Abstract
After World War II approximately 8 million former prisoners of war, forced laborers, concentration camp inhabitants, and other displaced persons from the eastern European countries remained in Germany, Austria, Italy and Greece. UNRRA (United Nations Relief and Rehabilitation Administration) repatriated approximately 6½ million of them, IRO (International Refugee Organization) together with other agencies, especially ICEM (International Committee for European Migration), helped with the resettlement of another million. The rest remained under the mandate of the High Commissioner for Refugees of the United Nations, thereafter called UNHCR, in camps and through a slow process different methods, mainly integration into the host countries, were tried. It became a common habit to call the last remnant of displaced persons the “hard core”. The meaning of this deplorable expression was that this remaining group did not want to be repatriated mainly for political reasons, was not eligible2 for further emigration for social and health reasons, and had difficulties with integration partly because of resentments on both sides — foreigners as well as local people. There were some signs of resignation on the part of the national and international authorities: the different welfare agencies were of the general opinion that for this residual group no satisfactory solutions could be found. Pessimism and apathy developed, especially within the camps of the refugees themselves.
The author is deeply obliged to Mr. A.R. Lindt, the former United Nations’ High Commissioner for Refugees, and to Mr. W. Pinegar of the High Commissioner’s Office, without whom this project would not have been possible.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Eligible means that a person is acceptable for a relief-or emigration program according to the conditions of the agency concerned. Eligibility is a special problem for the programs of UNHCR because here these conditions are defined by international laws in a very strict way.
The refugee workers of the different local or international welfare agencies, mostly under contract with UNHCR, are called counselors. Some of them were trained social workers, the majority dedicated people with a kind of in-service-training only.
Social prognosis in this respect means the assessment of the chance for integration in normal social life with the help of the specific kinds of assistance, e. g. financial help, social guidance, psychiatric therapy, etc.
Under “matched contribution” one has to understand that the programs are financed partly by local authorities and agencies.
Bhaskaran, K., Seth, R.C., and Yadav, S.N., Migration and Mental Ill-Health in Industry, in Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 12, 1-2, 1970, 102–116.
Caravedo, B. and Valdivia, O.: A Study on Mental Health of a Cross-Section of Industrial Population. The International Journal of Social Psychiatry, VII, 269–282, 1961.
Dube, K.C.: Pilot Investigation of the Incidence of Mental Diseases in India — An Interim Report to the Indian Council of Medical Research, 1967.
Fraser, R.: The Incidence of Neurosis among Factory Workers — Industrial Health Research Board, Report No. 90. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London, 1947.
Ganguli, H.C.: Mental Health in Industry. Presidential Address at the Fifty-fourth Indian Science Congress — Section of Psychology and Educational Sciences, 1967.
Kleiner, R.J. and Parker, S.: “Goal Striving and Psychosomatic Symptoms in a Migrant and Non-migrant Population” in ‘Mobility and Mental Health’, Edited by Mildred B. Kantor, Illinois, U.S.A., Charles, C. Thomas, 1965.
Kleiner, R.J. and Parker, S.: Migration and Mental Illness — A New Look — Amer. Social. Review, 24: 687–690, 1959.
Lazarus, J., Locke, B.Z., and Thomas, D.S.: Migration Differentials in Mental Diease — Milbank, Mem. Fund. — Quart. 41: 25; 1963.
Locke, B.Z., Kramer, M. and Pasamanic B.: Immigration and Insanity — Public Health Reports, 75:301, 1960.
Lee, S.E.: Socio-economic and Migration Differentials in Mental Disease — Milbank Mem. Fund — Quart., 41, 249, 1963.
Malzberg, B.: Social and Biological Aspects of Mental Disease — Utica, N.Y. State Hospitals, Press, 1940.
Malzberg, B. and Lee, E.S.: Migration and Mental Disease — New York — Social Science Research Council, 1956.
Murphy, H.B.M.: Migration and the Major Mental Disorders in “Mobility and Mental Health” — Edited by Mildred B. Kantor — Illinois, U.S.A., Charles C. Thomas, 1965.
Ødegaard, Ø.: Emigration and Insanity — Acta. Psychiat. et. Neurol. Supplement, 4, 1932.
Ødegaard, Ø.: Distribution of Mental Diseases in Norway — Acta. Psychiat. et. Neurol., 20:247, 1945.
Sethi, B.B., Gupta, S.C., Rajkumar: 300 Urban Families — A Psychiatric Study, The Indian Jour. Psychiat. IX, 280–302, 1967.
Thomas, G.E., Bhaskaran, K. and Chopra, H.D.: A Psychiatric Morbidity Survey of a Village in Ranchi (unpublished data), 1966.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1973 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Strotzka, H. (1973). Mental Health Aspects of Camp Clearance. In: Uprooting and After.... Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-95213-5_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-95213-5_23
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-95215-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-95213-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive