Towards Monetary Union in the European Community: Why and How

  • Daniel Gros
  • Niels Thygesen

Abstract

European Monetary Integration is, again, high on the political agenda. At the European Council in Dublin in April 1990 there was even an agreement that monetary union should be reached by January 1993, the date at which the internal market measures are scheduled to be completed. While it is natural for heads of government and state to push for monetary integration mainly for political reasons economists look at the economic costs and benefits. This paper therefore tries to answer the two fundamental questions an economist would like to ask about European monetary integration:
  1. 1.

    Why? That is, what are the economic reasons for advancing on the road of monetary integration?

     
  2. 2.

    How? That is, what “concrete steps” should be taken to take us where we want to go?

     

Keywords

Europe Income Assure Arena Volatility 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. CIAMPI, CARLO A. (1989). An Operational Framework for an Integrated Monetary Policy in Europe, in: collection of papers annexed to Delors Report, 225–232.Google Scholar
  2. COHEN, DANIEL (1989). The Costs and Benefits of a European Currency. Ch.7, in: de Cecco, M. and Giovannini, A. (eds.). A European Central Bank? Italian Macroeconomic Policy Group and Centre for Economic Policy Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 195–209.Google Scholar
  3. GROS, DANIEL (1988). The EMS and the Determination of the European Price Level. Centre for European Policy Studies. CEPS Working Document No. 35, Brussels.Google Scholar
  4. GROS, DANIEL (1990). The Ecu and Common Monetary Policy: From a Premonetary Union Stage to a Full Monetary Union. Centre for European Policy Studies, CEPS Working Document No. 45, Brussels, February.Google Scholar
  5. GROS, DANIEL and THYGESEN, NIELS (1988). The EMS: Achievements, Current Issues and Directions for the Future. Centre for European Policy Studies, CEPS Paper No. 35, Brussels.Google Scholar
  6. GROS, DANIEL and THYGESEN, NIELS (1990). Concrete Steps Towards Monetary Union. Centre for European Policy Studies. CEPS Paper No. 45, Brussels, April.Google Scholar
  7. LOUIS, JEAN VICTOR et al. (1989). Vers un Système Européen de Banques Centrales. Collection dirigée par l’Institut d’Etudes Européennes. Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles.Google Scholar
  8. POEHL, KARL OTTO (1989). The Further Development of the European Monetary System, in: collection of papers annexed to Delors Report, 131–155, September (1988).Google Scholar
  9. ROMER, PAUL (1989). Increasing Returns and New Developments in the Theory of Growth. NBER Working Paper No. 3098, September.Google Scholar
  10. STOCKMAN, ALAN C. (1988). Sectoral and National Aggregate Disturbances to Industrial Output in Seven European Countries. Journal of Monetary Economics 21, 387–409, North-Holland.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. SZASZ, ANDRE (1989). Comment on paper: Institutional Development of the EMS. By Thygesen, Niels. Paper presented at the conference on The European Monetary System in the 1990s organized by the Bank of Greece and the Centre for European Policy Studies, in Athens, August 31-September 2.Google Scholar
  12. THYGESEN, NIELS (1989a). A European Central Banking System — Some Analytical and Operational Considerations, in: collection of papers annexed to Delors Report, 157–176.Google Scholar
  13. THYGESEN, NIELS (1989b). The Benefits and Costs of Currency Unification. Paper for 1989 Kiel Week Conference. The Completion of the Internal Market, forthcoming in volume of proceedings, Kiel Institute of World Economics.Google Scholar
  14. WALTERS, ALAN (1986). Britain’s Economic Renaissance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. BALDWIN, R. (1988). Hysteresis in Import Prices: The Beachhead Effect. American Economic Review, 78, 773–785.Google Scholar
  16. BALDWIN, R. and KRUGMAN, P. (1989). Persistent Trade Effects of Large Exchange Rate Shocks. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 104(4), 635–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. CANZONERI, M. and ROGERS, C. (1990). Is the European Community an Optimal Currency Area? Optimal Taxation Versus the Cost of Multiple Currencies. American Economic Review, 80(3), 419–433.Google Scholar
  18. DIXIT, A. (1989). Hysteresis, Import Penetration, and Exchange Rate Pass-Through. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 104, 205–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. DORNBUSCH, R. (1989). The EMS, the Dollar and the Yen, in: Giavazzi, F., Micossi, S. and Miller, M., eds., The European Monetary System. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 205–228.Google Scholar
  20. FISCHER, S. (1982). Seigniorage and the Case for a National Money. Journal of Political Economy, 90, 295–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. GRILLI, V. (1989). Exchange Rates and Seigniorage. European Economic Review, 33, 550–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. ISHIYAMA, Y. (1975). The Theory of Optimum Currency Areas: A Survey. IMF Staff Papers, 22(2), 344–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. LEIGH-PEMBERTON, R. (1990). Europe 1992: Some Monetary Policy Issues, in: Monetary Policy Issues in the 1990s. Kansas City: Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, 175–182.Google Scholar
  24. MUNDELL, R.A. (1961). A Theory of Optimum Currency Areas. American Economic Review, 51(4), 657–65.Google Scholar
  25. WELFENS, P.J.J. (1990). Creating a European Central Bank after 1992: Issues of EC Monetary Integration and Problems of Institutional Innovation, this volume.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel Gros
  • Niels Thygesen

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations