402PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stork T, Walkowiak T, Siniawski H, Miiller R, Hetzer R, Hochrein H (1990) Nichtinvasive Erfassung der AbstoBungsreaktion nach Herztransplantation mittels Dopplersonographie. Z. Kardiol 79 (suppl I): 74Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tauchert M, Behrenbeck DW, Hoetzel J, Hilger HH (1976) Ein neuer pharmakologischer Test zur Diagnose der Koronarinsuffizienz. DMW 101: 37–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wann S, Farig J, Childress R, Dillon J, Weyman A, Feigenbaum H (1979) Exercise cross-sectional Echocardiography in Ischemic Heart Disease. Circulation 60: 1300–1308PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yacoub MH, Reid CJ, Al-Khadimi RH, Radley-Smith R (1985) Cardiac transplantation - the London experience. Z. Kardiol 74 (suppl VI): 40–45Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Younis LT, Melin JA, Schoevaerdts J-C (1990) Left Ventricular Systolic Function and Diastolic Filling At Rest and During Upright Exercise after Orthotopic Hearttransplantation: Comparison with Young and Aged Normal Subjects. J Heart Transplantation 9: 683–692Google Scholar

Literatur zu Kapitel 8.3

  1. 1.
    Haug G, Lang G, Tretter N, Berghoff A (1993) Stellenwert der Streßerchokardiographie in der kardiologischen Rehabilitation. In: Gehring J, von Bibra H, Echokardiographische Diagnostik bei koronarer Herzkrankheit. Steinkopff Darmstadt, S. 133–146Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Haug G, Lang G, Tretter N, Berghoff A (1994) Dynamic Stress-Echocardiography: New method to assess exercise capacity free of ischemia in stationary and outpatient coronary training groups. Int J of Sports- medicine, in pressGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Haug G, Lang G, Tretter N, Berghoff A (1994) Dynamische StreBechokardiographie: Neue Methode zur Beurteilung der ischamiefreien Belastbarkeit in stationarer Bewegungstherapie und ambulanten Herzgruppen. Z Sportmedizin, im DruckGoogle Scholar
  4. Destro A (1993) Dipyridamole-echo in rehabilitation. 1st International Symposium on Stress Echo, PisaGoogle Scholar
  5. Haug G, Lang G, Berghoff A (1993) Stress Echo in Cardiac Rehabilitation: Diagnostic Advantage of a Combined Supine and Half-Sitting Exercise Protocol. 1st International Symposium on Stress Echo, PisaGoogle Scholar
  6. Haug G, Lang G, Berghoff A (1992) Exercise echocardiography in cardiac rehabilation. valuable tool for diagnostic, therapy and sociomedical judgement. 5th Worl Congress of Cardiac rehabilitation, BordeauxGoogle Scholar
  7. Haug G, Lang G, Berghoff A ( 1994 ) Dynamische StreBechokardiographie in der kardiologischen Bewegungstherapie: Stellenwert zur Steuerung rehabilitativer Trainingsprogramme bei unklarem Belastungs-EKG. Vortrag П. Europaisches Symposium “Quantifizierung von rehabilitativen Trainingsprogrammen”, WienGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Dr. Dietrich Steinkopff Verlag, GmbH & Co. KG, Darmstadt 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Günter Haug
    • 1
  1. 1.Rehabilitationsklinik Hochstaufen der BfABayerisch GmainDeutschland

Personalised recommendations