Skip to main content

Infrastructure for Technological Change: Intellectual Property Rights

  • Conference paper
Knowledge and Industrial Organization

Abstract

The patent system is, in certain respects, unique in the context of the law governing monopolies and restrictive trade practices. For various reasons which are explored in more depth below, the government chooses to give a monopoly right to those who produce (and/or own) certain intellectual property. Within this system of protection, the drafting and examination of patent specifications are of paramount importance. As a consequence, the law affords Patent Agents and, in effect, the Patent Office, a privileged position with a view to ensuring that this process is carried out expertly. This paper reports on research undertaken by the authors for the Office of Fair Trading, prior to its ruling (for a more detailed discussion see OFT, 1986; Bosworth and Wilson, 1988).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Akerlof, G., 1970, “The Market for Lemons: Qualitative Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism”. Quarterly Journal of Economics 84,488–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balz, M.W., 1975, Invention and Innovation Under Soviet Law, Lexington Books, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks, M.A.L. (Chairman), 1970, The British Patent System, Report of the Committee to Examine the Patent System and Patent Law, Cmnd 4407, HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosworth, D.L. and R.A. Wilson, 1988, Infrastructure for the Protection of Intellectual Property: Patent Agents and Patent Monopolies, Research Report, Institute for Employment Research, University of Warwick, Coventry.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P. and J. Stiglitz, 1980, “Uncertainty Industrial Structure and the Speed of R&D”, Bell Journal of Economics 11, 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitch, E.W., 1977, “The Nature and Function of the Patent System”, Journal of Law and Economics 20, 2, 265–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marplan, 1985, Report on a Survey of the Earnings and Professional Practices of Patent Agents, Prepared for the Office of Fair Trading, Marplan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mincer J., 1974, Schooling, Experience and Earnings, National Bureau of Economic Research, Human Behaviour and Social Institutions Series, NBER, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, R.B., 1983, Intellectual Property Rights and Innovation, Cmnd 9117, HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Fair Trading, 1986, Review of Restrictions on the Patent Agents’ Profession, OFT, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patents, Designs and Trademarks, Annual Report of the Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trademarks, HMSO (annual), London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sample Surveys, 1986, Survey of Applicants and Applications, Survey for the Office of Fair Trading, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C.T. and Z.A. Silberston, 1973, Economic Impact of Patents, Cambridge U.P., Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tookey, G.W., 1972, Restrictive Business Practices: an Analysis of the WIPO Model Laws for the Developing Countries from the Point of View of the Export Interests of the Developing Countries, United Nations, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G., 1975, “The Transitional Gains Gap”, Bell Journal of Economics 9, 2, 671-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G. and A. Gordon, 1981, “Perceived Earnings Functions and ex ante Rates of Return to Post Compulsory Education in England”, Higher Education 10,199–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R.A., 1980, “The Rate of Return to Becoming a Qualified Scientist or Engineer in Great Britain, 1966–76”, Scottish Journal of Political Economy 21,41–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R.A., 1983, “Rates of Return: Some Further Results”, Scottish Journal of Political Economy 30, 2, 114–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R.A., 1987, “The Determinants of the Earnings of Professional Engineers in Great Britain 1981”, Applied Economics 19,983–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, B.D., 1983, “The Economics of Invention Incentives: Patents, Prizes and Research Contracts”, American Economic Review 73, 691–707.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bosworth, D.L., Wilson, R.A. (1989). Infrastructure for Technological Change: Intellectual Property Rights. In: Andersson, Å.E., Batten, D.F., Karlsson, C. (eds) Knowledge and Industrial Organization. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-95597-6_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-95597-6_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-95599-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-95597-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics