Nierenkrankheiten pp 1035-1190 | Cite as

Die Immunologie der Nephropathien und Nierentransplantation

  • E. F. Pfeiffer
  • K. Federlin
  • F. Wahlig
Part of the Handbuch der Inneren Medizin book series (INNEREN, volume 8 / 0)

Zusammenfassung

Pathogenetische Probleme hatten von jeher für die Nierenerkrankungen eine praktisch wichtige Bedeutung. Der beste Beweis ist die schnelle Anerkennung, die das „Pathogenetische System der Brightschen Nierenkrankheiten“ von Volhard und Fahr (1913) schon bald nach seiner Aufstellung gefunden hat. Erst nach dieser Klassifizierung der Nierenkrankheiten in degenerative, entzündliche und arteriosklerotische Leiden war es möglich, feste morphologische Begriffe mit den funktionellen Symptomen der Klinik zu verbinden. Prognostische Aussagen wurden möglich.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Brod, J., u. V. Prat: Pyelonephritis. III. Internat. Congr. Nephrol. Washington 1966, Abstr. S. 99.Google Scholar
  2. Dixon, F. J.: Pathogenesis of immunologically induced glomerulonephritis. III. Intern. Congr. Nephrol. Washington 1966, Abstr. S. 59.Google Scholar
  3. Dixon, F. J., J. D. Feldman, and J. J. Vazquez: Experimental glomerulonephritis. The pathogenesis of a laboratory model resem-bling the spectrum of human glomerulonephritis. J. exp. Med. 113, 889 (1961).Google Scholar
  4. Federlin, K., W. Marx, S. Crespien, K. H. Ostner, W. Menzel u. E. F. Pfeiffer: Studien zur „Übertragung” der Masugi-Nephritis der Ratte. X. Versuche zur Erzeugung einer einseitigen Nephritis bei der Ratte und zum Problem der Nierenfixation des heterologen Antikörpers. Z. Immun.-Forsch. 131, 480 (1966).Google Scholar
  5. Heptinstall, R. H.: Experimental pyelonephritis: Profit and loss. III. Intern. Congr. Nephrol. Washington 1966, Abstr. S. 60.Google Scholar
  6. Hess, E., C. T. Ashworth, and M. Ziff: Transfer of an autoimmune nephrosis in the rat by means of lymph node cells. J. exp. Med. 115, 421 (1962).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Heymann, W., B. Hackel, W. Hunter, and F. Cuppage: Transfer of experimental autoimmune nephrosis in rats. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. (N.Y.) 111, 568 (1962).Google Scholar
  8. Lindemann, W.: Sur le mode d’action de certains poisons renaux. Ann. Inst. Pasteur 14, 49 (1900).Google Scholar
  9. Murray, J. E., J. P. Merrill, and J. H. Harrison: Kidney transplantation between seven pairs of identical twins. Ann. Surg. 148, 343 (1958).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Pfeiffer, E. F., and K. Federlin: Experimental chronic glomerulonephritis: Role of nephritogenic cells and circulating kidney fixing antibodies in its immunologic mechanism. III. Intern. Congr. Nephrol. Washington 1966, Abstr. S. 63 (im Druck).Google Scholar
  11. Pfeiffer, E. F., u J. P. Merrill: Die Autoaggression in der Pathogenese der diffusen Glomerulonephritis. Dtsch. med. Wschr. 87, 934 (1962).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Pfeiffer, E. F., K. Schöffling, W. Sandritter, J. Schröder, K. Steigerwald u. L. Wolf: Studien zur „Übertragung” der Masugi-Nephritis der Ratte. I. Die Übertragung durch kurzdauernde Parabiose. Z. ges. exp. Med. 124, 471 (1954).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Steblay, R. W., and M. Rudofsky: Transfer of nephritis in sheep by sheep plasma containing antibodies reacting with sheep glomerular basement membrane (G.M.B.). III. Intern. Congr. Nephrol. Washington 1966, Abstr. S. 278.Google Scholar
  14. Ueda, Y., T. Takasy, and O. Sakai: The study of experimental pyelonephritis: The effect of E. coli endotoxin in the progression of chronic pyelonephritis. III. Intern. Congr. Nephrol. Washington 1966, Abstr. S. 61.Google Scholar
  15. Unanue, E. R., and F. J. Dixon: Experimental glomerulonephritis: V. Studies on the interaction of nephrotoxic antibodies with tissues of the rat. J. exp. Med. 122, 697 (1965).Google Scholar
  16. Unanue, E. R., and F. J. Dixon: Experimental glomerulonephritis: VI. The autologous phase of nephrotoxic serum nephritis. J. exp. Med. 122, 715 (1965).Google Scholar
  17. Unanue, E. R., F. J. Dixon, and S. Lee: Experimental glomerulonephritis: VIII. The in vivo fixation of heterologous nephrotoxic antibodies to, and their exchange among tissues of the rat. Int. Arch. Allergy 29, 140 (1960).Google Scholar
  18. Volhard, F., u. Th. Fahr: Die Bright’sche Nierenkrankheit. Klinik, Pathologie und Atlas. Berlin: Springer 1913Google Scholar

Literatur

  1. Acevedo, D., O. Gonzalezy, J. Safian: Acciön de los antihistaminicos en la evolueiön de la glomerulonefritis experimental. Rev. med. Chile 77, 41 (1949).Google Scholar
  2. Ahlström, G. C.: Zur Pathogenese der akuten diffusen Glomerulonephritis. Experimentelle Untersuchungen über die allergische Gewebsreaktion der Niere. Acta path, microbiol. scand., Suppl. 29–32, 1 (1936/37).Google Scholar
  3. Apitz, K.: Über anaphylaktische Organveränderungen bei Kaninchen. Virchows Arch. path. Anat. 289, 46 (1933).Google Scholar
  4. Aranson, B. G., B. D. Jankovic, B. H. Waksman, and C. Wennersten: Zit. nach R. Fischer u. B. Fischer, Nephrotoxic serum nephritis in thymecto- mized rats. J. exp. Med. 116, 177 (1961).Google Scholar
  5. Arends, E.: Die experimentelle Nephritis- Nephrose bei männlichen und weiblichen Sprague-Dawley-Ratten und ihre Beeinflussung durch verschiedene Hormone, insbesondere durch Stilben und Östradiol. Darstellung der Geschlechtsunterschiede. Inaug.-Diss. Freiburg 1960.Google Scholar
  6. Arhelger, R. B., J. G. Brunson, R. A. Good, and R. L. Vernier: Influence of gram-negative endotoxin on pathogenesis of nephrotoxic serum nephritis in rats. Lab. Invest. 10, 669 (1961).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Arhelger, R. B., P. N. Smith, B. L. Walker, W. M. Fant, and J. G. Brunson: Influence of local abdominal radiation on response of rabbits to nephrotoxic serum. Amer. J. Path. 39, 631 (1961).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Arnolt, W. Z., R. J. Kellar, and G. D. Mathew: Hypertension associated with experimental nephritis. Edinb. med. J. 44, 205 (1937).Google Scholar
  9. Ascoli, G., u. F. Figari: Über Nephrose. Berl. klin. Wschr. 560, 634 (1902).Google Scholar
  10. Auer, J.: Local autoinoculation of the sensitized organism with foreign proteins as a cause of abnormal reactions. J. exp. Med. 32, 427 (1920).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Barnett, H., D. Simons, and Wells, R. Jr.: Nephrotic syndrome occurring during tridione therapy. Amer. J. Med. 4, 760 (1948).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Bartlett, P., J. Keegan, and H. Schaefer: Mechanism of aminonucleoside-induced nephrosis in rats. Kidney mitochondrial phosphorylation and dephosphorylation activity. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. (N.Y.) 112, 96 (1963).Google Scholar
  13. Bartlett, P., H. Schaefer, and J. Keegan: Mechanism of aminonucleoside-induced nephrosis in the rat. The metabolism of tritiated aminonucleoside. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. (N.Y.) 102, 499 (1959).Google Scholar
  14. Bartlett, P., H. Schaefer, and J. Keegan: Mechanism of aminonucleoside-induced nephrosis in the rat. Hepatic mitochondriae oxydative phosphorylation. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. (N.Y.) 117, 248 (1964).Google Scholar
  15. Baxter, J.: In: Proc. 5th. Ann. Conf. on the Nephrotic Syndrome 1953, Nat. Nephr. Found, Inc. New York. Zit. nach E. F. Pfeiffer: Habil.-Schr. Frankfurt 1955.Google Scholar
  16. Belak, A., u. J. Siegler: Vegetatives Nervensystem und Immunität. IV. Mitt. Z. ges. exp. Med. 75, 443 (1931).Google Scholar
  17. Bell E. T., and B. J. Clawson: Experimental glomerulonephritis in a monkey. Amer. J. Path. 7, 57 (1931).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Bell, E. T., and B. T. Hartzell: Effect of foreign protein on the kidney. J. infect. Dis. 24, 618 (1919).Google Scholar
  19. Benacerraf, B., L. Potter, R. McCluskey, and F. Miller: The pathologie effects of intravenously administered soluble antigen-antibody-complexes. II. Acute glomerulonephritis. J. exp. Med. III, 195 (1960).Google Scholar
  20. Benjamin, E., u. E. Sluka: Antikörperbildung nach experimenteller Schädigung des hämatopoetischen Systems durch Röntgenstrahlen. Wien, klin. Wschr. 21, 1896 (1956).Google Scholar
  21. Beregi, E.: Eine neue Methode zur Herbeiführung der experimentellen Glomerulonephritis. Virchows Arch. path. Anat. 330, 391 (1957).Google Scholar
  22. Bert, P.: J. Anat. (Paris) 1, 69 (1864). Zit. nach E. F. Pfeiffer u. Mitarb. Z. ges. exp. Med. 132, 436 (1960).Google Scholar
  23. Bialestock, D.: Further investigations into aetiology of glomerulonephritis. Med. J. Aust. 1, 835 (1953).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Biehling, R.: Herdinfektion und Immunität. Verh. dtsch. Ges. inn. Med. 42, 438 (1930).Google Scholar
  25. Bierry, H.: Recherches sur les injections de sang et de serum nephrotoxique au chien. C.R. Soc. biol. (Paris) 53, 839 (1901). — Zit. nach E. F. Pfeiffer, Habil.-Schr. Frankfurt 1955.Google Scholar
  26. Billingham, H. E., L. Brent, and P. B. Medawar: Antigenic stimulus in transplantation immunity. Nature (Lond.) 178, 514 (1956).Google Scholar
  27. Biro, L.: Behandlung der akuten Nephritis mit synthetischem Antihistamin. Wien. med. Wschr. 98, 193 (1948).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Bjorneboe, F. M., and H. Gormsen: The role of plasma cells as antibody producers. Acta pathl. microbiol. scand. 20, 649 (1943).Google Scholar
  29. Blau, M., E.D. Day, and D. Pressman: The rate of localization of anti-rat kidney antibodies. J. Immunol. 79, 330 (1957).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Bohle, A., H. T. Krecke, H. Kleinmeier u. K. Goergen: Über die tierexperimentelle Glomerulonephritis unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der sogenannten Cavelti-Nephritis. Arch. Kreisl.- Forsch. 21, 245 (1954).Google Scholar
  31. Bohle, A., F. Miller, H. Sitte u. A. Yolac: Frühveränderungen bei der Masugi-Nephritis der Ratten, elektronenoptische Untersuchungen. In: Grabar-Miescher, Immunpathologie. Basel u. Stuttgart: Benno Schwabe & Co. 1959.Google Scholar
  32. Bohn, H.: Mechanismus des blassen Hochdrucks. Verh. dtsch. Ges. inn. Med. 42, 198 (1930).Google Scholar
  33. Bollmann, J. L., J. C. Cain, and J. H. Grindlay: Techniques for the collection of lymph from the liver, small intestine or thoracic duct of the rat. J. Lab. clin. Med. 33, 1349 (1948).Google Scholar
  34. M. Bordet: Ann. Inst. Pasteur 14, 257 (1900). Zit. nach E. F. Pfeiffer, Habil.-Schr. Frankfurt 1955.Google Scholar
  35. Borowski, A., D. Kessner, W. Hartroft, and L. Recant: Aminonucleoside-induced chronic glomerulonephritis in rats. J. Lab. clin. Med. 57, 512 (1961).Google Scholar
  36. Borowsky, B. A., D. M. Kessner, and L. Recant: Structural analogues of puromycin in production of experimental nephrosis in rats. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. (N.Y.) 97, 857 (1958).Google Scholar
  37. Braun, K.: Inaug.-Diss. 1966 (in Vorb.).Google Scholar
  38. Brecht, H., u. P. Boucke: Ein neuer Pulsabnehmer für Kleintiere. Naunyn-Schmiedebergs Arch. exp. Path. Pharmak. 217, 399 (1953).Google Scholar
  39. Brent, L., J. B. Brown, and P. B. Medawar: Biological problems of grafting. Symposion de l’Universite de Liege 1959, p. 64.Google Scholar
  40. Breuninger, H.: Methode zur unblutigen Messung des Blutdruckes an Kleintieren. Arzneimittel-Forsch. 6, 222 (1956).Google Scholar
  41. Brunson, J. G., L. Thomas, and C. N. Gamble: Morphologie changes in rabbits following the intravenous administration of meningococcal toxin. II. Two appropriately spaced injections; the role of fibrinoid in the generalized Schwartzman reaction. Amer. J. Path. 31, 655 (1955).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Bunster, E., and R. K. Meyer: An improved method of parabiosis. Anat. Ree. 47, 339 (1933).Google Scholar
  43. Burkey, E. L.: Production in rabbit of hypersensitive reactions to lens, rabbit muscle and low ragweed extracts by action of staphylococcus aureus. J. Allergy 5, 466 (1934).Google Scholar
  44. Burnet, F. M., and F. Fenner: The production of antibodies. 2d ed. Macmillan: Melbourne 1949.Google Scholar
  45. Caffrey, R. W., W. O. Rieke, and N. B. Everett: Radioautographic studies of small lymphocytes in the thoracic duct of the rat. Acta haemat. (Basel) 28, 145 (1962).Google Scholar
  46. Calcagno, P. L., J. M. Rubin, P. K. Mukherji, and K. L. Terplan: Response to nephrotoxic serum in the newborn rat. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. (N.Y.) 114, 124 (1963).Google Scholar
  47. Castaigne, J., et F. Rathery: Lesions des reins produites par injection d’emulsion renale ou de serum nephrotoxique. C. R. Soc. Biol. (Paris) 54, 563 (1902).Google Scholar
  48. Chase, M. W., and M. Landsteiner: The cellular transfer of cutaneous hypersensitivity of tuberculin. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. (N.Y.) 59, 134 (1945).Google Scholar
  49. Cavelti, P. A.: Experimentelle Studien über die Pathogenese des fieberhaften Rheumatismus (Polyarthritis acuta rheumatica). Schweiz, med. Wschr. 78, 83 (1948).Google Scholar
  50. Cavelti, Ph. A.: Über die Bedeutung von Gewebsantikörpern bei der Glomerulonephritis. Internat. Allergie- Kongr. Zürich 1951.Google Scholar
  51. Cavelti, Ph. A., and E. Staehelin-Cavelti: Production of autoantibodies to kidney in experimental animals. Arch. Path. 39, 148 (1945).Google Scholar
  52. Cavelti, Ph. A., and E. Staehelin-Cavelti: Production of glomerulo-nephritis in rats by means of autoantibodies to kidneys. Arch. Path. 40, 158 (1945).Google Scholar
  53. Cavelti, Ph. A., and E. Staehelin-Cavelti: Clinical and pathological aspect of experimental glomerulonephritis produced in rats by means of autoantibodies to kidney. Arch. Path. 40, 163 (1945).Google Scholar
  54. Centanni, E.: Über die Autopraecipitine und eine allgemeine Form derselben. Zbl. Bakt. 35, 91 (1904).Google Scholar
  55. Centanni, E.: Über die Autopraecipitine. Untersuchungen über ein Hepatopraecipitin bei Distomatose. Zbl. Bakt. 43, 508 (1907).Google Scholar
  56. Chikamitsu, H.: Experimentelle Studien über immuncytotoxische Glomerulonephritis. Folia endocr. jap. 16, 85 (1940).Google Scholar
  57. Chute, R. N., and S. C. Sommers: Hemolytic disease and polycythemia in parabiosis intoxication. Blood 7, 1005 (1952).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Cochrane, G., and W. O. Weigle: The cutaneous reaction to soluble antigen-antibody complexes. A comparison with the Arthus phenomenon. J. exp. Med. 108, 591 (1958).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Cole, L., R. Cromartie, and D. W. Watson: Specific soluble substance involved in nephrotoxic nephritis. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. (N.Y.) 77, 498 (1951).Google Scholar
  60. Coons, A. H., and M. H. Kaplan: Localization of antigen in tissue cells. II. Improvements in a method for detection of antigen by means of fluorescent antibody. J. exp. Med. 91, 1 (1950).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Coons, A. H., E. H. Leduc, and M. H. Kaplan: Localization of antigen in tissue cells. VI. The fate of injected protein in the mouse. J. exp. Med. 93, 173 (1951).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Coulter, C. B., and M. Pappenheimer: Proc. N.Y. path. Soc. 16, 80 (1916). Zit. nach E. F. Pfeiffer, Habil.-Schr. Frankfurt 1955.Google Scholar
  63. Delezenne, C.: Serums nephrotoxiques. Ann. Inst. Pasteur 14, 686 (1900).Google Scholar
  64. Ditschuneit, H., R. Ohebschalon u. E. F. Pfeiffer: Studien zur Übertragung der Masuginephritis der Ratte. V. Die Kinetik der Elimination von Kaninchen-anti-Rattennierenglobulin, Kaninchen- y-Globulin, Humanalbumin und Human-y-Globulin bei der Ratte. Z. ges. exp. Med. 134, 148 (1961).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Dixon, F. J.: The role of antigen-antibody complexes in disease. Harvey Lect. 58, 21 (1962/63).Google Scholar
  66. Dixon, F. J.: Immunpathology of the kidney. 4th Symposium on Immunpathology. Monte Carlo 1965. Basel: Benno Schwabe & Co. 1965.Google Scholar
  67. Dixon, F. J., J. D. Feldman, and J. J. Vazquez: Experimental glomerulonephritis. The pathogenesis of a laboratory model resembling the spectrum of human glomerulonephritis. J. exp. Med. 113, 889 (1961).Google Scholar
  68. Dixon, F. J., J. J. Vazquez, W. C. Weigle, and C. Cochrane: Pathogenesis of serum sickness. Arch. Path. 65, 18 (1958).Google Scholar
  69. Donoso, J., H. Rodriguezy A. Steiner: Estudios experimentales de la patogenia de la glomerulonephritis. Rev. med. Chile 77, 498 (1949).Google Scholar
  70. Dubach, U., u. L. Recant: Aminonucleosid-Nephrose. Versuch einer biochemischen Erklärung ätiologisch verschiedener Nephroseformen. Klin. Wschr. 38, 1177 (1960).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Dunker, S., K. Federlin u. E. F. Pfeiffer: 1967 (in Vorbereitung).Google Scholar
  72. Dutz, H., H. J. Rossa u. K. Voigt: Über die Beeinflussung des Verlaufes der experimentellen Rattennephritis durch Phenylaethylbarbitursäure. Z. ges. inn. Med. 9, 502 (1954).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Dutz, H., K. Voigt u. J. Wendler: Über die Beeinflussung der experimentellen Rattennephritis durch Testosteron, Östradiol, Kastration und somatotropes Hormon. Z. ges. inn. Med. 11, 1115 (1956b).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Dutz, H., K. Voigt, J. Wendler, E. Schindowski u. S. Arcona: Die Beeinflussung der experimentellen Rattennephritis durch verschiedene Kostformen. Z. ges. inn. Med. 11, 823 (1956a).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Ehrich, W. E.: Cytotoxic glomerular nephritis in rabbits on allergic condition. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. (N.Y.) 35, 576 (1937).Google Scholar
  76. Ehrich, W. E., C. W. Forman, and J. Seifter: Diffuse glomerular nephritis and lipid nephrosis. Arch. Path. 54, 463 (1952).Google Scholar
  77. Ehrich, W. E., R. E. Wolf, and G. M. Bartol: Acute experimental glomerular nephritis in rabbits: a correlation of morphological and functional changes. J. exp. Med. 67, 769 (1938).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Ehrlich, P (1892): Zit, nach E. F. Pfeiffer, Habil.-Schr. Frankfurt a.M. 1955.Google Scholar
  79. Einhoff, A. M.: Der Einfluß von Röntgenstrahlen auf die Manifestation und Übertragung der experimentellen Rattennephritis. Inaug.-Diss. Frankfurt a.M. 1963.Google Scholar
  80. Eisen, H. N., and D. Pressman: The zone of localization of antibodies. VIII. Some properties of the antigen responsible for the renal localization of anti-kidney-serum. J. Immunol. 64, 487 (1950).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Erdmann, Gr.: Der Einfluß des Thiosemicarbazonderivates „Tebethion” auf die Masugi-Nephritis. Dtsch. Gesundh.- Wes. 7, 850 (1952).Google Scholar
  82. Erdmann, Gr.: Experimentelle Nephritis des Jungtieres. Mschr. Kinderheilk. 106, 151 (1958).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Erdmann, Gr.: Altersunterschiede der immunopathologischen Befunde bei experimenteller Nephritis. In: P. Grabar u. P. Miescher, Immunpathologie. I. Internat. Symposium Basel/ Seelisberg 1958. Basel: Benno Schwabe & Co. 1959.Google Scholar
  84. Fagraeus, A.: Antibody production in relation to development of plasma cells; in vivo and in vitro experiments. Acta med. scand. (Suppl. 204) 130, 3 (1948).Google Scholar
  85. Fahr, Th.: Beiträge zur Frage der experimentellen Glomerulonephritis. Verh. dtsch. path. Ges. 47, 179 (1935).Google Scholar
  86. Fanconi, Gr., C. Kousmine u. W. Frischknecht: Die konstitutionelle Bereitschaft zum Nephrosesyndrom. Helv. paediat. Acta 6, 199 (1951).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Farquahr, M. G., R. L. Vernier, and R. A. Good: Studies on familial nephrosis. II. Glomerular changes observed with electron microscope. Amer. J. Path. 33, 791 (1957).Google Scholar
  88. Farr, L. E., and J. E. Smadel: The effect of dietary protein on the course of nephrotoxic nephritis in rats. J. exp. Med. 70, 615 (1939).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Federlin, K., D. Kriegbaum u. E. F. Pfeiffer: (In Vorbereitung) (1966b).Google Scholar
  90. Federlin, K., W. Leinweber u. E. F. Pfeiffer: Studien zur „Übertragung” der Masugi-Nephritis der Ratte. X. Die Übertragung durch Lymphozyten aus Lymphgefäßdrainage. Z. Immun.-Forsch. 130, 380 (1966a).Google Scholar
  91. Federlin, K., W. Marx, S. Crespin, K. H. Ostner, W. Menzel u. E. F. Pfeiffer: Versuche zur Erzeugung einer einseitigen Nephritis bei der Ratte und zum Problem der Nierenfixation des heterologen Antikörpers. Z. Immun.-Forsch. 131, 480 (1966c).Google Scholar
  92. Federlin, K., W. Sandritter, W. Müller-Ruchholtz u. E. F. Pfeiffer: Beitrag zur Morphologie der primären und sekundären experimentellen Glomerulonephritis der Ratte. Verh. dtsch. Ges. inn. Med. 69, 203 (1963).Google Scholar
  93. Federlin, K., F. Wahlig, M. Öttinger u. E. F. Pfeiffer: (1966d) (in Vorbereitung).Google Scholar
  94. Feldman, J. D.: Pathogenesis of ultrastructural glomerular changes induced by immunologic means. In: III. Internat. Symposium on Immunopathology, d. 263 (ed. by P. Grabar and P. Miescher). Basel: Benno Schwabe & Co. 1963.Google Scholar
  95. Feldman, J. D., and E. R. Fisher: Renal lesions of aminonucleoside nephrosis as revealed by electron microscopy. Lab. Invest. 8, 371 (1959).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Felix-Davies, D., and B. H. Waksman: Passive transfer of experimental immune thyroiditis in the guinea pig. Arthr. and Rheum. 4, 416 (1961).Google Scholar
  97. Fenner, F.: Epizootic behaviour of mousepox (infections ectromelia). Brit. J. exp. Path. 29, 69 (1948).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. Ferrebee, J.: In: J. Metcoff, Proc. of the 8th Ann. Conf. on the Nephrotic Syndrome, No 4, 1957, p. 93.Google Scholar
  99. Zit. nach A. B. Borowski, D. Kessner, W. Hartroft, and L. Recant: J. Lab. clin. Med. 57, 512 (1961).Google Scholar
  100. Finerty, J. C., and T. C. Panos: Parabiosis intoxication. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. 76, 833 (1951).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. Fishberg, A. M.: Hypertension and nephritis. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger 1939 3d Ed. u. 1944 4th Ed.Google Scholar
  102. Fishberg, A. M.: Hypertension and nephritis, 5th ed., p. 558. London: Baillier, Tindall & Cox 1954.Google Scholar
  103. Fisher, R., and B. Fisher: Nephrotoxic serum nephritis in thymectomized rats. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. (N.Y.) 115, 156 (1964).Google Scholar
  104. Fitch, F. W., W. Wissler, M. La Via, and P. Barker: The timing of antigen injection relative to whole body x-irradiation and the development of circulating antibody and the splenic histologic reaction in the rat. J. Immunol. 76, 151 (1956).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. Forssman, J. J.: Die Herstellung hochwertiger spezifischer Schafhämolysine ohne Verwendung von Schafblut. Ein Beitrag zur Lehre von der heterologen Antikörperbildung. Biochem. Z. 5 (1911) 78. Zit. nach E. F. Pfeiffer, Habil.-Schr. Frankfurt a. M. 1955.Google Scholar
  106. Frenk, S., J. Antonowicz, J. Craig, and J. Metcoff: Experimental nephrotic syndrome induced in rats by aminonucleoside. Renal lesions and body electrolytic composition. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. (N.Y.) 98, 424 (1955).Google Scholar
  107. Freudemann, H.: Die experimentelle Nephritis-Nephrose beim Kaninchen und ihre Beeinflussung durch Steroidhormone, insbesondere von Östradiol und Stilben. Inaug.-Diss. Freiburg 1960.Google Scholar
  108. Freund, J., and K. McDermott: Sensitization to horse- serum by means of adjuvans. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. (N.Y.) 49, 548 (1942).Google Scholar
  109. Freund, J., E. R. Stern, and T. M. Pisani: Isoallergic encephalomyelitis and radiculitis in guinea-pigs after one injection of brain and mycobacteria in water-in-oil emulsion. J. Immunol. 57, 179 (1947).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. Frey, W.: Nieren und ableitende Harnwege. In: Handbuch der inneren Medizin, 4. Aufl., Bd. VIII. Berlin-Göttingen-Heidelberg: Springer 1951.Google Scholar
  111. Frick, E.: Antikörper nach Injektion homologen und heterologen Hirnbreis im Tierexperiment. Dtsch. Z. Nerven- heilk. 103, 72 (1949).Google Scholar
  112. Frick, E.: Nephritis durch Nierenautoantikörper. Z. Immun.-Forsch. 107, 411 (1950).Google Scholar
  113. Friedberger, E.: Weitere Mitteilung über die Anaphylaxie. III. Erwiderung zur Arbeit von Kraus und Novotny: Zur Theorie Friedberger über Anaphylaxie. Z. Immun.- Forsch. 3, 692 (1909).Google Scholar
  114. Friedemann, U.: Weitere Untersuchungen über den Mechanismus der Anaphylaxie. Z. Immun.-Forsch. 2, 591 (1909).Google Scholar
  115. Fröhlich, A.: Über lokale gewebliche Anaphylaxie. Z. Immun.-Forsch. 20, 476 (1914).Google Scholar
  116. Furth, J., and E. A. Kabat: Immunological specificity of material sedimentable at high speed present in normal and tumor tissues. J. exp. Med. 74, 247 (1941).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  117. Gerlach, W.: Allergie und Morphe. Virchows Arch. path. Anat. 247, 294 (1923).Google Scholar
  118. Germuth, F. G. Jr.: Comparative histologic and immunologic study in rabbits of induced hypersensitivity of serum sickness type. J. exp. Med. 97, 257 (1953).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  119. Germuth, F. G., and G. E. McKennon: Studies on the biological properties of antigen-antibody-complexes. I. Anaphylactic shock induced by soluble antigen-antibody complexes in unsensitized normal guinea pigs. Bull. Johns Hopk. Hosp. 101, 13 (1957).Google Scholar
  120. Germuth, F. G. Jr., B. Ottinger, and J. Oyama: Influence of cortisone on experimental hypersensitivity and circulating antibody in guinea-pig. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. (N.Y.) 80, 88 (1952).Google Scholar
  121. Germuth, F. G. Jr., and A. D. Pollak: The production of lesions of “serum-sickness” in normal animals by the presence of antigen. Bull. Johns Hopk. Hosp. 102, 245 (1958).Google Scholar
  122. Glassock, R. J., and J. J. Watson: Studies on the pathogenesis of kidney-in-adjuvant-nephritis in rats. Fed. Proc. 25, 659 (1966).Google Scholar
  123. Goldblatt, H., J. Lynch, R. F. Hanzal, and W. D. Summerville: Studies on experimental hypertension; production of persistant evaluation of systolic blood pressure by means of renal ischemia. J. exp. Med. 59, 347 (1934).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  124. Gorer, P. A.: Interactions between sessile and humoral antibodies. In: Ciba Foundation Symp. on Cellular Aspects of Immunity, p. 330–343. Boston: Little, Brown & Co. 1960.Google Scholar
  125. Gorer, P. A.: The antigenic structure of tumors. Advanc. Immunol. 1, 345–393 (1961).Google Scholar
  126. Gowans, J. L.: The recirculation of lymphocytes from blood to lymph in the rat. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 146, 54 (1959).Google Scholar
  127. Gowans, J. L., D.D. McGregor, and D. M. Cowen: The role of small lymphocytes in the rejection of homografts of skin. The immunologically competent cell. Ciba Foundation, Study Group No 16, 20 (1963).Google Scholar
  128. Greenspon, S. A., and C. A. Krakower: Direct evidence for antigenicity of glomeruli in production of nephrotoxic serums. Arch. Path. 491, 291 (1950).Google Scholar
  129. Gruber, G. B.: Zur pathologischen Anatomie der Periarteriitis nodosa. Virchows Arch. path. Anat. 245 89 (1923). Zit. nach E.F. Pfeiffer, Habil.-Schr., Frankfurt a.M. 1955.Google Scholar
  130. Grümer: Inaug.-Diss. Frankfurt a.M. 1948. Zit. nach H. Dutz, H. J. Rossa u. K. Voigt. Z. ges. inn. Med. 9, 502 (1954).Google Scholar
  131. Hall, C. E., and O. Hall: Relationship of sodium intake to hypertensive hyalinosis syndrome produced in rat by parabiosis. Hypertensive cardiovascular disease. Texas Rep. Biol. Med. 9, 714 (1951).Google Scholar
  132. Hall, C. E., and O. Hall: Categories of parabiotic intoxication: Further evidence that the condition results from unequal cross transfusion. Amer. J. Physiol. 184, 155 (1956).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  133. Hall, C. E., and O. Hall: Glomerulonephritis and hypertension produced by parenteral administration of methylcellulose. Amer. J. Path. 40, 167 (1962).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  134. Hall, C. E., and O. Hall: Macromolecular hypertension and associated pathologic changes resulting from treatment with polyvinyl alcohol. Amer. J. Path. 41, 247 (1962).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  135. Hall, E. E., and O. Hall: Polyvinyl alcohol nephrosis (Relationship of degree of polymerization to pathophysiologic effects). Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. (N.Y.) 112, 86 (1963).Google Scholar
  136. Halpern B., G. Lagrue, P. Samarcq et A. Brannelec: Nephropathies experimentales par administration de proteines etrangeres chez le lapin. C. R. Soc. Biol. (Paris) 153, 965 (1959).Google Scholar
  137. Halpern, B., P. Milliez, G. Lagrue, A. Fray, and C. Morard: Protective action of heparin in experimental immune nephritis. Nature (Lond.) 205, 257 (1965).Google Scholar
  138. Halpern, J. W., u. M. Trolliet: Acta allerg. (Kbh.) 2, 150–191 (1949).Google Scholar
  139. Zit. nach H. Dutz, H. J. Rossa u. K. Voigt: Z. ges. inn. Med. 9, 502 (1954).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  140. Hammer, D. K., and F. J. Dixon: Experimental glomerulonephritis. II. Immunologic events in the pathogenesis of nephrotoxic serum nephritis in the rat. J. exp. Med. 117, 1019 (1963).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  141. Hammer, D. K., J. J. Vazquez, and F. J. Dixon: Nephrotoxic serum nephritis in newborn rats. Lab. Invest. 12, 8 (1963).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  142. Hamori, A., u. A. Koranyi: Der Einfluß der Entnervung der Nieren auf die Masugi-Nephritis. Z. Klin. Med. 133, 722 (1938).Google Scholar
  143. Harkin, J., and L. Becant: Pathogenesis of experimental nephrosis; electron microscopic observations. Amer. J. Path. 36, 303 (1960).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  144. Harris, T. N., and W. E. Ehrich: Fate of injected particulate antigens in relation to formation of antibodies. J. exp. Med. 84, 157 (1946).Google Scholar
  145. Hartman, M.E., G.C. Hartman, and R.C. Baldridge: Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. (N.Y.) 100, 152 (1959).Google Scholar
  146. Zit. nach u. C. Dubach u. L. Recant: Klin. Wschr. 38, 1177 (1960).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  147. Hartwich, A.: Demonstrationen zum klinischen Referat über Kreislauf Wirkungen körpereigener Stoffe. Verh. dtsch. Ges. inn. Med. 44, 76 (1932).Google Scholar
  148. Hartzell (1925): Zit. nach E. T. Bell, and B. J. Clawson.Google Scholar
  149. Hasson, M. W., and B. C. Seegal: Nephrotoxic nephritis in the rat produced by duck antirat-kidney-serum. I. Occurrence of a latent period. Fed. Proc. 13, 431 (1954).Google Scholar
  150. Hayman, J. M. Jr, and J. W. Martinjo: Acute nephritis: Review of 77 cases. Amer. J. med. Sci. 200, 505 (1940).Google Scholar
  151. Hawn, C.V.Z., and C.A. Janeway: Histological and serological sequences in experimental hypersensitivity. J. exp. Med. 85, 571 (1947).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  152. Heintz, R., u. M. Losse: Zur Behandlung der experimentellen Nephritis (Masugi-Nephritis) und des anaphylaktischen Schockes mit Benadryl (ß-Dimethylaminoäthylbenzhydryläther). Z. ges. exp. Med. 115, 597 (1950).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  153. Hemmings, W. A., and F. W. B rambell: Protein transfer across the foetal membranes. Brit. med. Bull. 17, 96 (1961).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  154. Hemprich, R.: Zur Frage der experimentellen Glomerulonephritis. Z. ges. exp. Med. 95, 304 (1935).Google Scholar
  155. W. Henle, L.A. Chambers, and W. Groupe: Serological speeifity of particulate components derived from various normal mammalian organs. J. exp. Med. 74, 495 (1941).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  156. Hermannsdorfer, A.: Dtsch. Z. Chir. 178, 289 (1923).Google Scholar
  157. Zit. nach E. F. Pfeiffer u. M. Mitarb: Z. ges. exp. Med. 132, 436 (1960).Google Scholar
  158. Hess, E. V., C. T. Ashworth, and M. Ziff: Transfer of an autoimmune nephrosis in the rat by means of lymphnode cells. J. exp. Med. 115, 421 (1962).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  159. Heymann, W.: Nephrosis experimental. Ree. cub. Pediat. 26, 65 (1954).Google Scholar
  160. Heymann, W.: Persönliche Mitteilung 1955.Google Scholar
  161. Zit. nach W. Sandritter u. M. Mitarb: Z. ges. exp. Med. 132, 453 (1960).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  162. Heymann, W.: Pathogenesis of the nephrotic syndrome: Considerations based on clinical and experimental studies. J. Pediat. 58, 609 (1961).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  163. Heymann, W., M. Gilkey, and M. Salehar: Antigenic property of renal cortex. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. (N.Y.) 73, 385 (1950).Google Scholar
  164. Heymann, W., and D. B. Hackel: The early development of anatomic and blood chemistry changes in the nephrotic syndrome in rats. J. Lab. clin. Med. 39, 429 (1952).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  165. Heymann, W., D. B. Hackel, S. Horwood, S. G. F. Wilson, and J. L. P. Hunter: Production of nephrotic syndrome in rats by Freund’s adjuvants and rat kidney suspension. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. (N.Y.) 100, 660 (1959).Google Scholar
  166. Heymann, W., D. B. Hackel, and J. L. P. Hunter: Tri-methadione (tridione) nephrosis in rats. Pediatrics 25, 112 (1960).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  167. Heymann, W., B. Hackel, W. Hunter, and F. Cuppage: Transfer of experimental auto-immune nephrosis in rats. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. (N.Y.) III, 568 (1962b).Google Scholar
  168. Heymann, W., J. L. P. Hunter, and D. B. Hackel: Experimental auto-immune nephrosis in rats. J. Immunol. 88, 135 (1962a).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  169. Heymann, W., E. P. Kmetec, O. Okuda, and F. P. Cuppage: Experimental autoimmune renal disease in rats. Excerpta Med. (Amst.) Internat. Congr. 78, 499 (1963).Google Scholar
  170. Heymann, W., and H. Z. Lund: Nephrotic syndrom in rats. Pediatrics 7, 691 (1951).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  171. Heymann, W., H. Z. Lund, and D. B. Hackel: The nephrotic syndrom in rats, with special reference to the progression of the glomerular lesion and to the use of nephrotoxic sera obtained from ducks. J. Lab. clin. Med. 39, 218 (1952).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  172. Hieronymi, G., A. Bohle u. F. Hart-mann: Morphologische und elektrophoretische Untersuchungen bei der Masugi-Nephritis der Ratten. Arch. Kreisl.-Forsch. 18, 34 (1952).Google Scholar
  173. Hill, A. G. S., B. Cruickshank, and A. Grossland: A study of antigenic components of kidney tissue. Brit. J. exp. Path. 34, 27 (1953).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  174. Hill, R. T.: Exchange of oestrin and corpus luteum hormones in parabiotic female rats. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. (N.Y.) 28, 866 (1931).Google Scholar
  175. Hodge, H. C., E. A. Maynard, W.G. Welt, Jr., H. J. Blanchel Jr., and R. X. Hyatt: Chronic oral toxicity of a high gel point methyl-cellulose (methocel HG) in rats and dogs. J. Pharmacol, exp. Ther. 99, 112 (1950).Google Scholar
  176. Hoff, F., u. J. Wendlberger: Vortrag Natur- wissenschaftl. Ges. Steiermark Okt. 1943. Vortrag Ärzteverein Steiermark Febr. 1945. Zit. nach F. Hoff, Medizinische Klinik, ein Fortbildungskurs für Ärzte, Monographie. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme 1948.Google Scholar
  177. Holm, G.: In vitro cytotoxic effects of lymphoid cells from rats with experimental autoimmune nephritis. Clin. exp. Immunol. 1. 45 (1966).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  178. Hueper, W. C.: Organic lesions produced by polyvinyl alcohol in rats and rabbits; a toxicopathologic investigation of experimental thesaurosis. Arch. Path. 28, 510 (1939).Google Scholar
  179. Hueper, W. C.: Experimental studies in cardiovascular pathology. IV. Methylcellulose atheromatosis and thesaurosis. Arch. Path. 33, 1 (1942).Google Scholar
  180. Hueper, W. C.: Macromolecular substances as pathogenic agents. Arch. Path. 33, 267 (1942).Google Scholar
  181. Hueper, W. C.: Reactions of blood and organs of dogs after intravenous injections of solutions of methylcelluloses of graded molecular weights. Amer. J. Path. 20, 737 (1944).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  182. Hume, D. M., J. P. Merrill, B. J. Miller, and G.W. Thorn: Experiences with renal homotransplantation in human. Report of 9 cases. J. clin. Invest. 34, 327 (1955).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  183. Humphrey, J. H.: The pathogenesis of glomerulonephritis: A reinvestigation of the auto- immunisation hypotheses. J. Path. Bact. 60, 211 (1948).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  184. Hunter, J. L. B., D. B. Hackel, and W. Heymann: Nephrotic syndrome in rats produced by sensitization to rat kidney proteins: Immunologic studies. J. Immunol. 85, 319 (1960).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  185. Illenyi, L., u. L. Borsäk: Der Einfluß des Vegetativtonus auf die Bildung des Hämolysins. Z. Immun.-Forsch. 94, 79 (1938).Google Scholar
  186. Ishizaka, K., and D. H. Campbell: Biological activity of soluble antigen antibody complexes. I. Skin reactive properties. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. (N.Y.) 97, 635 (1958).Google Scholar
  187. Ishizaka, K., T. Ishizaka, and D. H. Campbell: The biological activity of soluble antigen-antibody complexes. II. Physical properties of soluble complexes having skin-irritating activity. J. exp. Med. 109, 127 (1959).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  188. Jimenez-Diaz, C.: Schweiz, med. Wschr. 1948, 920. Zit. nach E. F. Pfeiffer 1955.Google Scholar
  189. Jones, D. B.: Glomerulonephritis. Amer. J. Path. 29, 33 (1933).Google Scholar
  190. Rabat, E. A., A. Wolf, and A. E. Bezer: Rapid production of acute disseminated encephalomyelitis in rhesus monkeys by injection of brain tissues with Adjuvants. Science 104, 362 (1946).Google Scholar
  191. Rabat, E. A., A. Wolf, and A. E. Bezer: Studies on acute disseminated encephalomyelitis produced experimentally in rhesus monkeys. J. exp. Med. 8, 417 (1947).Google Scholar
  192. Kabat, E. A., A. Wolf, A. E. Bezer, and J. P. Murray: Studies in acute disseminated encephalomyelitis produced experimentally in rhesus monkeys. Changes in cerebrospinal fluid proteins. J. exp. Med. 93, 615 (1951).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  193. Kaliss, N.: The survival of homografts in mice pretreated with antisera to mouse tissue. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 64, 977 (1957).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  194. Kaliss, N.: The elements of immunologic enhancement: a con¬sideration of mechanisms. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 101, 64 (1962).Google Scholar
  195. Kaliss, N.: Immunological enhancement. The immunologically induced prolongation of tumor homograft survival. Proc. 10th Congr. int. Soc. Blood Transf., Stockholm 1964, 91–103 (1965).Google Scholar
  196. Kaliss, N., and B. F. Bryant: Factor determining homograft destruction and immunological enhancement in mice receiving successive tumor macula. J. Nat. Cancer Inst. 90, 691 (1958).Google Scholar
  197. Kantor, F. S.: Renal glomerular lesions in mice following injection of streptococcal M-protein. Yale J. Biol. Med. 34, 70 (1961).Google Scholar
  198. Kantor, F.S., and R.M. Cole: A fibrinogen precipitating factor (FPF) of group A streptococci. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. (N. Y.) 102, 146 (1959).Google Scholar
  199. Kaplan, M. H.: Localization of streptococcal antigens in tissue. I. Histologic distribution and persistence of M-protein, types 1, 5, 12, and 19 in the tissues of the mouse. J. exp. Med. 107, 341 (1958).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  200. Kaplan, M. H.: Immunologic relations of streptococcal and tissue antigens. I. Properties of an antigen in certain strains of group A streptococci exhibiting an immunologic cross-reaction with human heart tissue. J. Immunol. 90, 595 (1963).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  201. Kay, C. F.: Mechanism by which experimental nephritis is produced in rabbits injected with nephrotoxic duck-serum. J. exp. Med. 72, 559 (1940).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  202. Kay, C. F.: Blood pressure in experimental nephritis produced by injection of nephrotoxic serum. Arch. Path. 29, 57 (1940).Google Scholar
  203. Kay, C. F.: The mechanism of a form of glomerulonephritis. Ne-phrotoxic nephritis in rabbits. Amer. J. med. Sci. 204, 483 (1942).Google Scholar
  204. Kellet, C. E.: Complement titre in acute nephritis with special reference to causation by reversed anaphylaxis. Lancet 1935 II, 1262.Google Scholar
  205. Kelly, D. K., and J. F. Winn: Renal lesions produced by group A type 12 streptococci. Science 127, 1337 (1958).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  206. Kidd, J. G., and W. Friedewald: Natural antibody that reacts in vitro with a sedimentable constituent of normal tissue cells. J. exp. Med. 76, 543 (1942).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  207. Klein, P., u. P. Burkholder: Ein Verfahren zur fluoreszenzoptischen Darstellung der Complementbindung und seine Anwendung zur histoimmunologischen Untersuchung der experimentellen Nierenanaphylaxie. Dtsch. med. Wschr. 84, 201 (1959).Google Scholar
  208. Klinge, F.: Die Eiweißüberempfindlichkeit der Gelenke: Ex-perimentelle pathologisch-anatomische Studie zur Pathogenese des Gelenkrheumatismus. Beitr. path. Anat. 83, 185 (1930).Google Scholar
  209. Klinge, F., u. R. Knepper: Nephrotoxine und hyperergische Nephritis. Verh. dtsch. Ges. Path. 63, 181 (1935).Google Scholar
  210. Knowlton, A., E. N. Loeb, H. C. Stoerk, and B. Seegal: The development of hypertension and nephritis in normal and in adrenalectomized rats treated with cortisone. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. (N.Y.) 72, 722 (1949).Google Scholar
  211. Kobernick, S. D.: Experimental rheumatic carditis, Periarteriitis nodosa and glomerulonephritis. Amer. J. med. Sci. 224, 329 (1952).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  212. Körtge, P., J. Merker, G. Palme u. K. Blum: Tubuläre Veränderungen im Licht- und elektronenmikroskopischen Bereich bei der Amino-nucleosid-Nephrose der Ratte. Z. ges. exp. Med. 137, 276 (1963).Google Scholar
  213. Kopeloff, C. M., and N. Kopeloff: Production of antibrain antibodies in monkey. J. Immunol. 48, 297 (1944).Google Scholar
  214. Kopeloff, C. M.: Neurologie manifestations in laboratory animals produced by organ (adjuvant) emulsions. J. Immunol. 57, 229 (1947).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  215. Krakower, C. A., and S. A. Greenspon: Localization of nephro- toxic antigen within isolated renal glomerulus. Arch. Path. 51, 629 (1951).Google Scholar
  216. Krecke, H. J.: Über die tierexperimentelle Glomerulonephritis unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der sogenannten Cavelti-Nephritis. Diss. Heidelberg 1954.Google Scholar
  217. Kriegbaum, D.: Inaug.-Diss. Frankfurt 1966 (in Vorb.).Google Scholar
  218. Kuczynski, M. H.: Nephritis. Virchows Arch. path. Anat. 227, 186 (1919).Google Scholar
  219. Kuczynski, M. H.: Von den ersten Anzeichen und der Heilung der Glomerulonephritis. Krankheitsforsch. 1, 287 (1925).Google Scholar
  220. Kulka, A. M.: Studies on antibody-antigen mixtures. I. Effect on normal living excised tissue. J. Immunol. 43, 273 (1942).Google Scholar
  221. Lachman, D. T., H. J. Müller-Eberhard, H. G. Kunkel, and F. Paronetto: The localization of in vivo bound complement in tissue sections. J. exp. Med. 115, 63 (1962).Google Scholar
  222. Lake, J., W. Simmonds, and A. Steinbeck: Aust. J. exp. Biol. med. Sci. 31, 55 (1933).Google Scholar
  223. Zit. nach M. Halpern u. Mitarb, C. R.: Soc. Biol. (Paris) 153, 965 (1959).Google Scholar
  224. Lange, K.: Über den immunologischen Mechanismus der akuten und chronischen Glomerulonephritis, S. 232. Internat. Nierensymposium Würzburg 1961.Google Scholar
  225. Lange, K., Demoleas, and E. J. Wenk: The effect of cortisone and triamcinolone on the immunologic background and the course of experimental glomerulonephritis. Amer. J. med. Sci. 240, 96 (1960).Google Scholar
  226. Lange, K., M. M. A. Gold, D. Weiner, and Y. Simons: Auto-antibodies in human glomerulonephritis. J. clin. Invest. 28, 50 (1949).Google Scholar
  227. Lange, K., R. Strang, L. B. Slobody, and E. J. Wenk: The treatment of the nephrotic syndrome with steroids in children and adults. Arch, intern. Med. 99, 760 (1957).Google Scholar
  228. Lange, K., M. Wachstein, and S. E. McPherson: Immunologic mechanism of transmission of experimental glomerulonephritis in parabiotic rats. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. (N.Y.) 106, 1316 (1961).Google Scholar
  229. Lange, K., E. J. Wenk, and J. Noble: Mechanism of biphasic experimental glomerulonephritis produced in rabbits by avian sera. Fed. Proc. 17, 1745 (1958).Google Scholar
  230. Lawrence, H. S.: The transfer of hypersensitivity of the delayed type in man. In: Cellular and humoral aspects of the hypersensitive states, p. 279. New York: Paul B. Hoeber Inc. 1959.Google Scholar
  231. Lawrence, H. S.: General perspectives. Conference on cell-bound antibodies, p. 3. Philadelphia: Wistar Institute Press 1963.Google Scholar
  232. Le Count, and Jackson: Experimental streptococcal nephritis in rabbits. J. infect, Dis. 15, 389 (1914).Google Scholar
  233. Leinweber, W.: Inaug.-Diss. Frankfurt 1967 (in Vorb.).Google Scholar
  234. Lennox, B., W. J. Dempster, and J. W. Boag: Suppression of tuberculin reaction in rabbits by total body irradiation with X-rays. Brit. J. exp. Path. 33, 380 (1952).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  235. Lerner, R. A., and F. J. Dixon: Induced and spontaneous glomerulonephritis in sheep. Fed. Proc. 25, 660 (1966).Google Scholar
  236. Letterer, E.: Allgemeine Pathologie. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme 1959.Google Scholar
  237. Letterer, E.: Die Morphologie der immune-pathischen Reaktionen. In: Handb. allg. Path. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer 1967.Google Scholar
  238. Letterer, E., u. G. Seybold: Bioptische und histologische Studien zur Masugi-Nephritis am Frosch. Virchows Arch. path. Anat. 318, 451 (1950).Google Scholar
  239. Lindemann, W.: Sur le mode d’aetion de certains poisons renaux. Ann. Inst. Pasteur 14,49 (1900).Google Scholar
  240. Lipman, R. W., and E. E. Jacobs: Nephrotoxic globulin nephritis. Arch. Path. 54,169 (1952).Google Scholar
  241. Lipman, R. W., H. U. Marti, and D. H. Campbell: Nephrotoxic globulin nephritis. Arch. Path. 53,1 (1952).Google Scholar
  242. Lipman, R. W., H. M. Marti, E. E. Jacobs, and D. Campbell: Nephrotoxic globulin nephritis. V. Effect of adrenal steroid administration or adrenalectomy. Arch. Path. 57, 405 (1954).Google Scholar
  243. Lipton, M. M., and J. Freund: The transfer of experimental allergic encephalomyelitis in the rat by means of parabiosis. J. Immunol. 71, 380 (1953).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  244. Liu, C. T.: Proc. 9th Ann. Conf. Nephr. Syndr. Bethesda, Md, 24.-26. Oct. 1957, p. 74.Google Scholar
  245. Liu, C. T., and W. W. McCrory: Autoantibodies in human glomerulonephritis and nephrotic syndrome. J. Immunol. 81, 942 (1958).Google Scholar
  246. Loeb, E. N., A. J. Knowlton, H. C. Stoerk, and B. C. Seegal: Observations on the pregnant rat injected with nephrotoxic anti-rat-placenta serum and desoxycorticosteronacetate. J. exp. Med. 89, 287 (1949).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  247. Long, E. R., and Finner: Experimental glomerulonephritis produced by intrarenal tuberculin reactions. Amer. J. Path. 4, 571 (1928).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  248. Longcope, W. T.: The production of experimental nephritis by repeated protein intoxication. J. exp. Med. 18, 678 (1913).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  249. Longcope, W. T.: Protein hypersensitivism and its importance in the etiology of disease. J. Amer. med. Ass. 5, 77 (1921).Google Scholar
  250. Longcope, W. T.: Pathogenesis of glomerular nephritis. Bull. John Hopk. Hosp. 45, 335 (1929).Google Scholar
  251. Longcope, W. T.: Observations of patients suffering from streptococcal infections, rheumatic fever and acute and chronic hemorrhagic nephritis. J. clin. Invest. 15, 269 (1936).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  252. Loosen, H., G. Steingaß, K. Müller u. H. Grünberg: Über den Einfluß differenter Diätformen auf den Verlauf der experimentellen Rattennephritis. Dtsch. Z. Verdau.- u. Stoffwechselkr. 18, 8 (1958).Google Scholar
  253. Lötz, W.: Blutdruckmessungen an gesunden und nephritiskranken Ratten im Einzelexperiment und im Parabioseversuch. Inaug.-Diss. Frankfurt a.M. 1963.Google Scholar
  254. Lukens, F. O. W.: Acute experimental glomerulitis following repeated injections of hemolytic streptococci into the renal artery. Bull. Johns Hopk. Hosp. 49, 312 (1931).Google Scholar
  255. Lukens, F. O. W., and W. T. Longcope: Experimental acute glomerulonephritis. J. exp. Med. 53, 511 (1931).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  256. Markowitz, A. S., S. H. Armstrong, and D. S. Kushner: Immunological relationship between the rat glomerulus and nephritogenic streptococci. Nature (Lond.) 187, 1095 (1960).Google Scholar
  257. Marko Witz, A. S., and C. F. Lange Jr.: Streptococcal related glomerulonephritis. I. Isolation, immunochemistry and comparative chemistry of soluble fractions from type 12 nephritogenic streptococci and human glomeruli. J. Immunol. 92, 565 (1964).Google Scholar
  258. Masugi, M.: Über das Wesen der spezifischen Veränderungen der Niere und Leber durch das Nephrotoxin bzw. das Hepatoxin. Zugleich ein Beitrag zur Pathogenese der Glomerulonephritis und der eklamptischen Lebererkrankung. Beitr. path. Anat. 91, 82 (1933).Google Scholar
  259. Masugi, M.: Über die experimentelle Glomerulonephritis durch das spezifische Antinierenserum. Ein Beitrag zur Pathogenese der diffusen Glomerulonephritis. Beitr. path. Anat. 92, 429 (1934).Google Scholar
  260. Masugi, M., u. T. Isibasi: Über allergische Vorgänge bei Allgemeininfektion vom Standpunkt der experimentellen Forschung. Zugleich ein Beitrag zur Pathogenese der diffusen Glomerulonephritis und der Periarteriitis nodosa. Beitr. path. Anat. 96, 391 (1936).Google Scholar
  261. Masugi, M., u. Y. Sato: Über die allergische Gewebsreaktion der Niere. Zugleich ein Beitrag zur Pathogenese der diffusen Glomerulonephritis und der Periarteriitis nodosa. Virchows Arch. path. Anat. 293, 615 (1934).Google Scholar
  262. Masugi, M., Y. Sato u. Todo: Über die Veränderungen des Herzens durch das spezifische Antiherzserum. Experimentelle Untersuchungen über die allergischen Gewebs-schäden des Herzens. Trans, jap. path. Soc. 25, 211 (1935).Google Scholar
  263. Masugi, M., and Y. Tomizuka: Trans, jap. path. Soc. 21, 329 (1931). Zit. nach E. F. Pfeiffer, Habil.-Schr. Frankfurt a.M. 1955.Google Scholar
  264. Matheson, B. H., and R. W. Reed: Experimental nephritis due to type specific streptococci. III. Biological, chemical and physical studies on type 12 nephritogenic substance. J. infect. Dis. 104, 213 (1959).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  265. Mayeda, T.: Dtsch. Z. Chir. 167, 295 (1921).Google Scholar
  266. Zit. nach E. F. Pfeiffer u. Mitarb. Z. ges. exp. Med. 132, 436 (1960).Google Scholar
  267. Mayersbach, H.: Zur Frage des Proteinübergangs von der Mutter zum Foeten. I. Befunde an Ratten am Ende der Schwangerschaft. Z. Zellforsch. 48, 479 (1958).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  268. McCluskey, R., B. Benacerraf, and F. Miller: Passive acute glomerulonephritis induced by antigen-antibody complexes solubilized in hapten excess. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. (N.Y.) III, 764 (1963).Google Scholar
  269. McCluskey, R. T., and B. Benacerraf: Localization of colloidal substances in vascular endothelium. A mechanism of tissue damage. II. Experimental serum sickness with acute glomerulonephritis induced passively in mice by antigen-antibody complexes in antigen excess. Amer. J. Path. 35, 275 (1959).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  270. McLean, J. R., J. D. Fitzgerald, O. Z. Vongos-Banad, and J. G. Hamilton: Arch. Path. 51, 1 (1951).Google Scholar
  271. Zit. bei K. Rother u. H. J. Sarre: In Miescher-Vorlaender, Immunpathologie in Klinik und Forschung. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme 1961.Google Scholar
  272. McLean, C. R., J. D. L. Fitzgerald, O. Z. Younghusband, and J. D. Hamilton: Diffuse glomerulonephritis induced in rabbits by small intravenous injections of horse serum. Arch. Path. 51, 1 (1961).Google Scholar
  273. McLeod, N., and G. G. Finney: Acute experimental glomerulitis following injection of streptococcus viridans in the renal artery. Bull. Johns Hopk. Hosp. 51, 300 (1932).Google Scholar
  274. Melli, G. (1964): Zit. nach Müller-Ruchholtz, Immunologische Folgen fortgesetzter Kreuztransfusionen. Habil.-Schr. Kiel 1966.Google Scholar
  275. Mellors, R. C.: Histochemical demonstration of in vivo localization of antibodies: antigenic components of kidney and pathogenesis of glomerulonephritis. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 3, 284 (1955).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  276. Mellors, R. C., J. Arias-Stella, M. Siegel, and D. Pressmann: Analytical pathology. II. Histopathologic demonstration of glomerular-localizing antibodies in experimental glomerulonephritis. Amer. J. Path. 31, 687 (1955).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  277. Merrill, J. P.: Persönliche Mitteilung 1957.Google Scholar
  278. Zit. E. F. Pfeiffer u. Mitarb: Z. ges. exp. Med. 132, 436 (1960).Google Scholar
  279. Merrill, J. P.: Persönliche Mitteilung 1965.Google Scholar
  280. Metalnikow, S.: Die Rolle des Nervensystems und der psychischen Faktoren in der Immunität. Z. ges. exp. Med. 84, 89 (1932).Google Scholar
  281. Middleton, E. Jr., B. Middleton, and B. C. Seegal: Effect of injecting rats with homologous renal tissue mixed with adjuvants or streptococci. Arch. Path. 56, 125 (1953).Google Scholar
  282. Midgley, A. R. Jr., and G. B. Pierce: Immunhistochemical analysis of basement membranes of the mouse. Amer. J. Path. 43, 929 (1963).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  283. Miller, E., B. Benacerraf, R. McCluskey, and L. Potter: Production of acute glomerulonephritis in mice with soluble antigen-antibody complexes prepared from homologous antibody. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. (N.Y.) 104, 706 (1960).Google Scholar
  284. Miller, F., u. A. Bohle: Vergleichende Licht- und elektronenmikroskopische Untersuchungen an der Basalmembran der Glomerulumcapillaren der Maus bei experimentellem Nierenamyloid. Klin. Wschr. 34, 1204 (1956).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  285. Möller, G.: Studies on the mechanism of immunological enhancement of tumor homograft. III. Interaction between humoral isoantibodies and immune lymphoid cells. J. Nat. Cancer Inst. 30, 1205 (1963).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  286. Moeller, J., u. E. F. Pfeiffer: Masugi-Nephritis und Renin. Z. klin. Med. 147, 101 (1950).Google Scholar
  287. Moench, A., u. K. Rother: Monophasische Immunopathogenese der experimentellen Nephritis-Nephrose bei Jungtieren. Naunyn — Schmiedebergs. Arch. exp. Path. Pharmak. 229, 469 (1956).Google Scholar
  288. Moench, A., u. A. Vogt: Studien zur Frage der Hormonbehandlung bei experimenteller Nephritis-Nephrose der weißen Ratte. Verh. dtsch. Ges. inn. Med. 64, 527 (1958).Google Scholar
  289. Moers, H.: Das Krankheitsbild der tierexperimentellen Nephritis im akuten Stadium. Dtsch. Arch. klin. Med. 189, 475 (1939).Google Scholar
  290. Moll, C., u. C. V. Hawn: Experimental hypersensitivity, relationship of dosage to serological and pathological response following injection of heterologous protein. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. (N.Y.) 80, 77 (1952).Google Scholar
  291. Moore, R. H., and D. Wough: Diffuse glomerulonephritis produced in rabbits by massive injections of bovine serum-gamma-globuline. J. exp. Med. 89. 541 (1949a).Google Scholar
  292. Moore, R. H., and D. Wough: Effects of exposure to cold and dietary restriction upon globulin nephritis in rabbits. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. (N.Y.) 79, 593 (1952).Google Scholar
  293. Moore, R. S., L. Wough, and S. D. Kobernik: Cardial lesions produced in rabbits by massive injections of bovine serum gamma-globuline. J. exp. Med. 89, 555 (1949b).Google Scholar
  294. Morgan, J. M.: Allergic encephalomyelitis in monkey in response to injection of normal monkey nervous tissue. J. exp. Med. 85, 131 (1947).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  295. Mosler: Ls Inaug.-Diss. Frankfurt 1964.Google Scholar
  296. Müller-Ruchholtz, W.: Immunologische Folgen fortgesetzter Kreuztransfusionen. Habil-Schr. Kiel 1966.Google Scholar
  297. Müller-Ruchholtz, W., W. Dettwyler u. E. F. Pfeiffer: Kontinuierlicher Blutaustausch zwischen unnarkotisierten Ratten mittels doppelter arterio-venöser Kreuztransfusion. Z. ges. exp. Med. 135, 368 (1962b).Google Scholar
  298. Müller-Ruchholtz, W., K. Federlin, A. Schneider, G. Schmitt, G. Rahlwes, K. Oster u. E. F. Pfeiffer: Übertragungsversuche zur Lokalisation eines nephritisauslösenden Faktors bei Ratten. Verh. dtsch. Ges. inn. Med. 68, 553 (1962a).Google Scholar
  299. Müller-Ruchholtz, W., E. Kraus, K. Federlin, J. Mosler u. E. F. Pfeiffer: Studien zur Übertragung der Masuginephritis der Ratte. VII. Weitere fluoreszenzmikroskopische Untersuchungen an Parabionten und nephritischen Einzeltieren. Z. Immun.-Forsch. 128, 137 (1965).Google Scholar
  300. Murray, J. E., J. P. Merrill, and J. H. Harrison: Kidney transplantation between seven pairs of identical twins. Ann. Surg. 148, 343 (1958).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  301. Nadimi, G.: Über die einseitige experimentelle Nierenentzündung bei der Ratte. Diss. Frankfurt 1964.Google Scholar
  302. Nefedieff, U.: Ann. Inst. Pasteur 15, 17 (1901). Zit. nach Pfeiffer, Habil.- Schr. 1955Google Scholar
  303. Noltenius, H., K. Miyasaki u. O. V. Deimling: Untersuchungen zur Genese der Proteinurie bei der experimentellen Glomerulonephritis junger Kaninchen. Beitr. path. Anat. S. 254 (1962b).Google Scholar
  304. Noltenius, H., K. Miyasaki u. W. Oehlert: Histoautoradiographische Untersuchungen mit 3H-Thymidin an der Kaninchenniere bei akuter experimenteller Glomerulonephritis. Beitr. path. Anat. S. 232 (1962a).Google Scholar
  305. Nossal, G. J.: How cells make antibodies. Sci. Amer. 211, 106 (1964).Google Scholar
  306. Öttinger, M.: Inaug.-Diss. Frankfurt 1966 (in Vorb.)Google Scholar
  307. Ogawa, S. H., u. Y. Sato: Über das Verhalten des Komplementgehaltes im Serum im Laufe der experimentellen Glomerulonephritis. Trans. Soc. Path. jap. 28, 212 (1938).Google Scholar
  308. Ohlhagen, B., and A. Svanborg: Attempts to produce experimental lipid nephrosis with tridione. Scand. J. clin. Lab. Invest. 5, 146 (1953).Google Scholar
  309. Ophüls, W.: The etiology and development of nephritis. J. Amer. med. Ass. 34 p. 1223 (1917). Zit. nach E. F. Pfeiffer, Habil.-Schr. Frankfurt a.M. 1955.Google Scholar
  310. Ortega, L. G., and R. C. Mellors: Analytical pathology. IV. The role of localized antibodies in the pathogenesis of nephrotic nephritis in the rat. J. exp. Med. 104, 151 (1956).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  311. Palmer, J. G., E. Eichwald, G. Cartwright, and M. Wintrobe: The experimental production of splenomegaly, anemia and leucopenia in albino rats. Blood 8, 72 (1953).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  312. Paterson, Ph. Y.: Transfer of allergic encephalomyelitis in rats by means of lymph node cells. J. exp. Med. III, 119 (1960).Google Scholar
  313. Paterson, Ph. Y.: Allergic encephalomyelitis. In: Advances in immunology, ed. by Dixon and Humphrey. New York and London: Academic Press 1966.Google Scholar
  314. Paterson, Ph. Y., S. M. Harwin, and N. C. Didakow: Acquired resistance to allergic encephalomyelitis and the role of a serum factor. J. clin. Invest. 40, 1069 (1961).Google Scholar
  315. Patrassi, G.: Über die durch Diphtheriebakterien experimentell hervorgerufene umschriebene Glomerulonephritis. Krankheitsforsch. 9, 340 (1932).Google Scholar
  316. Pearce, R. M.: Experimental study of nephrotoxin. Univ. Penn. med. Bull. 16, 217 (1904).Google Scholar
  317. Pfeiffer, E. F.: Die Bedeutung der tierexperimentellen Glomerulonephritis für das Verständnis der menschlichen Nephritispathogenese. Habil.-Schr. Frankfurt a.M. 1955.Google Scholar
  318. Pfeiffer, E. F.: Die Bedeutung des Parabioseversuchs für das Autoallergieproblem. (A) Ber. Dtsch. Ophthal. Ges. Heidelberg 61, 90 (1957). — (B) Proc. 9th Amer. Conf. Nephr. Syndr. 1958, p. 64.Google Scholar
  319. Pfeiffer, E. F.: Nachweis, Natur und klinische Bedeutung eines nephritisauslösenden Faktors bei Nierenerkrankungen (Ref.), Verh. dtsch. Ges. inn. Med. 68, 413, (1962).Google Scholar
  320. Pfeiffer, E. F.: Demonstration of and evidence for the lymphocyte bound nature of a secondary nephritis producing factor in nephrotoxic glomerulonephritis in rats. Immunopath. III. Int. Symp. La Jolla. Basel: Benno Schwabe & Co. 1963, S. 220.Google Scholar
  321. Pfeiffer, E. F., u. H. Bruch: Auto-antikörper gegen menschliches Nierengewebe. Verh. dtsch. Ges. inn. Med. 56, 189 (1950).Google Scholar
  322. Pfeiffer, E. F., u. H. Bruch: Über den Nachweis von Autoantikörpern gegen menschliches Nierengewebe bei Nieren- und Hochdruckkranken mit der Kollodium-Partikelreaktion. Dtsch. Arch. klin. Med. 199, 613 (1952).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  323. Pfeiffer, E. F., u. H. Bruch: Die Autoallergic in der Pathogenese der diffusen Glomerulonephritis. Ergebn. inn. Med. Kinderheilk., N.F. 4, 670 (1953).Google Scholar
  324. Pfeiffer, E. F., H. Ditschuneit, I. Otto, W. Menk, W. Sandritter u. O. Schöffling: Der immunologische Mechanismus der Übertragung von experimenteller Glomerulonephtitis und Panophthalmitis mit Hilfe des Parabioseversuchs. Verh. dtsch. Ges. inn. Med. 65, 450 (1959).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  325. Pfeiffer, E. F., u. J. P. Merrill: Die Autoaggression in der Pathogenese der diffusen Glomerulonephritis. Dtsch. med. Wschr. 87, 934 (1962).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  326. Pfeiffer, E. F., J. Mosler u. K. Federlin: Studien zur Übertragung der Masuginephritis der Ratte. VI. Die Beschränkung der Lokalisation des heterologen Kaninchen-Anti-Rattennieren- Serums auf die Glomerula der primär nephritischen Parabionten. Z. ges. exp. Med. 138, 385 (1964).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  327. Pfeiffer, E. F., W. Müller-Ruchholtz, and K. Federlin: Transfer of nephrotoxic glomerulonephritis in rats by means of white blood cells. Nature (Lond.) 195, 718 (1962).Google Scholar
  328. Pfeiffer, E. F., W. Sandritter, K. Schöffling, G. Treser, E. Kraus, W. Menk u. M. Herrmann: Studien zur Übertragung der Masuginephritis der Ratte. II. Die Übertragung durch Parabiose genetisch gleichartiger Partner. Z. ges. exp. Med. 132, 436 (1960).Google Scholar
  329. Pfeiffer, E. F., K. Schöffling, J. Bachrach, W. Menk, E. Kraus, J. Otto, and W. Sandritter: Transfer of experimental panophthalmitis in rats by parabiosis. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. (N.Y.) 100, 467 (1959).Google Scholar
  330. Pfeiffer, E. F., K. Schöffling, W. Sandritter, J. Schröder, H. Steigcrwald u. L. Wolf: Studien zur Übertragung der Masuginephritis der Ratte. I. Die Übertragung durch kurzdauernde Parabiose. Z. ges. exp. Med. 124, 471 (1954a).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  331. Pfeiffer, E. F., K. Schöffling, J. H.E. Bruch u. W. T. Spielmann: Masugi-Nephritis und Serumkomplement der Ratte. Z. exp. Med. 122, 446 (1954b).Google Scholar
  332. Piel, C. F.: Experimental renal disease as observed by electron micro-scopy. Fed. Proc. 17, 453 (1958).Google Scholar
  333. Pressman, D.: The zone of activity of antibodies as determined by the use of radioactive tracers. Trans. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 11, 203 (1949).Google Scholar
  334. Pressman, D.: Proc. 5th Amer. Conf. on the Nephrotic Syndrome, 1953, Nat. Nephrosis Fond. Inc. N.Y.Google Scholar
  335. Pressman, D.: Current status of the tissue localization of J131 labeled antitissue antibodies. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 70, 72 (1957).Google Scholar
  336. Pressman, D., and H. Eisen: Zone of localization of antibodies; attempt to saturate antibody binding sites in mouse kidney. J. Immunol. 64, 273 (1950).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  337. Pressman, D., and G. Keighley: The zone of activity of antibodies as determined by the use of radioactive tracers. The zone of activity of nephrotoxic antikidney serum. J. Immunol. 58, 141 (1948).Google Scholar
  338. Pressman, D., L. Korngold, and W. Heymann: Localizing properties of anti-rat-kidney serum prepared in ducks. Arch. Path. 55, 347 (1953).Google Scholar
  339. Pressman, D., and B. Sherman: The zone of localization of antibodies: XI. The in vivo purification of kidney localizing anti-kidney-antibody. J. Immunol. 67, 15 (1951).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  340. Quinodoz, J. V.: Essai de transfer de la glomerulonephrite “nephrotoxique” au moyen de l’exsudat peritoneal aseptique et du broyat de rate. Path, et Biol. 12, 412 (1964).Google Scholar
  341. Randerath, E.: Die Entwicklung der Lehre von den Nephrosen in der pathologischen Anatomie. Ergebn. allg. Path. path. Anat. 32, 91 (1937).Google Scholar
  342. Randerath, E.: Nephrose-Nephritis. Klin. Wschr. 20, 281, 305 (1941).Google Scholar
  343. Randerath, E.: Nephritis-Nephrose. In: E. Becher, Nierenkrankheiten, Bd. 2. Jena: Gustav Fischer 1947.Google Scholar
  344. Randerath, E.: Zur Frage der Abgrenzung Neprose. Nephritis. Regensburg. Jb. ärztl. Fortbild. 1, 95 (1949).Google Scholar
  345. Ranzi, E., u. H. Ehrlich: Über die Wirkung von Toxinen und die Bildung von Antikörpern bei parabiotischen Tieren. Z. Immun.-Forsch. 3, 38 (1909).Google Scholar
  346. Rathe, J.: Die Masuginephritis unter Röntgenbestrahlung. Helv. med. Acta 22, 133 (1955).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  347. Ratschow, M.: Über den Lokalisatoreffekt im sensibilisierten Organismus. Neue med. Welt 1950, 1308.Google Scholar
  348. Redfern, W. W.: Microscopic changes of heterophile skin reaction; pathology of heterophile skin reactions. Arch. Path. 6, 585 (1928).Google Scholar
  349. Reed, R. W., and B. H. Matheson: Experimental nephritis due to type specific streptococci. IV. The effect of type 12 nephrotoxin in monkeys. J. infect. Dis. 106, 245 (1960).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  350. Reubi, F.: L’influence des antihistaminiques de synthese sur le developpement et revolution de la nephrite experimentale. Helv. med. Acta 12, 547 (1945).Google Scholar
  351. Rössle, Gerlach u. M. Klinge (1930): Zit nach E. F. Pfeiffer 1955.Google Scholar
  352. Roth, E., u. K. Bloss: Über die experimentelle Nephritis (Glomerulonephritis). Zugleich ein Beitrag zur Nephritis bei Schweinerotlauf. Virchows Arch. path. Anat. 238, 325 (1922).Google Scholar
  353. Rother, K.: Über die Pathogenese verschiedener Formen experimenteller Nephritis. Naunyn-Schmiedebergs Arch. exp. Path. Pharmak. 220, 448 (1953).Google Scholar
  354. Rother, K.: Aktuelle Probleme der Auto- sensibilisierung bei Glomerulonephritis. Int. Arch. Allergy 22, 306 (1963).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  355. Rother, K., u. H. J. Sarre: Immunologische Untersuchungen bei Nieren- und Gefäßerkrankungen. In: P. Miescher u. K. Vorlaender, Immunpathologie in Klinik und Forschung. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme 1961.Google Scholar
  356. Rother, K., u. H. J. Sarre: Untersuchungen zur pathogenetischen Bedeutung der Autoantikörper. Einseitige experimentelle chronische Glomerulonephritis. Klin. Wschr. 40, 429 (1962).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  357. Rothbard, S., and R. F. Watson: Antigenicity of rat collagen. Reverse anaphylaxis induced in rats by anti-rat-collagen serum. J. exp. Med. 103, 57 (1956).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  358. Rothbard, S., and R. F. Watson: Renal glomerular lesions induced by rabbit anti-rat-collagen serum in rats, prepared with adjuvans. J. exp. Med. 109, 633 (1959).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  359. Rothbard, S., and R. F. Watson: Antigenicity of rat-collagen. J. exp. Med. 113, 1041 (1961).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  360. Rudofski, U., and R. W. Steblay: Studies on autoimmune nephritis in sheep. II. Passive transfer of nephritis in sheep by plasma. Fed. Proc. 25, 659 (1966)Google Scholar
  361. Salomonsen, J., u. D. Madsen: Zit. nach Beregi. Virchows Arch. path. Anat. 330, 391 (1957).Google Scholar
  362. Sandritter, W., E. Kraus, G. Treser, W. Menk, M. Herrmann, K. Schöffling u. E. F. Pfeiffer: Studien zur Übertragung der Masuginephritis der Ratte. III. Die Übertragung der „chronischen” Glomerulonephritis durch Parabiose genetisch glaichartiger Partner. Z. ges. exp. Med. 132, 453 (1960).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  363. Sandritter, W., u. E. F. Pfeiffer: Morphologische Beob-achtungen zur Übertragung der akuten und chronischen Masugi-Nephritis der Ratte im Parabioseversuch. Verh. dtsch. Ges. Path. 43, 213 (1959).Google Scholar
  364. Sarre, H.: Nierenkrankheiten, 2. Aufl. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme 1959.Google Scholar
  365. Sarre, H., u. K. Rother: Die Autoaggression in der Pathogenese der diffusen Glomerulonephritis. Bemerkungen zur Interpretation unserer Arbeiten durch E. F. Pfeiffer u. J. P. Merrill in dieser Wschr. 87, 934 (1962). Dtsch. med. Wschr. 88, 1802 (1963).Google Scholar
  366. Sarre, H. J.: Diskussionsbemerkung. In: Verh. dtsch. Ges. inn. Med. 60, 413 (1954).Google Scholar
  367. Sarre, H. J., u. K. Rother: Allergische Erkrankungen der Niere. In K. Hansen,  Allergie. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme 1957.Google Scholar
  368. Sarre, H. J., u. H. Wirtz: Geschwindigkeit und Ort der „Nephrotoxin“-Bindung bei der experimentellen Glomerulonephritis. Klin. Wschr. 18, 1948 (1939).Google Scholar
  369. Sarre, H. J., u. H. Wirtz Geschwindigkeit und Ort der Antigen-Antikörper-Reaktion bei der experimentellen Nephritis. Dtsch. Arch. klin. Med. 189, 1 (1942).Google Scholar
  370. Sata (1906): Zit. nach E. F. Pfeiffer, Habil.-Schr. Frankfurt 1955.Google Scholar
  371. Sauerbruch, F.: Münch, med. Wschr. 70, 866 (1923).Google Scholar
  372. Sauerbruch, F Zit. nach E. F. Pfeiffer et al. Z. ges. exp. Med. 132, 436 (1960).Google Scholar
  373. Sauerbruch, F., u. M. Heyde: Münch, med. Wschr. 19081, 153. Zit. nach E. F. Pfeiffer, Habil.-Schr. Frankfurt a.M. 1955.Google Scholar
  374. Sauerbruch, F., u. E. Knake: Über die Bedeutung der Milz bei Parabiosetieren. Klin. Wschr. 15, 884 (1936).Google Scholar
  375. Schäfer, H. E., u. A. Schäfer: Zur Pathogenese der glomerulären Nierenerkrankungen. Materia med. Nordmark 1965, 158ff.Google Scholar
  376. Schloss, G.: Der Regulationsapparat am Gefäßpol des Nierenkörperchens bei der Masugi-Nephritis-Ratte. Helv. med. Acta 12, 777 (1945).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  377. Schmidt, G.: Dtsch. Z. Chir. 171, 141 (1922). Zit. nach E. F. Pfeiffer et al. Z. ges. exp. Med. 132, 436 (1960).Google Scholar
  378. Schmidt, G Schöffling, K.: Über die iso- und autoallergische Glomerulonephritis der Ratte. III. Internistentgg Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Oktober 1960. Leipzig: VEB Georg Thieme 1963, S. 161.Google Scholar
  379. Schöffling, K., F. Kemper, W. Sandritter u. E. F. Pfeiffer: Studien zur Übertragung der Masuginephritis der Ratte. IV. Versuch der diaplacentaren Übertragung. Z. ges. exp. Med. 133, 43 (1960).Google Scholar
  380. Schöffling, K., E. F. Pfeiffer, K. Retiene, K. Federlin, H. Stroh, G. Nadimi, R. Heintz u. W. Sandritter: Transport und Bindung nephritisauslösender Faktoren bei einseitiger experimenteller Nierenentzündung. Verh. dtsch. ges. inn. Med. 68, 557 (1962).Google Scholar
  381. Schwab, L., F. C. Moll, T. H. Hall, M. Bolan, M. Kirk, C. V. Z. Hawn, and C. A. Janeway: Experimental hypersensitivity in the rabbit, effect of inhibition of antibody formation by X-radiation and nitrogen mustard on the histologic and serologic sequences, and on the behaviour of serum complement following single large injections of foreign proteins. J. exp. Med. 91, 505 (1950).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  382. Schwappacher, W.: Der Einfluß einer Cortisondauerbehandlung auf die Übertragung der experimentellen Nierenentzündung der Ratte. Inaug.-Diss. Frankfurt a.M. 1962.Google Scholar
  383. Schwentker, F., and F. Comploier: Production of kidney antibodies by injection of homologous kidney phis bacterial toxins. J. exp. Med. 70, 223 (1939).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  384. Schwentker, F., and T. M. Rivers: Antibody response of rabbits to injections of emulsions and extracts of homologous brain. J. exp. Med. 60, 559 (1934).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  385. Schwiegk, H., N. Lang, H. Jahrmärker, K. H. Bässler, J. Schmidt u. M. Hertl: Untersuchungen über radioaktiv markierte Organantikörper. Verh. dtsch. Ges. inn. Med. 60, 266 (1954).Google Scholar
  386. Sclare, G., and G. Taylor: Experimental thyreoiditis and the placentar transfer of auto-antibodies. J. Path. Bact. 82, 29 (1961).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  387. Seegal, B. C.: Usefulness of the fluorescent antibody technic in the study of experimental nephritis. Its possible uses for comprehension of the pathogenesis of some human kidney diseases. Rass. Fisiopat. clin. ter. 31, 1063 (1959).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  388. Seegal, B. C III. Internat. Symp. on Immunpathology, La Jolla 1963, edit, byT Grabar u. T Miescher. Basel Benno Schwabe & Co. 1964.Google Scholar
  389. Seegal, B. C., and M. Bevans: The production of glomerulo-nephritis by immunologic methods. J. chron. Dis. 5, 153 (1957).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  390. Seegal, B. C., K. C. Hsu, E. Fiaschi e G. Andres: La tecnica degli anticorpi fluorescenti applicata alio studio della patogenesi della nefrite umana. Rass. Fisiopat. clin. ter. 31, 1 (1959).Google Scholar
  391. Seegal, B. C., K. C. Hsu, M. S. Rathenburg, and M. L. Chapeau: Studies on the mechanism of experimental nephritis with fluorescein labeled antibody. II. Localization and persistance of injected rabbit or duck anti-rat-kidney serum during the course of nephritis in rats. Amer. J. Path. 41, 183 (1962).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  392. Seegal, B. C., and E. N. Loeb: The production of chronic glomerulonephritis in rats by injection of rabbit anti-rat-placenta-serum. J. exp. Med. 84, 211 (1946).Google Scholar
  393. Seifter, J., W. Ehrich, J. A. Begani, and G. H. Warren: Effects of cortisone, hyaluronidase, desoxycortico- sterone and artisone on experimental serum disease in rabbits. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. (N.Y.) 75, 337 (1950).Google Scholar
  394. Sherwin, A. C., A. Leznoff, M. Richter, and B. Rose: Studies on the immuno¬logical specificity of autologous gamma-globulin in the glomeruli of rabbits with experimentally induced glomerulonephritis. Canad. J. Biochem. 41, 897 (1963).Google Scholar
  395. Simonsen, M. M.: Biological incompatibility in kidney transplantation in dogs. Acta path, microbiol. scand. 32, 36 (1953).Google Scholar
  396. Simonsen, M. M Studies on the pathogenesis of experimental glomerulonephritis. Acta path, microbiol. scand. 32, 85 (1953).Google Scholar
  397. Sitte, H.: Veränderungen im Glomerulum der Rattenniere nach Fremdeiweißgaben und hypothetische Erklärung der glomerulären Ultrafiltration. Verh. dtsch. Ges. Path. 43, 225 (1959).Google Scholar
  398. Smadel, J. E.: Experimental nephritis in rats by injections of anti-kidney-serum I. Preparation and immunological studies of nephrotoxin. J. exp. Med. 64, 921 (1936).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  399. Smadel, J. E Pathological studies of the acute and chronic disease. J. exp. Med. 65, 541 (1937).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  400. Smadel, J. E., and L. E. Farr: Experimental nephritis in rats induced by injection of anti-kidney-serum. II. Clinical and functional studies. J. exp. Med. 65, 527 (1937).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  401. Solomon, D. H., J. W. Gardella, H. Fanger, F. M. Dethier, and J. W. Ferrebee: Nephrotoxic nephritis in rats, evidence for the glomerular origin of the kidney antigen. J. exp. Med. 90, 267 (1949).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  402. Sprunt, D. H., and A. D. Dulaney: Effects of autolytic changes on antigenic properties of kidney preparation. Fed. Proc. 10, 419 (1951).Google Scholar
  403. Sprunt, D. H., W. R. Rogers, and A. D. Dulaney: Fed. Proc. 9, 344 (1950).Google Scholar
  404. Spühler, O., H. U. Zollinger u. M. Enderlin: Zum Mechanismus der Masugi-Nephritis. Schweiz, med. Wschr. 81, 904 (1951).Google Scholar
  405. Staads- baeder, S.: L’auto-immunisation en pathologie. These universite catholique de Louvain, Brüssel 1959.Google Scholar
  406. Staemmler, M.: Disk.-Bemerkung in Verh. dtsch. Ges. Path. 1935, 184.Google Scholar
  407. Staemmler, M Die Harnorgane. In: Kaufmann, Spezielle pathologische Anatomie, 11. u. 12. Aufl., Bd. II, Teil 1 (Herausgeber: M. Staemmler). Berlin: W. de Gruyter & Co. 1957.Google Scholar
  408. Stavitsky, A. B., W. Heymann, and D. B. Hackel: Relation of complement fixation to renal disease in rats injected with duck antikidney serum. J. Lab. clin. Med. 47, 349 (1956).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  409. Steblay, R. W.:  Glomerulonephritis induced in sheep by injection of heterologous glomerular basement membrane and Freund’s complete adjuvant. J. exp. Med. 116, 253 (1962).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  410. Steblay, R. W.Glomerulonephritis induced in monkeys by injections of heterologous glomerular basement membrane and Freund’s adjuvant. Nature (Lond.) 197, 1173 (1963).Google Scholar
  411. Steblay, R. W Effect of injecting heterologous glomerular basement membrane preparations in pregnant sheep. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. (N.Y.) 112, 15 (1963).Google Scholar
  412. Steblay, R. W Transfer of nephritis from sheep with autoimmune nephritis to recipient sheep by artery-to-artery cross circulation. Fed. Proc. 23, 449 (1964).Google Scholar
  413. Steblay, R. W Some immunologic properties of human glomerular basement membrane. IV. Immediate or delayed nephritis induced in rabbits by sheep antihuman glomerular basement membrane sera. J. Immunol. 95, 517 (1965).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  414. Steblay, R. W., and M. H. Lepper: Some immunological properties of human and dog glomerular basement membrane. J. Immunol. 87, 636 (1961).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  415. Strehler, E.: Glomerulonephritis und Endocarditis bei Kaninchen nach Injektion von Immunseren gegen Aorta. Verh. dtsch. Ges. inn. Med. 56, 188 (1950).Google Scholar
  416. Strehler, E., u. H. Sollberger: Helv. med. Acta (Ser. A) 1, 79 (1950). Zit. nach H. Dutz et al. Z. ges. inn. Med. 11,1 (1956).Google Scholar
  417. Strehler, E. K., D. Hunziker, D. Staehelin u. Balli: Helv. med. Acta 1, 54 (1951). Zit. nach H. Dutz et al. Z. ges. inn. Med. 11, 1 (1951).Google Scholar
  418. Stroh, H.: Transport und Bindung von Nephrotoxinen und nephritisauslösenden Faktoren bei der einseitigen Nierenentzündung des Kaninchens. Inaug.-Diss. Frankfurt a.M. 1964.Google Scholar
  419. Swift, H. E., and J. E. Smadel: Experimental nephritis in rats induced by injections of antikidney serum: Prevention of injurious effects of nephrotoxin in vivo by kidney extract. J. exp. Med. 65, 557 (1937).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  420. Takeda (1928): Zit. nach E. F. Pfeiffer. Habil.-Schr. Frankfurt 1955.Google Scholar
  421. Taliaferro, W. H.: Modification of the immunresponse by radiation and cortisone. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 69, 745 (1957).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  422. Teilum, GL, H. C. Engback, N. Harboe, and M. Simonson: Effects of cortisone on experimental glomerulonephritis. J. clin. Path. 4, 301 (1951).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  423. Teoh, T. B.: The effects of methyl cellulose in rats; with special reference to splenomegaly, anaemia and the problem of hypersplenism. J. Path. Bact. 81, 33 (1961).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  424. Thiel, A.: Licht- und elektronenmikroskopische Studie über das Nierenkörperchen der griechischen Landschildkröte (Testudo graeca L.). Z. Zellforsch., Abt. Histochem. 47, 288 (1958).Google Scholar
  425. Todd, E. W., and R. C. Lancefield: Variants of hemolytic streptococci; their relation to type-specific substance, virulence and toxin. J. exp. Med. 48, 751 (1928).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  426. Tomizuka (1928, 1931): Zit. nach E. F. Pfeiffer. Habil.-Schr. Frankfurt a.M. 1955.Google Scholar
  427. Trapani, J. L., J. S. Garvey, and D. H. Campbell: Stimulating action of soluble antigen-antibody complexes on normal guinea pig smooth muscle. Science 127, 700 (1958).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  428. Triedeman, R. S., H. Metzger, K. C. Hsu, M. Rothenberg, B. C. Seegal, and A. Urquhart: Studies of the mechanism of experimental nephritis with fluorescein-labeled antibody. I. Localization and persistence of injected duck-anti-rat-lung serum during the course of nephritis in rats. Amer. J. Path. 41, 95 (1962).Google Scholar
  429. Tsuji, S.: Ein Betrag zur Frage der immuncytotoxischen Glomerulonephritis. Beitr. path. Anat. 98, 425 (1936/37).Google Scholar
  430. Turiaf, J., L. Zizine et Ch. Sors: L’hypertension arterielle et les lesions vasculo-humorales du rat en parabiose. Presse med. 62, 57 (1954).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  431. Tusch, E.: Über die Beeinflussung des Verlaufes der Masuginephritis durch Hibernation. Wien. klin. Forsch. 961 (1955).Google Scholar
  432. Uhr, J. W., and Scharff: Delayed hypersensitivity. The effect of X-irradiation on the development of delayed hypersensitivity and antibody formation. J. exp. Med. 112, 65 (1960).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  433. Unanue, E., and E. J. Dixon: Experimental glomerulonephritis. IV. Participation of complement in nephrotoxic nephritis. J. exp. Med. 119, 965 (1964).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  434. Unanue, E. R.: Immunpathology of rabbits immunized to kidney fractions. Scripps Clin, and Res. Found. La Jolla Calif. No 92037, 1965.Google Scholar
  435. Unanue, E. R., and F. J. Dixon: Experimental glomerulo-nephritis. V. Studies on the interaction of nephrotoxic antibodies with tissues of the rat. J. exp. Med. 122, 697 (1965a).Google Scholar
  436. Unanue, E. R., and F. J. Dixon Experimental glomerulonephritis. VI. The autologous phase of nephrotoxic serum nephritis. J. exp. Med. 122, 715 (1965b).Google Scholar
  437. Unanue, E. R., F. J. Dixon, and S. Lee: Experimental glomerulonephritis. VIII. The in vivo fixation of heterologous nephrotoxic antibodies to, and their exchange among, tissues of the rat. Int. Arch. Allergy 29, 140 (1966).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  438. Unanue, E. R., S. Lee, F. J. Dixon, and J. D. Feldman: Experimental glomerulo¬nephritis. VII. The absence of an autoimmunic antikidney response in nephrotoxic serum- nephritis. J. exp. Med. 122, 565 (1965).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  439. Van Dyke, D. C., and R. L. Huff: Epilation in non irradiated member of parabiotically united rats. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. (N.Y.) 72, 266 (1949).Google Scholar
  440. Van Dyke, D. C., R. L. Huff, and H. M. Evans: Efficiency of vascular union in parabiosis. Stanf. med. Bull. 6, 271 (1948).Google Scholar
  441. Vaubel, E.: Die Eiweißüberempfindlichkeit (Gewebshyperergie) des Bindegewebes. Beitr. path. Anat. 89, 374 (1933).Google Scholar
  442. Veil u. Sturm: Pathologie des Stammhirnes. Jena 1946.Google Scholar
  443. Vernier, R. J., B. Papermaster, and R. A. Good: Light and electronmicroscopic pathology of experimental aminonucleoside nephrosis: Relation to nephrosis in man. Fed. Proc. 17, 463 (1958).Google Scholar
  444. Vogt, A.: Ein Beitrag zur Immunologie der Masugi-Nephritis. Habil.-Schr. Freiburg 1965.Google Scholar
  445. Vogt, A., and H. G. Kochern: Immediate and delayed nephrotoxic nephritis in rats. The role of complement fixation. Amer. J. Path. 39, 379 (1961).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  446. Vogt, A., and H. G. Kochern Ein Beitrag zur Immunologie der Masugi-Nephritis. Verh. dtsch. Ges. Path. 45, 302 (1961).Google Scholar
  447. Volhard, F.: Die doppelseitigen haematogenen Nierenerkrankungen. In: Handbuch der inneren Medizin, Bd. 6, II. Berlin: Springer 1931.Google Scholar
  448. Vorlaender, K. O.: Die Bewertung von Auto-Immuni-sierungsnachweisen bei klinischen Erkrankungen und ihre Abhängigkeit von der Methodik. Klin. Wschr. 31, 748 (1953).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  449. Vorlaender, K. O., W. Fitting u. D. Gierlich: Der Einfluß heterologer Gewebszellen (Nierentrockenzellen, nach Niehans) auf die Masugi-Nephritis der Ratte. Klin. Wschr. 32, 1065 (1954).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  450. Vorlaender, K. O., G. Hellwig u. G. Liesenfeld: Experimentelle Untersuchungen zur Pathogenese der durch hämolytische Streptokokken der Gruppe A, Typ 12, hervorgerufenen Nervenentzündung. Allergie u. Asthma 5, 13 (1959).Google Scholar
  451. Wachstein, M., and K. Lange: Histologie and histochemical studies of the rabbit glomerulonephritis produced by specific anti-kidney duck serum. Amer. J. Path. 36, 835 (1958).Google Scholar
  452. Wachstein, M., and K. Lange Proteinuria and tubular atrophy in The rat. Lab. Invest. 9, 371 (1960).Google Scholar
  453. Wagner, V., u. E. Holeckova: Der Einfluß nephrotoxischer Sera auf Nierenexplantation in vitro. Schweiz. Z. allg. Path. 14, 163 (1951).Google Scholar
  454. Walther, D.: Ein Beitrag zur Insuffizienz der proximalen Nierentubuli und zur Deutung der Nephrohydrose. Münch med. Wschr. 105, 1370 (1963).Google Scholar
  455. Weigle, W. O., C. G. Cochrane, and F. J. Dixon: Anaphylactogenic properties of soluble antigen-antibody complexes in the guinea pig and rabbit. J. Immunol. 85, 469 (1960).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  456. Weigle, W. O., u. F. J. Dixon: Die biologischen Eigenschaften von Antigen-Antikörper- Komplexen und ihre pathogene Bedeutung. In: Miescher-Vorlaender, Immunpathologie in Klinik und Forschung. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme 1961.Google Scholar
  457. Weiss, A.: Weitere Beiträge zur Frage der experimentellen Glomerulonephritis. Beitr. path. Anat. 96, 111 (1935).Google Scholar
  458. Welsh, J., G. Ward, and W. McFadden Jr.: Effect of an antihistamine (Chlorprophenpyridamine maleate) on experimental nephrotoxic nephritis in rats. Int. Arch. Allergy 17, 39 (1960).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  459. Wilson, G. W., and J. Oliver: Experiments of production of specific antisera for infections of unknown course. III. Nephrotoxins: Their specifity as demonstrated by method of selective absorption. J. exp. Med. 32, 183 (1920).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  460. Wilson, S., D. Hackel, S. Harwood, G. Nash, and W. Heyman: Aminonucleoside nephrosis in rats. Pediatrics 21, 963 (1958).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  461. Winternitz, W. W., and D. B. Hackel: Effect of antihistaminics on experimental nephritis in rats. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. (N.Y.) 78, 294 (1951).Google Scholar
  462. Wood, C., and R. G. White: Experimental glomerulonephritis produced in mice by subcutaneous injections of heat-killed proteus mirabilis. Brit. J. exp. Path. 37, 49 (1956).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  463. Zeckwer, J.: Cardiovascular lesions as result of joining rats in parabiosis. Arch. Path. 54, 84 (1952).Google Scholar
  464. Zollinger, H. U.: Die klinische und experimentelle Glomerulonephrose. Helv. med. Acta 12, 23 (1945).PubMedGoogle Scholar

Literatur

  1. Addis, Th.: The glomerular nephritis, diagnosis and treatment. New York: Macmillan Co. 1948.Google Scholar
  2. Albertini, A. v., u. A. Grumbach: Die experimentellen Streptokokkeninfekte des Kaninchens und ihre Beziehungen zu Herdinfekten. Ergebn. allg Path. path. Anat. 32, 314 (1937).Google Scholar
  3. Bell, E. T., and B. I. Clawson: Experimental glomerulonephritis in a monkey. Amer. J. Path. 7, 57 (1931).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bernheimer, A. W., P. D. Lazarides, and A. T. Wilson: Diphospho- pyridine nucleotidase as an extracellular product of streptococcal growth and its possible relationship to leucotoxicity. J. exp. Med. 106, 27 (1957).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bock, H. E.: Ref. Verh. dtsch. Ges. inn. Med. 60 (1954), zit. in: M. Ratschow, Angiologie. Stuttgart 1959.Google Scholar
  6. Brass, K.: Über die Pathogenese der sog. nichteitrigen embolischen Herdnephritis Löhleins. Frankfurt. Z. Path. 61, 42 (1949).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Brod, J., L. Paukova, Y. Fenel, Z. Heye, and E. Krathova: Influence of fasting on the immunological reactions and course of acute glomerulonephritis. Lancet 1958 I, 760.Google Scholar
  8. Burkholder, P. M.: Complement fixation in diseased tissues. I. Fixation of guinea pig complement in sections of kidney from humans with membraneous glomerulonephritis and on kidney of rats injected with anti-rat kidney serum. J. exp. Med. 114, 605 (1961).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Burnet, F. M.: The clonal selection theory of aquired immunity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1959.Google Scholar
  10. Burnet, F. M., and F. Fenner: The production of antibodies. Melbourne: Macmillan 1949.Google Scholar
  11. Caiger: In: Albutt’s System Med. (N.Y.) 2, 159 (1898). Zit. Rammelkamp u. Weaver.Google Scholar
  12. Christ, P.: Serologische Untersuchungen bei Streptokokkeninfektionen. Vortrag 29. Kolloqu. Paul-Ehrlich-Institut 17. 3. 1953, H. 51 der Arbeiten aus dem Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, Frankfurt a.M. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer 1953.Google Scholar
  13. Christ, P Untersuchungen mit der Antistreptokinase-, der Antihyaluronidase- und der Antistreptolysin-Reaktion. Z. Rheumaforsch. 12, 141 (1953).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Christ, P., u. W. H. Hauss: Über die klinische Bedeutung des Antistreptokinase- und Anti- hyaluronidasetiters. Z. Rheumaforsch. 3/4, 84 (1952).Google Scholar
  15. Chodumel, V., and Z. Jezkova: Determination of antibodies to kidney tissue. Lancet 19611, 965.Google Scholar
  16. Cruickshank, B.: The role of “Auto-antibodies” in human glomerulonephritis. Immunpath. 1st Intern. Symp. Basel Seelisberg 1958, S. 98., Benno Schwabe & Co. 1959.Google Scholar
  17. Davis, B. D., E. A. Kaimt, A. Harris, and A. D. Moore: The anticomplementary activity of serum-gamma-globulin. J. Immunol. 49, 223 (1944).Google Scholar
  18. Dietrich, A., u. H. Siegmund: Handbuch der speziellen pathologischen Anatomie, Bd. VIII. Berlin: Springer 1926.Google Scholar
  19. Dixon, F. J., J. D. Feldman, and I. J. Vazquez: Experimental glomerulonephritis. The pathogenesis of a laboratory model resembling the spectrum of human glomerulonephritis. J. exp. Med. 113, 889 (1961).Google Scholar
  20. Dixon, F. J., J. J. Vazquez, W. C. Weigle, and C. G. Cochrane: Pathogenesis of serum sickness. Arch. Path. 65, 18 (1958).Google Scholar
  21. Domagk, G., u. C. Neuhaus: Die experimentelle Glomerulonephritis. Virchows Arch. path. Anat. 264, 522 (1927).Google Scholar
  22. Earle, D. P., and R. B. Jennings: Studies on poststreptococcal nephritis and other glomerular diseases. Ann. intern. Med. 51, 851 (1959).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Ecker, E. E., S. Seifter, T. F. Dozois, and L. Barr: Complement in infectious diseases in man. J. clin. Invest. 25, 800 (1946).Google Scholar
  24. Federlin, K., W. Leinweber u. E. F. Pfeiffer: Studien zur „Übertragung” der Masugi- Nephritis der Ratte. X. Die Übertragung mit Lymphocyten aus Lymphgefäßdrainage. Z. Immun.-Forsch. 130, 380 (1966).Google Scholar
  25. Federlin, K., H. Mentzel u. E. F. Pfeiffer: In Vorbereitung (1966).Google Scholar
  26. Felix-Davies, D., and B. H. Waksman: Arthr. and Rheum. 4, 416 (1961).Google Scholar
  27. Fischel, E. E., and D. C. Gajdusek: Serum complement in acute glomerulonephritis and other renal diseases. Amer. J. Med. 12, 190 (1952).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Fischel, E. E., R. H. Pauli, and J. Lesh: Serological studies in rheumatic fever. J. clin. Invest. 28,1127 (1949).Google Scholar
  29. Fishberg, A.M.: Hypertension and nephritis. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger 1939, 3. ed., and 1944, 4. ed.Google Scholar
  30. Freedman, P., and A. S. Markowitz: Isolation of antibodylike gammaglobulin from lupus glomeruli. Brit. med. J. 19621, 1175.Google Scholar
  31. Freedman, P., and A. S. Markowitz Gammaglobulin and complement in the diseased kidney. J. clin. Invest. 41, 328 (1962).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Freedman, P., J. H. Peters, and R. M. Kark: Localisation of gamma globulin in the diseased kidney. Arch, intern. Med. 105, 524 (1960).Google Scholar
  33. Friedmann, U., u. H. Deicher: Weitere klinische und experimentelle Untersuchungen über den Scharlach. Die Pathogenese der Scharlachnephritis. Z. klin. Med. 108, 727 (1928).Google Scholar
  34. Friou, Gr. F.: The significance of lupus erythematosus globulin reaction against human tissue antigens in certain acute and chronic diseases. Ann. intern. Med. 101, 9 (1958).Google Scholar
  35. Friou, GL J., and H. A. Wenner: On occurrence in human serum of inhibitary substance to hyaluronidase produced by strain of hemolytic streptococcus. J. infect. Dis. 80, 185 (1947).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Gajdusek, D. C.: An autoimmune reaction against human tissue antigen in certain acute and chronic diseases. Arch, intern. Med. 101, 9 (1958).Google Scholar
  37. Gara u. Goldberg (1948): Zit. E. F. Pfeiffer, W. Spielmann u. H. Brückner.Google Scholar
  38. Goldner, M.: Untersuchungen um das Komplement bei Leberkranken. Dtsch. med. Wschr. 55, 390 (1929).Google Scholar
  39. Goodman, H. C. R., R. A. Malmgren, I.L. Fably, and G. Brecher: Separation of factors in lupus erythematosus serum reacting with components of cell nuclei. Lancet 1959, No 7099, 382.Google Scholar
  40. Griffith, F.: The serological classification of streptococcus pyogenes. J. Hyg. (Lond.) 34, 542 (1935).Google Scholar
  41. Hansen-Pruss, C., W. T. Longcope, and D. P. O’Brien: Skin reactions to filtrate of hemolytic streptococci in acute and subacute nephritis. J. clin. Invest. 7, 543 (1929). Hayman I. M Jr and J. W. Martin Jr.: Acute nephritis: Review of 77 cases. Amer. J. med. Sci. 200, 505 (1940).Google Scholar
  42. Heintz, R.: Nierenfibel, S. 170. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme 1964.Google Scholar
  43. Heller, P., V. I. Jakulis, and H. I. Zimmermann: Antigenicity of connective tissue extracts. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. (N.Y.) 101, 509 (1953).Google Scholar
  44. Hess, E. V., C. T. Ashworth, and M. Ziff: Transfer of an autoimmune nephrosis in rat by means of lymphnode cells. J. exp. Med. 115, 421 (1962).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Hoff, F., u. Wendlberger: Vortrag Naturwiss. Ges. Steiermark, Okt. 1943.Google Scholar
  46. Holm, G.: In vitro cytotoxic effects of lymphoid cells from rats with experimental autoimmun-nephrosis. Clin. exp. Immunol. 1, 45 (1960).Google Scholar
  47. Holman, H.R., and H. G. Kunkel: Affinity between the lupus erythematosus serum factor and cell nuclei and nucleiprotein. Science 126, 162 (1957).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Jennings, R., and E. D. De Lamath: Penicillin-therapy of scarlet fever and the streptococcus carrier. Amer. J. Med. 2, 1 (1947).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Kalbak, K.: Experimentelle og Kliniske Underogelser von “0”-Streptolysin og Fore- komsten af “0”-Antistreptolysin i Serum. Kopenhagen: Munksgaards 1942.Google Scholar
  50. Kantor, F. S.: Renal glomerular lesions in mice following injection of streptococcal M-protein. Yale J. Biol. Med. 34, 70 (1961).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Kaplan, M. H.: Localisation of streptococcal antigens in tissue. I. Histologic distribution and persistence of M-protein, types 1, 5, 12, and 19 in the tissues of the mouse. J. exp. Med. 107, 341 (1958).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Kaplan, M. H Immunologic relation of streptococci and tissue antigens. I. Properties of an antigen in certain strains of group A streptococci exhibiting an immunologic cross-reaction with heart tissue. J. Immunol. 90, 595 (1963).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Kay, C. F., P. F. Lucchesi, and R. B. Rutherford: Experimental investigation of immunologic mechanism as cause of glomerulonephritis. J. Immunol. 42, 369 (1941).Google Scholar
  54. Kayser-Petersen, J. E., u. E. Schwab: Über Nierenerkrankungen nach Angina. Münch, med. Wschr. 69, 580 (1922).Google Scholar
  55. Kellet, C. E.: Complement titre in acute nephritis, with special reference to causation by reversed anaphylaxis. Lancet 2, 1262 (1936).Google Scholar
  56. Kellet, C. E Complementary activity of the blood in acute nephritis with special reference to prognosis. Lancet 2, 911 (1952).Google Scholar
  57. Kellner, A., E. B. Freeman, and A. S. Carlson: Neutralizing antibodies of streptococcal diphosphopyridine nucleotidase in serum of experimental animals and human beings. J. exp. Med. 108, 299 73 Handbuch der inneren Medizin, Bd. VIII/1, 5. Aufl. (1958).Google Scholar
  58. Kelsey, H., and F. Y. Scholes: Streptococcal types in scarlet fever. The association of change of streptococcal type with complications. Med. J. Aust. 1. 728 (1941).Google Scholar
  59. Kempe, C. H., R. W. Olmsted, and E. C. Curnen: Outbreak of acute nephritis in adolescent school boys. Pediatrics 8, 393 (1951).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Kesselring, F., u. H. U. Zollinger: Die Wegnersche Granulo-matose. Ergebn. inn. Med. Kinderheilk., N.F. 16, 41 (1961).Google Scholar
  61. Klinge, F.: Der Rheumatismus. Ergebn. allg. Path. path. Anat. 27, 242 (1933).Google Scholar
  62. Klinge, F., u. R. Knepper: Nephrotoxine und hyperergische Nephritis. Verh. dtsch. Ges. Path. 63, 181 (1935).Google Scholar
  63. Koffler, D., and F. Paronetto: Immunfluorescent localisation of Immunglobulins, and fibrinogen in human diseases. II. Acute, subacute and chronic glomerulonephritis. J. clin. Invest. 44, 1665 (1965).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Kramer, N. C., M. F. Watt, J. Howe, and A. E. Parrish: Circulating antihuman kidney antibodies in human renal disease. Amer. J. Med. 30, 39 (1961).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Kriegbaum, D.: Inaug.-Diss. Frankfurt 1966 (in Vorbereitung).Google Scholar
  66. Kucynski, M. H.: Nephritisstudien. Virchows Arch, path. Anat. 227, 186 (1919).Google Scholar
  67. Kucynski, M. H Von den ersten Anfängen und der Heilung der Glomerulonephritis. Krankheitsforsch. 1, 287 (1925).Google Scholar
  68. Lancefield, R. C.: Antigenic complex of streptococcus hemolyticus. Chemical and immunological properties of species-specific substance. J. exp. Med. 47, 481, 843, 857 (1928).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Lancefield, R. C Serological differentiation of specific types of bovine hemolytic streptococci (group B). J. Exp. Med. 59, 441 (1934)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Lange, K., M.M. A. Gold, D. Weiner, and Y. Simon: Autoantibodies in human glomerulonephritis. J. clin. Invest. 28, 50 (1949).Google Scholar
  71. Lange, K., L. Slobody, F. Craig, G. Ogur, J. Oberman, and F. Lo Casto: Serum complement in acute glomerulonephritis and the nephrotic syndrome. Pediatrics 8, 814 (1951).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Lange, K., R. Strang, and L. Slobody: The significance of serum complement levels for the diagnosis and prognosis of acute and subacute glomerulonephritis. Bull. N.Y. Acad. Med. 30,315 (1954).Google Scholar
  73. Lange, K., G. Treser, J. Sagel, A. Ty, and E. Wassermann: Routine immunhistology in renal diseases. Ann. intern. Med. 64, 25 (1966).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Lange, K., E. Wassermann, and L. Slobody: The significance of serum complement levels for the diagnosis and prognosis of acute and subacute glomerulonephritis and lupus erythematosus disseminatus. Ann. intern. Med. 53, 636 (1960).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Langmuir, A. D., C. Richardson, and C. A. Perry: The agglutination of autoclaved hemolytic streptococci by serum from patients with rheumatic fever and other conditions. J. clin. Invest. 28, 331 (1949).Google Scholar
  76. Lichtwitz, L.: Die Praxis der Nierenkrankheiten, 1., 2. u. 3. Aufl. Berlin: Springer 1921, 1925, 1934; - Nephritis. New York 1942.Google Scholar
  77. Lipman, R. W., G. Cameron, and D. H. Campbell: The specifity of anti- kidney-antibody determined by its effect upon tissue culture explants. Proc. nat. Acad. Sci. (Wash.) 36, 576 (1950).Google Scholar
  78. Liu, C. T., and W. McCrory: Autoantibodies in human glomerulonephritis and nephrotic syndrome. J. Immunol. 81, 492 (1958).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Lomnitz: Zit Volhard. Longcope, W. T.: Observations of patients suffering from streptococcal infections, rheumatic fever and acute and chronic hemorrhagic nephritis. J. clin. Invest. 15, 269 (1936).Google Scholar
  80. Lübbers, P., u. G. Sudeck: Nephritis bei Nierenallergie. Acta allerg. (Kbh.) 15, 344 (1960).Google Scholar
  81. Lyttle, J. D. D. Seegal, N. E. Loeb, and E. L. Jost: The serum antistreptolysin titre in acute glomerulonephritis. J. clin. Invest. 17, 631 (1938).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Manser, R. W., and M. M. Wilson: An epidemic of hemolytic streptococcal (group A) infection associated with a considerable incidence of acute nephritis. Med. J. Aust. 2, 339 (1952).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Markowitz, A. S., S. H. Armstrong, and D. S. Kushner: Immunological relationship between the rat glomerulies and nephritogenic streptococci. Nature (Lond.) 187, 1095 (1960).Google Scholar
  84. Markowitz, A. S., and C. F. Lange Jr.: Streptococcal related glomerulonephritis. I. Isolation, immunochemistry and comparative chemistry of soluble fractions from type 12 nephritogenic streptococci and human glomeruli. J. Immunol. 92, 565 (1964).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Masugi, M.: Über das Wesen der spezifischen Veränderungen der Niere und der Leber durch das Nephrotoxin bzw. das Hepatotoxin. Zugleich ein Beitrag zur Pathogenese der Glomerulonephritis und der eklamptischen Lebererkrankung. Beitr. path. Anat. 91, 82 (1933).Google Scholar
  86. Masugi, M Über die experimentelle Glomerulonephritis durch das spezifische Antinierenserum. Ein Beitrag zur Pathogenese der diffusen Glomerulonephritis. Beitr. path. Anat. 92, 429 (1934).Google Scholar
  87. Matheson, B. H., and R. W. Reed: Experimental nephritis due to type specific streptococci. III. Biological, chemical and physical studies on type 12 nephritogenic substance. J. infect. Dis. 104, 213 (1959).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Mayer, M. M., A. G. Osier, O. G. Bier, and M. Heidelberger: The activating effects of magnesium and other cations on the hemolytic function of complement. J. exp. Med. 84, 535 (1946).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Mayer, M. M., A. G. Osier, O. G. Bier, and M. Heidelberger Quantitative studies of complement fixation. J. Immunol. 59, 195 (1948).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. McCluskey R., and B. Benacerraf: The production of experimental serum sickness with acute glomerulonephritis in mice by soluble antigen-antibody-complex. Immunpath. 1st Intern. Sympos. Basel I Seelisberg 1958. Benno Schwabe & Co. 1959, p. 318.Google Scholar
  91. McLean, C. R., J. D. L. Fitzgerald, O. Z. Younghusband, and J. D. Hamilton: Diffuse glomerulonephritis induced in rabbits by small intravenous injections of horse serum. Arch. Path. 51, 1 (1961).Google Scholar
  92. Mellors, R. C., and L. G. Ortega: New observations on the pathogenesis of glomerulonephritis, lipid nephrosis, Periarteriitis nodosa and secondary amyloidosis in man. Amer. J. Path, 2, 455 (1956).Google Scholar
  93. Merrill, J. P.: Persönliche Mitteilung 1966.Google Scholar
  94. Michael, A. F., K. N. Drummond, R. L. Yernier, and R. A. Good: Immunologic basis of renal disease. Pediat. Clin. N. Amer. 11, 685 (1964).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Miescher, P., u. K. O. Vorlaender: Immunpathologie in Klinik und Forschung. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme 1961.Google Scholar
  96. Miller, F.: Renal localisation and persistence of type 12 streptococcal M-protein. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. (N.Y.) 108. 539 (1961).Google Scholar
  97. Moeller, J.: Renin- injektionen bei Nephritikern. Klin. Wschr. 27, 540 (1949).Google Scholar
  98. Moeller, J Humorale Faktoren in der Pathogenese des menschlichen Hochdruckes. Arch. Kreisl.-Forsch. 18, 249 (1952).Google Scholar
  99. Moeller, J Überempfindlichkeit gegen Dextran bei renalem Hochdruck. Dtsch. med. Wschr. 80, 565 (1955).Google Scholar
  100. Müller- Ruchholtz, W., W. Dettwyler u. E. F. Pfeiffer: Kontinuierlicher Blutaustausch zwischen un- narkotisierten Ratten mittels doppelter arterio-venöser Kreuztransfusion. Z. ges. exp. Med. 185, 368 (1962).Google Scholar
  101. Müller-Ruchholtz, W., K. Federlin, A. Schneider, G. Schmitt, G. Rahlwes, K. Ostner u. E. F. Pfeiffer: Übertragungsversuche zur Lokalisation eines nephritisauslösenden Faktors bei Ratten. Verh. dtsch. Ges. inn. Med. 68, 553 (1962).Google Scholar
  102. Ohlhagen, B.: Studies on thermostabile anticomplementary human sera. Acta med. scand., Suppl. 162 (1945).Google Scholar
  103. Pachter, M. R.: Die Herdnephritiden, ihre Häufigkeit, Histologie, Klinik und Pathogenese. Schweiz. Z. Path. 18, 198 (1955).Google Scholar
  104. Parkin, Th., I.E. Rusted, H.B. Burchell, and J. F. Edwards: Hemorrhagic and interstitial pneumonitis with nephritis. Amer. J. Med. 18, 220 (1955).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. Paronetto, F., and D. Koffler: Immunfluorescent-localisation of Immunglobulins, complement, and fibrinogen in human diseases. I. Systemic lupus erythematosus. J. clin. Invest. 44, 1657 (1965).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. Paterson, Ph. Y.: Transfer of allergic encephalomyelitis in rats by means of lymphnode cells. J. exp. Med. 111, 119 (1960).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. Pfeiffer, E. F.: Die Bedeutung der tierexperimentellen Glomerulonephritis für das Verständnis der menschlichen Nephritis-pathogenese. Habil.-Schr. Frankfurt 1955.Google Scholar
  108. Pfeiffer, E. F Demonstration of and evidence for the lymphocyte bound nature of a secondary nephritis producing factor in nephrotoxic glomerulonephritis in rats. Immunpath. IIIrd Intern. Symp. La Jolla Calif. 1963. Basel: Benno Schwabe & Co. 1963 a).Google Scholar
  109. Pfeiffer, E. F Die Gefährdung der Nieren durch Herdinfekte. Regensburg. Jb. ärztl. Fortbild. 11, 1,45 (1963 b).Google Scholar
  110. Pfeiffer, E F ., u. M E Bruch: Autoantikörper gegen menschliches Nierengewebe. Verh. dtsch. Ges. inn. Med. 56,189,1950.Google Scholar
  111. Pfeiffer, E. F., u. M. E. Bruch Über den Nachweis von Autoantikörpern gegen menschliches Nierengewebe bei Nieren- und Hochdruckkranken mit der Kollodiumpartikel- Reaktion. Dtsch. Arch. klin. Med. 199, 613 (1952).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. Pfeiffer, E. F., u. J. P. Merrill: Die Auto- aggression in der Pathogenese der diffusen Glomerulonephritis. Dtsch. med. Wschr. 87, 934 (1962).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  113. Pfeiffer, E. F., W. Spielmann u. H. Brückner: Vergleichende Bestimmung von Serumkomplement und Bluteiweißkörpern bei entzündlichen Gefäßerkrankungen und anderen internen Krankheitsbildern. Verh. dtsch. Ges. inn. Med. 60,274 (1954).Google Scholar
  114. Portwich, F.: Periarteriitis nodosa. Ergebn. inn. Med. 12, 428 (1959).Google Scholar
  115. Rammelkamp, C. H.: Aetiology of glomerulonephritis. In: Renal disease, chapt. 8, p. 173. Oxford: Blackwell Sci. Publ. 1963.Google Scholar
  116. Rammelkamp, C. H., F. W. Denny, and L. W. Wanne- maker: Studies on the epidemiology of rheumatic fever in the armed services. In: Rheumatic fever, a Symposium, (ed. L. Thomas) p. 72. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press 1952.Google Scholar
  117. Rammelkamp, C. H., and R. S. Weaver: Acute glomerulonephritis. The significance of the variation in the incidence of the disease. J. clin. Invest. 32, 345 (1953).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  118. Reed, R. W.: An epidemic of acute nephritis. Canad. med. Ass. J. 68, 448 (1953).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  119. Reed, R. W., and B. H. Matheson: Experimental nephritis due to type specific streptococci. IV. The effect of type 12 nephrotoxin in monkeys. J. infect. Dis. 106, 245 (1960).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  120. Reubi, F., et H. Löffler: La signification du streptocoque hemolytique du group A, type 12 pour le developpement de la glomerulonephrite. Schweiz, med. Wschr. 84, 1239 (1954).Google Scholar
  121. Ristec, L., B. Jacsik u. M. Jocko vie: Virus glomerulo-nephritis. Acta med. jugosl. 4, 250 (1950).Google Scholar
  122. Rose, G. A., and H. Spencer: Periarteriitis nodosa. Brit. med. J. 1957 II, 1148.Google Scholar
  123. Sandritter, W., E. Kraus, G. Treser, W. Menk, H. Herrmann, K. Schöffling u. E. F. Pfeiffer: Studien zur Übertragung der Masugi-Nephritis der Ratte. III. Die Übertragung der „chronischen“ Glomerulonephritis durch Parabiose genetisch gleichartiger Partner. Z. ges. exp. Med. 132, 453 (1960).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  124. Sarre, H.: Nierenkrankheiten, II. Aufl. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme 1959.Google Scholar
  125. Sarre, H Das Nierenödem. Med. Klin. 56, 594 (1961).Google Scholar
  126. Sarre, H., H. Sieberth u. H. Noltenius: Das Goodpasture-Syndrom. Glomerulonephritis und Lungenblutungen. Dtsch. med. Wschr. 89, 2405 (1964).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  127. Schäfer, H. E.: Untersuchungen über die Bedeutung des Serumkomplementes bei experimenteller und humaner Glomerulonephritis. Z. klin. Med. 158, 221 (1964).Google Scholar
  128. Schäfer, H. E., u. A. Schäfer: Diagnostische Bedeutung der Serumkomplementaktivität bei Nierenerkrankungen. Verh. dtsch. Ges. inn. Med. 69, 725 (1963).Google Scholar
  129. Scheiffarth, F., u. A. Bulitta: Zur Verwertbarkeit verschiedener Methoden der Aktivitätsdiagnostik bei Fokalinfektionen. Z. Laryng. Rhinol. 32, 65 (1953).Google Scholar
  130. Scheiffarth, F., u. F. Legeier: Serologische und klinische Erfahrungen mit der Antistreptolysin-Reaktion bei akutem und chronischem Gelenkrheumatismus. Ärztl. Wschr. 6, 660 (1951).Google Scholar
  131. Schick, B.: Die Nachkrankheiten des Scharlach. J. Kinderheilk. 65, 132 (1907).Google Scholar
  132. Schmidt, H.: Fortschritte der Serologie. Darmstadt: Dr. Dietrich Steinkopff 1951.Google Scholar
  133. Seegal, B. C., K. C. Hsu, E. Fiaschi e G. Anders: La tecnica degli anticorpi fluorescenti applicata alio studio della pathogenesi della nefrite umana. Rass. Fisipat. clin. ter. 31, 1 (1959).Google Scholar
  134. Seegal, D., and I. D. Lyttle: Antistreptolysin titre of the serum in acute glomerulonephritis. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. (N.Y.) 31, 211 (1933).Google Scholar
  135. Seifter, S., and E. E. Ecker: Complement and isoagglutinins in urinary proteins. J. clin. Invest. 25, 809 (1946).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  136. Spielmann, W., E. F. Pfeiffer u. H. E. Bruch: Zur Problematik de& Nachweises von Autoantikörpern gegen gesundes und krankes Nierengewebe bei Nierenkranken mittels Komplementbindungsreaktionen. Z. ges. exp. Med. 123, 236 (1954).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  137. Steiner u. Johannessen: Zit. in Langstein, Pfaundler und Schlossmanns Handbuch für Kinderkrankheiten, 2. Aufl. Leipzig 1906.Google Scholar
  138. Swift, H. F., A. T. Wilson, and R. C. Lancefield: Typing group A hemolytic streptococci by the precipitin reaction in capillary pipettes. J. exp. Med. 78, 127 (1943).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  139. Thomas, L., and I. H. Dingle: Investigations of meningococcal infection; bactericidal action of normal and immune sera for meningococcus. J. clin. Invest. 22, 375 (1943).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  140. Thomson, S., W. M. Arnott, and G. D. Matthew: Blood complement in acute glomerulonephritis and toxaemia of pregnancy. Lancet 1939 II, 734.Google Scholar
  141. Thulin, K. H., and E. Berglund: Occurrence of streptococcus 0 agglutinin in serum from cases of chronic and acute nephritis. Nord. Med. 34, 889 (1947).Google Scholar
  142. Tillet, W. S., and R. L. Garner: The fibrinolytic activity of hemolytic streptococci. J. exp. Med. 58, 485 (1933).Google Scholar
  143. Todd, E. W.: Antigenic streptococcal hemolysin. J. exp. Med. 52, 267 (1932).Google Scholar
  144. Todd, E. W., and R. C. Lancefield: Variants of hemolytic streptococci; their relation to type-specific substance, virulence and toxin. J. exp. Med. 48, 751 (1928).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  145. Treser, GL, I. Sagel, and K. Lange: Specificity of immunofluorescence in experimental and human renal disease. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. (N.Y.) 117, 842 (1964).Google Scholar
  146. Veil, W. H., u. B. Buchholz: Der  Komplementschwund im Blute. Eine bedeutsame immuno- biologische Reaktion beim rheumatischen Infekt und ihre Beziehung zur allgemeinen Pathologie des Rheumatismus. Klin. Wschr. 11, 2019 (1932).Google Scholar
  147. Volhard, F.: Die doppelseitigen hämatogenen Nierenerkrankungen. In: Handbuch der inneren Medizin, 2. Aufl., Bd. 6, Teil 1 u. II. Berlin: Springer 1931.Google Scholar
  148. Volhard, F., u. Th. Fahr: Die Brightsche Nierenkrankheit, Klinik, Pathologie und Atlas. Berlin: Springer 1913.Google Scholar
  149. Vorlaender, E.: Über den Nachweis komplementbindender Auto-Antikörper bei Nieren- und Lebererkrankungen. Z. ges. exp. Med. 118, 352 (1952).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  150. Vorlaender, K. O., K. W. Fritz u. H. J. Braun: Rheumatismus und Nierenentzündung. Münch, med. Wschr. 101, 150 (1959).Google Scholar
  151. Vorlaender, K. O., Gr. Hellweg u. Gr. Liesenfeld: Experimentelle Untersuchungen zur Pathogenese der durch hämolytische Streptokokken der Gruppe A, Typ 12 hervorgerufenen Nierenentzündungen. Allergie u. Asthma 5, 13 (1959).Google Scholar
  152. Vorlaender, K. O., u. H. Nüssgens: Die Gefäßveränderungen beim visceralen Erythematodes und ihre immunologischen Grundlagen. Z. Immun.-Forsch. 114, 353 (1957).Google Scholar
  153. Vorlaender, S., K. O. Vorlaender u. H. Lüchtrath: Versuche zur künstlichen Lokalisation eines Infektes auf die Rattenniere. Klin. Wschr. 1956, 1069.Google Scholar
  154. Wagner, V., V. Zavazal, V. Kasalovad, V. Maly, A. Mecla. and J. Prokop: Immunology of toxemias of pregnancy, I. Findings of organ specific antibodies. Experientia (Basel) 15, 24 (1959).Google Scholar
  155. Wahl, R.: Presse méd. 63, 1366 (1955). Zit. nach Vorlaender, Fritz u. Braun 1959.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  156. Wahlig, F., K. Federlin u. E. F. Pfeiffer: In Vorbereitung (1966).Google Scholar
  157. West, C. D., A. I. McAdams, J. M. McConville, Ch. B. Neil, C. Davis, and N. H. Holland: Hypocomplemen- temic and normocomplementemic persistent (chronic) glomerulonephritis. Clinical and pathologic characteristics. J. Pediat. 67, 1089 (1965).Google Scholar
  158. Wilkins, R. F., M. Dreschler, and D.L. Larson: Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. (N.Y.) 99, 645 (1958).Google Scholar
  159. Wilson, A. T.: The leucotoxic action of streptococci. J. exp. Med. 105, 463 (1954).Google Scholar
  160. Winblad, S. T.: Studies in hemolytic streptococcus fibrinolysin, antifibrinolysin and antistreptolysin. Lund 1941.Google Scholar
  161. Zollinger, H. U.: Niere und ableitende Harnwege. In: Doerr-Uehlinger, Spezielle pathologische Anatomie, S. 366. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer 1966.Google Scholar
  162. Zollinger, H. U., u. R. Hegglin: Die idiopathische Lungenhaemosiderose als pulmonale Form der Purpura Schönlein-Henoch. Schweiz, med. Wschr. 88, 439 (1958)Google Scholar

Literatur

  1. Abramoff, P., and H.R. Wolfe: Precipitin production in chickens. XIII. A quantitative study of the effect of simultaneous injections in two antigens. J. Immunol. 77, 94 (1956).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Adler, F.L.: Competitions of antigen, ed. by Kallos and B.H. Waksman. Progr. Allergy 8, 41 (1963).Google Scholar
  3. Albert, F., G. Lejeune-Ledand, P. Moureau, and A. Andrè: Does a total transfusion done shortly after birth indicate a state of tolerance in receptor ? Biological problems of grafting. Les congrés et colloques de l’universite de Liege 12, 369 (1959).Google Scholar
  4. Algire, G.H., J.M. Weaver, and R.T. Prehn: Growth of cells in vivo in diffusion chambers. I. Survival of homografts in immunized mice. J. nat. Cancer Inst. 15, 493 (1954).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Algire, G.H., J.M. Weaver, and R.T. Prehn Studies on tissue homotransplantation in mice using diffusion-chamber methods. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 64, 1009 (1957).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Altman, B.: Tissue transplantation: Circulating antibody in the homo- transplantation of kidney and skin. Ann. roy. Coll. Surg. Engl. 33, 79 (1963).Google Scholar
  7. Altman, B., and M. Simonsen: Cytotoxic antibody and hemagglutinin in canine homotransplantation. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 120, 28 (1964).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. André, J.A., R.S. Schwartz, W.J. Mitus, and W. Dameshek: The morphologic responses of the lymphoid system to homografts. I. First and second set responses in normal rabbits. Blood 19,313 (1962).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. André, J. A., and R. S. Schwarz: The morphologic responses of the lymphoid system to homografts. III. Electron microscopy study. Blood 24, 113 (1964).Google Scholar
  10. Bach, F., and K. Hirschhorn: Lymphocyte interactions: a potential histocompatibility test in vitro. Science 143, 813 (1964).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Bailey, D.W.: Histoincompatibility associated with the X-chromosome in mice. Transplantation 1, 70 (1963).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Ballhorn, H.: Ist ein Arzt berechtigt zum Zwecke der Hautverpflanzung Fremdhaut von Leichen, Leichenteilen oder abgetrennten Gliedmaßen zu entnehmen? Med. Klin. 58, 111 (1963).Google Scholar
  13. Barnes, B.A.: Survival data of renal transplantations in patients. Transplantation 3, 812 (1965).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Bauer, K.H.: Homoio- transplantation von Epidermis bei eineiigen Zwillingen. Bruns’ Beitr. klin. Chir. 141, 442 (1927).Google Scholar
  15. Berenbaum, M.C.: Immunosuppresive agents. Brit. med. Bull. 21, 140 (1965).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Billingham, R.E., and T. Boswell: Studies on problems of corneal homografts. Proc. roy. Soc. B 141, 392 (1953).Google Scholar
  17. Billingham, R.E., and L. Brent: A simple method for inducing tolerance of skin homografts in mice. Transplant. Bull. 4, 67 (1957).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Billingham, R.E., L. Brent, and P.B. Medawar: Actively acquired tolerance of foreign cells. Nature (Lond.) 172, 603 (1953).Google Scholar
  19. Billingham, R.E., L. Brent, P.B. Medawar, and E.M. Sparrow: Quantitative studies on tissue transplantation immunity; survival times of skin homografts exchanged between members of different inbred strains of mice. Proc. Soc. Roy. Med. 143, 43 (1954).Google Scholar
  20. Billingham, R.E., P.L. Krohn, and P.B. Medawar: Effect of cortisone on survival of skin homografts in rabbits. Brit. med. J. 19511, 1157.Google Scholar
  21. Borst, W., u. E. Enderlen: Über Transplantation von Gefäßen und ganzen Organen. Dtsch. Z. Chir. 99, 54 (1909).Google Scholar
  22. Brent, L., and P.B. Medawar: Tissue transplantation: a new approach to the “typing” problem. Brit, med. J. 1963 II, 269.Google Scholar
  23. Brooks, J.R., S.H. Sturgis, and O. J. Hill: An evaluation of endocrine tissue homotransplantation in the millipore chamber with a note on tissue adaption to the host. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 87, 487 (1960).Google Scholar
  24. Brosig, W., u. R. Nagel: Nierentransplantation. Berlin: W. de Gruyter & Co. 1965.Google Scholar
  25. Broster, L.R., and H. Gardner-Hill: A case of Addison’s disease successfully treated by a graft. Brit. med. J. 1946 II, 570.Google Scholar
  26. Calne, R. Y.: Renal transplantation. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins Co. 1963.Google Scholar
  27. Carrel, A.: Nephrektomie und Reimplantation einer Niere. Langenbecks Arch. klin. Chir. 88, 379 (1909).Google Scholar
  28. Carrel, A., and C. Guthrie: Functions of a transplanted kidney. Science 22, 473 (1905).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Ceppellini, R., F. Celada, P.L. Mattiuz, and A. Zanalda: Study of the possible correlation between blood antigens and histocompatibility in man. I. Production of leucoagglutinins by repeated transfusions from one donor. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 120, 335 (1964).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Chase, R.M., and F.P. Rapaport: The bacterial induction of homograft sensitivity. I. Effects of sensitization with group A streptococci. J. exp. Med. 122, 721 (1965).Google Scholar
  31. Converse, J.M.: Reaction of the body to homografts. N.Y. St. J. Med. 61, 3239 (1961).Google Scholar
  32. Cronkite, E.P., C.R. Jansen, G.C. Mather, N.O. Nielsen, A.E. Usenick, E.R. Adamik, and C.R. Sipe: Studies on lymphocytes. I. Lymphopenia produced by prolonged extracorporal irradiation of circulating blood. Blood 20, 203 (1962).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Dausset, J., and J. Colombani: Isoanticorps antileucocytaires Serologie et importance pratique en particulier pour les greffes, p. 324. Basel and New York 1962. Int. Soc. Blood Transf., Tokio 1960.Google Scholar
  34. Davies, D. A.L.: Some properties of mouse histocompatibility antigens: H-2, NON-H-2, X(Leucemic) and Y (sex linked). Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 120, 230 (1964).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Decastello, A. v.: Über experimentelle Nierentransplantation. Wien. klin. Wschr. 15, 317 (1902).Google Scholar
  36. Dempster, W. J.: A toxic syndrome observed in dogs with transplanted kidneys. Acta med. scand. 144, 361 (1953).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Dempster, W. J The relationship between the antigens of skin and kidney of the dog. Brit. J. plast. Surg. 5, 228 (1953).Google Scholar
  38. Dempster, W.J., C.V. Harrison, and R. Shackman: Rejection processes in human homotransplated kidneys. Brit. med. J. 1964 II, 969.Google Scholar
  39. Dixon, F. J., and P.H. Maurer: Effects of large infusions of heterologous serum proteins on the serum protein metabolism of rabbits. J. exp. Med. 101, 233 (1955a).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Dixon, F. J., and P.H. Maurer Immunologic unresponsiveness induced by protein antigens. J. exp. Med. 101, 245 (1955b).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Dumond, A.E., D. J. Mayer, and J.H. Mulholland: The suppression of immunologic activity by diversion of thoracic duct lymph. Ann. Surg. 160, 41 (1964).Google Scholar
  42. Dunsford, J., C.C. Bowley, A.M. Hutchinson, J.S. Thompson, R. Sanger, and R.R. Race: A human blood-group chimera. Brit. med. J. 2, 81 (1953).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Ebbe, S., M. Baldini, and W. Dameshek: The antigenic structure of blood platelets. I. Demonstration in the rabbit of antigens in common between skin and blood platelets. Blood 19, 537 (1962).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Fowler Jr., R., W.K. Schubert, and C.D. West: Acquired partial tolerance to homologous skin grafts in the human infant at birth. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 87, 403 (1960).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Gaillard, P. J.: Transplantation of cultivated parathyroid gland tissue in man. In: Preservation and transplantation of normal tissues. Ciba Found. Sympos. (ed. G. E. W. Wolstenholme). Boston: Little, Brown & Co. 1954.Google Scholar
  46. Goldsmith, K.L.G.: Donor selection and compatibility typing. Brit. med. Bull. 21, 162 (1965).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Gorer, P.A., J.F. Loutit, and H.S. Micklem: Proposed revisions of “transplantese”. Nature (Lond.) 189, 1024 (1961).Google Scholar
  48. Gowans, J.L., and D.D. McGregor: The immunological activities of lymphocytes. Progr. Allergy 9,1 (1965).Google Scholar
  49. Gowans, J.L., D.D. McGregor, and D.M. Co wen: The role of small lymphocytes in the rejection of homografts of skin. In: The immunological competent cell (ed. G.E.W. Wolstenholme and J. Knight), p. 20. London: Churchill 1963.Google Scholar
  50. Hamburger, J., J. Vaysse, J. Crosnier, J. Auvert et J. Dormont: Resultats de quatorze transplantations renales chez l’homme. Bull. Soc. med. Hop. Paris 114, 225 (1963).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Hamburger, J., J. Vaysse, J. Crosnier, J. Auvert, C.M. Lalanne, and J. Hopper: Renal homo- transplantation in man after radiation of the recipient. Amer. J. Med. 32, 854 (1962).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Hasek, M.M.: Zit. nach Brosig u. Nagel. Folia biol. (Praha) 8, 57 (1962).Google Scholar
  53. Hume, D.M., and R.H. Egdahl: Progressive destruction of renal homografts isolated from the regional lymphatics of the host. Surgery 88, 194 (1955).Google Scholar
  54. Hume, D.M., J.P. Merrill, B.F. Miller, and G. W. Thorn: Experiences with renal homo transplantation in the human: report of nine cases. J. clin. Invest. 34, 327 (1955).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Ingebrigsten, R.: Homoioplastische Nierentransplantation. Zbl. Chir. 2, 1740 (1914).Google Scholar
  56. Kaliss, M.: The survival of homografts in mice pretreated with antisera to mouse tissue. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 64, 977 (1957).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Kaufman Jr., H.M., R.F. Clark, J.H. Magee, M. S. Rittenbury, C. M. Goldsmith, G. R. Prout Jr., and D.M. Hume: Lymphocytes in urine as an aid in the early detection of renal homograft rejection. Surg. Gynec. Obstet. 119, 25 (1964).Google Scholar
  58. Kincaid-Smith, P.: Vasculat changes in homotransplants. Brit. med. J. 1964 1,178.Google Scholar
  59. Kountz, S.L., M.A. Williams, P.M. Williams, C. Kapros, and W.J. Dempster: Mechanism of rejection of homotransplanted kidneys. Nature (Lond.) 199, 257 (1963).Google Scholar
  60. Krieg, A.F., R.P. Bolande, W.D. Holden, C.A. Hubay, and L. Persky: Membranous glomerulonephritis occuring in a human renal homograft. Amer. J. clin. Path. 34, 155 (1960).Google Scholar
  61. Krohn, P.L.: Ovarian transplantation in mice. In: Biological problems of grafting, ed. by F. Albert and P.B. Medawar. Oxford: Blackwell Sci. Publ. 1959.Google Scholar
  62. Küss, R., J. Teinturier et P. Milliez: Quelques essais de greffes du rein chez l’homme. Mem. Acad, chir., Paris 77, 755 (1951).Google Scholar
  63. Landsteiner, E., and C.A. Hufnagel: Zit. nach Brosig u. Nagel.Google Scholar
  64. Lawler, R.H., J.W. West, P.H. McNulty, E.J. Clancy, and P.R. Murphy: Homotransplantation of the kidney in the human. J. Amer. med. Ass. 144, 844 (1950).Google Scholar
  65. Lennert, K., u. W. Remmele: Karyometrische Untersuchungen an Lymphknotenzellen des Menschen. Acta haematol. (Basel) 19, 99 (1958).Google Scholar
