Advertisement

Transabdominal Fine Needle Biopsy of Lymph Nodes for Urologic Cancer Staging

  • K. Rothenberger
  • A. Hofstetter
  • N. Rupp
  • K.-J. Pfeifer

Abstract

Accurate staging of malignant urologic tumors related to the tumor node metastasis (TNM) system has become general. It is particularly this procedure that allows best treatment planning. Clinicians often underrate the frequency of lymphogenous dissemination. Patients affected by carcinoma of the prostate show metastasis in a lymph node with 20% in stage B and 64% in stage C (Spellmann et al. 1977), i.e., these patients are to be classified as stage D. For this reason a staging operation should be performed prior to radical operation for both tumor of the bladder and carcinoma of the prostate. These surgical interventions mean discomfort to the patient and call for preoperative diagnosis with the greatest possible accuracy. Lymphography, however, represents a high percentage of false negatives and false positives (Fuchs 1965). In this case, sonography and computed tomography were not sufficient to furnish improvement of major importance. Both methods do not allow detection of metastasis in a lymph node at an early stage of growth, as it is exclusively the increase in tumor masses that can be determined (Feuerbach et al. 1979; Rothenberger et al. 1979).

Keywords

Lymph Node Tumor Node Metastasis Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Fine Needle Biopsy Urinary Bladder Carcinoma 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Feuerbach St, Rupp N, Rossmann W, Heller HJ, Rothenberger K, Tauber R, Schmidt G (1979) Lymphknotenmetastasen-Diagnose durch Lymphographie und CT. Fortschr Röntgenstr 130:3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Fuchs WA (1965) Lymphographie und Tumordiagnostik. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Göthlin JH (1976) Post-lymphographic percutaneous fine needle biopsy of lymph nodes guided by fluroscopy. Radiology 120:105Google Scholar
  4. Rothenberger K, Rupp N, Feuerbach St, Bayer-Peitsch E (1979) Lymphknoten-Metastasennachweis durch transabdominelle Feinnadelbiopsie. In: Verhandlungsbericht der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Urologie 1978. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, p 65Google Scholar
  5. Rothenberger K, Hofstetter A, Pfeifer K-J, Rupp N (1979) Transperitoneale Feinnadel-Biopsie retroperitonealer Lymphknoten in der Karzinomdiagnostik. Fortschr Med 97:2218–2222PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Rupp N, Rothenberger K, Bayer-Pietsch E, Feuerbach St, Esch U (1979) Die perkutane Feinnadelbiopsie von Lymphknoten. Fortschr Röntgenstr 130:3, 328Google Scholar
  7. Spellmann MC, Castellino RA, Ray GR, Pistenma DA, Bagshaw MA (1977) An evaluation of lymphography in localized carcinoma of the prostate. Radiology 125:637Google Scholar
  8. Zornoza J, Wallace S, Goldstein HM, Lukeman M, Jing B-S (1977) Transperitoneal percutaneous retroperitoneal lymph node aspiration biopsy. Radiology 122:111PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Rothenberger
  • A. Hofstetter
  • N. Rupp
  • K.-J. Pfeifer

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations