Skip to main content

The Main Features of the Trade-Political Framework in CentralEast European Countries

  • Chapter
Entrepreneurship in CentralEast Europe
  • 32 Accesses

Abstract

Though the CentralEast European countries, i.e. the Czech Republic, the Slovak Republic, Hungary and Poland, are much less “open” to the world than market economies of a similar size, they were — and still are — much more sensitive to changes in their external environment. At present this is due mainly to the fact that their economy is still very energy demanding. Consequently, all major changes in the volume and/or costs of their fuel imports have serious repercussions on their economic performance. The introduction of world prices in trade with the former USSR merely led to a five-fold increase in the import costs of Soviet fuels and caused a loss of about 3/4 bill. US $ in each of these countries only in 1991 — an amount which represented between 0.3 to 0.8 percent of their GDP. The vulnerability of the economies of these countries is also due to the very high share of so-called “sensitive items”1 in their exports, as the import of these goods is subject to restrictions world-wide. (To consequences of this we shall come back in part 3.3 of this chapter.) The third and most important reason for their vulnerability was the dominant orientation of their foreign trade to East European markets, especially to that of the former Soviet Union. According to official statistical data based on official exchange rates, the share of COMECON countries in their overall trade reached 68 to 77 percent in the middle of the 80’s (Table 3.1).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. See Lepänen S.: “The Soviet Union, Eastern Europe and Finland”, The Governmental Institute for Economic Research, Helsinki 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See Kawecka-Wyrzykowska E.: “The Evaluation of Benefits from GSP Granted to Poland by the EC” in Bák H., Góra S., Ladyka S., “Export Restructuring of Polish Economy, Assessment of Methods and Instruments Applied”, Studie i Materialy No. 22, IKCHZ, Warsaw, XL 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See Kawecka-Wyrzykowska E.: “Implications of the Association Agreement with the European Communities for Poland”, in “Reintegration of Poland into the West European Economy”, Foreign Trade Research Institute, Warsaw, April 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See Guzek M.: “Implications for the Polish Economy after Joining CEFTA”, Institut Konjunkturi Cen Handlu Zaganicznego, Warsaw, 1992. The consequences of Polish participation in the CEFTA was assessed with regard to changes in domestic prices and production costs in the entire economy due to cheaper imports from Hungary and the Czech and the Slovak Republics as a result of the reduction of the fiscal costs of trade; the decline of fiscal revenues to the national budget; benefits of Polish exporters realized in exports to the Czech and the Slovak Republics and to Hungary. Changes in domestic prices and production costs resulting from a decline in prices for imports from these three countries were analyzed with an input-output model encompassing 43 branches of production. Advantages from trade liberalization gained by Polish exporters were considered to be equivalent to the amount of taxes and duties levied on imports from Poland.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See Guzek M.: “Central European Free Trade Area a Polish Perspective”. Discussion paper presented at the Europe Conference of the Freie Universität Berlin on November 4–6th 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  6. See Bond, D. L., and Solomon A.: “Levelling the Playing Field for East European Exports”, discussion paper presented at the IWESS conference in November 1991 and recommendations presented by the Import-Export Bank of the United States to the government of the US in the same year.

    Google Scholar 

  7. See i. a. Obláth G.: “Convertibility in Eastern Europe, Concepts, Issues and Strategies”, and Espa E.: “External Assistance, Multilateralism and Convertibility in the Post-Socialist Economies”, discussion papers presented at the AIECE meeting, May 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Winkler A.: “Außenhandel, Inflation und Konvertibilität. Ein Beitrag zur Diskussion über eine Osteuropäische Zahlungsunion”, Freie Universität Berlin, VI. 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Van Brabant J.: “Key Problems of Creating a Central European Payments Union”. Banca Nazionale, Quarterly Review, June 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lavigne M.: “How to Solve the Problems Resulting from the Collapse of East European-Soviet Trade”, Florence, EUI, 1992 etc.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Physica-Verlag Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sereghyová, J. (1993). The Main Features of the Trade-Political Framework in CentralEast European Countries. In: Entrepreneurship in CentralEast Europe. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-95908-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-95908-0_4

  • Publisher Name: Physica-Verlag HD

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-0730-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-95908-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics