Advertisement

Ethnic Segmentation as the Unintended Result of Intentional Action

  • Hartmut Esser

Abstract

The substantive object of this contribution and the definition of the collective characteristic to be studied here are simple to describe: the ethnic segmentation as a certain kind of selectivity of social relations. Ethnic segmentation is considered to be present where persons of differing ethnicity can be shown to choose, from among the various options open to them (for interaction, economic activity, identification etc.), that alternative which is orientated to ethnic criteria, and to do so more often than would be predicted given random choice. The methodological peculiarity is also quite clear: segmentation is undoubtably a collective phenomenon. In most cases segmentation occurs with such an inevitability (for example, race-relations cycles) that one really could speak of there being an ‘iron law’ at work i.e. the social process involved takes its course even if it runs contrary to the declared intentions of the individuals involved and is thus ‘inevitable’ and ‘irreversible’. The present contribution concerns itself with the individualistic reconstruction of ethnic segmentation as an — under certain conditions — ‘inevitable’ result of intentional actions of individuals.

Keywords

Host Country Migrant Worker Social Distance Intentional Action Decision Structure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Blalock, H.M., and Wilken, P.H. (1979). Intergroup Processes. A Micro-MacroPerspective. New York and London: Free Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bogardus, E.S. (1929/30). “A Race Relations Cycle”. American Journal of Sociology, 35: 612–617.Google Scholar
  3. Boudon, R. (1979). Widersprüche sozialen Handelns. Darmstadt und Neuwied: Luchterhand.Google Scholar
  4. Bondon, R. (1980). Die Logik des gesellschaftlichen Handelns. Darmstadt und Neuwied: Luchterhand.Google Scholar
  5. Esser, H. (1980). Aspekte der Wanderungssoziologie. Darmstadt und Neuwied: Luchterhand.Google Scholar
  6. Granovetter, M. (1978). “Threshold Models of Collective Behaviour”. American Journal of Sociology, 83: 1420–1443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Noel, D.L. (1968). “A Theory of Origin of Ethnic Stratification”. Social Problems, 16: 157–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Orbell, J.M., and Sherill, K.S. (1969). “Racial Attitudes and the Metropolitan Context: A Structural Analysis”. Public Opinion Quarterly, 33: 46–54.Google Scholar
  9. Park, R.E. (1950). “The Nature of Race Relations”. In: R.E. Park, Race and Culture. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press.Google Scholar
  10. Schelling, T.C. (1971). “Dynamic Models of Segregation”. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1: 143–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Schelling, T.C. (1978). Micromotives and Macrobehavior. New York and London: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  12. Shibutani, T., and Kwan, K. (1965). Ethnic Stratification. A Comparative Approach. New York and London: Collier-Macmillan.Google Scholar
  13. Weber, M. (1972). Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. 5th Ed., Tübingen: Mohr-Siebeck.Google Scholar
  14. Weinstock, S. (1963). “Role Elements: A Link Between Acculturation and Oc- cupational Status”. British Journal of Sociology, 14: 144–149.Google Scholar
  15. Wiley, N.F. (1970). “The Ethnic Mobility Trap and Stratification Theory”. In: P.I. Rose (Ed.). The Study of Society, 2nd Ed. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  16. Wippler, R. (1982). “The Generation of Oligarchic Structures in Constitutionally Democratic Organizations”. In: W. Raub (Ed.). Theoretical Models and Empirical Analyses. Contributions to the Explanation of Individual Actions and Collective Phenomena. Utrecht: E.S. Publications.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Physica-Verlag Heidelberg Wien 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hartmut Esser
    • 1
  1. 1.Methoden und Analysen (ZUMA) e.V.Zentrum für UmfragenMannheimGermany

Personalised recommendations