  66. Lennert, K., u. W. Remmele Karyometrische Untersuchungen an Lymphknotenzellen des Menschen. III. Basophile Stamm- zellen, Plasmazellen und Gewebszellen. Acta haemat. (Basel) 21, 139 (1959).Google Scholar
  67. Longmire, W.P., J.A. Cannon, and R.A. Weber: General surgical problems of tissue transplantation. In: Preservation and transplantation of normal tissues. London: Churchill 1954.Google Scholar
  68. Medawar, P. B.: Behaviour and fate of autografts and homografts in rabbits. J. Anat. (Lond.) 78, 176 (1944).Google Scholar
  69. Medawar, P. B A second study of the behaviour and fate of skin homografts in rabbits. J. Anat. (Lond.) 79, 157 (1945).Google Scholar
  70. Medawar, P. B Immunity to homologous grafted skin. I. The suppression of cell division in grafts transplanted to immunized animals. Brit. J. exp. Path. 27, 9 (1946 a).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Medawar, P.B Immunity to homologous grafted skin. II. The relationship between antigens of blood and skin. Brit. J. exp. Path. 27, 15 (1946b).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Medawar, P.B Immunity to homologous grafted skin III. The fate of skin homografts transplanted to the brain, to subcutaneous tissue and to the anterior chamber of the eye. Brit. J. exp. Path. 39, 58 (1948a).Google Scholar
  73. Medawar, P.B Tests by tissue culture methods on the nature of immunity to transplanted skin. Quart. J. micr. Sci. 89, 239 (1948b).Google Scholar
  74. Medawar, P.B The immunology of transplantation. Harvey Lectures, p. 144 (1956/57). New York: Academic press 1958.Google Scholar
  75. Merrill, J.P.: Homografts rejection. In: Immunological diseases (ed. M. Samter and H. L. Alexander). London: Churchill (1965).Google Scholar
  76. Merrill, J.P Persönliche Mitteilungen 1966.Google Scholar
  77. Merrill, J.P., J.E. Murray, J.H. Harrison, and W.R. Guild: Successful homotransplantation of the human kidney between identical twins. J. Amer. med. Ass. 160, 277 (1956).Google Scholar
  78. Michison, N.A.: La tolerance acquise et la tolerance naturelle a l’egard de substances antigeniques defines. 1963. Colloques internat. de Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, No 116. Transplantation 2, 450 (1964).Google Scholar
  79. Michon, L., J. Hamburger, N. Oeconomos, P. Delinotte, G. Richet, J. Vaysse et B. Antoine: Une tentative de transplantation renale chez l’homme, aspects medicaux et biologiques. Presse méd. 61, 1419 (1953).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Miller, J.F.A.P.: Role of thymus in transplantation immunity. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 99, 340 (1962).Google Scholar
  81. Miller, J.F.A.P The thymus and transplantation immunity. Brit. med. Bull. 21, 111 (1965).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Müller-Ruchholtz, W.: Immunologische Folgen fortgesetzter Kreuztransfusionen. Habil.- Schr. Universität Kiel 1966.Google Scholar
  83. Murray, J.E., R. Gleason, and A. Bartholomay: Fourth report of human kidney transplant registry: 16 September 1964 to 15 March 1965. Transplantation 3, 684 (1965).Google Scholar
  84. Murray, J.E., J.P. Merrill, G.J. Dammin, J.B. Delly Jr., G.W. Alexandre, and J.H. Harrison: Kidney transplantation in modified recipients. Ann. Surg. 156, 337 (1962).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Murray, J.E., D.E. Reid, J.H. Harrison, and J.P. Merrill: Successful pregnancy after human renal transplantation. N. Engl. J. Med. 269, 341 (1963).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Nagel, R.: Tierexperimentelle Untersuchungen über die medikamentöse Beeinflussung der Immunreaktion bei Homotransplantation von Nieren. HabilSchr. Freie Universität Berlin 1963.Google Scholar
  87. Nathan, P.: Antigen release from the transplanted dog kidney. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 120, 548 (1964).Google Scholar
  88. Owen, R.D.: Immunogenetic consequences of vascular anastomoses between bovine twins. Science 102, 400 (1945).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Pfeiffer, E.F.: Nachweis, Natur und klinische Bedeutung eines nephritisauslösenden Faktors bei Nierenerkrankungen. Verh. dtsch. Ges. inn. Med. 68, 413 (1962).Google Scholar
  90. Pfeiffer, E. F., u. J. P. Merrill: Die Autoaggression in der Pathogenese der diffusen Glomerulonephritis. Dtsch. med. Wschr. 87, 934 (1962).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Porter, K.A.: Pathological changes in transplanted kidneys. In: T. E. Starzl, Experience in renal transplantation, p. 299. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders & Co. 1964.Google Scholar
  92. Porter, K.A Morphological and clinical aspects of organ transplantation. Brit, med. Bull. 21, 171 (1965).Google Scholar
  93. Porter, K.A., N.H. Joseph, J.M. Rendall, C. Stolinski, R.J. Hoehn, and R.Y. Calne: The role of lymphocytes in the rejection of canine renal homotrans- plants. Lab. Invest. 13, 1080 (1964a).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Porter, K.A., W.S. Peart, J.R. Kenyon, N.H. Joseph, R.J. Hoehn, and R.Y. Calne: Rejection of kidney homotransplants. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 120, 472, (1964b).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Rapaport, F.T.: In: Histocompatibility testing, p. 101. Publication 1229. Washington: Nat. Acad. Sci. 1965. Zit. nach Müller-Ruchholtz.Google Scholar
  96. Reemtsma, K., B.H. McCracken, J.U. Schlegel, M.A. Pearl, C.W. Pearce, C.W. de Witt, P.E. Smith, R.L. Hewitt, R.L. Flinner, and O. Creech Jr.: Reversal of early graft rejection after renal heterotransplantation in man. Ann. Surg. 160, 384 (1964).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. Rose, N.R., J.H. Kite, T.K. Doebbler, and R.C. Brown: In vitro reactions of lymphoid cells with thyroid tissue. In: Cell bound antibodys (ed. B. Amos and H. Koprowski), p. 19. Philadelphia: Wistar Institute Press 1963.Google Scholar
  98. Rosenau, W.: Interaction of lymphoid cells with target cells in tissue culture. In: Cell-bound antibodies, ed. by B. Amos and H. Koprowski. p. 75. Philadelphia: Wistar Institute Press 1963.Google Scholar
  99. Sacks, J.H., D.R. Fillippone, and D.M. Hume: Studies of immune destruction of lymphoid tissue. I. Lymphocytotoxic effect of rabbit-anti-rat-lymphocyte antiserum. Transplantation 2, 60 (1964).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. Simonsen, M.: Kidney transplantation. Scand. J. clin. Lab. Invest. 1, 350 (1949).Google Scholar
  101. Simonsen, M Immunogenitical speculations on human kidney transplants. Transplantation 4, 354 (1966).Google Scholar
  102. Simonsen, M., J. Buemaun, A. Gammeltoft, F. Jensen, and K. Jorgensen: Biological incompatibility in kidney transplantation in dogs. I. Experimentel and morphological investigations. Acta path, microbiol. scand. 32,1 (1953).Google Scholar
  103. Snell, G.D.: The terminology of tissue transplantation. Transplantation 2, 655 (1964).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. Snell, G.D., G. Hoecker, D.B. Amos, and J. H. Stimpfling: A revised nomenclature for the histocompatibility—2 locus of the mouse. Transplantation 2, 777 (1964).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. Starzl, T.E.: Experience in renal transplantation. Philadelphia and London: W.B. Saunders Co. 1964.Google Scholar
  106. Starzl, T.E., T.L. Marchioro, G. Hermann, R.S. Brittain, and W.R. Wadcll: Renal homografts in patients with major donor recipient blood group incompatibilities. Surg. Forum 14, 214 (1963).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. Starzl, T.E., T.L. Marchioro, G.N. Peters, C.H. Kirkpatrick, W.E.C. Wilson, K.A. Porter, D. Rifkind, D. A. Ogden, C. R. Hirchcock, and W. R. Waddell: Renal heterotransplantation from baboon to man; experience with 6 cases. Transplantation 2, 752 (1964).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. Stastny, P., V. A. Stembridge, T. Vischer, and M. Ziff: Homologous disease in the adult rat, a model for autoimmune disease. II. Findings in the joints, heart and other tissues. J. exp. Med. 122, 681 (1965).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. Talmage, D.W., and H.N. Claman: Cell potential: Its mutation and selection. A theory of differentiation based on antibody production, (ed R. A. Good and A. E. Gabrielsen), p. 49. New York: Harper & Row 1964.Google Scholar
  110. Terasaki, P.I., T.L. Marchioro, and T.E. Starzl: Histocompatibility testing. Proc. nat. Acad. Sci. (Wash.) 83 (1965) Monograph. Zit. nach Wolff.Google Scholar
  111. Ullmann, E.: Experimentelle Nierentransplantation. Vorläufige Mitt. Wien. klin. Wschr. 15, 281 (1902).Google Scholar
  112. Unger, E.: Über Nierentransplantationen. Berl. klin. Wschr. 46, 1056 (1909).Google Scholar
  113. Vorony, U.U.: Zit. nach Brosig u. Nagel.Google Scholar
  114. Wolff, H. P.: Ergebnisse und Probleme der Nierentransplantation. Dtsch. med. Wschr. 91, 738 (1966).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  115. Woodruff, M. F. A.: Can tolerance to homologous skin be induced in the human infant at birth ? Transplant. Bull. 4, 26 (1957).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  116. Woodruff, M.F. A The transplantation of tissues and organs. Springfield (111.): Ch.C. Thomas 1960.Google Scholar
  117. Woodruff, M.F. A Human kidney transplant conference (Washington 1963). Transplantation 2, 581 (1964).Google Scholar
  118. Woodruff, M.F. A Biological and clinical aspects of organ transplantation. Brit. med. Bull. 21, 176 (1965).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  119. Zaaijer, J.H.: Nierentransplantation. Dtsch. med. Wschr. 34, 1777 (1908).Google Scholar
  120. Zukoski, C. F., H. M. Lee, and D. H. Hume: Prolonged functional survival of a secondary renal homo- transplant in the dog. Surgery 50, 926 (1961).Google Scholar

Literatur

  1. Adams, D. A., and M. H. Maxwell: Current therapy on the nephrotic syndrome in adults. III. Intern. Congr. Nephrol. Washington, 25–30. Sept. 1966 (im Druck).Google Scholar
  2. Arneil, GL C., and C. N. Lam: Long term results from intensive steroid treatment of idiopathic nephrosis in children. III. Intern. Congr. Nephrol. Washington, 25–30. Sept. 1966 (im Druck).Google Scholar
  3. Burkholder, P. M.: Light, immunofluorescence and electron microscopy of extra-cellular glomerular deposits in renal diseases of probable immunologic origin. III. Intern. Congr. Nephrol. Washington, 25–30. Sept. 1966 (im Druck).Google Scholar
  4. Dixon, F. J.: Pathogenesis of immunologically induced glomerulonephritis. III. Intern. Congr. Nephrol. Washington, 25–30. Sept. 1966 (im Druck).Google Scholar
  5. Earle, D. P., and R. B. Jennings: Glomerulonephritis. III. Intern. Congr. Nephrol. Washington, 25.-30. Sept. 1966 (im Druck).Google Scholar
  6. Fiaschi, E., and R. Naccarato: Renal histopathology in toxemia. Light and electron microscopic and immunohistologic studies during pregnancy puerperium and at some distance from delivery. III. Intern. Congr. Nephrol. Washington, 25–30. Sept. 1966 (im Druck).Google Scholar
  7. Fish, A. J., R. C. Herdman, W. D. Kelly, and R. A. Good: Long term pathological alteration in well-functioning human renal homotransplants. III. Intern. Congr. Nephrol. Washington, 25–30 Sept. 1966 (im Druck).Google Scholar
  8. Freedman, P., P. Meister, Bun S. Co, C. Aseron, A. S. Markowitz, and A. Dubin: Streptococcal infection and the kidney. III. Intern. Congr. Nephrol. Washington, 25–30. Sept. 1966 (im Druck).Google Scholar
  9. Goldman, R., C. Costa, B. Tinglof, and J. Wilkerson: Focal glomerulonephritis and the nephrotic syndrome. III. Intern. Congr. Nephrol. Washington, 25–30. Sept. 1966 (im Druck).Google Scholar
  10. Good, R. A., A. F. Michael Jr., R. C. Herdman, H. Gewürz, R. J. Pickering, K. N. Drummond, A. J. Fish, and R. L. Vernier: Immunological dissection of diffuse renal diseases of man. III. Intern. Congr. Nephrol. Washington, 25–30. Sept. 1966 (im Druck).Google Scholar
  11. Guttmann, R. D., R. R. Lindquist, R. M. Parker, C. B. Carpenter, and J. P. Merrill: Renal transplantation under controlled immunogenetic conditions. III. Intern. Congr. Nephrol. Washington, 25.-30. Sept. 1966 (im Druck).Google Scholar
  12. Hager, E. B., C. L. Hampers, and P. Kölker: Transplantation antibodies. III. Intern. Congr. Nephrol. Washington, 25–30. Sept. 1966 (im Druck).Google Scholar
  13. Hamburger, J., J. Crosnier et J. Dormont: Les maladies du rein transplants. III. Intern. Congr. Nephrol. Washington, 25–30. Sept. 1966 (im Druck).Google Scholar
  14. Hardwicke, J., I. D. Blainey, D. B. Brewer, and J. F. Soothill: The nephrotic syndrome. III. Intern. Congr. Nephrol. Washington, 25–30. Sept. 1966 (im Druck).Google Scholar
  15. Hill, L. L., S. Guerra, and H. S. Rosenberg: Immunopathologic studies of acute glomerulonephritis in children. III. Intern. Congr. Nephrol. Washington, 25–30. Sept. 1966 (im Druck).Google Scholar
  16. Humair, L. M., E. V. Potter, D. P. Earle, T. Poon-King, I. Mohammed, and R. Cox: Serum levels of beta-c-globulin in epidemic acute glomerulonephritis. III. Intern. Congr. Nephrol. Washington, 25–30. Sept. 1966 (im Druck).Google Scholar
  17. Hume, D. M.: Persönliche Mitteilung 1966.Google Scholar
  18. Hume, D. M., G. M. Williams, H. M. Lee, H. J. O. White, J. Ferre, and J. S. Wolf: Experiences with 100 consecutive non-twin renal homotransplants in man. III. Intern. Congr. Nephrol. Washington, 25–30. Sept. 1966 (im Druck).Google Scholar
  19. Hume, D. M., J. P. Merrill, B. J. Miller, and G. W. Thorn: Experiences with renal homotransplantation in human. Report of 9 cases. J. clin. Invest. 34, 327 (1955).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Kölker, P.: Immunoglobulin feedback and allotransplant tolerance: Use of 6-mercapto- purine and anti-typhoid sera. III. Intern. Congr. Nephrol. Washington, 25–30. Sept. 1966 (im Druck).Google Scholar
  21. Kimmelstiel, P.: Some glomerular lesions by electron microscopy. III. Intern. Congr. Nephrol. Washington, 25–30. Sept. 1966 (im Druck).Google Scholar
  22. Kissmeyer-Nielsen, F., O. Fjeidborg, S. Olsen, and V. P. Petersen: Complement fixing kidney antibodies in human kidney transplantation. III. Intern. Congr. Nephrol. Washington, 25–30. Sept. 1966 (im Druck).Google Scholar
  23. Körnitz, S. L., D. F. Knudsen, and R. Cohn: The pathophysiology of renal allo-transplant rejection. III. Intern. Congr. Nephrol. Washington, 25–30. Sept. 1966 (im Druck).Google Scholar
  24. Kramer, N. C., P. G. Cohen, M. F. Watt, D. J. Hand, and A. E. Parrish: An immunological factor in the prognosis of glomerulonephritis. III. Intern. Congr. Nephrol. Washington, 25–30. Sept. 1966 (im Druck).Google Scholar
  25. Lange, K., Gr. Treser, R. Ores, A. Ty, and E. Wassermann: Histologie and immunologic features of acute, subacute and chronic glomerulonephritis. III. Intern. Congr. Nephrol. Washington, 25–30. Sept. 1966 (im Druck).Google Scholar
  26. Merrill, J. P.: Persönliche Mitteilung (1966).Google Scholar
  27. Murray, J. E., J. E. Merrill, and J. E. Harrison: Kidney transplantation between seven pairs of identical twins. Ann. roy. Coll. Surg. Engl. 23, 343 (1958).Google Scholar
  28. Pearl, M. A., T. Oelsner, and R. Burch: Immunosuppressive drug therapy in the nephrotic syndrome. III. Intern. Congr. Nephrol. Washington, 25–30. Sept. 1966 (im Druck).Google Scholar
  29. Pfeiffer, E. F., u. J. P. Merrill: Die Autoaggression in der Pathogenese der diffusen Glomerulonephritis. Dtsch. med. Wschr. 87, 934 (1962).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Pirani, C. L., and V. E. Pollak: Longitudinal studies of renal biopsies. III. Intern. Congr. Nephrol. Washington, 25–30. Sept. 1966 (im Druck).Google Scholar
  31. Porter, K. A., J. Dossetor, W. S. Peart, J. M. Rendali, and T. E. Starzl: Deposits on the glomerular capillary basement membranes of long-surviving renal allografts. III. Intern. Congr. Nephrol. Washington, 25–30. Sept. 1966 (im Druck).Google Scholar
  32. Post, R. S., and M. A. Alousi: Classification of nephrotic syndromes of unknown etiology by thin section: Histologic and immunohistochemical studies. III. Intern. Congr. Nephrol. Washington, 25–30. Sept. 1966 (im Druck).Google Scholar
  33. Potter, E. A. Siegel, L. Humair, R. Jennings, P. Herdson, and T. Poon-King: Further definition of the epidemic nephritis in Trinidad by means and renal biopsies. III. Intern. Congr. Nephrol. Washington, 15–30. Sept. 1966 (im Druck).Google Scholar
  34. Ross, E. J.: Effect of long-term steroid therapy in adults. III. Intern. Congr. Nephrol. Washington, 25–30. Sept. 1966 (im Druck).Google Scholar
  35. Spargo, B. H.: Electron microscopy of the diseased kidney. III. Intern. Congr. Nephrol. Washington, 25–30. Sept. 1966 (im Druck).Google Scholar
  36. Spencer, E. S., Y. P. Petersen, and O. Fjeld- borg: Lymphocyturia and the renal allograft reaction: The magnitude of lymphocyte excretion as an index of the activity of the renal allograft reaction. III. Intern. Congr. Nephrol. Washington, 25–30. Sept. 1966 (im Druck).Google Scholar
  37. Truniger, E., S. M. Rosen, H. Kriek, D. E. Oken, J. P. Merrill, and J. E. Murray: Rejection and intrarenal hemodynamics of the homotransplanted dog kidney. III. Intern. Congr. Nephrol. Washington, 25–30. Sept. 1966 (im Druck).Google Scholar
  38. Van Pelt, W.: Nitrogen mustard in the treatment of steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome in children. III. Intern. Congr. Nephrol. Washington, 25–30. Sept. 1966 (im Druck).Google Scholar
  39. Vernier, R. I., B. Tinglof, R. Urizar, N. Litman, and F. GL Smith: Immunofluorescence studies in renal diseases. III. Intern. Congr. Nephrol. Washington, 25–30. Sept. 1966 (im Druck).Google Scholar
  40. Wassermann, E., GL Treser, T. Ehrenreich, R. Ores, and K. Lange: Glomerular changes in clinically healed acute glomerulonephritis. Correlation of light microscopy, electron microscopy and immunohistology. III. Intern. Congr. Nephrol. Washington, 25–30. Sept. 1966 (im Druck).Google Scholar
  41. Wood, C.: A controlled study of prednisone treatment of patients with nephrotic syndrome and particular histologic types of glomerulonephritis. III. Intern. Congr. Nephrol. Washington, 25–30. Sept. 1966 (im Druck).Google Scholar
  42. Zegarra-Puppi, J.: Nephrotic syndrome - treatment and follow-up with serial renal biopsies. III. Intern. Congr. Nephrol. Washington, 25–30. Sept. 1966 (im Druck).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1968

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. F. Pfeiffer
  • K. Federlin
  • F. Wahlig

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations