Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Kontrastmittel in der Praxis pp 107–113Cite as

Die Verabreichung von Kontrastmitteln

  • Chapter

  • 38 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Es erscheint vom Prinzip her völlig vernünftig, daß KM, die i. allg. den Patienten in hoher Konzentration und hohen Dosen injiziert werden, besser verträglich sein müßten, wenn sie Körpertemperatur haben. Viele Radiologen benutzen einen der von der Industrie angebotenen thermostatkontrollierten Heizschränke, um ihre KM auf 37°C zu erwärmen. Abgesehen von der Toxizität und Verträglichkeit vermindert die Erwärmung des KM auf Körpertemperatur auf jeden Fall deutlich seine Viskosität und macht die Injektion, besonders über dünne Nadeln und Katheter, leichter [1].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Halsell RD (1987) Heating contrast media in role contemporary angiography. Radiology 164: 276–278

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Turner E, Kentner P, Melamed JL, Rao G, Seitz MJ (1982) Frequency of anaphylactoid reactions during intravenous urography with radiographic contrast media at two different temperatures. Radiology 143: 327–329

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wilcox J, Sage MR (1984) Is viscosity important in the production of blood-brain-barrier disruption by intracarotid contrast media? Neuroadiology 26:?

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ansell G (1987) Radiological contrast media. In: Inman WHW (ed) Monitoring for drug safety, 2nd ed. MTP Press, Lancashire, pp 337–348

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dawson P, Hemingway A (1987) Contrast doses in interventional radiology. J Intervent Radio] 2: 145–146

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bernstein EF, Palmer JD, Aaberg TA, Davis RL (1961) Studies on the toxicology of Hypaque-90% following rapid venous injection. Radiology 76: 88–95

    Google Scholar 

  7. Davies P, Roberts MB, Roylance J (1975) Acute reactions to urographic contrast media. BMJ 2: 434–437

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lorenz W, Doericke A (1985) Histamino libération induite par les produits anésthesique ou leurs solvants: spécifique ou non-spécifique. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 4: 115–123

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Pfister RC, Hutter AM (1982) Alteration in heart rate and rhythm at urography wit sodium diatrizoate. Acta Radiologica 23: 107–110

    Google Scholar 

  10. Shehadi WM (1975) Adverse reactions to intravascularly administered contrast media. AJR 124: 145–152

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dawson P et al (1986) Contrast, coagulation and fibrinolysis. Invest Radiol 21: 248–252

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Dawson P (1988) Non-ionic contrast agents and coagulation. Invest Radiol 23: 310–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dawson P (1988) Non-ionic contrast agents and coagulation. Invest Radiol 23: 310–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hawkins IF, Herbeth (1974) Contrast material used as a catheter flushing agent: a method to reduce clot formation during angiography. Radiology 110: 351–352

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Miller DL (1989) Heparin in angiography: current patterns of use. Radiology 172: 1007–1011

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Robertson HJF (1987) Blood clot formation in angiographic syringes containing non-ionic contrast media. Radiology 162: 621–622

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. P. Dawson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. I. O. Skalpe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. V. Taenzer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, Univ. of London, Royal Postgraduate Medical School, Hammersmith Hospital, Ducane Road, W12 OHS, London, England

    Peter Dawson

  2. Klinische Entwicklung Diagnostika, Schering AG, Müllerstraße. 170-178, D-1000, Berlin 65, Deutschland

    Wolfram Clauß

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dawson, P., Skalpe, I.O., Taenzer, V. (1993). Die Verabreichung von Kontrastmitteln. In: Dawson, P., Clauß, W. (eds) Kontrastmittel in der Praxis. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-93540-4_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-93540-4_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-56614-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-93540-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation