Advertisement

Advances in CT pp 229-238 | Cite as

Advantage of “Dynamic Screening” in Major Trauma Victims and Critical Care Patients

  • J. Gmeinwieser
  • P. Gerhardt
  • K. Mühlbauer
  • M. Strotzer

Abstract

The use of “dynamic screening” has two great advantages in CT examination of major trauma victims and critical care patients. Data acquisition with one second scan time minimizes artifacts caused by uncontrolable respiration or motion. The scan rate of 12 images per minute allowes extensive scan series within a few minutes without significant loss of image quality. “Dynamic screening” makes CT of major trauma victims and critical care patients faster, easier and safer.

Keywords

Intensive Care Patient Trauma Victim Critical Care Patient Intimal Flap Malignant Liver Tumor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Brant-Zawadski M, Miller EM, Federle MP (1981) CT in the evaluation of spinal trauma. AJR 136: 369–375Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dunn EL, Berry PH, Conally JD (1983) Computed tomography of the pelvis in patients with multiple injuries. J Trauma 23: 378–382PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    French BN, Dublin AB (1977) The value of computerized tomography in the management of 1000 consecutive head injuries. Surg Neurol 7: 141–143Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Friedmann G, Mödder U (1982) Computertomographie bei Bauchtraumen. Radiologe 22: 112–116PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Heller M, Jend H-H (1984) Computertomographie in der Traumatologie. Thieme, Stuttgart New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Insel J, Weissmann C, Kemper M, Askanazi J, Hyman AJ (1986) Cardiovascular changes during transport of critically ill and postoperative patients. Crit Care Med 14: 539–542PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mc Cort JJ (1987) Caring for the major trauma victim: the role for Radiology. Radiology 163: 1–9Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Peitzman AB, Makaroun MS, Slasky S, Ritter P (1986) Prospective study of computed tomography in initial management of blunt abdominal trauma. J Trauma 26: 585–591PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sherck JP, Mc Cort JJ, Oakes DD (1984) Computed tomography in thoracoabdominal trauma. J Trauma 24: 1015–1020PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schultz E, Fischer P (1982) Meßungenauigkeiten und Artefakte bei der Computertomographie. Fortschr Röntgenstr 137: 466–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Trunkey D, Federle MP (1986) Computed tomography in perspective. J Trauma 29: 660–663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zilhka A (1982) Computed tomography in facial trauma. Radiology 144: 545–548Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zimmerman RA, Bilaniuk LT (1978) Cranial computed tomography in the diagnosis and management of acute head trauma. AJR 131: 27–34PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Gmeinwieser
  • P. Gerhardt
  • K. Mühlbauer
  • M. Strotzer

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations