Assessment of the Risk of HIV Spread Via Non-Steady Heterosexual Partners in the U.S. Population

  • Joan L. Aron
  • P. Sankara Sarma
Part of the Lecture Notes in Biomathematics book series (LNBM, volume 83)

Abstract

We evaluate the conditions for the initial spread of HIV infection via non-steady heterosexual partners in the U.S. population. The main source of data is a 1988 U.S. survey on sexual partners in the 12 months prior to the survey. The behavioral data are coupled with a multi-state life table constructed from 1985 U.S. rates of marriage, divorce and mortality. The life table allows for projections that take age, sex and marital status into account.

We consider the basic reproductive rate of HIV infection from the most sexually active group of adults, 18-year-old unmarried males. Using a period of infectivity of 10 years, an HIV-infected 18-year-old unmarried male might contact, on average, around 100 males via his non-steady female sexual partners and their non-steady male sexual partners. This estimate does depend on the age and marital status of the chosen partners. However, the most important parameter is the product of per-partner probabilities of male-to-female and female-to-male transmission. This quantity would have to exceed roughly 1/100 in order for the epidemic to spread via non-steady heterosexual partners. Although current estimates suggest this is unlikely, major uncertainties remain concerning HIV transmission to both steady and non-steady heterosexual partners.

Keywords

Syphilis Gonorrhea Colgate 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, R.M. and R.M. May. (1988). Epidemiological parameters of HIV transmission. Nature 333. 514–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Becker, R.A. and J.M. Chambers. (1984). S: An Interactive Environment for Data Analysis and Graphics. Wadsworth, Belmont, California.Google Scholar
  3. Blythe, S.P. and C. Castillo-Chavez. (1989). Like-with-like preference and sexual mixing models. Math. Biosci. In press.Google Scholar
  4. Bumpass, L.L. and J.A. Sweet. (1988). Preliminary evidence on cohabitation. National Survey of Families and Households Working Paper No. 2. Center for Demography and Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar
  5. Centers for Disease Control. (1988). Syphilis and congenital syphilis-United States, 1985–1988. MMWR 37. 486–489.Google Scholar
  6. Colgate, S. A., E. A. Stanley, J. M. Hyman, S. P. Layne and C. Quails. (1988). A behavior based model of the initial growth of AIDS in the United States. Los Alamos National Laboratory Report LA-UR-88–2396.Google Scholar
  7. Curran, J.W., H.W. Jaffe, A.M. Hardy, W.M. Morgan, R.M. Selik and T.J. Dondero. (1988). Epidemiology of HIV infection and AIDS in the United States. Science 239. 610–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Davis, J.A. and T.W. Smith. (1988). General Social Surveys. 1972–1988: Cumulative Codebook, NORC, Chicago.Google Scholar
  9. DeGruttola, V. and K.H. Mayer. (1988). Assessing and modeling heterosexual spread of the human immunodeficiency virus in the United States. Rev. Infect. Dis. 10, 138–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dietz, K. (1988). On the transmission dynamics of HIV. Math. Biosci. 90. 397–414.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fay, R.E., C.F. Turner, A.D. Klassen and J.H. Gagnon. (1989). Prevalence and patterns of same-gender sexual contact among men. Science 243. 338–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hethcote, H.W. and J.A. Yorke. (1984). Gonorrhea Transmission Dynamics and Control. Lect. Notes in Biomathematics. Vol. 56. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  13. Hyman, J.M. and E.A. Stanley. (1988). Using mathematical models to understand the AIDS epidemic. Math. Biosci. 90. 415–473.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jacguez, J.A., C.P. Simon, J. Koopman, L. Sattenspiel and T. Perry. (1988). Modeling and analyzing HIV transmission: the effect of contact patterns. Math. Biosci. 92, 119–199.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Keyfitz, N. (1988). A Markov chain for calculating the durability of marriage. Math. Pop. Stud. 1, 101–121.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. May, R.M. and R.M. Anderson. (1987). Transmission dynamics of HIV infection. Nature 326. 137–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Michael, R.T., E.O. Laumann, J.H. Gagnon and T.W. Smith. (1988). Number of sex partners and potential risk of sexual exposure to human immunodeficiency virus. MMWR 37. 565–568.Google Scholar
  18. National Center for Health Statistics. (1988a). Vital Statistics of the United States. 1985 Life Tables. Vol. 2. Section 6. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Hyattsville, Maryland.Google Scholar
  19. National Center for Health Statistics. (1988b). Advance report of final marriage statistics, 1985. Monthly Vital Statistics Report, 37(1), Supplement, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Hyattsville, Maryland.Google Scholar
  20. National Center for Health Statistics. (1989). Vital Statistics of the United States. Vol. 3. Marriage and Divorce. 1985. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Hyattsville, Maryland. In press.Google Scholar
  21. Pepin, J., F.A. Plummer, R.C. Brunham, P. Piot, D.W. Cameron and A.R. Ronald. (1989). The interaction of HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases: an opportunity for intervention. AIDS 3, 3–9.Google Scholar
  22. Rubin, D.B. (1987). Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. Wiley and Sons, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. SAS. (1985). SAS User’s Guide: Statistics. Version 5 Edition. SAS, Institute, Cary, North Carolina.Google Scholar
  24. Schoen, R. (1975). Constructing increment-decrement life tables. Demography 12, 313–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schoen, R. (1983). Measuring the tightness of a marriage squeeze. Demography 20. 61–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schoen, R. and J.R. Kluegel. (1988). The widening gap in black and white marriage rates: the impact of population composition and differential marriage propensities. Amer. Soc. Rev. 53. 895–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schoen, R. and K.C. Land. (1979). A general algorithm for estimating a Markov-generated increment-decrement life table with applications to marital-status patterns. J. Amer. Stat. Assn. 74. 761–776.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Specter, M. (1989). Funds for sex survey blocked by house panel. Washington Post July 26. 1989. A3.Google Scholar
  29. U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1988). Marital Status and Living Arrangements: March 1987. Current Population Reports, Series P-20, No.423, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  30. Yellin, J. and P.A. Samuelson. (1977). Comparison of linear and nonlinear models for human population dynamics. Theor. Pop. Biol. 11. 105–126.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joan L. Aron
    • 1
  • P. Sankara Sarma
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of Population Dynamics, School of Hygiene and Public HealthThe Johns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations