Intergeneration Solutions to the Social Security Dilemma

  • Manfred J. Holler
Conference paper
Part of the Microeconomic Studies book series (MICROECONOMIC)

Abstract

The contemporary discussion of state-run social security plans follows two paths. The first one is characterized by the search for a social insurance scheme which might be feasable, at least under minor revisions, for future periods up to the middle of the next century. For example, Lawrence Thompson (1983, 1432) presents projections on the ratios of “covered workers per OASDI beneficiary” for the year 2060. Various formulas have been analyzed in theoretical and empirical models in order to test whether the corresponding insurance scheme is feasible under alternative short-term economic fluctuations, alternative growth rates of the economy and the population and long-term Kontratieff and Esterlin cycles. By feasibility is meant that, on the one hand, the pensioners receive a per capita income which allows them to have a “decent” eve of their lives, and on the other hand, the working population is left with a “reasonable” net income after paying the premiums into the social insurance budget.

Keywords

Income Assure Expense Bors Arena 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aaron, H. (1966), “The Social Insurance Paradox”, Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, 32, 371–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arrow, J. (1982), “Risk Perception in Psychology and Economics”, Economic Inquiry, 20, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Asimakopulos, A. and J.C. Weldon (1968), “On the Theory of Government Pension Plans”, Canadian Journal of Economics, 1, 699–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker, G.S. (1962), “Investment in Human Capital: A Theoretical Analysis”, Journal of Political Economy (Supplement), 70, 9–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cagan, Ph. (1965), The Effect of Pension Plans on Aggregate Savings. Evidence from a Sample Survey, National Bureau of Economics Research, Occasional Paper 95, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Davis, O.A. and M.J. Hinich (1968), “On the Power and Importance of the Mean Preference in a Mathematical Model of Democratic Choice”, Public Choice, 5, 59–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Esping-Anderson, G. and W. Korpi (1984), Social Policy as Class Politics in Postwar Capitalism; Scandinavia, Austria and Germany, Institutet for Social Forskning, Ocassional Paper 4, Stockholm.Google Scholar
  8. Feldstein, M.S. (1974), “Social Security, Induced Retirement and Aggregate Capital Accumulation”, Journal of Political Economy, 82, 905–926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fisher, F.M. (1977), “On Donor Sovereignty and United Charities”, American Economic Review, 67, 632–638.Google Scholar
  10. Friedman, J.W. (1977), Oligopoly and the Theory of Games, Amsterdam et al.; North-Holland.Google Scholar
  11. Green, K.V. (1974), “Toward a Positive Theory of Intergenerational Income Transfers”, Public Finance, 29, 306–324.Google Scholar
  12. Harsanyi, J.C. (1955), “Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics, and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility”, Journal of Political Economy, 61, 309–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harsanyi, J.C. (1976), “Can Maximin Principle Serve as a Basis for Morality? A Critique of John Rawls’ Theory”, American Political Science Review, 69, 594–606.Google Scholar
  14. Harsanyi, J.C. (1982), “Morality and the Theory of Rational Behavior”, in; A. Sen and B. Williams (eds.) Utilitarism and Beyond, Cambridge; Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Holler, M.M. (1985), Solutions to the Social Security Dilemma Reconsidered, mimeo. University of Munich.Google Scholar
  16. Hollister, R. (1976), “Social Mythology and Reform; Income Maintenance for the Age”, Annuals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 415, 19–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Howe, R.E. and J.E. Roemer (1981), “Rawlsian Justice as the Core of a Game”, American Economic Review, 71, 880–895.Google Scholar
  18. Kliemt, H. and B. Schauenberg (1984), “Coalitions and Hierarchies: Some Observations on the Fundamentals of Human Cooperation”, in: M.J. Holler (ed.). Coalitions and Collective Action, Würzburg: Physica-Verlag, 9–32.Google Scholar
  19. Lambert, P.J. (1985), “Endogenizing the Income Distribution: the Re- distributive Effect, and Laffer Effects, of a Progressive Tax- Benefit System”, European Journal of Political Economy,1, 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lerner, A.P. (1959), “Consumption-Loan Interest and Money”, Journal of Political Economy, 67, 512–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Luce, R.D. and H. Raiffa (1957), Games and Decisions, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  22. Petersen, J.H. (1983), The Financing of Old-Age Pensioning from an Elementary Public Choice Perspective, Department of Public Finance and Policy, Odense University, Ocassional Papers No. 4.Google Scholar
  23. Rawls, J. (1951), “Outline of a Decision Procedure for Ethics”, Philosophical Review, 60, 177–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rawls, J. (1972), A Theory of Justice, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Samuelson, P.A. (1958), “An Exact Consumption-Loan Model with or without the Social Contrivance of Money”, Journal of Political Economy, 66, 467–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Samuelson, P.A. (1959), “Consumption-Loan Interest and Money: Reply”, Journal of Political Economy, 67, 518–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schelling, Th.C. (1960), The Strategy of Conflict, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Taylor, M. (1976), Anarchy and Cooperation, London: Whiley.Google Scholar
  29. Thaler, R.H. and H.M. Shefrin (1981), “An Economic Theory of Self- Control”, Journal of Political Economy, 89, 392–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Thompson, L.H. (1983), “The Social Security Reform Debate”, Journal Of Economic Literature, 21, 1425–1467.Google Scholar
  31. Townley, P.G.C. (1981), “Public Choice and the Social Insurance Paradox: A Note”, Canadian Journal of Economics, 14, 712–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Weizsäcker, C.C., von (1980), Barriers to Entry, Berlin et al.: Springer.Google Scholar
  33. Verbon, H.A.A. (1984), On the Independence of Financing Methods and Redistributive Aspects of Public Pensions, Universiteit van Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  34. Verbon H.A.A. and F.A.A.M. van Winden (1984), Public Pensions and Political Decision-Making, Paper presented at the Conference “On the Origin and Future of Social Security Schemes”, 13–14 December 1984 at Berlin (in this volume).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Manfred J. Holler

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations