Abstract
The neutralist-selectionist controversy persists with respect to the population genetical mechanism of molecular evolution. In this paper, we first show how we can explain, from a selectionist perspective, the fact that molecular evolution rates are smaller than total mutation rates. Next, using a statistical analysis of electrophoretic data on local differentiation, we show that, in most cases, stochastic selection is more responsible for local differentiation than is random drift.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Haldane, J.B.S. (1937). The effect of variation on fitness. Amer. Nat. 71, 337–349.
Gillespie, J.H. (1986). Natural selection and the molecular clock. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Mathematical Biology, Nov. 10–15, 1985, Kyoto, Japan (ed. E. Teramoto) New York: Springer Verlag.
Gillespie, J.H. & Langley, C.H. (1974). A general model to account for enzyme variation in natural populations. Genetics 76, 837–848.
Ishii, K. & Matsuda, H. (1985). Extension of the Haldane-Muller principle of mutation load with application for estimating a possible range of relative evolution rate. Genet. Res., Camb. 46, 75–84.
Ishii, K., Matsuda, H. & Ogita, N. (1982). A mathematical model of biological evolution. J. Math. Biology 14, 327–353.
Kimura, M. (1968). Evolutionary rate at the molecular level. Nature 217, 624–626.
Kimura, M. (1982). The neutral theory as a basis for understanding the mechanism of evolution and variation at the molecular level. In Molecular Evolution, Protein Polymorphism and the Neutral Theory (ed. M. Kimura), pp.3–56. Tokyo. Japan Scientific Societies Press.
Kimura, M. (1983). The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kimura, M. & Ohta, T. (1971). On the rate of molecular evolution. Nature 217, 624–626.
Matsuda, H. & Ishii, K. (1980). Stationary gene frequency distribution in the environment fluctuating between two distinct states. J. Math. Biology 11, 119–141.
Miyata, T. (1982). Evolutionary changes and functional constraint in DNA sequences. In Molecular Evolution, Protein Polymorphism and the Neutral Theory (ed. M. Kimura), pp.233–266. Tokyo: Japan Scientific Societies Press.
Muller, H.J. (1950). Our load of mutations. Amer. J. Hum. Genet. 2, 111–176.
Takahata, N, Ishii, K. & Matsuda, H. (1975). Effect of temporal fluctuation of selection coefficient on gene frequency in a population. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 72, 4541–4545.
Zuckerkandl, E. & Pauling, L. (1965). Evolutionary divergence and convergence in proteins. In Evolving Genes and Proteins (ed. V. Bryson and H.J. Vogel), pp.97–166. New York: Academic Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1987 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ishii, K., Inutsuka, H., Matsuda, H., Ogita, N. (1987). Population Genetical Mechanism of Molecular Evolution. In: Teramoto, E., Yumaguti, M. (eds) Mathematical Topics in Population Biology, Morphogenesis and Neurosciences. Lecture Notes in Biomathematics, vol 71. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-93360-8_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-93360-8_16
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-17875-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-93360-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive