Abstract

In every case of an unverified, progressive intracranial lesion its nature should be histologically confirmed whether it is a neoplasm or otherwise. This applies whatever its location, and whether there are solitary or multiple lesions. This is essential before the planning of any conservative or radiation treatment. The exception to this is when an open exploratory operation is primarily indicated, during the performance of which adequate biopsy material can be obtained for conventional histological examination. This holds true even today, when modern computer tomographic devices guarantee improved differential diagnosis. Experience with CT has proved, after the initial phase of the first few years, that as a result of misinterpretation of the CT scan diagnostic errors can occur and, as a result of this the selection of the wrong treatment or even the failure to achieve a cure.

Keywords

Catheter Adenoma Radioactive Isotope Sarcoma Interferon 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Badt, B.: Mikroskopische Schnelldiagnose bei hirnchirurgischen Eingriffen. Zentralbl. Neurochir. 2, 123 (1937).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Birg, W., Krebber, L., Mundinger, F.: Ein einfaches Verfahren für die Übertragung von Tomographie-Scan-Schichten auf das Röntgenbild, insbesondere für die funktionelle Neurochirurgie. Fortschr. Neurol. Psychiat. 47, 637–640 (1979).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Birg, W., Mundinger, F.: Direct target point determination for stereotactic brain operations from CT-data and the calculation of setting parameters for polar-coordinate stereotactic devices. Proc. 8th Meeting World Soc. Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, Part III, Zürich 1981, Appl. Neurophysiol. 45, 387–395 (1982).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Heath, R. G., John, S., Foss, O.: Stereotaxic biopsy: A method for the study of discrete brain regions of animals and man. Arch. Neurol. 4, 291 (1961).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kautzky, R.: Die Schnelldiagnose intracranieller Erkrankungen mit Hilfe des supravital gefärbten Quetschpräparats. Virchows Arch. Path. Anat. 320–495 (1951).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    MacMenemey, W. H.: An appraisal of smear-diagnosis in neurosurgery. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 33, 471(1960).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Morris, A. A.: The use of the smear technique in the rapid histological diagnosis of tumours of the central nervous system: Description of a new staining method. J. Neurosurg. 4, 497–504 (1947).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mundinger, F.: Die stereotaktische interstitielle Therapie nicht resezierbarer intracranieller Tumoren mit Ir-192 und Jod-125. In: Kombinierte chirurgische und radiologische Behandlung maligner Tumoren. Wannemacher, M., Schreiber, H. W., Gauwerky, F., pp. 90–112, München: Urban & Schwarzenberg 1981.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mundinger, F.: Implantation of Radioisotopes (Curietherapie) In: Textbook of Stereotaxy of the Human Brain. Ed.: Schaltenbrand/Walker, pp. 410–445, Stuttgart: Thieme 1982.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mundinger, F., Birg, W.: CT-Aided Stereotaxy for Functional Neurosurgery and Deep Brain Implants. Advances in Neurosurgery 10, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer 1981.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mundinger, F., Hoefer, T.: Protracted long-term irradiation of inoperable midbrain tumours by stereotactic Curietherapy using Iridium-192. Acta Neurochirurg. Suppl. 21, 93–100(1974).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mundinger, F., Metzel, E.: Interstitial radioisotope therapy of intractable diencephalic tumors by the stereotaxic permanent implantation of iridium-192. Including Bioptic Control. Conf. neurol. 32, 195–202 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ostertag, Chr. B., Mennel, H. D., Kiessling, M.: Stereotactic biopsy of brain tumors. Surg. Neurol. 14, 275–283 (1980).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pecker, J., Scarabin, J.-M., Vallee, B., Bruchner, J.-M.: Treatment in tumours of the pineal region: Value of stereotaxic biopsy. Surg. Neurol. 12, 341 (1979).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Riechert, T., Giesinger, M. A., Mölbert, E.: Biopsien während stereotaktischer Operationen beim Parkinsonsyndrom. Neurochirurgia 10, 106–118 (1967).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Riechert, T., Mundinger F.: Beschreibung und Anwendung eines Zielgerätes für stereotaktische Hirnoperationen (IL Modell). Acta Neurochir. 33, 308 (1955).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shetter, A. G., Bertuccini, T. V., Pittman, H. W.: Closed needle biopsy in the diagnosis of intracranial mass lesions. Surg. Neurol. 8, 341 (1977).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sugita, K., Mutsuga, N., Takaoka, Y., Hirota, T., Shibuya, M., Doi, T.: Stereotaxic exploration of para-third ventricle tumours. In Proceedings of the 6th Symposium of the International Society of Research in Stereoencephalotomy, part II. Tokyo (1973) Convin. Neurol. 37, 156 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Waltregny, A.: Apport des méthodes steréotaxiques dans le diagnostic et le traitement des tumeurs cérébrales. Ann. Radiol. 19, 241 (1976).PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Mundinger

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations