Skip to main content

Frictionless forecasting is a fiction

  • Chapter
The Necessity of Friction

Abstract

Observers of the political and economic scene note that almost all decisions involve incremental changes from the status quo1. Slightly mitigating the ills we have has always seemed preferable to flying to others that we know not of. It now appears, however, that advanced information technology and improved theoretical understanding of social and economic phenomena may have put us on the verge of a breakthrough, and the possibility exists of flying directly to radically new solutions that we can predict sufficiently well not only to avoid ills but discontinuously to enhance the good. Arguments for this brave new frictionless society go roughly as follows:

  1. 1.

    With the increase in specialization, experts are available today who are capable of short-term forecasts about almost all aspects of social and economic behavior.

  2. 2.

    Concurrently, it is becoming increasingly difficult for any one person to integrate all of this understanding.

  3. 3.

    Computer technology now allows one to incorporate this immense body of short-term forecast knowledge in programs that can, through simulation, predict the long-term future impacts of contemplated decisions. These impacts are often surprising and counterintuitive, accounting for the fear, in the past, of anything but small changes2.

  4. 4.

    Once we can predict the impact of globally discontinuous decisions, debate can appropriately center on which effects are preferable and not on what the impacts will be.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Lindblom, Charles E., “The Science of ‘Muddling Through’,” Pub.Adm.Rev., 19,1959, 79–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Forrgster, Jay W., “Lessons from System Dynamics Modeling,” System Dynamics Review, 3,2, Summer 1987, 136–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Werbos, Paul J., “A menu of designs for reinforcement learning over time,” in Neural Networks for Control, T. Miller, R. Sutton, and P. Werbos, eds., MIT Press, Cambridge, MA., 1990, 67–95

    Google Scholar 

  4. Simon, Herbert A., “The Mind’s Eye in Chess,” (with W.G. Chase), in Models of Thought, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT., 1979, 421. See also his Hitchcock Lecture delivered at the University of California at Berkeley, Feb. 13, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A more detailed exposition of our skill-acqusition model, directed more toward coping skills than predictive skills, may be found in our book: Dreyfus, Hubert L. and Dreyfus, Stuart E., Mind over Machine, paperback edition, Free Press, New York, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dreyfus and Dreyfus, Mind Over Machine, op cit, 36–40, 163–167

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Physica-Verlag Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dreyfus, H.L., Dreyfus, S.E. (1993). Frictionless forecasting is a fiction. In: Åkerman, N. (eds) The Necessity of Friction. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-95905-9_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-95905-9_18

  • Publisher Name: Physica-Verlag HD

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-95907-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-95905-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics