The Social Infrastructure of Innovation in Finland

  • Antti Kasvio


One of the main limitations of traditional innovation research has been its narrow technological orientation. Researchers have been interested mainly in such things as the creation and utilization of new raw materials, technologies or products. A rather straightforward relationship has been assumed to exist between the growth of a nation’s R&D expenditure, extensive technology programmes, effective diffusion of new technologies and the competitiveness of an economy (see e.g. Niitamo 1958, Rosenberg 1971 and OECD 1980).


Nordic Country Industrial Relation Social Infrastructure National Innovation System Lean Production 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adler, P. (1989), ‘Capitalizing on New Product and Process Technologies: Current Problems and Emergent Trends in U.S. Industry’. Paper presented at the OECD Conference ‘Technological Change as a Social Process Society, Enterprise, and the Individual’. Helsinki 11–13 November.Google Scholar
  2. Alasoini, T. (1991), ‘Modernization Strategies in Finnish Manufacture, Past Experiences, Prospects for the 90’s’, in: Kasvio et al. (1991), 39–67.Google Scholar
  3. Alasoini, T. (1992), ‘Toward a New Model of Rationalization and Labor Relations in the Finnish Paper Industry’. International Journal of Human Factors in Manufacturing vol. 2, 4, 355–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alestalo, M., Uusitalo, H. (1986), Finland. Flora, P.(ed.), Growth to Limits. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  5. Allardt, E. et al. (1988), Ihminen, työpaikan tärkein voimavara. Helsinki (in Finnish).Google Scholar
  6. Allardt, E. (1990), ‘Tieteen ja korkeakoululaitoksen kehitys keskeiseksi yhteiskunnalli-seksi laitokseksi’, in: Riihinen (1990), 615–633 (in Finnish).Google Scholar
  7. Aoki, M. (1986), ‘Horizontal vs. Vertical Information Structure of the Firm’. American Economic Review, Vol. 76, No. 5.Google Scholar
  8. Asplund, R. (1991), Education, Human Capital and Economic Growth. Helsinki: ETLA (The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy), Series В No. 71.Google Scholar
  9. Boyer, R.(1989), New Directions in Management Practices and Work Organization. General Principles and National Trajectories. Paper presented at the OECD Conference ‘Technological Change as a Social Process Society, Enterprise, and the Individual’. Helsinki 11–13 November.Google Scholar
  10. Brulin, G. (1989), Fran den ‘svenska modellen’ till företagskorporatism? Facket och den nya företagsledningsstrategin. Lund: Studentlitteratur (in Swedish).Google Scholar
  11. Bruun, N., Nielsen, R. (1992), ‘The Future of the Nordic Labour Relations Model’, in: C Bruun etal.(1992), 221–263.Google Scholar
  12. Bruun, N., Flodgren, C., Halvorsen, M., Hydén, H., Nielsen, R. (eds.) (1992), The Nordic Labour Relations Model. Labour Law and Trade Unions in the Nordic Countries — Today and Tomorrow. Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  13. Cole, R.E. (1989), Strategies for Learning. Small-Group Activities in American, Japanese, and Swedish Industry. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  14. Crouch, C (1990), Generalized Political Exchange in Industrial Relations in Europe during the 20th Century, in: Marin, B. (ed.), Governance and Generalized Political Exchange. Self-Organizing Policy Networks in Action. Frankfurt am Main: Campus, 69–116.Google Scholar
  15. Dertouzos, M.L., R.K. Lester and R.M. Solow, (1989), Made in America. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  16. Dore, R. (1986), Flexible Rigidities. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Dosi, G., C Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg and L. Soete (eds.) (1988), Technical Change and Economic Theory. London: Pinter Publishers.Google Scholar
  18. Economist (1992), ‘Coming Top. A Survey on Education’. The Economist, November 21st–27th.Google Scholar
  19. Edquist, C and B.-Å. Lundvall (1989), ‘Comparing Small National Systems of Innovation’, mimeo.Google Scholar
  20. Elam, M. and M. Börjeson (1991), ‘Workplace Reform and the Stabilization of Flexible Production in Sweden’, in:V Jessop et al. (1991), 314–359.Google Scholar
  21. Emerson, M. (1988), ‘Regulation or Deregulation of the Labour Market’. European Economic Review 32, 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. ETLA (1993), The Finnish Economy, 1993/1. Helsinki: ETLA (The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy).Google Scholar
  23. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (1989), Participation in Change — New Technology and the Role of Employee Involvement. Dublin: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions.Google Scholar
  24. Flodgren, B. (1992), ‘Co-Determination at the Workplace’, in: Bruun et al. (1992), 46–92.Google Scholar
  25. Freeman, C. (1989), Technological Change as a Social Process — Society, Enterprises, and the Individual. OECD: Paris.Google Scholar
  26. Freeman, C. (1992), Tormal Scientific and Technical Institutions in the National System of Innovation’, in: Lundvall (1992), 169–187.Google Scholar
  27. Handy, C. (1989), The Age of Unreason. London: Business Books Ltd.Google Scholar
  28. Hertog, J.F. den and P. Schröder, (1989), Social Research for Technological Change: Lessons from National Programmes in Europe and North America. Maastricht: MERIT - Maastricht Economic Research Institute on Innovation and TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  29. Hingel, A. (1991), Archipelago Europe — Islands of Innovation. Brussels: Commission of the European Community, DG XII/H-3. Monitor/FAST, april.Google Scholar
  30. Hohn, H.W. (1991), Von der Einheitsgewerkschaft zum Betriebssyndikalismus. Soziale Besschliessung im dualen System der Interessenvertretung. Berlin: Zigma.Google Scholar
  31. Hyötyläinen, R., K. Toikka, R. Heinonen, A. Kasvio, J. Kiviniitty, P. Seppälä and E. Tuominen (1991), Teknis-organisatorinen muutos ja mukautuvat tuotantojärjestelmät. Tutkimussuunnitelma 14.10 (in Finnish).Google Scholar
  32. Hänninen, V. and K. Kauppinen-Toropainen (1981), ‘Case Studies in Job Reorganization and Job Redesign in Finland’. Institute of Occupational Health, Reviews 6 HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  33. d’Iribarne, P. (1989), La Logique de l’Honneur. Gestion des Entreprises et Traditions Nationales. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar
  34. Jaikumar, R. (1986), Post-Industrial Manufacturing. Harvard Business Review, Nov.-Dec, 79–86.Google Scholar
  35. Jessop, В., H. Kastendiek, K. Nielsen and A.K. Pedersen (eds.) (1991), The Politics of Flexibility. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  36. Julkunen, R. (1987), Työprosessi ja pitkät aallot. Työn uusien organisaatiomuotojen synty ja yleistyminen. Jyväskylä: Vastapaino (in Finnish).Google Scholar
  37. Julkunen, R., Rantalaiho, L. (1991), ‘Crisis of Caring: Towards New Solutions of Welfare Services’, in: Kasvio et al. (1991), 293–320.Google Scholar
  38. Kairamo, K. (ed.) (1989), Education for Life: A European Strategy. Surrey: Butterworth Scientific Ltd.Google Scholar
  39. Kasvio, A. (1990), Recent Work Reforms, Their Social and Political Context and the Development of Social Scientific Work Research in Finland. University of Tampere, Work Research Centre, Working Papers 7.Google Scholar
  40. Kasvio, A. (1991), ‘Strategies of Organizational Change in Finland’, in: Kasvio et al. (1991), 189–206.Google Scholar
  41. Kasvio, A., Cs. Makó and M. McDaid (eds.)(1991), Work and Social Innovations in Europe. University of Tampere, Work Research Centre, Working Papers 25.Google Scholar
  42. Katzenstein, P.J. (1985), Small States in World Markets. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Kauppinen, T. (1989), Työelämän suhteet markkinatalousmaissa: neuvottelutoimimman kehityksen suuntaviivoja Suomessa ja 12 muussa maassa. Helsinki: Työelämän suhteiden neuvottelukunta 1/1989 (in Finnish).Google Scholar
  44. Kauppinen, T. (1992), Suomen työmarkkinamallin muutos. Helsinki: Työministeriö, työpoliittinen tutkimus 30 (in Finnish).Google Scholar
  45. Kevätsalo, K. (1991), Ammattiyhdistysliike ja työelämän muutos. Ammattiyhdistysliik-keen toiminta 5 työpaikan muutoksessa. Helsinki: Metallityöväen Liitto (in Finnish).Google Scholar
  46. Kiviniitty, J. and T. Alasoini (1992), ‘Prospects of Lean and Anthropocentric Manufacturing in the Finnish Engineering Industry’. Paper presented for the Conference Autonomy and Independent Work. Nijmegen, 30 November/1 December.Google Scholar
  47. Koistinen, P. and K. Lilja (1988), ‘Consensual Adaptation to New Technology: The Finnish Case’, in: Hyman, R. and W. Streeck (eds.), New Technology and Industrial Relations. Oxford: Blackwell, 263–271.Google Scholar
  48. Kolu, T. (1991), Työelämän laatu 1977–1990. Hyvinvoinnin koettuja muutoksia työssä. Työolokomitean mietinnön liiteselvitys. Komiteanmietintö 1991:38, Helsinki (in Finnish).Google Scholar
  49. Komiteanmietintö (1991), Työolokomitean mietintö. Komiteanmietintö 1991:37. Helsinki (in Finnish).Google Scholar
  50. Kortteinen, M. (1992), Suomalainen työ — tutkimus kulttuurisesta muodosta. Helsinki: Vastapaino (in Finnish).Google Scholar
  51. Kosonen, P. (1991), ‘Flexibilization and the Alternatives of the Nordic Welfare States’, in:C Jessop et al.(1991), 263–281.Google Scholar
  52. Kämäräinen, P. (1991), ‘Education, Vocational Training and Working Life in the Nordic Countries. Remarks on Current Educational Reforms and on the Role of Research Activities’. Finnish Work Research Bulletin,Vol. 2, 2b, 8–11.Google Scholar
  53. Laine-Sveiby, K. (1991), Suomalaisuus strategiana. Helsinki: WSOY (in Finnish).Google Scholar
  54. Landesmann, M. (1992), ‘Industrial Policies and Social Corporatism’, in:C Pekkarinen et al. (1992), 242–279.Google Scholar
  55. Lavikka, R. (1992), ‘Teamwork Enhances Flexibility in the Finnish Clothing Industry’, in: Kasvio, A. (ed.), Industry without BlueCollar Workers — Perspectives of European Clothing Industry in the 1990’s. University of Tampere, Work Research Centre, Working Papers 36, 381–397.Google Scholar
  56. Lehner, F. (1991), Synthesis Report: Anthropocentric Production Systems: The European Response to Advanced Manufacturing and Gobalization. IAT-FAST-APS Study Report No. 1. Gelsenkirchen: Institut fur Arbeit und Technik.Google Scholar
  57. Lehto, A.-M. (1992), Työelämän laatu ja tasa-arvo. Työolokomitean liiteselvitys. Komiteanmietintö 1991:39, Helsinki (in Finnish).Google Scholar
  58. Lilja, R., T. Santamäki-Vuori and G. Standing (1990), Unemployment and Labour Market Flexibility: Finland. International Labour Office, Finland.Google Scholar
  59. Lillrank, P., Kano, N. (1989), Continuous Improvement. Quality Control Circles in Japanese Industry. Ann Arbor: Center for Japanese Studies, The University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  60. Lotti, L. (1985), ‘Values Associated to Work in Finland and in Some Other Industrial Countries’ in: Kasvio, A. and E. Kaukonen (eds.), Working Life in Transition. Proceedings of a Finnish-Soviet Seminar. Tampere: University of Tampere, Department of Sociology and Social Psychology, Research Reports 8, 208–214.Google Scholar
  61. Lundvall, B.A.(ed.) (1992), National Systems of Innovation. Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter Publishers.Google Scholar
  62. Murray, F., (1989), ‘Beyond the Negotiation of Gender: Technology Bargaining and Equal Opportunities’. Economic and Industrial Democracy, Vol. 10, 517–542.Google Scholar
  63. McDaid, M. (1991), ‘Convergence and Integration in Europe: A Comment on Pohjola’s Paper’, in: Kasvio et al. (1991), 265–289.Google Scholar
  64. Nelson, R.R. (ed.) (1992), National Systems of Innovations: A Comparative Study. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Nielsen, R. (1992), ‘Protection of Employment Rights’, in: Bruun et al. (1992), 93–112.Google Scholar
  66. Niemelä, J. and H. Leimu (1991), ‘From Industrial Conflict towards Flexible Specialization: A Case Study of Finnish Shipyards, in: Kasvio et al. (1991), 79–99.Google Scholar
  67. Niitamo, O.E. (1958), Tuottavuuden kehitys Suomen teollisuudessa vuosina 1925–1952. Helsinki: Kansantaloudellisia tutkimuksia 20 (in Finnish).Google Scholar
  68. Normann, G. (ed.) (1992), Mot en Ny Nordisk Välfärdsmodell. Solna: Industriförbundets Förlag AB (in Swedish).Google Scholar
  69. Numminen, J. (1992), Tulevaisuuden teesit yliopistoille’. Yliopisto, 27, 10–12 (in Finnish).Google Scholar
  70. Nye, J.S. Jr. (1990), ‘Top Dog and Staying that Way’. The World in 1991. London: The Economist Publications, 14–15.Google Scholar
  71. OECD (1980), Technical Change and Economic Policy. Science and Technology in a New Economic and Social Context. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  72. OECD (1988), New Technologies in the 1990’s. Towards a Socio-Economic Strategy. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  73. Ollus, M., R. Lovio, J. Mieskonen, P. Vuorinen, J. Karko, S. Vuori and P. Ylä-Anttila (1990), Joustava tuotanto ja verkostotalouden rakenteet. Helsinki: SITRA, No. 109 (in Finnish).Google Scholar
  74. Pekkarinen, J. (1988), ‘Keynesianism and the Scandinavian Models of Economic Policy’. Helsinki: World Institute for Development Economics Research, Working Papers 35.Google Scholar
  75. Pekkarinen, J., M. Pohjola, and R. Rowthorn (eds.) (1992), Social Corporatism — A Superior Economic System? Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  76. Perez, C (1983), Structural Change and the Assimilation of New Technologies in the Economic and Social System. Futures, Vol. 15, No. 4.Google Scholar
  77. Piirainen, T. (1992), ‘Hyvinvointivaltio ja yhteiskunnalliset ristiriidat: kohti postkorporatistista sosiaalipolitiikkaa?’, in: Riihinen, O. (1992), 291–320 (in Finnish).Google Scholar
  78. Pohjola, M. (1988), ‘Työehtosopimusjärjestelmän tulevaisuus’. TTT Katsaus, 4 (in Finnish).Google Scholar
  79. Pohjola, M. (1992), ‘Corporatism and Wage Bargaining’, in: Pekkarinen et al. (1992), 44–81.Google Scholar
  80. Poikkeus, L. (1992), ‘The Early Retirement as a Means of Labour Market Policies’, in: Koistinen, P. et al., Finnish Labour Market Policy in Trial — Evaluation on the 1980’s.Google Scholar
  81. Tampere: University of Tampere, Work Research Centre, Working Papers 27, 67–91.Google Scholar
  82. Ranta, J. (1989), ‘Tomorrow’s Industries, Structural Changes and the Future of Work Organizations’, in: Cooley, M., European Competitiveness in the 21st Century. Integration of Work, Culture and Technology. A Contribution to the FAST Proposal for an R&D Programme on Human Work in Advanced Technological Environments. Brussels: June.Google Scholar
  83. Rehnström, P. (1992), ‘Pärjääkö Suomi Euroopan tuottavuuskilpailussa’. Helsinki: Suomen työnantajain keskusliitto, teknillinen osasto 8.4 (in Finnish).Google Scholar
  84. Reich, R. (1991), The Work of Nations. London: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  85. Riihinen, O. (ed.)(1990), Suomi 2017. Jyväskylä: Gummerus (in Finnish).Google Scholar
  86. Riihinen, О. (1992), ‘Näkökulmia tulevaisuuteen’, in: Riihinen (ed.) (1992), 603–638 (in Finnish).Google Scholar
  87. Riihinen, O. (ed.)(1992), Sosiaalipolitiikka 2017. Näkökulmia suomalaisen yhteiskunnan kehitykseen ja tulevaisuuteen. Porvoo: WSOY (in Finnish).Google Scholar
  88. Roobeek, A. (1987), Crisis of Fordism and the Rise of the New Technological Paradigm. Futures, April.Google Scholar
  89. Rosenberg, N. (1971), Penguin Modern Economic Readings: The Economics of Technical Change. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  90. Saari, J. (1992), Social Packages: Preconditions, Strategies, Explanations. Unpublished MA Thesis, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
  91. Scott, A.J. and M. Storper (1987), ‘High Technology Industry and Regional Development: a Theoretical Critique and Reconstruction’. International Social Science Journal, March.Google Scholar
  92. Seppälä, E.-O. (1991), ‘Kansallinen innovaatiojärjestelmä ja 1990-luvun teknologia-politiikka’. Työelämän tutkimus vol. 2, 5, 813 (in Finnish).Google Scholar
  93. Silvennoinen, H. and A. Pirilä (1992), ‘Lattiatason ideaalityöntekijä — työn vaatimusten, työntekijän ominaisuuksien ja rekrytointistrategioiden yhteensovittuminen’. Työpoliittinen aikakauskirja 4, 13–25 (in Finnish).Google Scholar
  94. Sorensen, B.A. (1980), ‘Handlingsorientert Arbeidslivsforskning — en kort beskrivelse av tradisjoner og aktuelle forskningsprogrammer ved Arbeidspsykologisk Institutt, Arbeidsfoskningsinstituttene’, in: Bjornstad, J.H., Bjaerland, T. (eds.), Arbeidsmiljo & Demokratisering. Larvik, 75–97.Google Scholar
  95. Standing, G. (1988), Unemployment and Labour Market Flexibility: Sweden. Geneva: International Labour Organization.Google Scholar
  96. Streeck, W. (1989), ‘Skills and the Limits of Neo-Liberalism: The Enterprise of the Future as a Place of Learning’. Work, Employment and Society 3, 90–104.Google Scholar
  97. Streeck, W. (1992), Social Institutions and Economic Performance. Studies on Industrial Relations in Advanced Capitalist Economies. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  98. Streeck, W. and Ph. Schmitter (1992), ‘From National Corporatism to Transnational Pluralism: Organized Interests in the Single European Market’, in: Streeck (1992), 197–231.Google Scholar
  99. Thurman, J. (1991), ‘Competence and Choice at Work’. On Business and Work. Towards New Frontiers. A Draft Report to be Submitted to the International Symposium Work Life in Transition, Stockholm, October 13, 1991. Uppsala: International Labour Organisation, 8–16.Google Scholar
  100. Toikka, K. (1992), ‘Rautahäkki: miten se rakennetaan ja puretaan’. Työelämän tutkimus vol. 3, No. 4, 35–39 (in Finnish).Google Scholar
  101. Tuohinen, R. (1990), Työlle viileä sukupolvi? Nuorten työlle antamista merkityksistä, niiden tutkimisesta ja tulkinnasta. Helsinki: Työministeriö, työpoliittisia tutkimuksia 1 (in Finnish).Google Scholar
  102. Valtion tiede- ja teknologianeuvosto (1991), Tiede- ja teknologiapoliittinen katsaus. Helsinki: Suomen Akatemia (in Finnish).Google Scholar
  103. Vartia, P. and P. Ylä-Anttila (1992), Kansantalous 2017. Helsinki: ETLA (The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy), Series В No. 80 (in Finnish).Google Scholar
  104. Vuori, S. and P. Vuorinen (1992), “Outlines of the Finnish Innovation System: The Institutional Setup and Performance”, first chapter of this volume.Google Scholar
  105. Vuorinen, P., Technology Cooperation: Do Networks Exist?’, in: Kasvio et al. (1991), 131–141.Google Scholar
  106. Wobbe, W. (1992), ‘Anthropocentric Production Systems: Shall the EC Intervene in New Emerging Structures of European Business?1 Paper presented for the Conference Autonomy and Independent Work, Nijmegen 30 November/1 December.Google Scholar
  107. Womack, J.P., D.T. Jones and D. Roos (1990), The Machine That Changed the World. New York.Google Scholar
  108. Ylä-Anttila, P. and R. Lovio (1991), ‘Flexible Production, Industrial Networks and Company Structure — Some Scandinavian Experience’, in: Kasvio et al. (1991), 103–129.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Physica-Verlag Heidelberg 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Antti Kasvio
    • 1
  1. 1.University of TampereFinland

Personalised recommendations