Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Integrierte Modellierung

  • Chapter
Informationsmanagement

Zusammenfassung

Für eine effiziente und wirtschaftliche Anwendungsentwicklung bedarf es neben einer vertikalen Abstimmung von Analyse, Design und Implementierung einer horizontalen Abstimmung von Daten, Funktionen und Kommunikation mit dem Ziel einer Integration von Problembeschreibung und Problemlösung. Genauso wie dabei auch Aufbau- und Ablauforganisation abzubilden und gegenseitig anzupassen sind, so sind Datenstrukturen und Algorithmen bzw. Beschreibungs- und Lösungsmodelle aufeinander abzustimmen. Einerseits kann das Lösungsverfahren nicht unabhängig vom Beschreibungsmodell entworfen werden, andererseits setzen bestimmte Algorithmen eine für ihre Anwendung geeignete Problembeschreibung voraus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Balzert, H., Ein Überblick über die Methoden-und Werkzeuglandschaft, in Balzert, H. (Hrsg.), CASE Systeme und Werkzeuge, Mannheim, 1991,27–100

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ballard, D. H., Brown, C. M., Computer Vision, Englewood Cliffs N.J., 1982

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baldi, S., Bieher, A, Braun, W., Haggenmüller, R., Knuth, R., Neeß, I., Schmidt, G., Schoberth, A, CONNEX: Eine Fallstudie zur Modellierung eingebetteter wissensbasierter Systeme, Arbeitsbericht EMSC, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  4. Baldi, S., Bicher, A, Haggenmüller, R., Schmidt, G., Comparison of principles, methods and techniques for modelling conventional systems and knowledge based systems, Arbeitsbericht EBS,1991

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brady, M., Hollerbach, J. (eds.), Robot Motion: Planning and Control, Cambridge Mass., 1982

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bibel, W., Automated Theorem Proving, Braunschweig, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  7. DeChampeaux, D., Faure, P., A comparative study of object-oriented analysis methods, J. Object-Oriented Programming 5(1), 1992,21–33

    Google Scholar 

  8. Coad, P., Yourdon, E, Object-Oriented Analysis, Englewood Cliffs, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  9. DeMarco, T., Structured Analysis and System Specification, New York, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  10. Drake, J., Tsai, W. T., Lee, H. J., Zualkeman, I., Object-oriented analysis: criteria and case study, Int. J. of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering 3(3),1993,319–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fichman, R. G., Kemerer, C. F., Object-oriented and conventional analysis and design methodologies, IEEE Computer, 1992, 22–39

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gaines, B., Knowledge acquisition systems for rapid prototyping of expert systems, INFOR 26, 1988,256–285

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hatley, D. J., Pirbhai, I. A., Strategies for Real-Time System Specification, New York, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kelly,G., The Psychology of Personal Constructs, New York, 1955

    Google Scholar 

  15. Loy, P. H., A comparison of object-oriented and structured development methodologies, ACMSIGSoft Software Eng. Notes 15(1),1990,44–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Monarchi, D., Puhr, G., A research typology for object-oriented analysis and design, Communications of the ACM 35(9), 1992, 35–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nerson, J.-M., Applying object-oriented analysis and design, Communications of the ACM 35(9), 1992,63–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nwana, H. S., Intelligent tutoring systems: an overview, AI Review 4,1990,251–277

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pawlak, Z., Rough Sets, Dordrecht, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  20. Quinlan, J. R., Discovering rules by induction from large collections of examples, in Michie, D. (ed.), Introductory Readings in Expert Systems, London, 1979,33–46

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rich, E., Knight, K., Artificial Intelligence, New York, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ross, D. T., Structured analysis: a language for communicating ideas, IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 3(1), 1977, 16–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ross, D. T., Schoman, K. E., Structured analysis for requirements definition, IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 3(1), 1977, 6–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rumbaugh, J., Blaha, M., Premerlani, W., Eddy, F., Lorenson, W., Object-Oriented Modeling and Design, Englewood Cliffs, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  25. Slowinski, R., Intelligent Decision Support, Dordrecht, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  26. Stein, W., Objektorientierte Analysemethoden — ein Vergleich, Informatik Spektrum 16(6), 1993, 317–332

    Google Scholar 

  27. Schreiber, G., Wielinga, B., Breuker, J. (eds.), KADS — A Principled Approach to Knowledge-Based System Development, San Diego, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wahlster, W., Natürlichsprachliche Systeme, in: Bibel, W., Siekmann, J. H. (Hrsg.), Künstliche Intelligenz, Informatik Fachberichte 59, Berlin, 1982,202–283

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wedekind, H., Objektorientierung und Vererbung, it 2, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wilfs-Brock, J. R., Johnson, R. E., Surveying current research in object-oriented design, Communications of the ACM 33(9), 1990,104–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wilfs-Brock, R. J., Wilkerson, B., Wiener, L., Designing Object-Oriented Software, Englewood Cliffs NJ, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ward, P. T., Mellor, S. J., Structured Development of Real Time Systems, Vol. 1-2, Englewood Cliffs NJ, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ward, P. T., Mellor, S. J., Structured Development of Real Time Systems, Vol. 3, Englewood Cliffs NJ, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wielinga, B. J., van de Velde, W., Schreiber, A. T., Akkermans, H., Towards a unification of knowledge modelling approaches, ESPRIT Project P5248 KADS-II, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  35. Weber, R., Zimmermann, H. J., Automatische Akquisition von unscharfen Expertenwissen, KI 2,1991,20–26

    Google Scholar 

  36. Yourdon, E., Constantine, L. L., Structured Design: Fundamentals of a Discipline of Computer Program and Systems Design, Englewood Cliffs NJ, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  37. Zadeh, L. A., Fuzzy sets, Inform. Control 8, 1965,338–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Zimmermann, H. J., Fuzzy Set Theory and its Applications, Boston, 1991

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universität des Saarlandes, Postfach 151150, D-66041, Saarbrücken, Deutschland

    Professor Dr. Günter Schmidt (Lehrstuhl für Betriebswirtschaftslehre)

Authors
  1. Professor Dr. Günter Schmidt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schmidt, G. (1996). Integrierte Modellierung. In: Informationsmanagement. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-97681-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-97681-0_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-61041-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-97681-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation