Infrastructure for Technological Change: Intellectual Property Rights
The patent system is, in certain respects, unique in the context of the law governing monopolies and restrictive trade practices. For various reasons which are explored in more depth below, the government chooses to give a monopoly right to those who produce (and/or own) certain intellectual property. Within this system of protection, the drafting and examination of patent specifications are of paramount importance. As a consequence, the law affords Patent Agents and, in effect, the Patent Office, a privileged position with a view to ensuring that this process is carried out expertly. This paper reports on research undertaken by the authors for the Office of Fair Trading, prior to its ruling (for a more detailed discussion see OFT, 1986; Bosworth and Wilson, 1988).
KeywordsIncome Expense Monopoly Marplan
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Balz, M.W., 1975, Invention and Innovation Under Soviet Law, Lexington Books, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
- Banks, M.A.L. (Chairman), 1970, The British Patent System, Report of the Committee to Examine the Patent System and Patent Law, Cmnd 4407, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
- Bosworth, D.L. and R.A. Wilson, 1988, Infrastructure for the Protection of Intellectual Property: Patent Agents and Patent Monopolies, Research Report, Institute for Employment Research, University of Warwick, Coventry.Google Scholar
- Marplan, 1985, Report on a Survey of the Earnings and Professional Practices of Patent Agents, Prepared for the Office of Fair Trading, Marplan, London.Google Scholar
- Mincer J., 1974, Schooling, Experience and Earnings, National Bureau of Economic Research, Human Behaviour and Social Institutions Series, NBER, New York.Google Scholar
- Nicholson, R.B., 1983, Intellectual Property Rights and Innovation, Cmnd 9117, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
- Office of Fair Trading, 1986, Review of Restrictions on the Patent Agents’ Profession, OFT, London.Google Scholar
- Patents, Designs and Trademarks, Annual Report of the Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trademarks, HMSO (annual), London.Google Scholar
- Sample Surveys, 1986, Survey of Applicants and Applications, Survey for the Office of Fair Trading, London.Google Scholar
- Taylor, C.T. and Z.A. Silberston, 1973, Economic Impact of Patents, Cambridge U.P., Cambridge.Google Scholar
- Tookey, G.W., 1972, Restrictive Business Practices: an Analysis of the WIPO Model Laws for the Developing Countries from the Point of View of the Export Interests of the Developing Countries, United Nations, New York.Google Scholar
- Wright, B.D., 1983, “The Economics of Invention Incentives: Patents, Prizes and Research Contracts”, American Economic Review 73, 691–707.Google Scholar