Abstract
Habitats vary in quality and individuals choose them accordingly. Some species distribute themselves non-randomly among habitats so as to equalize the net reproductive rates of individuals in different habitats (Ideal Free Distribution). Habitat selectivity is greatest when population sizes are small.
Determining habitat preferences may be done in the laboratory or the field. The latter may be accomplished by studying the covariance of census and habitat qualities, or by studying the non-randomness of population distribution among habitats. All methods have confirmed the density-dependence of habitat selectivity.
Density-sensitive habitat distributions may be used to reduce the cost of regular censuses. In some cases, they may make it practical to replace censuses and yield limits with habitat reserves.
When populations decline greatly, they are supported by the most favored habitats. Substantial fractions of some populations may depend on such cradle habitats. Pest populations may be controlled most cheaply by concentrating on their cradle habitats, although natural selection might interfere.
Managers will have to take cognizance of habitat selection in order to achieve maximum sustainable yields. Sometimes, harvesting should be concentrated in habitats where death rates are naturally high or birth rates naturally low. But long-term considerations in cases where some individuals dominate others may complicate achieving maximum sustainable yields.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abramsky, Z., M.L. Rosenzweig and S. Brand. 1985, Habitat selection in Israel desert rodents: comparison of a traditional and a new method of analysis. Oikos, Vol. 45, pp. 79–88.
Crowell, K.L. and S.L. Pimm. 1976. Competition and niche shifts of mice introduced into small islands. Oikos, Vol. 27, pp. 251–258.
Fagen, R. An ideal free distribution method for assessing productivity changes from habitat use statistics. Ms.
Fretwell, S.D. 1972. Populations in a Seasonal Environment. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Fretwell, S.D. and H.L. Lucas Jr. 1970. On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. I. Theoretical development. Acta Biotheor., Vol. 19, pp. 16–36.
Hanna, S. The structure of fishing systems and the implementation of management policy. (This volume).
Holt, R.D. 1985. Population dynamics in two-patch environments: some anomalous consequences of an optimal habitat distribution. Theor. Pop. Biol., Vol. 28, pp. 181–208.
Ito, Y. 1952. The growth form of populations in some aphids, with special reference to the relation between population density and movements (in Japanese with English summary). Res. Pop. Ecol., Vol. 1, pp. 36–48.
Kirchhoff, M.D., J.W. Schoen and M. Thomas. Seasonal distribution and habitat use by Sitka black-tailed deer in southeastern Alaska. Ms.
Kirchhoff, M.D., J.W. Schoen and O.C. Wallmo. 1983. Black-tailed deer use in relation to forest clear-cut edges in southeastern Alaska. J. Wildl. Manage., Vol. 47, pp. 497–501.
Kosaka, M. 1956. Experimental studies on the habitat preference and evaluation of environment by flatfishes, Limanda yokohamae, (Gunthek) and Kareius bicoloratus (Basilewsky) (in Japanese with English summary). Bull. Jap. Soc. Sci. Fish., Vol. 22, pp. 284–288.
Mangel, M. Sampling surveys for a highly organized population. (This volume).
Morisita, M. 1950. Dispersal and population density of a water-strider, Gerris lacustris L (in Japanese). Contr. Physiol. Ecol. Kyoto Univ. No. 65.
Morisita, M. 1952. Habitat preference and evaluation of environment of an animal. Experimental studies on the population density of an ant-lion, Glenuroides japonicus M’L. (I) (in Japanese with English summary). Phys. and Ecol., Vol. 5, pp. 1–16.
Rosenzweig, M.L. 1974. On the evolution of habitat selection. Proc. First Intern. Congr. Ecol., pp. 401–404.
Rosenzweig, M.L. 1977. Aspects of biological exploitation. Quart. Rev. Biol., Vol. 52, pp. 371–380.
Rosenzweig, M.L. and Z. Abramsky. 1985. Detecting density-dependent habitat selection. Amer. Natur., Vol. 126, pp. 405–417.
Rosenzweig, M.L. and Z. Abramsky. 1986. Centrifugal community organization. Oikos, Vol. 46, pp. 339–348.
Rosenzweig, M.L., Z. Abramsky and S. Brand. 1984. Estimating species interactions in heterogeneous environments. Oikos, Vol. 43, pp. 329–340.
Schoen, J.W. and M.D. Kirchhoff. 1985. Seasonal distribution and home-range patterns of Sitka black-tailed deer on Admiralty Island, southeast Alaska. J. Wildl. Manage., Vol. 49, pp. 96–103.
Slobodkin, L.B. 1968. How to be a predator. Amer. Zool., Vol. 8, pp. 43–51.
Svardson, G. 1949. Competition and habitat selection in birds. Oikos, Vol. 1, pp. 157–174.
Van Horne, B. 1983. Density as a misleading indicator of habitat quality. J. Wildl. Manage., Vol. 47, pp. 893–901.
Vincent, T. and Joel Brown. Havesting an evolutionary model. (This volume.)
Clark, Colin, 1982. Concentration profiles and the production and management of marine fisheries in W. Eichhorn (ed.), Economic Theory of Natural Resources. Physica-Verlag, Wurtzburg-Wien.
McKelvey, Robert, 1986. The economic regulation of targeting behavior in a multispecies fishery. Natural Resource Modeling. Vol. 1, No. 1.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1987 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Rosenzweig, M.L. (1987). Density-Dependent Habitat Selection: A Tool for More Effective Population Management. In: Vincent, T.L., Cohen, Y., Grantham, W.J., Kirkwood, G.P., Skowronski, J.M. (eds) Modeling and Management of Resources under Uncertainty. Lecture Notes in Biomathematics, vol 72. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-93365-3_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-93365-3_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-17999-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-93365-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive