Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems ((LNE,volume 161))

  • 31 Accesses

Abstract

One possible measure of efficiency for an organization is the number of administrators per operative or the total number of employees per operative which is the previous number plus one. The first measure was defined as aR. For a constant span of control we have

$$\matrix{{{\rm{a}}_{\rm{R}} } \hfill & { = {{1 + {\rm{s}}_{\rm{R}} {{{\rm{s}}^{\rm{R}} - 1} \over {{\rm{s - 1}}}} - {\rm{s}}_{\rm{R}} {\rm{s}}^{{\rm{R - 1}}} } \over {{\rm{s}}_{\rm{R}} {\rm{s}}^{{\rm{R - 1}}} }}} \hfill \cr {} \hfill & { = {{1 + {{{\rm{s}}_{\rm{R}} } \over {{\rm{s - 1}}}} \cdot \left( {{\rm{s}}^{{\rm{R - 1}}} - 1} \right)} \over {{\rm{s}}_{\rm{R}} {\rm{s}}^{{\rm{R - 1}}} }}} \hfill \cr {} \hfill & { = {1 \over {{\rm{s - 1}}}} + {\rm{s}}^{1 - {\rm{R}}} \cdot \left[ {{1 \over {{\rm{s}}_{\rm{R}} }} - {1 \over {{\rm{s - 1}}}}} \right].} \hfill \cr }$$

Thus

$${\rm{a}}_{\rm{R}} \left\{ {\matrix{ { \mathbin{\lower.3ex\hbox{$\buildrel>\over {\smash{\scriptstyle=}\vphantom{_x}}$}} {1 \over {{\rm{s - 1}}}}\,{\rm{if}}\,{\rm{s}}_{\rm{R}} < {\rm{s}}} \hfill \cr { = {1 \over {{\rm{s - 1}}}}\,{\rm{if}}\,{\rm{s}}_{\rm{R}} = {\rm{s - 1}}{\rm{.}}} \hfill \cr } } \right.$$
(1)

Proposition (1) contains two statements: The ratio of administrators to operatives takes on its minimum value when the president’s span of control assumes its admissible maximum. More importantly, the minimum ratio \({1 \over {{\rm{s - 1}}}}\) depends only on the span of control and is independent of the scale R of the organization. A constant span of control is consistent with constant returns to scale in administration provided the president’s span of control is large. Here we have defined returns to scale in terms of the ratio of administrators to operatives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Beckmann, M.J., (1960), “Returns to Scale in Business Administration,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 74, 464–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckmann, Martin (1977b), “On the Ratio of Supervisors to Supervised,” Quantitative Wirtschaftsforschung, Festschrift für Wilhelm Krelle, (E. Helmstädler and R. Hern, eds.), Tübingen: Mohr, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starbuck, W.H., (1964), “Organizational Growth and Development,” in J.G. March (ed.), Handbook of Organizations, Chicago: Rand McNally & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, Oliver E., (1967), “Hierarchical Control and Optimum Firm Size,” Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, 123–138.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1978 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Beckmann, M.J. (1978). Scale. In: Rank in Organizations. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 161. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-95336-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-95336-1_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-09088-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-95336-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics