Abstract
One way to get a better understanding of innovation processes in a specific country might be to carry out a systematic comparison with other countries. In this way the international diversity of modes and methods of innovation might be used to enhance the comprehension of national innovation possibilities. The concept of ‘national systems of innovation’ might be useful as a tool in such comparative studies.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Andersen, E. S. (1992), ‘Approaching National Systems of Innovation’, in Lundvall, Bengt-Ake (ed.) (1992), National Systems of Innovation. Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, London, Pinter Publishers.
Andersen, E. S. and Lundvall, B.-Å.(1988), ‘Small Countries Facing Technological Revolutions: An Analytical Framework’, in Freeman, C. and Lundvall, B.-Å.(eds.), SmallCountries Facing the Technological Revolution, London, Pinter Publishers.
Andreasen, P.B. & P. Lotz (1990), The Research Laboratory “Denmark” — Innovation in Danish Health Care Industry, Report prepared for the Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Copenhagen.
Aoki, M. (1986), ‘Horizontal vs. Vertical Information Structure of the Firm’, American Economic Review, Vol. 76, No. 5.
Aoki, M. (1990), ‘The Participatory Generation of Information Rents and the Theory of the Firm’, in Aoki, M. et al. (eds.), The Firm as a Nexus of Treaties, London, New Park, New Dehli, Sage Publications.
Basbjerg, B.L. (1983), Patents and the Measurement of Technological Change, Research Policy vol. 16 no. 2–4.
Braendgaard, A., Gregersen, B., Lundvall, B.-Å., Olesen, N. M. and Aaen, I (1984), ‘Strukturproblemer, Teknologipolitik, Sociale innovationer, Serie от industriel udvikling nr. 30, Aalborg Universitetsforlag.
Christensen, J.L. (1992), The Role of Finance in Industrial Innovation — Aspects ofFinancial Systems, Aalborg, Aalborg Universitets Forlag.
Central Statistical Office in Finland (1990), Science and Technology in Finland 1989, Helsinki.
Dahlberg, Å (1989), ‘Utbildning för 1990-talets arbetsmarknad’ in Mohlin, B (ed.) NordiskKonferens от Utbildning för 1990-talet, Göteborg, Graphie Systems.
Dalum, B. (1992), ‘Export Specialization, Structural Competi- tiveness and National Systems of Innovation’ in Lundvall, B.-A. (ed.), National Systems of Innovation Towardsa Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, London, Pinter Publishers.
Dalum, B., Moller K. , Jorgensen U. and Valentin F. (1991), ‘Inter- nationalisering og erhvervsudvikling’, Notat, København, Industri- og Handelsstyrelsen.
Edquist, C. and Lundvall B. Å. (1993), ‘Comparing the Danish and the Swedish Systems of Innovation’ in Nelson, R.R. (ed.), National Systems of Innovation, Forthcoming.
Edquist, C. and McKelvey, M. (1991), The Diffusion of New Product Technologies andProductivity Growth in Swedish Industry, CCC Working Paper no. 91–15, University of California at Bakerly.
ETLA, IFF, IUI, NøI (1990), Growth and Integration in a Nordic Perspective, Finland.
Freeman, C. (1987), Technology and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan, London, Pinter Publishers.
Freeman, C. and Lundvall, B.Å. (eds.), (1988), Small Countries Facing the TechnologicalRevolution, London, Pinter Publishers.
Grandstrand, C. and Sigurdson J. (eds.) (1985), Technological Innovation and IndustrialDevelopment in Telecommunications. The Role of Public Buying in the Telecommunication Sector in the Nordic Countries, Lund, Nordforsk and Research Policy Institute.
Gregersen, B. (1992), ‘The Public Sector as a Pacer in National Systems of Innovation’ in Lundvall, B.-A. (ed.), National Systems of Innovation Towards a Theory of Innovationand Interactive Learning, London, Pinter Publishers.
Heum, P. and Ylä-Anttila (1992), ‘Firm Dynamics in a Nordic Perspective — Large Corporations and Industrial Transformation’, Discussion Paper, ETLA, Finland.
Johnson, B. (1992), ‘Institutional Learning’, in Lundvall, Bengt-Ake (ed.) (1992), NationalSystems of Innovation. Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, Pinter
Publishers. Jørgensen, U. (1986), ‘Elektronikbranchens etablering og strukturelle udvikling’, Forskningsrapport nr. II, Institut for Samfundsfag, DtH, Copenhagen.
Lemola, T. and Lovio R. (1988), ‘Possibilities for a Small Country in High-Technology Production: The Electronics Industry in Finland’ in C. Freeman and B.-Å. Lundvall (eds.), Small Countries Facing the Technological Revolution, London, Pinter Publishers.
Lovio, R. (1992), The influence of foreign companies on the birth and development of the Finnish electronic industry’ in Vuori, S. and Ylä-Anttila, P., (eds.) (1992), MasteringTechnology Diffusion — The Finnish Experience, Helsinki, ETLA.
Lundvall, B.Å. (ed.) (1992), National Systems of Innovation. Towards a Theory ofInnovation and Interactive Learning, London, Pinter Publishers.
Lundvall, B.Å., Olesen N.M. and Aaen I. (1984), Det Landbrugs- industrielle Kompleks, Aalborg, Aalborg Universitstsforlag.
Maddison, A. (1991), Dynamic Forces in Capitalist Development, Oxford University Press.
Mjøset, L. (ed.) (1986), Norden — Dagen derpà, Kobenhavn, Samfundslitteratur.
Mjøset, L. (1992), The Irish Economy in a Comparative Institutional Perspective, Dublin, National Economic and Social Council, No. 93.
Nelson, R.R. (1986) ‘Institutions Supporting Technical Advance in Industry’, American Economic Review, vol. 76 no. 2.
Nordisk Industrifond (1991a), Nordisk FoU-statistik for 1989 og statsbudgettanalyse 1991, Information, no. 7, Oslo.
Nordisk Industrifond (1991b), Innovation activities in the Nordic Countries, Information, no. 3, Oslo.
Nordisk Industrifond (1992), Vitenskaps- og teknologi-indiaktorer for Norden, Information, no. 3, Oslo.
OECD (1991), Basic Science and Technology Statistics, Paris, OECD.
OECD (1992), Science and Technology Policy, Review and Outlook 1991, Paris, OECD.
Porter, M. E. (1990), The Competitive Advantage of Nations, New York, The Free Press.
Raumolin, J. (1992), ‘The diffusion of technology in the forest and mining sector in Finland’ in Vuori, S. and Ylä-Anttila, P. (eds.) (1992), Mastering Technology Diffusion —The Finnish Experience, Helsinki, ETLA.
Rothwell, R. & W. Zegveld (1981), Industrial Innovation and Public Policy, Frances Pinter, London.
Undervisningsministeriet (1991), Udviklingen iforskning og teknologi i 1980’erne — belystmed videnskabs- og teknologi- indikatorer, Kobenhavn.
Vuori, S. and Ylä-Anttila, P., (eds.) (1992), Mastering Technology Diffusion — The FinnishExperience, Helsinki, ETLA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1994 Physica-Verlag Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Gregersen, B., Johnson, B., Kristensen, A. (1994). Comparing National Systems of Innovation. The Case of Finland, Denmark and Sweden. In: Vuori, S., Vuorinen, P. (eds) Explaining Technical Change in a Small Country. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-95913-4_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-95913-4_6
Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-0760-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-95913-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive