Antenatal Clinic Analysis and Evaluation of Patient Care for the Health Care System

  • D. D. F McColl
  • R. F. Harrison
  • A. R. Unwin
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Medical Informatics book series (LNMED, volume 11)


In an effort to improve antenatal care a pilot study of one year’s attendance at the Rotunda Hospital, Dublin, Ireland has been undertaken. A measure of the value of examinations carried out during antenatal care has been developed. The usefulness of routine tests in mid-pregnancy was assessed.


Cerebral Palsy Antenatal Care Spina Bifida Perinatal Mortality Antenatal Clinic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Alberman, E., Better perinatal health: prospects for better peri-natal health, The Lancet, pp. 189–192, 26 January, 1980.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baird, Sir D., The perinatal mortality rate as a measure of the efficiency of the maternity services, Health Bulletin, Scottish Home and Health Department, Vol. 35, pp. 234–242, 1977.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Browne, A.D.H., Computer assisted quality control in perinatal management, The International Cerebral Palsy Society Seminar on the Primary Prevention of Cerebral Palsy, Aosta, Italy, 1978.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chalmers, I., Better perinatal health: the search for indices, The Lancet, pp. 1063–1065, 17 November, 1979.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chamberlain, G., A re-examination of antenatal care, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, Vol. 71, pp. 662–668, September 1978.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chamberlain, G., Better perinatal health: background to perinatal health, The Lancet, pp. 1061–1063, 17 November, 1979.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gortmaker, S.L., The effects of perinatal care upon the health of the newborn, American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 69, pp. 653–660, July 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hall, M.H., Ching, P.K. and MacGillivray, I., Is routine antenatal care worth while? The Lancet, pp. 78–80, 12 July, 1980.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    House of Commons: Social Services Committee, Perinatal and neo-natal mortality, Vol. 1 Report, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, 19 June, 1980Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kidd, G.M., The obstetric unit of the future, Irish Medical Times, pp. 21–26, 25 January, 1980.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rooth, G., Better perinatal health: Sweden, The Lancet, pp. 1170–1172, 1 December, 1979.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rumeau-Rouquette, C., Breart, G., du Mayaubrun, C., Crost, M. and Rabarison, Y., Evaluation de la pathologie perinatale et de la prevention en France: enquetes nationales INSERM 1972-1976, J. Gyn. Obst. Biol. Repr., Vol. 7, pp. 905–916, 1978.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Scott-Samuel, A., Delayed booking for antenatal care, Public Health, Vol. 93, pp. 246–251, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Scrimgeour, J.B. and Cockburn, F., Better perinatal health: con-genital abnormalities, The Lancet, pp. 1349–1352, 22/29 December, 1979.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stronge, J.M., A general review of the maternity services, Irish Medical Times, 25 January, 1980.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. D. F McColl
    • 1
  • R. F. Harrison
    • 2
  • A. R. Unwin
    • 3
  1. 1.Health Computing Ireland LimitedUK
  2. 2.Department of Obstetrics and GynaecologyTrinity CollegeDublinUK
  3. 3.Department of StatisticsTrinity CollegeDublinUK

Personalised recommendations