Power is one of the most alluring but also one of the most intractable concepts in political science. It leads to a number of paradoxes (Brams, 1976, ch. 7), which continue to manifest themselves in real-life voting bodies like the European Community Council of Ministers (Brams and Affuso, 1985; Brams, 1985: 101–104). For example, one implication of some definitions of power is that the greater proportion of resources (such as votes) that an actor controls, the greater is his power. In this paper, we shall show that this implication in a certain context may be false.
KeywordsAssure Posit Arena
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Brams, S.J. (1975). Game Theory and Politics. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Brams, S.J. (1976). Paradoxes in Politics: An Introduction to the Nonobvious in Political Science. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Brams, S.J. (1983). Superior Beings: If They Exist, Howe Would We Know? Game-Theoretic Implications of Omniscience, Omnipotence, Immortality, and Incomprehensibility. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
- Brams, S.J. (1985). Rational Politics: Decisions, Games, and Strategy. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
- Brams, S.J., Felsenthal, D.S., and Maoz, Z. (1986). “Chairman paradoxes under approval voting”. In H. Berghel (ed.), Theory and Decision: Essays in Honor of Werner Leinfellner. Dordrecht: D. Reidel (forthcoming).Google Scholar
- Brams, S.J., and Fishburn, P.C. (1983). Approval Voting. Cambridge: Birkhäuser Boston.Google Scholar
- Farquharson, R. (1969). Theory of Voting. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Handel, M.I. (1981). Weak States in the Internationl System. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
- Nagel, J.H. (1975). The Descriptive Analysis of Power. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Niemi, R.G., and Frank, A.Q. (1982). “Sophisticated voting under the plurality procedure”. In P.C. Ordeshook and K.A. Shepsle (eds.), Political Equilibrium. Boston: Kluwer Nijhoff.Google Scholar