Abstract

Water is the most abundant constituent of all physiologically active plant tissues. The water contents of leaves, for example, lie mostly in a range of 55–85% of their fresh weight. The range of water contents for other relatively succulent parts of plants, such as younger roots and herbaceous stems is about the same. Water contents of even such a largely non-living tissue such as wood are mostly in the range of 30–60% of the fresh weight. The lowest water contents among living plant organs occur principally in such dormant structures as seeds and spores.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Ahrns, W.: Weitere Untersuchungen über die Abhängigkeit des gegenseitigen Mengenverhältnisses der Kohlenhydrate im Laubblatt vom Wassergehalt. Bot. Archiv 5, 234–259 1924).Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, D. B., and T. Kerr: A note on the growth behavior of cotton bolls. Plant Physiol. 18, 261–269 (1943).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bachmann, F.: Studien über Dickenänderungen von Laubblättem. Jb. wiss. Bot. 61, 372–429 (1922).Google Scholar
  4. Bartholomew, E. T.: Internal decline of lemons. III. Water deficit in lemon fruits caused by excessive leaf evaporation. Amer. J. Bot. 13, 102–117 (1926).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Briggs, L. J., and H. L. Shantz: The wilting coefficient for different plants and its indirect determination. U. S. Dept. Agric. Bur. Plant Ind. Bull. 1912a, No 230.Google Scholar
  6. The relative wilting coefficients for different plants. Bot. Gaz. 53, 229–235 (1912b).Google Scholar
  7. The relative water requirement of plants. J. Agric. Res. 3, 1–65 (1914).Google Scholar
  8. Broyer, T. C.: The movement of materials into plants. Part I. Osmosis and the movement of water into plants. Bot. Review 13, 1–58 (1947).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chu, Chien-Ren: Der Emfluß des Wassergehaltes der Blätter der Waldbäume auf ihre Lebensfähigkeit usw. Flora (Jena) 130, 384–437 (1936).Google Scholar
  10. Engmann, K. F.: Studien über die Leistungsfähigkeit der Wassergewebe sukkulenter Pflanzen. Beih. bot. Zbl., Abt. A 52, 381–414 (1934).Google Scholar
  11. Furr, J. R., and J. O. Reeve: Range of soil-moisture percentages through which plants undergo permanent wilting in some soils from semiarid irrigated areas. J. Agric. Res. 71, 149–170 (1945).Google Scholar
  12. Gail, F. W.: Osmotic pressure of cell sap and its possible relation to winter killing and leaf fall. Bot. Gaz. 81, 434–445 (1926).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gibbs, R. D.: Studies of wood. II. On the water content of certain Canadian trees, and on changes in the water-gas system during seasoning and flotation. Canad. J. Res. 12, 727–760 (1935).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Harris, F. S.: The effect of soil moisture, plant food, and age on the ratio of tops to roots in plants. J. Amer. Soc. Agron. 6, 65–75 (1914).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Harris, J. A.: The physico-chemical properties of plant saps in relation to phytogeography. Minneapolis: Univ. Minnesota Press 1934.Google Scholar
  16. Hendrickson, A. H., and F. J. Veihmeyer: Permanent wilting percentages obtained from field and laboratory trials. Plant Physiol. 20, 517–539 (1945).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Herrick, E. M.: Seasonal and diurnal variations in the osmotic values and suction tension values in the aerial portions of Ambrosia trifida. Amer. J. Bot. 20, 18–34 (1933).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kerr, T., and D. B. Anderson: Osmotic quantities in growing cotton bolls. Plant Physiol. 19, 338–349 (1944).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kramer, P, J.: The relation between rate of transpiration and rate of absorption of water in plants. Amer. J. Bot. 24, 10–15 (1937).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Root resistance as a cause of the absorption lag. Amer. J. Bot. 25, 110–113 (1938).Google Scholar
  21. Livingston, B. E., and L.A.Hawkins: The water relation between plant and soil. Carnegie Instn. Wash. Publ. 1915, No 204, 1–48.Google Scholar
  22. Luxford, R. F.: Distribution and amount of moisture in virgin redwood trees. J. Forestry 28, 770–772 (1930).Google Scholar
  23. Mac Dougal, D. T.: Studies in tree growth by the dendrographic method. Carnegie Instn. Wash. Publ. 1936, No 462.Google Scholar
  24. Mac Dougal, D. T., J. B. Overton and G. M. Smith: The hydrostatic-pneumatic system of certain trees; movements of liquids and gases. Carnegie Instn. Wash. Publ. 1929, No 397.Google Scholar
  25. Maximov, N. A.: The plant in relation to water. R. H. Yapp, Editor. London: George Allen a. Unwin 1929.Google Scholar
  26. Meyer, B. S.: A critical evaluation of the terminology of diffusion phenomena. Plant Physiol. 20, 142–164 (1945).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Montfort, C.: Die Wasserbilanz in Nährlösung, Salzlösung und Hochmoorwasser. Z. Bot. 14, 98–172 (1922).Google Scholar
  28. Renner, O.: Experimentale Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Wasserbewegung. Flora (Jena) 103, 171–247 (1911).Google Scholar
  29. Richards, L. A., and L. R. Weaver: Fifteen-atmosphere percentage as related to the permanent wilting percentage. Soil Sci. 56, 331–339 (1943).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Moisture retention by some irrigated soils as related to soil-moisture tension. J. Agric. Res. 69, 215–235 (1944).Google Scholar
  31. Schneider, G. W., and N. F. Childers: Influence of soil moisture on photosynthesis, respiration, and transpiration of apple leaves. Plant Physiol. 16, 565–583 (1941).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Shantz, H. L., and L. N. Piemeisel: The water requirement of plants at Akron, Colorado. J. Agric. Res. 34, 1093–1190 (1927).Google Scholar
  33. Spoehr, H. A.: The carbohydrate economy of cacti. Carnegie Instn. Wash. Puhl. 1919, No 287.Google Scholar
  34. Spoehr, H. A., and H. W. Milner: Starch dissolution and amylotic activity of leaves. Proc. Amer. Phil. Soc. 81, 37–78 (1939).Google Scholar
  35. Stanescu, P. P.: Daily variations in products of photosynthesis, water content, and acidity of leaves toward end of vegetative period. Amer. J. Bot. 23, 374–379 (1936).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Steward, F. C, P. R. Stout and C. Preston: The balance sheet of metabolities for potato discs showing the effect of salts and dissolved oxygen on metabolism at 23° C. Plant Physiol. 15, 409–447 (1940).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Stocker, O.: Das Wasserdefizit von Gefäßpflanzen in verschiedenen Klimazonen. Planta (Berl.) 7, 382–387 (1929).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stocking, C. R.: The calculation of tensions in Cucurbita pepo. Amer. J. Bot. 32, 126–134 (1945).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Stoddart, L. A.: Osmotic pressure and water content of prairie plants. Plant Physiol. 10, 661–680 (1935).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Taylor, C. A., H. F. Blaney and W. W. Mc Laughlin: The wilting range in certain soils and the ultimate wilting point. Trans. Amer. Geophysic. Union 15, 436–444 (1934).Google Scholar
  41. Thoday, D.: Experimental studies on vegetable assimilation and respiration. V. A critical examination of Sachs’method for using increase of dry weight as a measure of carbon dioxide assimilation in leaves. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond., Ser. B 82, 1–55 (1909).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. On the behavior during drought of leaves of two cape species of Passerina, with some notes on their anatomy. Ann. of Bot. 35, 585–601 (1921).Google Scholar
  43. Veihmeyer, F. J., and A. H. Hendrickson: Methods of measuring field capacity and permanent wilting percentage of soils. Soil Sci. 68, 75–94 (1949).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Walter, H.: Plasmaquellung und Assimilation. Protoplasma (Berl.) 6, 113–156 (1929).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Die Hydratur der Pflanze. Jena: Gustav Fischer 1931.Google Scholar
  46. Einführung in die Phytologie. III. Grundlagen der Pflanzenverbreitung. Stuttgart-Ludwigsburg: Eugen Ulmer 1949.Google Scholar
  47. Wilson, C. C.: Diurnal fluctuations of growth in length of tomato stems. Plant Physiol. 23, 156–157 (1948).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wilson, C. C., W. R. Boggess and P. J. Kramer: Diurnal fluctuations in the moisture content of some herbaceous plants. Amer. J. Bot. 40, 97–100 (1953).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag OHG. Berlin · Göttingen · Heidelberg 1956

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bernard S. Meyer

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations