Advertisement

Natural Selection and Continuous Variation

  • Alan Robertson
Part of the Lecture Notes in Biomathematics book series (LNBM, volume 39)

Abstract

In his paper to this meeting, Dr. Lewontin stresses the difficulty in using some of the classical formulae of population genetics, even when we deal only with a single locus at which the genotypes can be accurately identified. One of the problems is the difficulty of transferring the concept of fitness from the context of changes of gene frequency within the population, to changes of the ability of the population as a whole to survive — a problem made more complicated by the possibility of frequency dependent selection. He indicated, very briefly, the way in which there are difficulties in discussing natural selection for continuous characters, and I would like to devote the greater part of my talk to this particular problem.

Keywords

Linkage Disequilibrium Natural Selection Fitness Function Wild Population Gene Frequency 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bulmer, M.G. (1971). Stable equilibria under the two-island model. Heredity 27, 321–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Kearsey, M.G. & Barnes, B.W. (1970). Variation for metrical characters in Drosophila populations. II. Natural Selection. Heredity 25, 11–21.Google Scholar
  3. Lande, R. (1976). The maintenance of genetic variability by mutation in a polygenic character with linked loci. Genet.Res. 26, 221–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Langley, C.H., Ito, K. & Voelker, R.A. (1977). Linkage disequilibrium in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 86, 447–54.Google Scholar
  5. Latter, B.D.H. (1970). Selection in finite populations with multiple alleles. II. Centripetal selection, mutation and isoallelic variation. Genetics 66, 165–86.Google Scholar
  6. Latter, B.D.H. & Robertson, A. (1962). The effects of inbreeding and artificial selection on reproductive fitness. Genet.Res. 3, 110–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lerner, I.M. & Gunns, C.A. (1952). Egg Size and Reproductive Fitness. Poultry Sci. 31, 537–44.Google Scholar
  8. Lopez-Fanjul, C. & Hill, W.G. (1973). Genetic differences between populations of Drosophila melanogaster. II. Laboratory and wild populations. Genet.Res. 22, 69–78.Google Scholar
  9. Sved, J.A. (1977). Opposition to artificial selection caused by natural selection at linked loci. In Proc.Int.Conf. on Quantitative Genetics, Ames, Ia.Google Scholar
  10. Thoday, J.M. (1979). Polygene Mapping: Uses and Limitations, pp. 219–237 in Quantitative Genetic Variation, ed. Thompson & Thoday, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Verghese, N.W. & Nordskog, A.W. (1968). Correlated responses in reproductive fitness to selection in chickens. Genet.Res. 11, 221–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Wright, S. (1935). Evolution in populations in approximate equilibrium. Genetics 20, 257–66.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alan Robertson
    • 1
  1. 1.GeneticsUniversity of EdinburghScotland

Personalised recommendations