L’Ordinateur et l’Aphasique

  • Evelyne Andreewsky
  • Gérard Deloche
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Medical Informatics book series (LNMED, volume 11)

Summary

(The computer and the aphasic)

Both the computer and the aphasic have problems in handling natural language.

A cognitive approach of language-handling mechanisms is carried out, starting from the acknowledgment of these problems, on one hand (Artificial Intelligence concepts and applications -i.e., respectively “procedures” or “speech synthesis”- given its theoretical framework, and neuropsycholinguistic facts — its experimental data).

The relevance of computers in neuropsycholinguistic experiments is illustrated, on the other hand, with an example (a “lexical decision” task) where the presentation of stimuli and the analysis of subjects answers are both under the control of a micro-computer.

We derived such specific applications from this research as computer-aided learning and rehabilitation of written language.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. (1).
    Liénard JS. Le processus de la communication parlée. Introduction à l’analyse et à la synthèse de la parole. Masson, Paris, 1977.Google Scholar
  2. (2).
    Andreewsky E, Seron X. Implicit processing of grammatical rules in a classical case of agrammation. Cortex. 1975; Vol XI, 379–390.Google Scholar
  3. (3).
    Dési M. Effets de fréquence en “décision lexicale”: influence de la classe grammaticale des mots. Diplôme de maîtrise de psychologie.Google Scholar
  4. (4).
    Patterson KE. What is right with “Deep” dyslexic patients ? Brain & Language. 1979; 8: 111–129.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. (5).
    Seron X, Deloche G, Moulard G, Rousselle M. A computer-based therapy for the treatment of aphasie subjects with writing disorders. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders. 1980; 45 (1): 45–58.Google Scholar
  6. (6).
    Deloche G, Seron X, Saillant B, Moulard G, Chassin G. “Rééducation programmée d’un cas d’agraphie”. Acta Neurologica Belgica. 1976; 76: 201–211.Google Scholar
  7. (7).
    Drai S. Perspective d’utilisation d’un ordinateur dans la rééducation de l’orthographe. Mémoire d’orthophonie, Université Paris V I. 1977.Google Scholar
  8. (8).
    Jutier P, Andreewsky E, Deloche G, Nicolas P. Micro-processor based system using a commercial tape recorder both as a digital and audio device. MECO: Advances in Measurement and Control, Vol. 3. 1978; 796–799.Google Scholar
  9. (9).
    Van Eeckhout P. Apport de la mélodie et du rythme dans les rééducations sévères. Rééducation orthophonique. 1979.Google Scholar
  10. (10).
    Foucambert J. “Quelques pré-supposés théoriques de l’enseignement habituel de la lecture”. Psychologie et Education, “Les processus psychologiques de la lecture”. 1978 ? 21–26.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Evelyne Andreewsky
    • 1
  • Gérard Deloche
    • 1
  1. 1.INSERM U.84Hôpital de la SalpêtrièreParis Cedex 13France

Personalised recommendations