Skip to main content

Abstract

In recent years the effectiveness of control by fungicides is threatened by the phenomenon of fungicide resistance. The latter is defined as the stable, inheritable adjustment of a fungal cell or a fungal population to a fungicide, resulting in a less than normal sensitivity to that fungicide. The term fungicide resistance is used for strains of a sensitive species which have become, usually by mutation, significantly less sensitive to a fungicide. Application of the fungicide will select for the resistant strains, and thus favour their multiplication. When the major part of the pathogen population has become resistant, failure of disease control may occur (Delp and Dekker 1985). Problems caused by fungicide resistance have increased over the last 2 decades, since selective fungicides were introduced, many of which act systemically in the plant. These fungicides act at specific sites in the fungal metabolism. In contrast to these specific-site inhibitors, there have hardly been any resistance problems with conventional fungicides, such as copper compounds and dithiocarbamates. The latter interfere with many enzyme systems in the fungal metabolism and are calles multisite inhibitors. The relation between specific-site inhibitors and mutation towards resistance is briefly discussed in Section 3.1. For more detailed information about the genetic and biochemical basis of resistance, see Georgopoulos (1977) and Dekker (1985).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anonymous (1947) Test tube dilution for use with the slide germination method of evaluation protectant fungicides. Phytopathology 37: 354–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Brancato FP, Golding NS (1953) The diameter of the mold colony as a reliable measure of growth. Mycologia 45: 848–864

    Google Scholar 

  • Brent KJ (1982) Powdery mildews of barley and cucumber. In: Dekker J, Georgopoulos SG (eds) Fungicide Resistance in Plant Protection. Pudoc, Wageningen, pp 219–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekker J ( 1982 a) Can we estimate the fungicide resistance hazard in the field from laboratory and greenhouse tests? In: Dekker J, Georgopoulos SG (eds) Fungicide Resistance in Crop Protection. Pudoc, Wageninden, pp 128–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekker J ( 1982 b) Countermeasures for avoiding fungicide resistance In: Dekker J, Georgopoulos SG (eds) Fungicide Resistance in Crop Protection. Pudoc, Wageningen, pp 177–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekker J (1982 c) Method for fungicide resistance in powdery mildew of cucumber. Plant Prot Bull FAO 30: 59–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekker J (1985) The development of resistance to fungicides. In: Hutson DH, Robers TR (eds) Progress in pesticide biochemistry and toxicology, vol 4. pp 165–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekker J, Ark PA (1959) Protection of antibiotic pimaricin from oxidation and ultraviolet light by chlorophyllin and other compounds. Antibiot Chemother 9: 327–332

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Delp CJ, Dekker J (1985) Fungicide resistance: definition and use of terms. EPPO Bull 15: 333–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckert JW (1982) Penicillium decay of citrus friuts. In: Dekker J, Georgopoulos SG (eds) Fungicide Resistance in Crop Protection. Pudoc, Wageningen, pp 231–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgopoulos SG (1977) Development of fungal resistance to fungicides. In: Siegel MR, Sisler HD (eds) Antifungal compounds, vol 2. pp 409–495

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgopoulos SG (1982a) Detection and measurement of fungicide-resistance. In: Dekker J, Georgopoulos SG (eds) Fungicide-Resistance in Plant Protection. Pudoc, Wageningen, pp 24–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgopoulos SG (1982 b) Method for resistance to benzimidazoles in Cercospora beticola. Plant Prot Bull FAO 30: 63–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgopoulos SG, Dekker J (1982) Detection and measurement of fungicide-resistance, general principles. Plant Prot Bull FAO 30: 39–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgopoulos SG, Dovas C (1973) A serious outbreak of strain of Cercospora beticola resistant to benzimidazole fungicides in Northern Greece. Plant Dis Rep 57: 321–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgopoulos SG, Alexandri E, Crysayi M (1972) Genetic evidence for the action of oxathiin and triazole derivates on the succinic dehydrogenase system of Ustilago maydis mitochondria. J Bacteriol 110: 809–817

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gilpatrick JD (1982) Method for fungicide resistance in Venturia spp. of apple and pear. Plant Prot Bull FAO 30: 51–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones AL, Walker RJ (1976) Tolerance of Venturia inaequalis to dodine and benzimidazole fungicides in Michigan. Plant Dis Rep 60: 40–44

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kable PF, Jeffery H (1980) Selection for tolerance in organisms exposed to sprays of biocide mixtures: a theoretical model. Phytopathology 70: 8–12

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Levy Y, Levi R, Cohen Y (1983) Buildup of a pathogen subpopulation resistant to a systemic fungicide under various control strategies: a flexible simulation model. Phytopathology 73: 1475–1480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogawa JM (1982) Method for resistance to benzimidazoles in Monilinia spp. on fruit and nut crops. Plant Prot Bull FAO 30: 55–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogawa JM, Manji BT, Heaton CR, Petrie J, Sonoda RM (1983) Methods for detecting and monitoring the resistance of plant pathogens to chemicals. In: Georghiou GP, Saito T (eds) Pest Resistance to Pesticides. Plenum, New York p 117–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwinn FJ ( 1982 a) Socio-economic impact of fungicide resistance. In: Dekker J, Georgopoulos SG (eds) Fungicide-Resistance in Crop Protection. Pudoc, Wageningen, pp 16–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwinn FJ (1982 b) Method for fungicide resistance in downy mildew of grapes. Plant Prot Bull FAO 30: 67–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwinn FJ (1982 c) Method for fungicide resistance in late blight of potato. Plant Prot Bull FAO 30: 69–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Skylakakis G (1982) The development and use of models describing outbreaks of fungicide resistance. Crop Prot 1: 249–262

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sonoda RM, Ogawa JM, Lyons T, Hanson J A (1970) Correlation between immobilization of zoospores by fungicides and the control of Phytophthora root and crown rot of transplanted tomatoes. Phytopathology 60: 783–787

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Staub T, Sozzi D (1984) Fungicide resistance: a continuing challenge. Plant Dis 68: 1026–1031

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tillman RW, Sisler HD (1973) Effect of chloroneb on the growth and metabolism of Ustilago maydis. Phytopathology 63: 219–225

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Torgeson DC (1967) Determination and measurement of fungitoxicity. In: Fungicides, an Advanced Treatise, vol 1. Academic Press, London, pp 93–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Uesugi Y (1982) Method for fungicide resistance in Pyricularia oryzae. Plant Prot Bull FAO 30: 141–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe MS, Minchin PN (1976) Quantitative assessment of variation in field populations of Erysiphe graminis f. sp. hordei using mobile nurseries. Trans Br Mycol Soc 66: 332–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadoks JC (1982) Can we use models describing the population dynamics of fungicide-resistant strains? In: Dekker J, Georgopoulos SG (eds) Fungicide-Resistance in Crop Protection. Pudoc, Wageningen, pp 149–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Zehr I, Bird GW, Fisher KD, Kickey KD, Lewis FH, Line RF, Rickard S (eds) (1978) Methods for evaluating plant fungicides, nematocides and bacteriocides. American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, USA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Springer-Verlag Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dekker, J. (1988). How to Detect and Measure Fungicide Resistance. In: Kranz, J., Rotem, J. (eds) Experimental Techniques in Plant Disease Epidemiology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-95534-1_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-95534-1_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-95536-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-95534-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics